Computerised decision support systems to promote appropriate use of blood products
Referencias
Additional references
Adams ES, Longhurst CA, Pageler N, Widen E, Franzon D, Cornfield DN. Computerized physician order entry with decision support decreases blood transfusions in children. Pediatrics 2011;127(5):e1112‐9.
Baer VL, Henry E, Lambert DK, Stoddard RA, Wiedmeier SE, Eggert LD, et al. Implementing a program to improve compliance with neonatal intensive care unit transfusion guidelines was accompanied by a reduction in transfusion rate: a pre‐post analysis within a multihospital health care system. Transfusion 2011;51(2):264‐9.
Bolton‐Maggs PHB (Ed), Cohen H, on behalf of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Steering Group. The 2011 Annual SHOT Report (2012). www.shotuk.org/shot‐reports/shot‐annual‐report‐summary‐2011/ (accessed 23 July 2013).
Bolton‐Maggs PHB (Ed), Thomas D, Cohen H, Watt A, Poles D, Davies T, et al. on behalf of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Steering Group. The 2015 Annual SHOT Report (2014). www.shotuk.org/wp‐content/uploads/report‐2014.pdf (accessed 29 January 2016).
Butler CE, Noel S, Hibbs SP, Miles D, Staves J, Mohaghegh P, et al. Implementation of a clinical decision support system improves compliance with restrictive transfusion policies in hematology patients. Transfusion 2015;55(8):1964‐71.
Carson JL, Carless PA, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub3]
Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Marques MB, Fung MK, et al. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(1):49‐58. [DOI: 10.7326/0003‐4819‐157‐1‐201206190‐00429]
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC). EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2015. What study designs should be included in an EPOC review?. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 7 June 2016).
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC). EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2015. Interrupted time series (ITS) analyses.. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 7 June 2016).
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC). EPOC Resources for review authors. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2015. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐specific‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 7 June 2016):(.
Collins RA, Triulzi DJ, Waters JH, Reddy V, Yazer MH. Evaluation of real‐time clinical decision support systems for platelet and cryoprecipitate orders. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 2015;141(1):78‐84.
Cresswell K, Majeed A, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Computerised decision support systems for healthcare professionals: an interpretative review. Informatics in Primary Care 2012;20(2):115‐28.
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Docherty AB, O’Donnell R, Brunskill S, Trivella M, Doree C, Holst LB, et al. Effect of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies on outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease in a non‐cardiac surgery setting: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ 2016;352:i1351.
Estcourt L, Birchall J, Lowe D, Grant‐Casey J, Rowley M, Murphy M. Platelet transfusions in haematology patients: are we using them appropriately?. Vox Sanguinis 2012;103(4):284‐93.
Estcourt LJ, Stanworth SJ, Doree C, Hopewell S, Trivella M, Murphy MF. Comparison of different platelet count thresholds to guide administration of prophylactic platelet transfusion for preventing bleeding in people with haematological disorders after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010983.pub2]
Estcourt LJ, Stanworth S, Doree C, Trivella M, Hopewell S, Blanco P, et al. Different doses of prophylactic platelet transfusion for preventing bleeding in people with haematological disorders after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010984.pub2]
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas‐Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223‐38.
GRADE Working Group, McMaster University. GRADEpro GDT. Version (accessed 24 June 2016). Hamilton (ON): GRADE Working Group, McMaster University, 2014.
Hibbs SP, Nielsen ND, Brunskill S, Doree C, Yazer MH, Kaufman RM, et al. The impact of electronic decision support on transfusion practice: a systematic review. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 2015;29(1):14‐23.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, editor(s). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies . In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Holst LB, Petersen MW, Haase N, Perner A, Wetterslev J. Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for guiding red blood cell transfusion: systematic review of randomised trials with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ 2015;350:h1354.
Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer‐based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 1998;280(15):1339‐46.
Kassakian SZ, Yackel TR, Deloughery T, Dorr DA. Clinical decision support reduces overuse of red blood cell transfusions: interrupted time series analysis. American Journal of Medicine 2016;129(6):636.e13‐20.
Kaufman RM, Djulbegovic B, Gernsheimer T, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Capocelli KE, et al. Platelet transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Annals of Internal Medicine 2015;162(3):205‐13. [DOI: 10.7326/M14‐1589]
Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330(7494):765.
Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 2006;333(7568):597‐600.
Lin YC, Chang CS, Yeh CJ, Wu YC. The appropriateness and physician compliance of platelet usage by a computerized transfusion decision support system in a medical center. Transfusion 2010;50(12):2565‐70.
McCrory MC, Strouse JJ, Takemoto CM, Easley RB. Computerized physician order entry improves compliance with a manual exchange transfusion protocol in the pediatric intensive care unit. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2014;36(2):143‐7.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009;151(4):264‐9.
National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion. 2011 Audit of Blood in Adult Medical Patients—Part 1. http://hospital.blood.co.uk/media/26862/nca‐medical_use_audit_part_1_report.pdf (accessed 26 May 2016).
National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion. National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion 2015 Audit of Patient Blood Management in Adults undergoing elective, scheduled surgery. http://hospital.blood.co.uk/media/28123/2015‐pbm‐in‐scheduled‐surgery‐audit‐report.pdf (accessed 28 June 2016).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Blood transfusion. NICE guideline [NG 24]. Published date: November 2015. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG24 (accessed 14 January 2016).
Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815‐34.
Pentti J, Syrjälä M, Pettilä V. Computerized quality assurance of decisions to transfuse blood components to critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2003;47(8):973‐8.
Poushter J, Pew Research Center. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone‐ownership‐and‐internet‐usage‐continues‐to‐climb‐in‐emerging‐economies/ (accessed 28 June 2016).
SourceForge. PlotDigitizer [plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/]. Version 2.6.8. SourceForge, 2015.
Razavi SA, Carter AB, Puskas JD, Gregg SR, Aziz IF, Buchman TG. Reduced red blood cell transfusion in cardiothoracic surgery after implementation of a novel clinical decision support tool. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2014;219(5):1028‐36.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 13: Including non‐randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rohde JM, Dimcheff DE, Blumberg N, Saint S, Langa KM, Kuhn L, et al. Health care‐associated infection after red blood cell transfusion: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2014;311(13):1317‐26.
Salpeter SR, Buckley JS, Chatterjee S. Impact of more restrictive blood transfusion strategies on clinical outcomes: a meta‐analysis and systematic review. American Journal of Medicine 2014;127(2):124‐31.e3.
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. on behalf of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D, editor(s). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Reeves BC, on behalf of the development group for ACROBAT‐NRSI. A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool: for Non‐Randomized Studies of Interventions (ACROBAT‐NRSI), Version 1.0.0. www.riskofbias.info (accessed 12 February 2016).
Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time‐to‐event data into meta‐analysis. Trials 2007;8:16. [DOI: 10.1186/1745‐6215‐8‐16]
Tinmouth A, Macdougall L, Fergusson D, Amin M, Graham ID, Hebert PC, et al. Reducing the amount of blood transfused: a systematic review of behavioral interventions to change physicians' transfusion practices. Archives of Internal Medicine 2005;165(8):845‐52.
Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion‐related mortality: the ongoing risks of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention. Blood 2009;113(15):3406‐17.
World Health Organization. Blood safety and availability. Fact sheet N°279. www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs279/en/ (accessed 28 June 2016).
Wilson K, MacDougall L, Fergusson D, Graham I, Tinmouth A, Hébert PC. The effectiveness of interventions to reduce physician's levels of inappropriate transfusion:what can be learned from a systematic review of the literature. Transfusion 2002;42(9):1224‐9.
