Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines versus placebo or no intervention

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012805Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 24 septiembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hepatobiliar

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Snezana Djurisic

    Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Janus C Jakobsen

    Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Sesilje B Petersen

    Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Mette Kenfelt

    Birkerød, Denmark

  • Christian Gluud

    Correspondencia a: Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

MK and SBP presented and drafted the idea for the systematic review. SD, JCJ, and CG drafted the protocol.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Copenhagen Trial Unit, Denmark.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

MK is co‐founder of HPV_update.dk.

Acknowledgements

Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: The Danish State is the largest single funder of The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group through its investment in the Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this review are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Danish State or the Copenhagen Trial Unit.

Peer reviewers: Jagdish K. Zade, India, and Sachin Thakkar, US
Contact Editor: Kurinchi Gurusamy, UK
Sign‐off Editor: Kurinchi S Gurusamy, UK

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Sep 24

Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines versus placebo or no intervention

Protocol

Snezana Djurisic, Janus C Jakobsen, Sesilje B Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, Christian Gluud

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012805

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.