Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ethical case interventions for adult patients

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 22 julio 2019

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012636Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 abril 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jan Schildmann

    Correspondencia a: Institute for Ethics, Wilhelm Löhe University of Applied Sciences, Fürth, Germany

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Stephan Nadolny

    Diaconia University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

  • Joschka Haltaufderheide

    Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr‐University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

  • Marjolein Gysels

    Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Jochen Vollmann

    Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr‐University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

  • Claudia Bausewein

    Department of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the protocol: [JS]
Designing the protocol: [JS; SN; MG; JH; JV; CB]
Co‐ordinating the protocol: [JS]
Designing search strategies: [Paul Miller; SN]
Writing the protocol: [JS; SN]
Providing general advice on the protocol: [MG; CB]
Securing funding for the protocol: [JS]
Performing previous work that was the foundation of the current study: [JS, JV]

Declarations of interest

There is no conflict of interest known by the review authors.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. The authors would also like to thank the following editors and peer referees who provided comments to improve the protocol: Elie Akl, Isabelle Columbet, Janet Squires, Julia Worswick, Monica Taljaard, Paul Miller, Thalia Awari.

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service (NHS) or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jul 22

Ethical case interventions for adult patients

Review

Jan Schildmann, Stephan Nadolny, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Marjolein Gysels, Jochen Vollmann, Claudia Bausewein

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012636.pub2

2017 Apr 19

Ethical case interventions for adult patients

Protocol

Jan Schildmann, Stephan Nadolny, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Marjolein Gysels, Jochen Vollmann, Claudia Bausewein

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012636

Notes

This protocol is based on a template developed by the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) editorial base.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.