Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

การให้โปรเจสเตอโรนเพื่อป้องกันการคลอดก่อนกำหนดที่เกิดขึ้นเองสำหรับสตรีตั้งครรภ์แฝด

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 31 octubre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jodie M Dodd

    Correspondencia a: School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Rosalie M Grivell

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia

  • Cecelia M OBrien

    Women's and Babies Division, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, Australia

  • Therese Dowswell

    Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

  • Andrea R Deussen

    School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

Contributions of authors

Jodie M Dodd drafted the original text of the protocol.
Therese Dowswell contributed to the text and commented on drafts.
Rosalie M Grivell, Cecelia M OBrien and Andrea R Deussen commented on drafts of the protocol.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • (TD) Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines

Declarations of interest

Jodie M Dodd is an investigator on the PROGRESS randomised trial, which may contribute data to this review.
Rosalie M Grivell: No conflicts of interest.
Cecelia M OBrien: No conflicts of interest.
Andrea R Deussen: No conflicts of interest.

Therese Dowswell is paid from a grant from her institution to work on this and other Cochrane Reviews. In the last 36 months she has been paid by WHO for work on other reviews.

Acknowledgements

As part of the prepublication editorial process, this protocol has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, through Cochrane Infrastructure and Cochrane Programme Grant funding to Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Therese Dowswell's work is supported by an NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Nov 20

Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Rosalie M Grivell, Cecelia M OBrien, Therese Dowswell, Andrea R Deussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3

2017 Oct 31

Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Rosalie M Grivell, Cecelia M OBrien, Therese Dowswell, Andrea R Deussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2

2016 Jan 02

Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Protocol

Jodie M Dodd, Rosalie M Grivell, Cecelia M OBrien, Therese Dowswell, Andrea R Deussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012024

Differences between protocol and review

In the protocol we stated that we would carry out subgroup analysis by route of administration. After consideration, we decided that drugs administered by different routes have different uptake and the effects of different types of progestogens (administered by different routes) are likely to be different. Therefore, in this review we have not carried out pooled analysis, but rather we have set out results for progestogens administered by different routes in separate comparisons.

In the original protocol we had not planned subgroup analysis by short cervix. We have added this so that this review is compatible with a related review examining progestogens in singleton pregnancy, and to reflect increasing interest in interventions in women with multiple risk factors.

In the review, the following outcomes are now listed as maternal, rather than as infant outcomes:

  1. Preterm birth (less than 34 weeks' gestation)

  2. Birth before 37 completed weeks

  3. Birth before 28 completed weeks

  4. Mean gestational age at birth

In the review, we have removed the following outcomes from the GRADE methods:

  1. Adverse drug reaction

  2. Prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM)

We have added the following outcome to the GRADE methods:

  1. Infant birthweight less than 2500 g

This was changed because for multiple pregnancy infant birthweight less than 2500 g is a more clinically relevant and meaningful outcome than either drug reaction or PROM.

We changed the following outcomes:

  1. Birth before 37 completed weeks

  2. Birth before 28 completed weeks

to:

  1. Preterm birth less than 37 weeks

  2. Preterm birth less than 28 weeks

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 34 week subgroup by timing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 34 week subgroup by timing.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 4 Perinatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 4 Perinatal death.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse drug reaction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 11 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 11 Caesarean section.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 12 Antenatal tocolysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 12 Antenatal tocolysis.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 13 Antenatal corticosteroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 13 Antenatal corticosteroids.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 14 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 14 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 15 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 15 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 16 Neonatal sepsis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 16 Neonatal sepsis.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 17 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 17 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 18 Use of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 18 Use of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 20 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 20 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 21 Chronic lung disease.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 21 Chronic lung disease.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 22 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 22 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 23 Fetal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 23 Fetal death.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 24 Neonatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 24 Neonatal death.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 25 Admission to NICU.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 25 Admission to NICU.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 26 Patent ductus arteriosus.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 26 Patent ductus arteriosus.

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence).

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence).

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by timing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by timing.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 4 Perinatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 4 Perinatal death.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse drug reaction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 10 Adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 11 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 11 Caesarean section.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 12 Satisfaction with therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 12 Satisfaction with therapy.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 13 Antenatal tocolysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 13 Antenatal tocolysis.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 14 Antenatal corticosteroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 14 Antenatal corticosteroids.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 15 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 15 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 16 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 16 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 17 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 17 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 18 Use of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 18 Use of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 20 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 20 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 21 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 21 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal sepsis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal sepsis.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 23 Fetal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 23 Fetal death.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 24 Neonatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.24

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 24 Neonatal death.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 25 Admission to NICU.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.25

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 25 Admission to NICU.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 26 Patent ductus arteriosus.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.26

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 26 Patent ductus arteriosus.

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total non‐independence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.27

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total non‐independence).

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% non‐independence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.28

Comparison 2 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo, Outcome 28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% non‐independence).

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 2 Perinatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 2 Perinatal death.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 3 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 3 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 4 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 4 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 5 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 5 Caesarean section.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 6 Antenatal tocolysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 6 Antenatal tocolysis.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 7 Antenatal corticosteroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 7 Antenatal corticosteroids.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 8 Neonatal sepsis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 8 Neonatal sepsis.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 9 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 9 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 10 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 10 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 11 Neonatal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 11 Neonatal death.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 12 Admission to NICU.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 12 Admission to NICU.

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 13 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 13 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence).

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 14 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 14 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence).

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 2 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 2 Prelabour rupture of the membranes.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 3 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 4 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 4 Caesarean section.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 5 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 5 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 6 Respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 6 Respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 7 Use of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 7 Use of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 8 Admission to NICU.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix, Outcome 8 Admission to NICU.

Comparison 5 Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor, Outcome 1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks.

Comparison 5 Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor, Outcome 2 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Intramuscular (IM) progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Patient or population: Women with a multiple pregnancy
Setting: Obstetric clinics in Finland, France, Lebanon, the Netherlands, and the USA
Intervention: Intramuscular (IM) progesterone
Comparison: No treatment or placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with no treatment or placebo

Risk with intramuscular (IM) progesterone

Perinatal death

Study population

RR 1.45
(0.60 to 3.51)

3089
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

LOW 1, 2

34 per 1000

49 per 1000
(20 to 120)

Preterm birth less than 34 weeks

Study population

RR 1.54
(1.06 to 2.26)

399
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 3, 4

191 per 1000

298 per 1000
(204 to 436)

Major neurodevelopmental disability at childhood follow‐up

Study population

(0 studies)

None of the included trial reported this outcome

see comment

see comment

Infant birthweight less than 2500 g

Study population

RR 0.99
(0.90 to 1.08)

4071
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

620 per 1000

613 per 1000
(558 to 669)

Preterm birth less than 28 weeks

Study population

RR 1.08
(0.75 to 1.55)

1920
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

‐58 per 1000

62 per 1000
(43 to 89)

Preterm birth less than 37 weeks

Study population

RR 1.05
(0.98 to 1.13)

2010
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

614 per 1000

639 per 1000
(602 to 688)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Statistical heterogeneity (I2 > 60%). Variation in size and direction of effect (‐1).
2Wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect. (‐1).
3Study with design limitations (lack of blinding) contributing data (64.2% weight) (‐1).
4Wide confidence interval (‐1).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy
Summary of findings 2. Vaginal progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Vaginal progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy

Patient or population: Women with a multiple pregnancy
Setting: Obstetric clinics in Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, Spain, Turkey and UK
Intervention: Vaginal progesterone
Comparison: No treatment or placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with no treatment or placebo

Risk with vaginal progesterone

Perinatal death

Study population

RR 1.23
(0.74 to 2.06)

2287
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1, 2

23 per 1000

28 per 1000
(17 to 47)

Preterm birth less than 34 weeks

Study population

RR 0.83
(0.63 to 1.09)

1727
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2, 3

227 per 1000

188 per 1000
(143 to 247)

Major neurodevelopmental disability at childhood follow‐up

Study population

(0 study)

None of the included trial reported this outcome.

see comment

see comment

Infant birthweight less than 2500 g

Study population

RR 0.95
(0.88 to 1.03)

3079
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

604 per 1000

574 per 1000
(532 to 622)

Preterm birth less than 37 weeks

Study population

RR 0.97
(0.89 to 1.06)

1597
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 5

559 per 1000

547 per 1000
(503 to 598)

Preterm birth less than 28 weeks

Study population

RR 1.22
(0.68 to 2.21)

1569
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2, 6

26 per 1000

31 per 1000
(18 to 57)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1One study contributing data with design limitations (weight of 52.1%) (‐1).
2Wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect (‐1).
3Two studies contributing data with design limitations (combined weight 48.5%) (‐1).
4Most of the pooled effect was provided by studies with design limitations (combined weight 54.4%) (‐1).
5One study contributing data with design limitations (weight of 33.9%) (‐1).
6Most of the pooled effect was provided by studies with design limitations (combined weight 57.4%) (‐1).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Vaginal progesterone compared to no treatment or placebo for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy
Table 1. Reporting of fetal, neonatal and perinatal death

Trial

Fetal death (FD)

Intrapartum death

Stillbirth

Neonatal death (NND)

Perinatal death (PND)

Included in Dodd 2013?

Decision for PND for multiples review?

Aboulghar 2012

Reported as maternal outcome. From text appears as if at least one pregnancy affected by demise of both twins

Yes

Cannot reliably convert maternal denominator for neonatal outcome.

Data not included

Awwad 2015

Yes

Yes, as a baby outcome.

N/A

Include

Cetingoz 2011

No death data

No PND reported

N/A

El‐Refaie 2016

No death data

No PND reported

N/A

Serra 2013

Fetal death reported as maternal outcome and only as a single co‐twin demise outcome. Unsure if any pregnancies where both twins died

Yes, as a baby outcome

Not reported. Cannot convert fetal death into a baby outcome because only reported if single twin demise likely to underestimate

Yes

Data not included.

Norman 2009

Reported as a maternal outcome and denominator not clear

Yes

No

No

No

Rode 2011

Yes. as maternal outcome but specifies only 1 twin affected in each of those pregnancies

Yes

In text

Yes

Yes

Wood 2012

Yes, as infant outcome

N/A

Yes

Awwad 2015

Yes

Yes

Yes, as infant outcome

N/A

Yes

Briery 2009

Yes

No PND reported

N/A

Combs 2010 triplets

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Combs 2011 twins

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hartikainen‐Sorri 1980

Yes in text

Yes

Yes

Lim 2011

1 or more died during delivery after 24 wks and also any IUD before onset labour or onset delivery

Reported “all live births”

No, and cannot be reliably added up from data presented

Yes

Data not included

Rouse 2007

Yes

Yes

Yes, from text (not in table)

No ‐ not sure why data not included

Yes

Senat 2013

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can add NND and FD (IP and IU); all Ns clear

No ‐ not sure why data not included

Yes.

Extrapolated from text and checked

Caritis 2009

Yes, as a maternal outcome

Yes

Cannot add FD and NND because FD reported as a maternal outcome

No

Data not included

IP: intrapartum
IU: intra‐uterine
IUD: intra‐uterine death
N/A: not applicable
wk: week

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Reporting of fetal, neonatal and perinatal death
Comparison 1. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks Show forest plot

2

399

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.54 [1.06, 2.26]

2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose Show forest plot

2

399

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.54 [1.06, 2.26]

2.1 Low dose (250 mg weekly or less)

1

238

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.73, 2.59]

2.2 High dose (greater than 250 mg weekly)

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [1.04, 2.68]

3 Preterm birth less than 34 week subgroup by timing Show forest plot

2

399

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.54 [1.06, 2.26]

3.1 Commencing after 20 weeks' gestation

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [1.04, 2.68]

3.2 Mixed timing of commencement

1

238

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.73, 2.59]

4 Perinatal death Show forest plot

6

3089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.60, 3.51]

5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose Show forest plot

6

3089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.60, 3.51]

5.1 Low dose (250 mg weekly or less)

5

2759

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.48, 2.77]

5.2 High dose (greater than 250 mg weekly)

1

330

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

9.11 [1.17, 71.10]

6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing Show forest plot

6

3089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.60, 3.51]

6.1 Starting before 20 weeks' gestation

2

1886

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.34, 2.66]

6.2 Starting after 20 weeks' gestation

2

484

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.76 [0.81, 17.46]

6.3 Mixed timing of start

2

719

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.01, 37.74]

7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes Show forest plot

6

1257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.84, 1.63]

8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks Show forest plot

5

2010

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.98, 1.13]

9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks Show forest plot

5

1920

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.75, 1.55]

10 Adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

2

1316

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.63, 1.32]

11 Caesarean section Show forest plot

7

2222

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.08]

12 Antenatal tocolysis Show forest plot

7

2218

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.85, 1.10]

13 Antenatal corticosteroids Show forest plot

7

2221

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.88, 1.11]

14 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g Show forest plot

5

4071

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.90, 1.08]

15 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes Show forest plot

4

3606

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.68, 1.15]

16 Neonatal sepsis Show forest plot

6

3327

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.41, 2.51]

17 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

8

4670

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.85, 1.34]

18 Use of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

3

2233

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.69, 1.17]

19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades Show forest plot

1

1355

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.36, 10.77]

20 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

5

2807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.16, 0.74]

21 Chronic lung disease Show forest plot

2

681

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.13, 27.80]

22 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

5

2610

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.36, 1.51]

23 Fetal death Show forest plot

4

3536

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.39, 2.20]

24 Neonatal death Show forest plot

7

3399

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.44, 1.91]

25 Admission to NICU Show forest plot

2

1668

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [1.13, 1.58]

26 Patent ductus arteriosus Show forest plot

4

2290

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.37, 2.21]

27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence) Show forest plot

6

1517

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.57, 3.20]

28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence) Show forest plot

6

3021

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.60, 3.49]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment or placebo
Comparison 2. Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks Show forest plot

6

1727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.63, 1.09]

2 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by dose Show forest plot

6

1727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.64, 1.07]

2.1 Low dose (200 mg or less daily)

4

1267

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.63, 1.37]

2.2 High dose (more than 200 mg daily)

3

460

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.52, 0.90]

3 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks subgroup by timing Show forest plot

6

1727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.63, 1.09]

3.1 Starting before 20 weeks' gestation

1

91

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.30, 1.58]

3.2 Starting after 20 weeks' gestation

4

1256

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.60, 0.91]

3.3 Mixed timing of start

1

380

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.90, 2.02]

4 Perinatal death Show forest plot

3

2287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.74, 2.06]

5 Perinatal death subgroup by dose Show forest plot

3

2287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.74, 2.06]

5.1 Low dose (200 mg or less daily)

3

2287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.74, 2.06]

6 Perinatal death subgroup by timing Show forest plot

3

2287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.74, 2.06]

6.1 Starting before 20 weeks' gestation

1

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.98 [0.18, 21.39]

6.2 Starting after 20 weeks' gestation

1

1346

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.51, 2.42]

6.3 Mixed timing of start

1

770

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.63, 2.61]

7 Prelabour rupture of the membranes Show forest plot

2

514

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.23, 1.60]

8 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks Show forest plot

6

1597

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.89, 1.06]

9 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks Show forest plot

4

1569

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.68, 2.21]

10 Adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

2

562

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.90, 1.09]

11 Caesarean section Show forest plot

6

2143

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.88, 0.98]

12 Satisfaction with therapy Show forest plot

1

494

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.35, 0.35]

13 Antenatal tocolysis Show forest plot

4

1420

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.62, 1.02]

14 Antenatal corticosteroids Show forest plot

4

1422

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.71, 1.06]

15 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g Show forest plot

4

3079

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

16 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes Show forest plot

3

2410

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.35, 1.19]

17 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

4

2560

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.64, 1.10]

18 Use of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

5

3134

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.48, 0.77]

19 Intraventricular haemorrhage ‐ all grades Show forest plot

1

1333

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.62, 4.66]

20 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

2

1945

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.45, 2.54]

21 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

3

2117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.13, 2.06]

22 Neonatal sepsis Show forest plot

2

1944

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.86, 2.33]

23 Fetal death Show forest plot

3

2328

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.65, 2.90]

24 Neonatal death Show forest plot

3

2905

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.75, 3.15]

25 Admission to NICU Show forest plot

5

4052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.87, 1.00]

26 Patent ductus arteriosus Show forest plot

2

1946

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.47, 1.22]

27 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total non‐independence) Show forest plot

3

1144

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.61, 2.44]

28 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% non‐independence) Show forest plot

3

2263

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.23 [0.74, 2.06]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment or placebo
Comparison 3. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks Show forest plot

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [1.04, 2.68]

2 Perinatal death Show forest plot

1

330

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.11 [1.17, 71.10]

3 Prelabour rupture of the membranes Show forest plot

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.63, 2.06]

4 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks Show forest plot

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.90, 1.25]

5 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

161

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.88, 1.49]

6 Antenatal tocolysis Show forest plot

1

158

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.76, 2.45]

7 Antenatal corticosteroids Show forest plot

1

159

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.64, 1.36]

8 Neonatal sepsis Show forest plot

1

303

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.03 [0.60, 42.57]

9 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

309

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [1.00, 2.12]

10 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

1

302

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 4.19]

11 Neonatal death Show forest plot

1

307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.03 [0.46, 35.61]

12 Admission to NICU Show forest plot

1

313

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [1.04, 1.74]

13 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming total dependence) Show forest plot

1

163

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.06 [0.60, 42.38]

14 Sensitivity analysis for perinatal death (assuming 1% dependence) Show forest plot

1

322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.11 [1.17, 71.10]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Intramuscular (IM) progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix
Comparison 4. Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks Show forest plot

1

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.49, 0.91]

2 Prelabour rupture of the membranes Show forest plot

1

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.12, 1.82]

3 Preterm birth less than 28 weeks Show forest plot

1

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.07, 1.88]

4 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.89, 1.11]

5 Infant birthweight less than 2500 g Show forest plot

1

439

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.85, 1.04]

6 Respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

439

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.55, 0.84]

7 Use of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

1

439

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.32, 0.69]

8 Admission to NICU Show forest plot

1

439

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.82, 1.01]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Vaginal progesterone versus no treatment: multiple pregnancy and short cervix
Comparison 5. Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Preterm birth less than 34 weeks Show forest plot

2

158

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.29, 1.10]

2 Preterm birth less than 37 weeks Show forest plot

2

168

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.72, 1.18]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Vaginal progesterone versus placebo: multiple pregnancy and another risk factor