Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012520Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 22 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Julie A Luker

    Correspondencia a: Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Julie Bernhardt

    Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia

  • Ian D Graham

    School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

  • Sandy Middleton

    Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia, Sydney, Australia

    NSW School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia

  • Elizabeth A Lynch

    Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia

  • Tharshanah Thayabaranathan

    Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

  • Louise Craig

    Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Australia, Sydney, Australia

    NSW School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia

  • Dominique A Cadilhac

    Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Australia

    Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

Contributions of authors

JL is leading the project and will be involved in the selection of studies, quality assessment of studies, data abstraction, data entry and analysis.

DC, JB, SM, IG, EL, TT and LC contributed to the development of the protocol, and they will assist with the selection of studies, quality assessment of studies, data abstraction and analysis.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Health & Medical Research Council, Australia.

    JL is supported by an Early Career Research Fellowship

    JB is supported by an Established Career Fellowship

Declarations of interest

Julie Luker: research affiliate with the NHMRC's Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery has received travel costs and expenses to present at the Stroke Society of Australasia Annual Scientific Meeting.
Julie Bernhardt: none known.
Ian Graham: none known.
Sandy Middleton: lead author of a trial that may be included in this review (if that is the case, Sandy Middleton will not be involved in data extraction or analysis of such a trial). Co‐Chair of Acute Stroke Nursing Education Network part funded by an AUD 20,000 unrestricted educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim: no funds received by myself or my institution.
Elizabeth Lynch: co‐author of a trial that may be included in this review (if that is the case, Elizabeth Lynch will not be involved in data extraction or analysis of such a trial).
Tharshanah Thayabaranathan: none known.
Louise Craig: none known.
Dominique Cadilhac: recipient of a restricted educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim unrelated to this work; also the Data Custodian for the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry and co‐author of a trial that may be included in this review (if that is the case, Dominique Cadilhac will not be involved in data extraction or analysis of such a trial).

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). The authors would also like to thank the following editors and peer referees who provided comments to improve the protocol: Denise O'Connor, Luke Vale, Paul Miller, Lalit Kalra, Peter Langhorne, and to Meggan Harris for copy‐editing the protocol. We acknowledge Carole Gibbs' (Research Librarian at the University of South Australia) contribution to the search strategy.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Aug 11

Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings

Review

Elizabeth A Lynch, Lemma N Bulto, Heilok Cheng, Louise Craig, Julie A Luker, Kathleen L Bagot, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Heidi Janssen, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Middleton, Dominique A Cadilhac

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012520.pub2

2017 Jan 22

Interventions for the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations in acute stroke settings

Protocol

Julie A Luker, Julie Bernhardt, Ian D Graham, Sandy Middleton, Elizabeth A Lynch, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Louise Craig, Dominique A Cadilhac

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012520

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.