Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Summary of findings 1. Eculizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for children and adults with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

Eculizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for children and adults aHUS

Patient or population: children and adults with aHUS

Settings: inpatient

Intervention: eculizumab

Comparison: placebo or alternative treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with placebo or alternative treatment

Risk with eculizumab treatment

Death

N/A

1/100

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

All 100 patients were alive at 26 weeks. There was 1 death in the 37 patients who were subsequently followed up over 2 years

Requirement for KRT

N/A

N/A

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

37/100 were undergoing dialysis at initiation of eculizumab therapy. Of these patients, 11 (30%) continued to require regular dialysis after 26 weeks of treatment representing a 70% reduction in dialysis requirement. At 2 years, 3/37 patients included within the secondary study remained dialysis‐dependent compared with 7 at baseline (57% reduction)

Disease remission

N/A

60/100

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

60/100 patients treated with eculizumab achieved complete TMA response after 26 weeks of treatment. Median time to complete TMA response was 56 ‐ 60 days. In a cohort of patients followed up for 2 years, 65% maintained complete TMA response at this time point

Change in eGFR

N/A

N/A

N/A

88 (3 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

In patients treated with eculizumab, mean change in eGFR over 26 weeks was 33 ± 34 mL/min/1.73 m². At 2 years, eGFR had improved by ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73 m² in 37 patients (49%)

HRQoL

N/A

N/A

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

In 49 patients aged ≥ 12 years treated with eculizumab, 67% demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in EQ‐5D score. In 22 paediatric patients treated with eculizumab the mean improvement in FACIT‐F score was 19.7 (improvement of > 4.7 considered clinically meaningful)

Adverse events

N/A

100/100

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

Adverse events occurred in 100% of patients treated with eculizumab. Serious adverse events occurred in 37% of patients. The most commonly reported events included diarrhoea (23%), fever (21%), headache (19%), upper respiratory tract infection (19%), cough (17%) and urinary tract infection (10%)

Meningococcal infection

N/A

2/100

N/A

100 (4 single‐arm studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

Meningococcal infection occurred in 2 patients (2%) treated with eculizumab

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; N/A: not applicable; KRT: Kidney replacement therapy; TMA: Thrombotic microangiopathy; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; HRQoL: health‐related quality of life; FACIT‐F: Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy ‐ fatigue.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Eculizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for children and adults with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)
Summary of findings 2. Ravulizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for adults with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)

Ravulizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for adults with aHUS

Patient or population: adults with aHUS

Settings: inpatient

Intervention: ravulizumab

Comparison: placebo or alternative treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Risk with placebo or alternative treatment

Risk with ravulizumab treatment

Death

N/A

4/58

N/A

58 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

Four deaths occurred, including one in a patient ultimately excluded based on eligibility criteria but who had received one dose of ravulizumab. No deaths were considered treatment‐related by the study investigators

Requirement for KRT

N/A

N/A

N/A

56 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

29/56 were undergoing dialysis at initiation of ravulizumab therapy. Of these patients, 12 (41%) continued to require regular dialysis after 26 weeks of treatment representing a 59% reduction in dialysis requirement

Disease remission

N/A

30/56

N/A

56 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

30/56 patients treated with ravulizumab achieved complete TMA response after 26 weeks of treatment. Median time to complete TMA response was 86 days

Change in eGFR

N/A

N/A

N/A

56 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

In patients treated with ravulizumab, mean change in eGFR over 26 weeks was 35 ± 35 mL/min/1.73 m²

HRQoL

N/A

N/A

N/A

44 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

A clinically meaningful improvement in FACIT‐F score (≥ 3‐point increase) was observed in 84% of patients treated with ravulizumab

Adverse events

N/A

58/58

N/A

58 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

Adverse events occurred in 100% of patients treated with ravulizumab. Serious adverse events occurred in 52% of patients. The most commonly reported events included headache (36%), diarrhoea (31%), vomiting (26), hypertension (22%), nausea (22%) and urinary tract infection (17%)

Meningococcal infection

N/A

0/58

N/A

58 (1 single‐arm study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low

No patients treated with ravulizumab developed meningococcal infection

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio; N/A: not applicable; KRT: Kidney replacement therapy; TMA: Thrombotic microangiopathy; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; HRQoL: Health‐related quality of life; FACIT‐F: Functional assessment of chronic illness therapy ‐ fatigue.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Ravulizumab versus placebo or alternative treatment for adults with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS)