Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome use for laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 07 abril 2020

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012946Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 febrero 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nicolás Kahuam‐López

    Correspondencia a: Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac México, Campus Norte, Huixquilucan, Mexico

    [email protected]

  • Alejandro Navas

    Cornea and Refractive Surgery Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Carlos Castillo‐Salgado

    Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

  • Enrique O Graue‐Hernandez

    Cornea and Refractive Surgery Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Aida Jimenez‐Corona

    Ocular Epidemiology and Visual Sciences Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Antonio Ibarra

    Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac México, Campus Norte, Huixquilucan, Mexico

Contributions of authors

NKL developed and design the protocol with input from AN, CCS, EGH, AJC, and AI.
NKL, AN, CCS, EGH, AJC, and AI contributed to the content and writing of the protocol.
All authors approved the final protocol draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) US Project, supported by grant 1 U01 EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    • Richard Wormald, Co‐ordinating Editor for Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) acknowledges financial support for his CEV research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.

    • This protocol was supported by the NIHR, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the CEV UK editorial base.

    The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

NKL has no known conflicts of interest.
AN has no known conflicts of interest.
CCS has no known conflicts of interest.
EGH has no known conflicts of interest.
AJC has no known conflicts of interest.
AI has no known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) for their support and guidance. We acknowledge Lori Rosman, CEV Information Specialist, for developing the search strategy.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Apr 07

Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

Review

Nicolás Kahuam-López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Antonio Ibarra

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012946.pub2

2018 Feb 08

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome use for laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

Protocol

Nicolás Kahuam‐López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo‐Salgado, Enrique O Graue‐Hernandez, Aida Jimenez‐Corona, Antonio Ibarra

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012946

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.