Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Factors that influence the provision of good‐quality routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis of the views and experiences of maternity care providers

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Appendices

Appendix 1. MEDLINE search strategy

#

Searches

Results

1

Prenatal Care/ or Perinatal Care/ or Maternal Health Services/ or Maternal‐Child Health Services/

37806

2

(antenatal care or antenatal service? or antenatal support or prenatal care or prenatal service? or prenatal support or antepartum care or antepartum service? or antepartum support or perinatal care or perinatal service? or perinatal support or maternal care or maternal service? or maternal health care or maternal healthcare or maternal support or pregnancy care or pregnancy service? or pregnancy support).ti,ab,kw.

21772

3

1 or 2

49966

4

exp Health Personnel/

446351

5

(Staff or provider$ or health care provider$ or nurs$ or midwife$ or midwives or physician$ or doctor$ or obstet$ or medical professional$ or clinician$ or skilled birth attendant$ or auxiliary or lay health worker$).ti,ab,kw.

1213677

6

4 or 5

1449700

7

3 and 6

17809

8

qualitative research/

33348

9

7 and 8

504

10

limit 7 to "qualitative (best balance of sensitivity and specificity)"

4640

11

9 or 10

4666

12

limit 11 to yr="2000 ‐Current"

3668

Theory of Reasoned Action
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Theory of Reasoned Action

Table 1. Qualitative and quantitative reviews related to the uptake and delivery of ANC

Review

Title

Focus

Methodology

What the current review adds

Dowswell 2015

Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low‐risk pregnancy

Effectiveness of reduced schedule of ANC visits (FANC)

Quantitative (Cochrane Review)

Data that might explain why reduced visit schedules work/don't work for some women/groups

Catling 2015

Group versus conventional antenatal care for women

Effectiveness of different approaches to ANC

Quantitative (Cochrane Review)

Data that might explain why reduced visit schedules work/don't work for some women/groups

Downe 2009

Why marginalised women don't use ANC (HIC)

Exploration of women's views and experiences of non‐use of ANC in HICs

Qualitative metasynthesis

A wider scope, as the proposed review includes all women from all settings and includes facilitators as well as barriers

Finlayson 2013

Why women don't use ANC (LMICs)

Exploration of women's views and experiences of non‐use or limited use of ANC in LMICs

Qualitative metasynthesis

A wider scope, as the proposed review includes all women from all settings and includes facilitators as well as barriers

Phillippi 2009

Women's perceptions of access to prenatal care in the USA

Exploration of women's views and experiences of access to ANC in the USA

Qualitative metasynthesis

A wider scope, as the proposed review includes all women from all settings

Downe 2015

What matters to women

Exploration of what pregnant women might want and need to support them through pregnancy

Qualitative metasynthesis

This review excluded women who were reporting on their actual experience of ANC. The proposed review will include these accounts.

Munabi‐Babigumira 2015

Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Exploration of the attitudes, views, experiences and behaviours of skilled birth attendants and those who support them, to identify factors that influence the delivery of intrapartum and postnatal care in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Qualitative evidence synthesis

Data that might identify the barriers and facilitators associated with the delivery of intrapartum and postpartum care from the perspective of healthcare providers

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Qualitative and quantitative reviews related to the uptake and delivery of ANC