Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012925Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 enero 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Smisha Agarwal

    Correspondencia a: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Chapel Hill, USA

    [email protected]

  • Lavanya Vasudevan

    Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, USA

  • Tigest Tamrat

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Claire Glenton

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

  • Simon Lewin

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

    Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa

  • Hanna Bergman

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Nicholas Henschke

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Garrett L Mehl

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Marita S Fønhus

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the protocol: CG, TT, SL, SA, GM, MS.

Designing the protocol: CG, TT, SL, SA, LV, NM, NH, MS, GM.

Co‐ordinating the protocol: SA, TT, CG, SL.

Writing the protocol: SA, TT, CG, LV.

Providing general advice on the protocol: CG, SL, MS TT, GM.

Securing funding for the protocol: GM.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • UNDP‐UNFPA‐UNICEF‐WHO‐World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored program executed by the World Health Organization (WHO), Switzerland.

    Provided funding for the review

Declarations of interest

Smisha Agarwal: The author was commissioned by the WHO to conduct this review.

Lavanya Vasudevan: none known.

Tigest Tamrat: none known.

Claire Glenton: none known.

Simon Lewin: The author is the joint co‐ordinating editor for the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group.

Hanna Bergman: Since May 2016, the author has been employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Response was contracted by the WHO to produce this review.

Nicholas Henschke: Since June 2016, the author has been employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Response was contracted by the WHO to produce this review.

Garrett L Mehl: owns stock in Apple Computer.

Marita Fønhus: none known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). We would like to thank the following editors and peer referees who provided comments to improve the protocol: Elizabeth Paulsen, Michel Wensing, Marit Johansen, and Marco Bardus. We would also like to thank John Eyers for designing the search strategies and Dolores Matthews for copy‐editing the protocol.

The Norwegian Satellite of Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) receives funding from the Norwegian Agency for Development Co‐operation (Norad), via the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, to support review authors in production of their reviews.

We are grateful to the Guideline Development Group of Digital Health Guidelines for constructive feedback in formulating the guiding questions for this systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jan 18

Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care

Protocol

Smisha Agarwal, Lavanya Vasudevan, Tigest Tamrat, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Hanna Bergman, Nicholas Henschke, Garrett L Mehl, Marita S Fønhus

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012925

Notes

This protocol is based on standard text and guidance provided by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Figure 1: Logic model outlining the three interventions and associated outcomes.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Figure 1: Logic model outlining the three interventions and associated outcomes.