Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012892Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 diciembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Stephanie L Harrison

    Correspondencia a: Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

  • Suzanne M Dyer

    Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

  • Kate E Laver

    Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

  • Rachel K Milte

    Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

  • Richard Fleming

    Dementia Training Australia, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

  • Maria Crotty

    Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the protocol: MC, SMD, SLH

Designing the protocol: SLH, SMD, KEL, RKM, RF, MC

Co‐ordinating the protocol: SLH, SMD, KEL, RKM, RF, MC

Designing search strategies: SLH, SMD

Writing the protocol: SLH, SMD, KEL, RKM, RF, MC

Providing general advice on the protocol: SLH, SMD, KEL, RKM, RF, MC

Securing funding for the protocol: MC

Performing previous work that was the foundation of the current study: SLH, SMD, RKM, MC

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Flinders University, Australia.

    SLH, SMD, KEL and MC are all staff at Flinders University and Flinders University provided the infrastructure for the project.

  • Dementia Training Australia, Australia.

    RF's funding will be covered by Dementia Training Australia, a consortium of five universities and Alzheimer’s Australia funded by the Australian Department of Health to develop, disseminate and implement new knowledge on the care of people with dementia.

External sources

  • NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Australia.

    The salaries of SLH and SMD, and partly the salary of MC, are supported by funding provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre (grant no. GNT9100000).

  • NHMRC‐ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship, Australia.

    KEL is supported by a NHMRC‐ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship.

  • NHMRC and Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Australia.

    RKM is supported by grants from the NHMRC (grant nos. 1079542 and 1121334) and the Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research Collaborative Grant.

Declarations of interest

  • SLH: none known.

  • SMD has been paid as a contractor for her contribution to a separate Cochrane Review on interventions for falls prevention by the John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, The University of Sydney.

  • KEL: none known.

  • RKM is supported by grants funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research Collaborative Grant.

  • RF: none known.

  • MC is an investigator on one clinical trial sponsored by Novartis for hip fracture patients.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). The authors would also like to thank the following editors and peer referees who provided comments to improve the protocol: Signe Flottorp (EPOC Editor), Paul Miller (EPOC Information Specialist), Julie Udell (external Peer Referee), and Jemma Hudson (EPOC Statistician); and Elizabeth Royle and Copy Edit Support for copy‐editing the protocol. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure, gave funding to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service (NHS), or the Department of Health.

The Australasian Satellite of the Cochrane EPOC Group is funded by Cochrane.

The contents of the published materials are solely the responsibility of the administering institution — Flinders University — and the individual authors identified, and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC or any other funding bodies or the funding partners.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Mar 07

Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people

Review

Stephanie L Harrison, Suzanne M Dyer, Kate E Laver, Rachel K Milte, Richard Fleming, Maria Crotty

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012892.pub2

2017 Dec 07

Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people

Protocol

Stephanie L Harrison, Suzanne M Dyer, Kate E Laver, Rachel K Milte, Richard Fleming, Maria Crotty

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012892

Notes

This protocol is based on standard text and guidance provided by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.