Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroides para pacientes adultos con cáncer avanzado que presentan náuseas y vómitos (no relacionados con la quimioterapia, la radioterapia ni la cirugía)

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012002.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 03 julio 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Petra Vayne‐Bossert

    Department of Readaptation and Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Collonge‐Bellerive, Switzerland

  • Alison Haywood

    School of Pharmacy, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia

    Mater Research Institute – The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Phillip Good

    Mater Research Institute – The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

    Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia

  • Sohil Khan

    School of Pharmacy, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia

    Mater Research Institute – The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

  • Kirsty Rickett

    The University of Queensland Library, UQ/Mater McAuley Library, Brisbane, Australia

  • Janet R Hardy

    Correspondencia a: Mater Research Institute – The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    [email protected]

    Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia

Contributions of authors

All authors initiated and designed the study and drafted the protocol. KR developed the search strategy in collaboration with the Cochrane PaPaS Group. PVB, JH, PG, and KR assessed the titles and abstracts of the studies identified by the search for potential inclusion. AH, SK, JH, and PG extracted the data and conducted the 'Risk of bias' assessment. AH and SK conducted the statistical analyses and GRADE assessment. JH and PG commented on and revised the review, checked the data extraction, and arbitrated in the event of disagreement between other authors.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Mater Research ‐ The University of Queensland, School of Pharmacy and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, The Mater Palliative Care Research Fund and St Vincent’s Hospital Brisbane, Australia.

    Inkind and operational funds

External sources

  • Travel fellowship for Petra Vayne‐Bossert, Switzerland.

    Sponsored by the University Hospital of Geneva

Declarations of interest

JH: none known; JH is a specialist palliative medicine physician and manages patients with nausea and vomiting due to advanced cancer. JH has authored a book “Opioids in cancer pain".

PVB: none known; PVB is a specialist palliative medicine physician and manages patients with nausea and vomiting due to advanced cancer.

PG: none known; PG is a specialist palliative medicine physician and manages patients with nausea and vomiting due to advanced cancer.

AH: none known.

SK: none known.

KR: none known.

Acknowledgements

Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: this project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group (PaPaS). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jul 03

Corticosteroids for adult patients with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting (not related to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery)

Review

Petra Vayne‐Bossert, Alison Haywood, Phillip Good, Sohil Khan, Kirsty Rickett, Janet R Hardy

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012002.pub2

2015 Dec 18

Corticosteroids for adult patients with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting (not related to chemo‐ or radiotherapy, or surgery)

Protocol

Petra Vayne‐Bossert, Alison Haywood, Phillip Good, Sohil Khan, Kirsty Rickett, Sue Jenkins‐Marsh, Janet R Hardy

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012002

Differences between protocol and review

We expanded the description of our approach to GRADE and moved it to the data synthesis section in line with current PaPaS guidance. Blinding of participants and personnel and selective reporting have been added to the assessment of risk of bias in included studies. Four of the review authors (JH, PG, PVB, KR) independently assessed the titles and abstracts due to the large number of results obtained in the literature search.

Notes

2019

An updated search in January 2019 did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. The review will be re‐assessed for updating in 2020. If appropriate, we will update the review before this date if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitates major revisions.

2020

An updated restricted search in February 2020 did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. The review will be re‐assessed for updating in 2022. If appropriate, we will update the review before this date if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitates major revisions.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

PRISMA Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

PRISMA Study flow diagram

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' domain, presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' domain, presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' domain for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' domain for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Nausea, outcome: 1.1 Nausea at 8 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Nausea, outcome: 1.1 Nausea at 8 days.

Comparison 1 Nausea, Outcome 1 Nausea at 8 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Nausea, Outcome 1 Nausea at 8 days.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Dexamethasone compared to placebo for adult patients with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting (not related to chemo‐ or radiotherapy, or surgery)

Dexamethasone compared to placebo for adult patients with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting not related to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery

Patient or population: participants with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting not related to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery
Settings: inpatients and outpatients
Intervention: dexamethasone

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Dexamethasone

Nausea at 8 days
Scale from: 0 to 10; lower score = less nausea.

The mean difference in the intensity of nausea at day 8 in the control groups ranged from ‐0.45 to 5.7

The mean difference in the intensity of nausea at day 8 in the intervention groups was, on average, ‐0.48 (from ‐1.53 lower to 0.57 higher)

127
(2 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1

Number of vomiting episodes

No data

No data

Adverse events

No data

No data

Quality of life

No data

No data

Patient satisfaction

No data

No data

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 We downgraded the quality of evidence by three levels due to imprecision, likely selection bias, attrition bias, and the small number of participants in the included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Dexamethasone compared to placebo for adult patients with advanced cancer who have nausea and vomiting (not related to chemo‐ or radiotherapy, or surgery)
Table 1. Primary sites of disease

Breast

Head, neck, and lung

Gastrointestinal

Gynaecological

Genitourinary

Sarcoma

Other

Bruera 2004

x

x

x

x

x

x

Mystakidou 1998

x

x

x

x

Yennurajalingam 2013

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Primary sites of disease
Comparison 1. Nausea

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Nausea at 8 days Show forest plot

2

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐1.53, 0.57]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Nausea