Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Drenajes timpánicos (tubos de ventilación) para la otitis media aguda recurrente en niños

Appendices

Appendix 1. CENTRAL search strategy

CENTRAL (Cochrane Register of Studies)

MEDLINE (Ovid)

Embase (Ovid)

CINAHL (EBSCO)

1 MESH DESCRIPTOR Otitis AND CENTRAL:TARGET

2 (otitis or inflamm* or infect* or disease):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

3 #1 OR #2

4 MESH DESCRIPTOR Ear, Middle AND CENTRAL:TARGET

5 (middle near ear):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

6 #5 OR #4

7 #3 AND #6

8 MESH DESCRIPTOR Otitis Media AND CENTRAL:TARGET

9 MESH DESCRIPTOR Otitis Media with Effusion EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

10 (((otitis near media) or OME)):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

11 ((middle near ear near effus*)):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

12 #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11

13 MESH DESCRIPTOR Acute Disease EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

14 (acute or suppurat* or serous or secretory or secretion* or purulent):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

15 #13 OR #14

16 #12 AND #15

17 MESH DESCRIPTOR Otitis Media, Suppurative EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

18 (AOM or TYMPANITIS):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

19 #16 OR #17 OR #18

20 MESH DESCRIPTOR Recurrence EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

21 MESH DESCRIPTOR Chronic Disease EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

22 MESH DESCRIPTOR Secondary Prevention EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

23 (recurrence* or recurrent or chronic or persistent or persistence or prone):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

24 #20 OR #21 OR #22 OR #23

25 #19 AND #24

26 MESH DESCRIPTOR Mastoiditis EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

27 (raom or mastoiditis):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

28 #25 OR #26 OR #27

29 MESH DESCRIPTOR Middle Ear Ventilation EXPLODE ALL AND CENTRAL:TARGET

30 ((middle near ear near (tube* or ventilat* or tubulation))):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

31 grommet*:AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

32 (((tympanostomy or myringotomy or tympanic) near (tube* or tubulation or ventilat*))):AB,EH,KW,KY,MC,MH,TI,TO AND CENTRAL:TARGET

33 #29 OR #30 OR #31 OR #32

34 #28 AND #33

1 Otitis/

2 (otitis or inflamm* or infect* or disease*).ab,ti.

3 1 or 2

4 exp Ear, Middle/

5 (middle adj3 ear).ab,ti.

6 4 or 5

7 3 and 6

8 otitis media/ or otitis media with effusion/

9 (middle adj3 ear adj3 effus*).mp. [mp=title, abstract, original title, name of substance word, subject heading word, keyword heading word, protocol supplementary concept word, rare disease supplementary concept word, unique identifier]

10 ((otitis adj3 media) or OME).ab,ti.

11 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12 exp Acute Disease/

13 (acute or suppurat* or serous or secretory or secretion* or purulent).ab,ti.

14 12 or 13

15 11 and 14

16 exp Otitis Media, Suppurative/

17 (AOM or TYMPANITIS).ab,ti.

18 15 or 16 or 17

19 exp Recurrence/

20 exp Chronic Disease/

21 exp Secondary Prevention/

22 (recurrence* or recurrent or chronic or persistent or persistence or prone).ab,ti.

23 19 or 20 or 21 or 22

24 18 and 23

25 Mastoiditis/

26 (raom or mastoiditis).ab,ti.

27 24 or 25 or 26

28 exp Middle Ear Ventilation/

29 (middle adj3 ear adj6 (tube* or ventilat* or tubulation)).ab,ti.

30 ((tympanostomy or myringotomy or tympanic) adj6 (tube* or tubulation or ventilat*)).ab,ti.

31 "grommet*".ab,ti.

32 28 or 29 or 30 or 31

33 27 and 32

34 randomized controlled trial.pt.

35 controlled clinical trial.pt.

36 randomized.ab.

37 placebo.ab.

38 drug therapy.fs.

39 randomly.ab.

40 trial.ab.

41 groups.ab.

42 34 or 35 or 36 or 37 or 38 or 39 or 40 or 41

43 exp animals/ not humans.sh.

44 42 not 43

45 33 and 44

1 otitis/

2 (otitis or inflamm* or infect* or disease).ti,ab.

3 1 or 2

4 exp middle ear/

5 (middle adj3 ear).ti,ab.

6 4 or 5

7 3 and 6

8 otitis media/

9 secretory otitis media/

10 ((otitis adj3 media) or OME).ti,ab.

11 (middle adj3 ear adj3 effus*).ti,ab.

12 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11

13 exp acute disease/

14 (acute or suppurat* or serous or secretory or secretion* or purulent).ti,ab.

15 13 or 14

16 12 and 15

17 exp suppurative otitis media/

18 (AOM or TYMPANITIS).ti,ab.

19 16 or 17 or 18

20 exp recurrent disease/

21 exp chronic disease/

22 exp secondary prevention/

23 (recurrence* or recurrent or chronic or persistent or persistence or prone).ti,ab.

24 20 or 21 or 22 or 23

25 19 and 24

26 mastoiditis/

27 (raom or mastoiditis).ti,ab.

28 25 or 26 or 27

29 exp middle ear ventilation/

30 (middle adj3 ear adj6 (tube* or ventilat* or tubulation)).ti,ab.

31 ((tympanostomy or myringotomy or tympanic) adj6 (tube* or tubulation or ventilat*)).ti,ab.

32 "grommet*".ti,ab.

33 29 or 30 or 31 or 32

34 28 and 33

35 (random* or factorial* or placebo* or assign* or allocat* or crossover*).tw.

36 (control* adj group*).tw.

37 (trial* and (control* or comparative)).tw.

38 ((blind* or mask*) and (single or double or triple or treble)).tw.

39 (treatment adj arm*).tw.

40 (control* adj group*).tw.

41 (phase adj (III or three)).tw.

42 (versus or vs).tw.

43 rct.tw.

44 crossover procedure/

45 double blind procedure/

46 single blind procedure/

47 randomization/

48 placebo/

49 exp clinical trial/

50 parallel design/

51 Latin square design/

52 35 or 36 or 37 or 38 or 39 or 40 or 41 or 42 or 43 or 44 or 45 or 46 or 47 or 48 or 49 or 50 or 51

53 exp ANIMAL/ or exp NONHUMAN/ or exp ANIMAL EXPERIMENT/ or exp ANIMAL MODEL/

54 exp human/

55 53 not 54

56 52 not 55

57 34 and 56

S31 S25 AND S30

S30 S26 OR S27 OR S28 OR S29

S29 TX grommet*

S28 TX ((tympanostomy or myringotomy or tympanic) n6 (tube* or tubulation or ventilat*))

S27 TX (middle n3 ear n6 (tube* or ventilat* or tubulation))

S26 (MH "Middle Ear Ventilation")

S25 S22 OR S23 OR S24

S24 TX (raom or mastoiditis

S23 (MH "Mastoiditis")

S22 S17 AND S21

S21 S18 OR S19 OR S20

S20 TX recurrence* or recurrent or chronic or persistent or persistence or prone

S19 (MH "Chronic Disease")

S18 (MH "Recurrence")

S17 S15 OR S16

S16 TX (AOM or TYMPANITIS)

S15 S11 AND S14

S14 S12 OR S13

S13 TX (acute or suppurat* or serous or secretory or secretion* or purulent)

S12 (MH "Acute Disease")

S11 S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10

S10 TX ((otitis n3 media) or OME)

S9 TX middle n3 ear n3 effus*

S8 (MH "Otitis Media with Effusion") OR (MH "Otitis Media")

S7 S3 AND S6

S6 S4 OR S5

S5 TX middle n3 ear

S4 (MH "Ear, Middle")

S3 S1 OR S2

S2 TX otitis or inflamm* or infect* or disease

S1 (MH "Otitis")

Cochrane ENT Register

LILACS

ClinicalTrials.gov

ICTRP

1 otitis or inflamm* or infect* or disease

2 middle near ear

3 #1 AND #2

4 (otitis near media) or OME

5 middle near ear near effus*

6 #3 or #4 or #5

7 acute or suppurat* or serous or secretory or secretion* or purulent

8 #6 AND #7

9 AOM or TYMPANITIS

10 #8 or #9

11 recurrence* or recurrent or chronic or persistent or persistence or prone

12 #10 and #11

13 raom or mastoiditis

14 #12 or #13

15 middle near ear near (tube* or ventilat* or tubulation)

16 grommet*

17 (tympanostomy or myringotomy or tympanic) near (tube* or tubulation or ventilat*)

18 #15 or #16 or #17

19 #14 and #18

((TW:"middle ear" OR TW:"Oído Medio" OR TW:"Orelha Média" OR TW:tympanostomy OR TW:myringotomy OR TW:tympanic) AND (TW:Ventila$ OR TW:tube$ OR TW:tubulation)) OR TW:grommet$

AND

Controlled Clinical Trial

Via the Cochrane Register of Studies

1 grommet OR grommets OR "tympanostomy tube" OR "tympanostomy tubes" OR "myringotomy tube" OR "myringotomy tubes" OR "middle ear tubulation" OR "tympanic membrane ventilation" OR (middle AND ear AND ventilation) AND INSEGMENT

2 (nct*):AU AND INSEGMENT

3 #1 AND #2

Via ClinicalTrials.gov

grommet OR grommets OR "tympanostomy tube" OR "tympanostomy tubes" OR "myringotomy tube" OR "myringotomy tubes" OR "middle ear tubulation" OR "tympanic membrane ventilation" OR (middle AND ear AND ventilation)

Study type: Interventional

rAOM OR recurren* AND AOM OR recurren* AND otitis OR recurren* AND tympanitis OR otitis AND prone

PRISMA flow diagram of search history.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of search history.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, outcome: 1.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, outcome: 1.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, outcome: 2.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, outcome: 2.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, outcome: 3.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, outcome: 3.1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 2 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 12 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 2 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 12 months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 3 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Grommets versus active monitoring, Outcome 3 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, Outcome 2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis, Outcome 2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, Outcome 1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation.

Comparison 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, Outcome 2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Grommets versus placebo medication, Outcome 2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Grommets versus active monitoring for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Grommets versus active monitoring for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Patients: children with recurrent acute otitis media
Setting: secondary and tertiary care
Intervention: grommets
Control: active monitoring

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with active monitoring

Risk with grommets

Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

Study population

RR 9.49
(2.38 to 37.80)

95
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

The NNTB based on the study population risk was 1/ (463‐49)* 1000 = 2.41

49 per 1000

463 per 1000
(116 to 1000)

Significant adverse effect: a tympanic membrane perforation persisting for 3 months or longer

0 (0/54)

n/a

54 (1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 12 months post‐randomisation

Study population

RR 1.41
(1.00 to 1.99)

200
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

The NNTB based on the study population risk was 1/ (479‐340)* 1000 = 7.19

340 per 1000

479 per 1000
(340 to 677)

Total number of AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

89 AOM recurrences in 41 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 2.17

36 AOM recurrences in 54 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 0.67

MD ‐1.50, 95% CI ‐1.99 to ‐1.01

95 (1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Total number of AOM recurrences at 12 months post‐randomisation

119 AOM recurrences in 100 children; incidence rate 1.70

92 AOM recurrences in 100 children; incidence rate 1.15

Incidence rate difference ‐0.55, 95% ‐0.17 to ‐0.93

200
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

Disease‐specific health‐related quality of life of the child at 4 and 12 months post‐randomisation using the OM‐6 questionnaire

"no statistically significant differences between treatment groups were reported at 4 and 12 months for any of the six subdomains of the OM‐6 questionnaire"

85 and 81, respectively (1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

AOM: acute otitis media; CI: confidence interval;MD: mean difference; n/a: not applicable; NNTB: number needed to treat to benefit; OM‐6: Otitis Media‐6; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1We downgraded the evidence from high to low quality due to study limitations and imprecise effect estimates (only one study with a small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Grommets versus active monitoring for recurrent acute otitis media in children
Summary of findings 2. Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Patients: children with recurrent acute otitis media
Setting: secondary and tertiary care
Intervention: grommets
Control: antibiotic prophylaxis

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with antibiotic prophylaxis

Risk with grommets

Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

Study population

RR 1.68
(1.07 to 2.65)

96
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1

The NNTB based on the study population risk was 1/ (586‐349)* 1000 = 4.22

349 per 1000

586 per 1000
(373 to 924)

Total number of AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

29 AOM recurrences in 21 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 1.38

19 AOM recurrences in 22 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 0.86

MD ‐0.52, 95% CI ‐1.37 to 0.33

43 (1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

AOM: acute otitis media; CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1We downgraded the evidence from high to very low quality due to study limitations (when we excluded the trial with high risk of bias from the analysis, no statistically significant difference was observed between groups) and imprecise effect estimates (only two studies with small sample sizes).

2We downgraded the evidence from high to very low quality due to study limitations and imprecise effect estimates (only one study with a very small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis for recurrent acute otitis media in children
Summary of findings 3. Grommets versus placebo medication for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Grommets versus placebo medication for recurrent acute otitis media in children

Patients: children with recurrent acute otitis media
Setting: secondary and tertiary care
Intervention: grommets
Control: placebo medication

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo medication

Risk with grommets

Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

Study population

RR 3.64
(1.20 to 11.04)

42
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1

The NNTB based on the study population risk was 1/ (546‐150)* 1000 = 2.53

150 per 1000

546 per 1000
(180 to 1000)

Significant adverse effect: a tympanic membrane perforation persisting for 3 months or longer

4% (3/76)

n/a

76 (1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

Total number of AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation

40 AOM recurrences in 20 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 2.0

19 AOM recurrences in 22 children; mean number of AOM recurrences per child: 0.86

MD ‐1.14, 95% CI ‐2.06 to ‐0.22

42
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

AOM: acute otitis media; CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; n/a: not applicable; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1We downgraded the evidence from high to very low quality due to study limitations and imprecise effect estimates (only one study with a very small sample size).

2We downgraded the evidence from high to low quality due to study limitations and imprecise effect estimates (only one study with a small sample size).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Grommets versus placebo medication for recurrent acute otitis media in children
Table 1. Interventions and comparison pairs included in this review

Study ID

Grommets

Grommets plus adenoidectomy

Active monitoring

Placebo medication

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Adenoidectomy

Casselbrant 1992

x

x

x

El‐Sayed 1996

x

x

Gebhart 1981

x

x

Gonzalez 1986

x

x

x

Kujala 2012

x

x

x

Comparison pairs for this review

#

Intervention

Comparator

Number of trials

Study ID

1

Grommets

Active monitoring

2

Gebhart 1981; Kujala 2012

2

Grommets

Antibiotic prophylaxis

3

Casselbrant 1992; El‐Sayed 1996; Gonzalez 1986

3

Grommets

Placebo medication

2

Casselbrant 1992; Gonzalez 1986

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Interventions and comparison pairs included in this review
Table 2. Overview of the outcomes reported in the included studies

Outcomes

Casselbrant 1992

El‐Sayed 1996

Gebhart 1981

Gonzalez 1986

Kujala 2012

Primary outcomes

Proportion of children who have no AOM recurrences at 3 to 6 months post‐randomisation

x

x

x

Significant adverse effect: tympanic membrane perforation persisting for 3 months or longer

x

x

Secondary outcomes

Proportion of children who have no AOM recurrences at 6 to 12 months post‐randomisation

x

Total number of AOM recurrences

< 3 months

3 to 6 months

x

x

6 to 12 months

x

Disease‐specific health‐related quality of life

< 3 months

3 to 6 months

x

6 to 12 months

x

Generic health‐related quality of life of the child and parent

< 3 months

3 to 6 months

6 to 12 months

Presence of middle ear effusion

< 3 months

3 to 6 months

6 to 12 months

Other adverse effects: ventilation tube misplaced in middle ear, otorrhoea within 1 week of ventilation tube placement, myringosclerosis

x

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Overview of the outcomes reported in the included studies
Comparison 1. Grommets versus active monitoring

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.49 [2.38, 37.80]

2 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 12 months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

200

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [1.00, 1.99]

3 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.5 [‐1.99, ‐1.01]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Grommets versus active monitoring
Comparison 2. Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

2

96

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [1.07, 2.65]

2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.37, 0.33]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Grommets versus antibiotic prophylaxis
Comparison 3. Grommets versus placebo medication

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion of patients who have no AOM recurrences at 6 months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.64 [1.20, 11.04]

2 Total number of AOM recurrences at six months post‐randomisation Show forest plot

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.14 [‐2.06, ‐0.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Grommets versus placebo medication