Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Paracetamol plus opioid compared with the same dose of opioid alone for cancer pain

Patient or population: people with cancer pain

Settings: inpatient or outpatient

Intervention: paracetamol plus opioid

Comparison: same dose of opioid alone

Outcomes

Probable outcome with
opioid + paracetamol

Probable outcome with
opioid alone

RR
(95% CI)

No of studies, participants

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Participants with at least 30% or at least 50% reduction in pain

No data

No data

N/A

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

PGIC much or very much improved

No data

No data

N/A

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Mean pain intensity at end of study

No difference between treatment groups

3 studies, 93 participants

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Pain no worse than mild at one or two weeks (or equivalent)

No data

No data

N/A

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Mean quality of life or "well‐being"

No difference between treatment groups

N/A

3 studies, 93 participants

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Participant preference

Better: 15/52

Better: 9/52

(No different: 28/52)

Not calculated

2 studies, 52 participants

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Adverse events

No difference between groups for specific opioid‐related adverse events

N/A

2 studies, 80 participants (maximum)

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

Serious adverse events

None specifically reported. 1 death due to underlying disease ‐ treatment unclear

N/A

3 studies, 93 participants

Very low

Very low quality because no or inadequate data

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio

Descriptors for levels of evidence (EPOC 2015):
High quality: This research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is low.
Moderate quality: This research provides a good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is moderate.
Low quality: This research provides some indication of the likely effect. However, the likelihood that it will be substantially different is high.
Very low quality: This research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high.

Substantially different: a large enough difference that it might affect a decision.

Figuras y tablas -