Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Community first responders for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Appendices

Appendix 1. Medline Search Strategy

1. exp Heart Arrest/ or exp Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/ or ((cardiac or heart or cardiopulmonary or cardio pulmonary or out of hospital) adj3 (arrest or resuscitation*)) or OHCA or CPR or asystole*

2. exp Emergency Responders/ or exp Volunteers/ or ((emergency or first or lay) adj3 responder*).mp. or volunteer*.mp. or CFR.mp.

3. ((randomized controlled trial or controlled clinical trial).pt. or randomi?ed.ab. or placebo.ab. or drug therapy.fs. or randomly.ab. or trial.ab. or groups.ab.) not (exp animals/ not humans.sh.)

4. 1 and 2 and 3

Appendix 2. Data Extraction Form

Data Extraction Form***

Review title

ACE 357 Impact of community first responders in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)

Study ID(surname of first author and year first full report of study was published e.g. Smith 2001)

Report IDs of other reports of this study(e.g. duplicate publications, follow‐up studies)

Notes:

Note – Please insure

· Consistency in the order and style used to describe the information for each included study.

· Any missing information recorded as unclear or not described.

General Information

1. Date form completed (dd/mm/yyyy)

2. ID of person extracting data

3. Report title

(title of paper/ abstract/ report that data are extracted from)

4. Report ID

(if there are multiple reports of this study)

5. Reference details

6. Report author contact details

7. Publication type

(e.g. full report, abstract, letter)

8. Study funding source

(including role of funders)

Possible conflicts of interest

(for study authors)

9. Notes:

Eligibility

Study Characteristics

Review Inclusion Criteria

Yes/ No / Unclear

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

10. Type of study

Randomized trial

Quasi ‐ randomized trial

11. Participants

Adults and/or children suffering from OHCA excluding studies primarily concerned with infants @ birth

12. Types of intervention

Studies that compare routine statutory EMS with this care plus the mobilisation of community first responders in instances of OHCA

13. Types of outcome measures

At least one of …

Primary outcomes

1. Survival to hospital discharge.

Secondary outcomes

2. Neurological outcome at hospital discharge (CPC).

3. Survival to hospital admission, defined as a patient admitted to hospital with spontaneous circulation and measurable blood pressure.

4. Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation performed prior to ambulance service arrival.

5. Defibrillation performed prior to ambulance service arrival.

14. Decision:

15. Reason for exclusion

16. Notes:

Population and Setting

Description

Include comparative information for each group (i.e. intervention and controls) if available

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

17. Population description

(from which study participants are drawn)

18. Setting

(including location and social context)

19. Inclusion criteria

20. Exclusion criteria

21. Method/s of recruitment of participants

22. Notes:

Methods

Descriptions as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

Aim of study

Design

Unit of allocation

(by individuals or cluster)

Start date

End date

Duration of participation

(from recruitment to last follow‐up)

Notes:

Risk of Bias Assessment

Domain

Risk of bias

Low/ High/Unclear

Support for judgement

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

23. Random sequence generation

(selection bias)

24. Allocation concealment

(selection bias)

25. Blinding of participants and personnel

(performance bias)

26. Blinding of outcome assessment

(detection bias)

27. Incomplete outcome data

(attrition bias)

28. Selective outcome reporting?

(reporting bias)

29. Other bias

30. Notes:

Participants

Provide overall data and, if available, comparative data for each intervention or comparison group.

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

31. Total no. randomized

32. Clusters

(if applicable, no., type, no. people per cluster)

33. Baseline imbalances

34. Withdrawals and exclusions

35. Age

36. Sex

37. Race/Ethnicity

38. Witnessed OHCA

39. Initial Rhythm

40. Co‐morbidities

41. Other treatment(s) received

(additional to study intervention)

42. Other relevant sociodemographics

43. Subgroups measured

44. Subgroups reported

45. Notes:

Intervention Groups

(Provide a table for each intervention and comparison group)

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

46. Group name

47. No. randomized to group

(specify whether no. people or clusters)

48. Description

(include sufficient detail for replication)

49. Duration of intervention period

50. Details of Intervention delivery

51. Providers

(e.g. no., profession, training,etc.)

52. Co‐interventions if any

53. Other

54. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

55. Group name

56. No. randomized to group

(specify whether no. people or clusters)

57. Description

(include sufficient detail for replication)

58. Duration of intervention period

59. Details of Intervention delivery

60. Providers

(e.g. no., profession, training, etc.)

61. Co‐interventions if any

62. Other

63. Notes:

Outcomes

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

64. Outcome name

Survival to hospital discharge

65. Time points measured

66. Time points reported

67. Outcome definition

68. Person measuring/reporting

69. Imputation of missing data

70. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

71. Outcome name

CPC @ Hospital discharge

72. Time points measured

73. Time points reported

74. Outcome definition

75. Person measuring/ reporting

76. Unit of measurement

77. Scale

78. Imputation of missing data

79. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

64a. Outcome name

Survival at 30 days

65a. Time points measured

66a. Time points reported

67a. Outcome definition

68a. Person measuring/reporting

69a. Imputation of missing data

70a. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

71a. Outcome name

CPC @ 30 days

72a. Time points measured

73a. Time points reported

74a. Outcome definition

75a. Person measuring/ reporting

76a. Unit of measurement

77a. Scale

78a. Imputation of missing data

79a. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

80. Outcome name

Survival to hospital admission

81. Time points measured

82. Time points reported

83. Outcome definition

84. Person measuring/reporting

85. Any Imputation of missing data

86. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

87. Outcome name

CPR before ambulance arrival

88. Time points measured

89. Time points reported

90. Outcome definition

91. Person measuring/reporting

92. Any Imputation of missing data

93. Notes:

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

94. Outcome name

Defibrillation before ambulance arrival

95. Time points measured

96. Time points reported

97. Outcome definition

98. Person measuring/reporting

99. Any Imputation of missing data

100. Notes

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

x1. Outcome name

HRQOL @ 90 Days

x2. Time points measured

x3. Time points reported

x4. Outcome definition

x5. Person measuring/reporting

x6. Scale Used + Description

x7. Any Imputation of missing data

x8. Notes

Results

Additional tables will be generated for each outcomes and subgroup as required

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

101. Comparison

102. Outcome

Survival to hospital discharge

103. Subgroup

104. Results

Note whether:

Adjusted OR

Unadjusted

Intervention

Comparison

No. events

No. participants

No. events

No. participants

105. No. missing participants and reasons

106. No. participants moved from other group and reasons

107. Any other results reported

108. Unit of analysis

109. Statistical methods used and appropriateness of these methods

110. Reanalysis required?

(if yes, specify why)

Yes/No/Unclear

111. Reanalysis possible?

Yes/No/Unclear

112. Reanalysed results

113. Notes:

Applicability

114. Have important populations been excluded from the study?

115. Does the study directly address the review question?

(any issues of partial or indirect applicability)

116. Notes:

Other Information

Description as stated in report/paper

Location in text

(pg & ¶/fig/table)

117. Key conclusions of study authors

118. References to other relevant studies

119. Correspondence required for further study information

(what and from whom)

120. Further study information requested

(from whom, what and when)

121. Correspondence received

(from whom, what and when)

122. Notes:

*** Adapted from‐ Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). Data collection form. EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2013. Available at:epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors