Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Ensayos de comparación directa de antibióticos para la bronquiectasia

Appendices

Appendix 1. Sources and search methods for the Cochrane Airways Trials Register

Electronic searches: core databases

Database

Search frequency

CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library)

Monthly

MEDLINE (Ovid)

Weekly

Embase (Ovid)

Weekly

PsycINFO (Ovid)

Monthly

CINAHL (EBSCO)

Monthly

AMED (EBSCO)

Monthly

Handsearches: core respiratory conference abstracts

Conference

Years searched

American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI)

2001 onwards

American Thoracic Society (ATS)

2001 onwards

Asia Pacific Society of Respirology (APSR)

2004 onwards

British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting (BTS)

2000 onwards

Chest Meeting

2003 onwards

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

1992, 1994, 2000 onwards

International Primary Care Respiratory Group Congress (IPCRG)

2002 onwards

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ)

1999 onwards

MEDLINE search strategy used to identify trials for the Cochrane Airways Trials Register

Bronchiectasis search

1. exp Bronchiectasis/

2. bronchiect$.mp.

3. bronchoect$.mp.

4. kartagener$.mp.

5. (ciliary adj3 dyskinesia).mp.

6. (bronchial$ adj3 dilat$).mp.

7. or/1‐6

Filter to identify RCTs

1. exp "clinical trial [publication type]"/

2. (randomized or randomised).ab,ti.

3. placebo.ab,ti.

4. dt.fs.

5. randomly.ab,ti.

6. trial.ab,ti.

7. groups.ab,ti.

8. or/1‐7

9. Animals/

10. Humans/

11. 9 not (9 and 10)

12. 8 not 11

The MEDLINE strategy and RCT filter are adapted to identify trials in other electronic databases.

Appendix 2. Search strategy to identify relevant trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register

#1 BRONCH:MISC1

#2 MeSH DESCRIPTOR Bronchiectasis Explode All

#3 bronchiect*

#4 #1 or #2 or #3

#5 MeSH DESCRIPTOR Anti‐Bacterial Agents Explode 1

#6 antibiotic* or anti‐biotic*

#7 anti‐bacteri* or antibacteri*

#8 *cillin

#9 *mycin or micin*

#10 *oxacin

#11 *tetracycline

#12 macrolide*

#13 quinolone*

#14 trimethoprim

#15 ceph*

#16 sulpha*

#17 #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10 or #11 or #12 or #13 or #14 or #15 or #16

#18 #4 and #17

[In search line #1, MISC1 denotes the field in the record where the reference has been coded for condition, in this case, bronchiectasis]

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 1 Response rate ‐ treatment failure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 1 Response rate ‐ treatment failure.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 2 Response rate ‐ microbiological response: patients with organisms eliminated.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 2 Response rate ‐ microbiological response: patients with organisms eliminated.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 3 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (excellent).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 3 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (excellent).

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 4 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (fair).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 4 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (fair).

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 5 Response rate ‐ relapse of sputum purulence at 3‐month follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 5 Response rate ‐ relapse of sputum purulence at 3‐month follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 6 Sputum volume (change mL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 6 Sputum volume (change mL).

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 7 FEV1 % predicted (change).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin), Outcome 7 FEV1 % predicted (change).

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 1 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 1 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence.

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 2 Response rate ‐ P aeruginosa eradication.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 2 Response rate ‐ P aeruginosa eradication.

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 3 Sputum purulence ‐ improvement in score at 3 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 3 Sputum purulence ‐ improvement in score at 3 months.

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Fluoroquinolones compared to amoxicillin for bronchiectasis

Fluoroquinolones compared to amoxicillin for bronchiectasis: short‐term studies (< 4 weeks)

Patient or population: adults aged 18 years and above with diagnosis of non‐cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Setting: hospital, Hong Kong
Intervention: fluoroquinolones (Chan 1996: ciprofloxacin, 500 mg, oral, twice daily, 7 days; Lam 1989: ofloxacin, 200 mg, oral, thrice daily, 10 days)
Comparison: amoxicillin (Chan 1996: 1000 mg, oral, 3 times per day, 7 days; Lam 1989: 1000 mg, oral, 3 times per day, 10 days)

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with amoxicillin

Risk with fluoroquinolones

Exacerbations

Not estimable

Outcome not reported in included studies

Serious adverse events

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Not estimable

83

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWa,b

Evidence graded on the overall quality of the study

Response rate ‐ treatment failure

429 per 1000

50 per 1000
(7 to 194)

OR 0.07
(0.01 to 0.32)

83
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWa,b

Response rate ‐ microbiological response

2 out of 8 participants responded.

8 out of 8 participants responded.

Peto OR 20.09 (2.83 to 142.59)

16
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWa,b

Small single study. Peto OR used owing to 100% response in intervention arm

Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (excellent)

357 per 1000

566 per 1000
(348 to 761)

OR 2.35
(0.96 to 5.72)

83
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOWa,b,c

Deaths

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Not estimable

83

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWa,b

No deaths reported. Evidence graded on the overall quality of the study

Quality of life

Not estimable

Outcome not reported in included studies

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aOne point deducted in relation to design and implementation of available studies suggesting likelihood of bias (unclear generation of randomisation sequence, potential selective reporting bias, and risk of other bias in Lam 1989).

bOne point deducted for imprecision (small sample size and few events).

cOne point deducted for imprecision (wide confidence interval).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Fluoroquinolones compared to amoxicillin for bronchiectasis
Summary of findings 2. Polymyxins compared to aminoglycosides for bronchiectasis

Polymyxins compared to aminoglycosides for bronchiectasis: long‐term studies (≥ 4 weeks)

Patient or population: adults aged 18 years and above with diagnosis of bronchiectasis
Setting: not reported
Intervention: polymyxins (Dimakou 2014: 300 mg, inhalation using Pari LC Plus jet nebulizer, twice daily, 4 weeks; Kaponi 2017: 300 mg, inhalation using Pari LC Plus jet nebulizer, twice daily, 3 months)
Comparison: aminoglycosides (Dimakou 2014: 1 MU, inhalation using Pari LC Plus jet nebulizer, twice daily, 4 weeks; Kaponi 2017: 1 MU, inhalation using Pari LC Plus jet nebulizer, twice daily, 3 months)

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with aminoglycosides

Risk with polymyxins

Exacerbation

Not estimable

Outcome not reported in included studies

Serious adverse events

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Not estimable

20

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOWa,b,c

Evidence graded on the overall quality of the study

Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence

800 per 1000

390 per 1000

(38 to 939)

OR 0.16 (0.01 to 3.85)

20
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOWa,b,d

Definition of improvement not reported

Response rate ‐ P aeruginosa eradication

471 per 1000

554 per 1000

(242 to 826)

OR 1.40 (0.36 to 5.35)

35

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOWa,b,d

Head‐to‐head comparison not reported directly

Deaths

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Not estimable

20
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOWa,b,c

No deaths reported. Evidence graded on the overall quality of the study

Quality of life

Not estimable

Outcome not reported in included studies

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aOne point deducted in relation to design and implementation of available studies suggesting likelihood of bias (all study methods unclear).

bOne point deducted for indirectness (no direct head‐to‐head comparisons).

cOne point deducted for imprecision (small sample size and few events).

dOne point deducted for imprecision (wide confidence intervals).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Polymyxins compared to aminoglycosides for bronchiectasis
Table 1. Study intervention characteristics

Study

Adults/

Children (N)

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Duration

Antibiotic (N)

Dose/ Frequency

Mode of delivery

Antibiotic (N)

Dose/ Frequency

Mode of delivery

Comparison (N)

Dose/ Frequency

Mode of delivery

Fluoroquinolones vs β‐lactams (amoxicillin)

Chan 1996

Adults (42)

Ciprofloxacin (plus amoxicillin placebo) (21)

500 mg

3 times daily

Oral

Amoxicillin (plus ciprofloxacin placebo)

(21)

1000 mg

3 times daily

Oral

7 days

Lam 1989

Adults (41)

Ofloxacin (plus amoxicillin placebo)

(20)

200 mg

3 times daily

Oral

Amoxicillin (plus
ofloxacin placebo)

(21)

1000 mg

3 times daily

Oral

10 days

Aminoglycosides vs polymyxins

Dimakou 2014

Adults (29)

Tobramycin

(10)

300 mg

twice daily

Inhalation by nebuliser

1 MU colistimethate sodium

(10)

300 mg

twice daily

Inhalation by nebuliser

Saline solution

(9)

4 mL of 0.9% solution

Inhalation by nebuliser

4 weeks

Kaponi 2017

Adults (52)

Tobramycin

(17)

300 mg

twice daily

Inhalation by nebuliser

1 MU colistimethate sodium

(18)

300 mg

twice daily

Inhalation by nebuliser

Saline solution

(17)

4 mL of 0.9% solution

Inhalation by nebuliser

3 months

N: number of participants.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Study intervention characteristics
Comparison 1. Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Response rate ‐ treatment failure Show forest plot

2

83

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.01, 0.32]

1.1 Ciprofloxacin

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.01, 0.49]

1.2 Ofloxacin

1

41

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 0.77]

2 Response rate ‐ microbiological response: patients with organisms eliminated Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (excellent) Show forest plot

2

83

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.35 [0.96, 5.72]

3.1 Ciprofloxacin vs amoxicillin

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.5 [0.43, 5.25]

3.2 Ofloxacin vs amoxicillin

1

41

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.79 [1.03, 13.91]

4 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence (fair) Show forest plot

2

83

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.88, 6.00]

4.1 Ciprofloxacin vs amoxicillin

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.68 [1.17, 18.69]

4.2 Ofloxacin vs amoxicillin

1

41

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.26, 4.44]

5 Response rate ‐ relapse of sputum purulence at 3‐month follow‐up Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Sputum volume (change mL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 FEV1 % predicted (change) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Fluoroquinolones versus β‐lactam (amoxicillin)
Comparison 2. Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Response rate ‐ improvement in sputum purulence Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Response rate ‐ P aeruginosa eradication Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Sputum purulence ‐ improvement in score at 3 months Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Polymyxins versus aminoglycosides