Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Closed‐system drug‐transfer devices in addition to safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing healthcare staff exposure to infusional hazardous drugs

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012860Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 13 noviembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud laboral

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

    Correspondencia a: Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Lawrence MJ Best

    Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, London, UK

  • Cynthia Tanguay

    Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique, CHU Sainte‐Justine, Montreal, Canada

  • Elaine Lennan

    Department of Chemotherapy, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK

  • Mika Korva

    Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland

  • Jean‐François Bussières

    Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique, CHU Sainte‐Justine, Montreal, Canada

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the protocol: KG.

Designing the protocol: KG.

Co‐ordinating the protocol: KG.

Designing search strategies: KG.

Writing the protocol: KG.

Providing general advice on the protocol: LB, CT, EL, MK, and JFB.

Securing funding for the protocol: KG.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • UK Oncology Nursing Society Board, UK.

    Grant to the sum of GBP 12,000 provided to Kurinchi Gurusamy and Lawrence Best.

Declarations of interest

Kurinchi Gurusamy and Lawrence Best: We received a grant for GBP 12,000 from the UK Oncology Nursing Society to conduct this Cochrane Review.

Cynthia Tanguay: I am a member of the Working Committee on the Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs established by the Association paritaire pour la santé et la sécurité du travail du secteur affaires sociales (ASSTSAS).

Elaine Lennan: None known.

Mika Korva: None known.

Jean‐François Bussières: I am a member of the Working Committee on the Safe Handling of Hazardous Drugs established by the Association paritaire pour la santé et la sécurité du travail du secteur affaires sociales (ASSTSAS).

The outcomes were chosen by the funders of this review, the board of the UK Oncology Nursing Society who represent the target population of the interventions evaluated. However, the peer referees also considered these outcomes to be the most important.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jani Ruotsalainen, Managing Editor, and Jos Verbeek, Co‐ordinating Editor from Cochrane Work Review Group for their help in all stages of the current protocol. We also thank the editors Alex Burdorf and Nicole Skoetz and external peer referee Thomas Connor for their comments and Anne Lawson for copy editing the text.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Mar 27

Closed‐system drug‐transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff

Review

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Lawrence MJ Best, Cynthia Tanguay, Elaine Lennan, Mika Korva, Jean‐François Bussières

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012860.pub2

2017 Nov 13

Closed‐system drug‐transfer devices in addition to safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing healthcare staff exposure to infusional hazardous drugs

Protocol

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Lawrence MJ Best, Cynthia Tanguay, Elaine Lennan, Mika Korva, Jean‐François Bussières

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012860

Notes

Parts of the 'Methods' section and Appendix 1 of this protocol are based on a standard template established by the Cochrane Work Review Group. This review is independent research funded by the UK Oncology Nursing Society. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK Oncology Nursing Society.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.