Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hysterectomy with salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 28 agosto 2019

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012858Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 noviembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Laura A M van Lieshouta

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands

    Dual first author

  • Miranda P Steenbeeka

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Dual first author

  • Joanne A De Hullu

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands

  • M Caroline Vos

    Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth‐TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands

  • Saskia Houterman

    Department of Education and Research, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands

  • Jack Wilkinson

    Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Jurgen MJ Piek

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

JP conceived the idea for this study. The objectives and methods were further clarified by JP, JdH, MV, JW, SH, LvL and MS. JP, LvL and MS drafted the protocol. JP, JdH, MV, JW and SH reviewed the protocol and provided critical feedback.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • None, Other.

Declarations of interest

JP, JdH, MV, JW, SH, LvL and MS have no interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

Marian Showell (Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Information Specialist), On Ying Chan (Radboud University Information Specialist) and Godelieve Engbersen (Elisabeth‐Tweesteden Hospital Information SpecialisT) for conducting the electronic search.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Aug 28

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone

Review

Laura A M van Lieshout, Miranda P Steenbeek, Joanne A De Hullu, M Caroline Vos, Saskia Houterman, Jack Wilkinson, Jurgen MJ Piek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2

2017 Nov 17

Hysterectomy with salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone

Protocol

Laura A M van Lieshout, Miranda P Steenbeek, Joanne A De Hullu, M Caroline Vos, Saskia Houterman, Jack Wilkinson, Jurgen MJ Piek

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012858

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.