Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Educación en lactancia materna y apoyo a las pacientes con gemelos o múltiplos de mayor orden

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012003.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 28 febrero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Heather M Whitford

    Correspondencia a: Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

    [email protected]

  • Selina K Wallis

    Capacity Research Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

  • Therese Dowswell

    Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

  • Helen M West

    Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

  • Mary J Renfrew

    Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Contributions of authors

Heather Whitford produced the first draft of the protocol, revised the protocol, assessed studies, extracted data for the review, wrote and revised the text.

Selina Wallis commented on drafts of the protocol, assessed studies, extracted data for the review, and contributed to the text of the review.

Therese Dowswell contributed to the methods section of the protocol, revised drafts of the protocol, and assessed studies.

Mary Renfrew contributed to outcome selection and commented on drafts of the protocol and text of the review.

Helen West assessed studies, extracted data for the review, wrote and revised the text.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • (T Dowswell & H West) Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    T Dowswell & H West are supported by the NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines.

Declarations of interest

Heather Whitford: none known.

Selina Wallis: none known.

Therese Dowswell: is employed through a grant from NIHR to her institution (The University of Liverpool) for her work on this protocol, and in the last 36 months has received funding from WHO to work on other Cochrane reviews.

Mary J Renfrew: has received grants for quality improvement work related to feeding infants in neonatal units; small amounts of money, in regard to co‐authoring a book; and been an invited speaker at a range of professional and academic organisations, for which no fee was received. None of these activities are in conflict with the subject of this review.

H West: is employed through a grant from NIHR to her institution (The University of Liverpool) for her work on this review. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mars Lord, mother of twins, for providing helpful feedback on the review protocol.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health research, via Cochrane Infrastructure and Cochrane Programme Grant funding to the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Therese Dowswell and Helen West's work is supported by an NIHR Cochrane Programme Grant Project: 13/89/05 – Pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews to support clinical guidelines.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who is external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Feb 28

Breastfeeding education and support for women with twins or higher order multiples

Review

Heather M Whitford, Selina K Wallis, Therese Dowswell, Helen M West, Mary J Renfrew

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012003.pub2

2015 Dec 21

Breastfeeding education and support for women with multiple pregnancies

Protocol

Heather M Whitford, Selina K Wallis, Therese Dowswell, Mary J Renfrew

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012003

Differences between protocol and review

The title was changed from 'Breastfeeding education and support for women with multiple pregnancies' to 'Breastfeeding education and support for women with twins or higher order multiples'.

Minor changes to the background were made in response to author feedback.

The subgroup analysis "by whether babies were twins or higher order multiples" was added to the planned analyses.

Reports excluded from the review 'Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies' (McFadden 2017) were checked for any studies that included sick or preterm infants and which might have included multiples.

Helen West was added as an author.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Female; Humans; Infant;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.