Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento adyuvante con antidepresivos para la enfermedad intestinal inflamatoria

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012680.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 abril 2019see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud digestiva

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Antonina Mikocka‐Walus

    Correspondencia a: School of Psychology, Deakin University Geelong, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Stephanie L Prady

    Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

  • Justyna Pollok

    Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Adrian J Esterman

    Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia

  • Andrea L Gordon

    School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

  • Simon Knowles

    Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia

  • Jane M Andrews

    Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

Contributions of authors

Antonina Mikocka‐Walus: content expert (psychology), conceived the project, developed the protocol, coordinated authors, entered the protocol details into RevMan, and will be responsible for the full review and updates.

Stephanie L. Prady: methodological expert, contributed to the review conduct.

Justyna Pollok: methodological expert, contributed to the review conduct.

Adrian Esterman: methodological expert, contributed to the review conduct.

Andrea Gordon: content expert (pharmacology), contributed to the review conduct.

Simon R. Knowles: content expert (psychology), contributed to the review conduct.

Jane M. Andrews: content expert (gastroenterology), contributed to the review conduct.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Authors' salaries are funded by their institutions, Other.

    Salaries

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Antonina Mikocka‐Walus: None known.

Stephanie L. Prady: None known

Justyna Pollok: None known.

Adrian Esterman: None known.

Andrea Gordon: None known.

Simon R. Knowles: He has served as a consultant for AbbVie and Shire ‐ these activities are outside the submitted work.

Jane M. Andrews: She has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Abbott, Allergan, Bayer, Celgene, Ferring, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, MSD, Shire ‐ these activities are outside the submitted work.

Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Andrea Gordon, Adrian Esterman and Jane Andrews are co‐authors of a trial that was included in this systematic review (Mikocka‐Walus 2016c). Data extraction and risk of bias assessment for this study were carried out by Justyna Pollok, Stephanie Prady and Simon Knowles.

Acknowledgements

Funding for the Cochrane IBD Group (May 1, 2017 ‐ April 30, 2022) has been provided by Crohn's and Colitis Canada (CCC).

We would like to thank the authors of Chojnacki 2011 for providing additional information about their study.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Apr 12

Adjuvant therapy with antidepressants for the management of inflammatory bowel disease

Review

Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Stephanie L Prady, Justyna Pollok, Adrian J Esterman, Andrea L Gordon, Simon Knowles, Jane M Andrews

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012680.pub2

2017 Jul 06

Adjuvant therapy with antidepressants for the management of inflammatory bowel disease

Protocol

Antonina Mikocka‐Walus, Andrea Fielder, Stephanie L Prady, Adrian J Esterman, Simon Knowles, Jane M Andrews

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012680

Differences between protocol and review

The Primary and Tertiary outcomes were previously specified as "Changes in [a scale]...", but after consideration, we decided to include studies that report outcomes not only as changes, but also between group differences. The "Changes in [a scale]..." phrasing was omitted to just listing the type of outcome and the type of scale, e.g. "Anxiety and depression as measured by any well‐established anxiety or depression scale". Further, to this we reworded 'validated' to 'well‐established'. While well‐established scales are usually validated, some scales, such as the CDAI, are actually not appropriately validated while they are widely used and performs well in studies.

Further, following feedback from the editors and peer‐reviewers, and to simplify data reporting, we reordered our outcome measures. Efficacy, in terms of symptoms of anxiety and depression, was considered the primary outcome measure in the review. Safety ‐ adverse events and serious adverse events, study withdrawals due to adverse events, and other efficacy measures such as QoL, clinical remission, relapse, pain, hospital admissions, surgery, need for steroid treatment were considered secondary outcome measures. Tertiary outcome measures were moved under secondary outcome measures. Clinical remission and relapse were simplified ‐ we have now removed the comments regarding 'at completion' and 'at follow‐up'. We also reordered our objectives, with the assessment of anxiety and depression being the primary objective, and the remaining objectives being secondary. We changed the word 'managing' to 'treating' for objective 1 and for 'improving' for objective 2.

We decided to not run the search of The UK National Research Register as at the moment of the search it was considered an archived site which was no longer updated. Instead we searched the EU clinical trials register.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 1 Anxiety at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 1 Anxiety at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 2 Anxiety at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 2 Anxiety at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 3 Depression at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 3 Depression at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 4 Depression at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 4 Depression at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 5 Adverse events at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 5 Adverse events at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events: nausea at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 6 Adverse events: nausea at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events: nausea at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events: nausea at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 8 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 8 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 9 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 9 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 10 Physical QoL at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 10 Physical QoL at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 11 Physical QoL at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 11 Physical QoL at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 12 Psychological QoL at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 12 Psychological QoL at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 13 Psychological QoL at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 13 Psychological QoL at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 14 Social QoL at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 14 Social QoL at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 15 Social QoL at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 15 Social QoL at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 16 Environmental QoL at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 16 Environmental QoL at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 17 Environmental QoL at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 17 Environmental QoL at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 18 Clinical remission at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 18 Clinical remission at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 19 Disease activity at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 19 Disease activity at 12 weeks.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 20 Disease activity at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 20 Disease activity at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 21 Endoscopic relapse at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 21 Endoscopic relapse at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 22 Relapse using faecal calprotectin at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 22 Relapse using faecal calprotectin at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 23 CRP at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 23 CRP at 12 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 24 Cytokines TH Effector Memory RA at 6 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 24 Cytokines TH Effector Memory RA at 6 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 25 Cytokines TC Effector Memory RA at 6 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 25 Cytokines TC Effector Memory RA at 6 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 26 Interleukin‐10 at 6 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 26 Interleukin‐10 at 6 months.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 27 Need for steroids at 12 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Antidepressants versus placebo, Outcome 27 Need for steroids at 12 months.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antidepressants compared to placebo for inflammatory bowel disease

Antidepressants compared to placebo for inflammatory bowel disease

Patient or population: participants with active and inactive inflammatory bowel disease
Setting: Outpatient
Intervention: Antidepressants
Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with Placebo

Risk with Antidepressants

Anxiety at 12 weeks

The mean anxiety was 8.5 (SD = 3.45)

The mean anxiety was 6.11 (SD = 3)

MD 2.39 lower
(‐4.3 lower to ‐0.48 higher)

44
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1, 2

Anxiety was assessed using the HADS

Anxiety at 12 months

The mean anxiety was 4.2 (SD = 4.9)

The mean anxiety was 3.8 (SD = 2.5)

MD ‐0.40 lower
(‐3.47 lower to 2.67 higher)

26
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3

Anxiety was assessed using the HADS

A second non‐randomised study using the HARS reported a mean score of 12.65 + 3.76 in the antidepressant group (n = 30) compared to 17.85 + 3.33 in the placebo group (n = 30) (MD ‐5.20, 95% CI ‐7 to ‐3.40; very low certainty evidence)

Depression at 12 weeks

The mean depression was 10.5 (SD = 3.57)

The mean depression was 7.47 (SD = 2.42)

MD ‐3.03 lower
(‐4.83 lower to ‐1.23 higher)

44
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1, 2

Depression was assessed using the HADS

Depression at 12 months

The mean depression was 3.1 (SD = 3.4)

The mean depression was 2.9 (SD = 2.8)

MD ‐0.20 lower
(‐2.62 lower to 2.22 higher)

26
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3

Depression was assessed using the HADS

A second non‐randomised study using the Beck Depression Inventory reported a mean score of 9.6 + 2.76 in the antidepressant group (n = 30) compared to 16.35 + 5.41 in the placebo group (n = 30) (MD ‐6.75, 95% CI ‐8.92 to ‐4.58; very low certainty evidence)

Adverse events at 12 months

250 per 1,000

573 per 1,000
(195 to 1,000)

RR 2.29
(0.78 to 6.73)

26
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low4

Commonly reported adverse events include nausea, headache, dizziness, drowsiness, sexual problems, insomnia, fatigue, low mood/anxiety, dry mouth muscle spasms and hot flushes

None of the included studies reported any serious adverse events

Quality of life

See comment

70
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1, 2, 3

Quality of life was assessed using the WHO‐QOL‐BREF

We were unable to pool data as the outcome was reported at 12 weeks in 1 trial (44 participants) and 12 months in 1 trial (26 participants). Physical, Psychological, Social and Environmental QoL were improved only at 12 weeks with no group difference at 12 months

Pain

Not reported

No studies reported this outcome

Maintenance of remission at 12 months

667 per 1,000

640 per 1,000
(367 to 1,000)

RR 0.96
(0.55 to 1.69)

26
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low5

Maintenance of remission was measured by the CDAI (< 150) and fecal calprotectin levels

Endoscopic relapse at 12 months

0 per 1,000

0 per 1,000
(0 to 0)

RR 0.14
(0.01 to 2.65)

60
(1 study)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low6

Non‐randomised study. We were unable to calculate absolute effects. Endoscopic relapse occurred in 0% (0/30) of participants in the antidepressants group compared to 10% (3/30) in the placebo group

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; CMD: Common mental disorders; MD: Mean Difference; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HARS: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; RR: Risk Ratio; WHO‐QOL‐BREF: World Health Organization Quality of Life abbreviated questionnaire

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision (44 participants)

2 Downgraded one level due to high risk of bias (incomplete outcome data)

3 Downgraded two levels due very serious imprecision (26 participants)

4 Downgraded two levels due very serious imprecision (11 events)

5 Downgraded two levels due very serious imprecision (17 events).

6 Downgraded one level due to very serious imprecision (3 events) and a large CI around the point estimate

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antidepressants compared to placebo for inflammatory bowel disease
Table 1. Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale results for observational study by Goodhand 2012

Case Control Study

Is the case definition adequate? (/1)

Representativeness of the cases (/1)

Selection of controls (/1)

Definition of controls (/1)

Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis (/2)

Assessment of exposure (/1)

Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls (/1)

Non‐Response Rate (/1)

Goodhand (2012)

1

1

2

1

1

1

7

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale results for observational study by Goodhand 2012
Comparison 1. Antidepressants versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Anxiety at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Anxiety at 12 months Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Depression at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Depression at 12 months Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Adverse events at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Adverse events: nausea at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Adverse events: nausea at 12 months Show forest plot

2

86

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.02 [0.74, 22.03]

8 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Study withdrawal due to adverse events at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Physical QoL at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Physical QoL at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12 Psychological QoL at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13 Psychological QoL at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14 Social QoL at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15 Social QoL at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16 Environmental QoL at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17 Environmental QoL at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18 Clinical remission at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19 Disease activity at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20 Disease activity at 12 months Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21 Endoscopic relapse at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22 Relapse using faecal calprotectin at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23 CRP at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

24 Cytokines TH Effector Memory RA at 6 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25 Cytokines TC Effector Memory RA at 6 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

26 Interleukin‐10 at 6 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

27 Need for steroids at 12 months Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antidepressants versus placebo