Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Study

Interventions

N

MD

95% CI

P value

Overshott 2010

Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo

15

‐3.6

‐15.6 to 8.4

0.5

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Duration of delirium (days).

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Adverse events (nausea).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 2 Adverse events (nausea).

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Use of rescue medications.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 3 Use of rescue medications.

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 4 Mortality.

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo, Outcome 5 Leaving the study early.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) compared to placebo for the treatment of delirium in non‐ICU settings

Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) compared to placebo for the treatment of delirium in non‐ICU settings

Patient or population: people with delirium
Settings: non‐ICU
Intervention: cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine)*
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks** (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine)

Duration of delirium
days
Follow‐up: 42 days

The mean duration was 9.9 days

The mean duration was 3.6 days lower

(15.6 lower to 8.4 higher)

Not estimable

15
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1

The data were reported by Overshott 2010.

The study was grossly underpowered, and the data were skewed.

Severity of delirium
CAM negative
Follow‐up: 28 days

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

No study reported this outcome.

Adverse events
nausea
Follow‐up: 42 days

143 per 1000

43 per 1000
(1 to 899)

RR 0.3
(0.01 to 6.29)

15
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1

Persistent cognitive impairment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

No study reported this outcome.

Length of hospitalisation

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

No study reported this outcome.

Mortality
Follow‐up: 42 days

571 per 1000

57 per 1000
(6 to 891)

RR 0.1
(0.01 to 1.56)

15
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1

Cost of intervention

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

No study reported this outcome.

*The dose of intervention: 1.5 mg once a day increasing to 1.5 mg twice a day after 7 days.

**The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded twice for imprecision due to very small sample size.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) compared to placebo for the treatment of delirium in non‐ICU settings
Comparison 1. Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Duration of delirium (days) Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

2 Adverse events (nausea) Show forest plot

1

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.01, 6.29]

3 Use of rescue medications Show forest plot

1

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [0.01, 2.10]

4 Mortality Show forest plot

1

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.56]

5 Leaving the study early Show forest plot

1

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.07, 11.54]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Cholinesterase inhibitors (rivastigmine) versus placebo