Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early‐stage cervical cancer

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012863Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 noviembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer ginecológico, neurooncología y otros cánceres

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Apiwat Aue‐aungkul

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

    [email protected]

  • Chumnan Kietpeerakool

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Khadra Galaal

    Gynaecological Oncology, Princess Alexandra Wing, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK

  • Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Chetta Ngamjarus

    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

  • Pisake Lumbiganon

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Contributions of authors

Apiwat Aue‐aungkul: conceived the review question, and developed, co‐ordinated and completed the protocol
Chumnan Kietpeerakool: conceived the review question, and developed and completed the protocol
Khadra Galaal: conceived the review question, and developed and completed the protocol
Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan: completed the protocol
Chetta Ngamjarus: had an editing and advisory role
Pisake Lumbiganon: co‐ordinated the development of the protocol and had an editing and advisory role

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

  • Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Princess Alexandra Wing, Royal Cornwall Hospital, UK.

  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

  • Cochrane Thailand, Thailand.

External sources

  • Thailand Research Fund (Distinguished Professor Award), Thailand.

Declarations of interest

Apiwat Aue‐aungkul: none known
Chumnan Kietpeerakool: none known
Khadra Galaal: none known
Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan: none known
Chetta Ngamjarus: none known
Pisake Lumbiganon: none known

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jo Morrison for clinical and editorial advice; Jo Platt for designing the search strategy; and Gail Quinn, Clare Jess and Tracey Harrison for their contributions to the editorial process.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure, Cochrane Programme Grant or Cochrane Incentive funding to the Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro‐oncology, and Orphan Cancer Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Jan 25

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early‐stage cervical cancer

Review

Apiwat Aue-aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012863.pub2

2017 Nov 15

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early‐stage cervical cancer

Protocol

Apiwat Aue‐aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012863

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.