Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Aspirina (dosis única) para el dolor perineal durante el período posparto temprano

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012129.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 09 febrero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sujana Molakatalla

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Emily Shepherd

    ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Rosalie M Grivell

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia

Contributions of authors

Sujana Molakatalla drafted the first version of the protocol for this review, with Emily Shepherd and Rosalie Grivell making comments and contributing to the final draft.

Sujana Molakatalla and Emily Shepherd assessed studies for inclusion and exclusion; carried out data extraction and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Emily Shepherd entered data into RevMan and performed the analyses. Sujana Molakatalla drafted the review with input from both Emily Shepherd (editorial) and Rosalie Grivell (editorial and clinical).

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

External sources

  • NHMRC: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

    Funding for the Pregnancy and Childbirth Australian and New Zealand Satellite

Declarations of interest

Sujana Molakatalla: none known.

Emily Bain: none known.

Rosalie M Grivell: none known.

Acknowledgements

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

We acknowledge the support from the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth editorial team in Liverpool, and the Australian and New Zealand Satellite of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth (funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)).

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Jul 24

Aspirin (single dose) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

Review

Emily Shepherd, Rosalie M Grivell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012129.pub3

2017 Feb 09

Aspirin (single dose) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

Review

Sujana Molakatalla, Emily Shepherd, Rosalie M Grivell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012129.pub2

2016 Mar 21

Aspirin (single dose) for perineal pain in early postpartum period

Protocol

Sujana Molakatalla, Emily Shepherd, Rosalie M Grivell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012129

Differences between protocol and review

There are some differences between our published protocol (Molakatalla 2016) and this full review.

Methods/data collection and analysis/assessment of pain ‐ we clarified that our measure was 50% or greater pain relief (our protocol stated 50%). We also clarified equations used for measures of pain in the review.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.2 Need for additional pain relief
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.2 Need for additional pain relief

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.3 Maternal adverse effects
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, outcome: 1.3 Maternal adverse effects

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman.

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 2 Need for additional pain relief.

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain, Outcome 3 Maternal adverse effects.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin compared with placebo for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

Aspirin compared with placebo for perineal pain in the early postpartum period

Patient or population: women with perineal pain in the early postpartum period

Settings: 17 RCTs published from 1967 to 1997 (11 RCTs conducted in USA, 3 in Venezuela, 1 each in Belgium, Canada and India)

Intervention: aspirin (single dose)

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Aspirin

Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman

(4 to 8 hours)

Study population

RR 2.03 (1.69, 2.42)

1001 (13 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

253 per 1000

513 per 1000 (427 to 612)

Need for additional pain relief

(4 to 8 hours)

Study population

RR 0.25 (0.17, 0.37)

744 (10 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2

267 per 1000

67 per 1000 (45 to 99)

Maternal adverse effects

(4 to 8 hours)

Study population

RR 1.08 (0.57, 2.06)

1067 (14 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3

27 per 1000

29 per 1000 (15 to 55)

Neonatal adverse effects

(0 RCTs)

Not reported by any of the included RCTs

Perineal pain at six weeks postpartum

(0 RCTs)

Not reported by any of the included RCTs

*The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1Study limitations: downgraded two levels due to the serious risk of bias

2Publication bias: downgraded by one level based on visual inspection of funnel plot which indicates likely publication bias

3Imprecision: downgraded one level due to few events and wide 95% CI around the pooled estimate which includes no effect

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Aspirin compared with placebo for perineal pain in the early postpartum period
Comparison 1. Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman Show forest plot

13

1001

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [1.69, 2.42]

1.1 300 mg aspirin

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.6 [0.36, 18.88]

1.2 500 to 650 mg aspirin

11

800

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [1.64, 2.39]

1.3 900 mg aspirin

1

40

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.83 [0.84, 3.99]

1.4 1200 mg aspirin

3

108

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.75 [1.25, 6.06]

2 Need for additional pain relief Show forest plot

10

744

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.17, 0.37]

2.1 300 mg aspirin

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.03, 0.79]

2.2 500 to 650 mg aspirin

9

569

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.17, 0.41]

2.3 900 mg aspirin

1

40

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.01, 2.60]

2.4 1200 mg aspirin

2

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.06, 0.70]

3 Maternal adverse effects Show forest plot

14

1067

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.57, 2.06]

3.1 300 mg aspirin

1

53

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 500 to 650 mg aspirin

13

892

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.51, 2.53]

3.3 900 mg aspirin

1

40

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.5 [0.55, 11.41]

3.4 1200 mg aspirin

2

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [0.01, 1.80]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Aspirin versus placebo for perineal pain
Comparison 2. 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2 Need for additional pain relief Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3 Maternal adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. 300 mg aspirin versus 600 mg aspirin for perineal pain
Comparison 3. 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman Show forest plot

2

121

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.52, 1.39]

2 Need for additional pain relief Show forest plot

2

121

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.30, 5.68]

3 Maternal adverse effects Show forest plot

2

121

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 69.52]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. 600 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain
Comparison 4. 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adequate pain relief as reported by the woman Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2 Need for additional pain relief Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3 Maternal adverse effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. 300 mg aspirin versus 1200 mg aspirin for perineal pain