Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Educational interventions for health professionals managing COPD in primary care

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012652Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 03 mayo 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jenifer Liang

    Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia

  • Michael J Abramson

    Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Johnson George

    Correspondencia a: Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

JL wrote the first and subsequent drafts of the protocol. All review authors contributed to the design of the protocol and provided comments on protocol drafts.

JL, JG and MJA will be involved in screening of eligible studies and data extraction. JL will perform data entry. JL will write the first and subsequent drafts of the full review. All review authors will provide comments on review drafts.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Victorian College of Pharmacy Foundation Board, Australia.

    Miss Liang is the recipient of the Cyril Tonkin Scholarship administered in 2014 by the Victorian College of Pharmacy Foundation Board at Monash University (Parkville campus), Australia.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Dr Johnson George and Prof Michael J Abramson are chief investigators on a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Project titled ‘RADICALS’. Jenifer Liang is a PhD scholar working within the RADICALS research project. The RADICALS study receives in‐kind support from its partnership organisations: Lung Foundation Australia (LFA), Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Ltd (BI) and Eastern Melbourne Primary Health Network (EMPHN). These organisations have no involvement in the proposed review, nor have they influenced our decision to undertake this systematic review. Dr George and Prof Abramson have held investigator‐initiated research grants from Pfizer and BI for unrelated research. Prof Abramson undertook an unrelated consultancy for AstraZeneca. He has received support for conference attendance from BI and Sanofi. Dr George has received in‐kind support from Vitalograph®, the manufacturers of COPD‐6TM, for unrelated research.

Acknowledgements

The Methods section of this protocol is based on a template used by the Cochrane Airways Group.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Airways. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Julia Walters was the Editor for this review and commented critically on the review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 May 06

Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care

Review

Amanda J Cross, Jenifer Liang, Dennis Thomas, Elida Zairina, Michael J Abramson, Johnson George

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012652.pub2

2017 May 03

Educational interventions for health professionals managing COPD in primary care

Protocol

Jenifer Liang, Michael J Abramson, Johnson George

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012652

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.