Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving outcomes in elderly patients admitted to a surgical service

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012485Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 03 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Gilgamesh Eamer

    Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Amir Taheri

    Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Sidian S Chen

    Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Quinn Daviduck

    Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Thane Chambers

    University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Xinzhe Shi

    Center for the Advancement of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada

  • Rachel G Khadaroo

    Correspondencia a: Department of Surgery, Divisions of General Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

QD and GE co‐ordinated the contributions from the coauthors and wrote the final draft of the protocol. QD, SC, TC, and GE worked on the methods sections. QD and GE drafted the clinical sections of the background, and TC was the contract person with the editorial base. QD and GE wrote the protocol with assistance from AT, SC, RK, and TC. TC devised and carried out the search strategy. QD, GE, and SC wrote the statistical analysis and data synthesis sections. RK, SC, QD, GE, and AT contributed significantly to the protocol. RK was the team lead and co‐ordinator and a major contributor to the initial concept of the protocol. XS provided guidance for statistical analysis.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Alberta, Canada.

    Salary support for: AT, TC, RK

External sources

  • Canadian Frailty Network, Canada.

    Canadian Frailty Network Interdisciplinary Fellowship 2016 for: GE

  • Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, Canada.

    AIHS Summer studentship for: QD

Declarations of interest

Gilgamesh Eamer: nothing to declare.

Amir Taheri: nothing to declare.

Sidian S Chen: nothing to declare.

Quinn Daviduck: nothing to declare.

Thane Chambers: nothing to declare.

Xinzhe Shi: nothing to declare

Rachel G Khadaroo: nothing to declare.

Acknowledgements

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this protocol has been commented on by Graham Ellis, Julia Worswick, Kristoffer Yungpeng Ding, Paul Miller, and Sasha Shepperd. We thank them for their valuable contribution to the protocol. We would like to thank Liz Dennett and Paul Miller for reviewing and providing excellent feedback on the search strategy.

National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, National Institute for Health Research, National Health Service, or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jan 31

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older people admitted to a surgical service

Review

Gilgamesh Eamer, Amir Taheri, Sidian S Chen, Quinn Daviduck, Thane Chambers, Xinzhe Shi, Rachel G Khadaroo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012485.pub2

2017 Jan 03

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving outcomes in elderly patients admitted to a surgical service

Protocol

Gilgamesh Eamer, Amir Taheri, Sidian S Chen, Quinn Daviduck, Thane Chambers, Xinzhe Shi, Rachel G Khadaroo

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012485

Notes

This protocol is based on standard text and guidance provided by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.