Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Administración de líquidos para la hiperbilirrubinemia neonatal no conjugada

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Al‐Masri 2012 {published data only}

Al‐Masri H. In healthy baby with severe jaundice do we need to give fluid supplementation during phototherapy?. Sudan Medical Journal 2012;48(3):176‐80. CENTRAL

Boo 2002 {published data only}

Boo NY, Lee HT. Randomized controlled trial of oral versus intravenous fluid supplementation on serum bilirubin level during phototherapy of term infants with severe hyperbilirubinaemia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2002;38(2):151‐5. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1440‐1754.2002.00746.x; PUBMED: 12030996]CENTRAL

Easa 2013 {published data only}

Easa ZO. Effect of intravenous fluid supplementation on serum bilirubin level during conventional phototherapy of term infants with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Al‐Qadisiah Medical Journal 2013;9(15):36‐45. CENTRAL

Iranpour 2004 {published data only}

Iranpour R, Nohekhan R, Haghshenas I. Effect of intravenous fluid supplementation on serum bilirubin level in jaundiced healthy neonates during conventional phototherapy. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2004;9(4):186‐90. CENTRAL

Mehta 2005 {published data only}

Mehta S, Kumar P, Narang A. A randomized controlled trial of fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Journal of Pediatrics 2005;147(6):781‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.07.026; PUBMED: 16356431]CENTRAL

Patel 2014 {published data only}

Patel M, Munshi S, Mehariya KM. Effect of fluid supplementation in severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. International Journal of Science and Research 2014;3(12):2524‐6. [www.ijsr.net/archive/v3i12/U1VCMTQxMDc5.pdf]CENTRAL

Saeidi 2009 {published data only}

Saeidi R, Heydarian F, Fakehi V. Role of intravenous extra fluid therapy in icteric neonates receiving phototherapy. Saudi Medical Journal 2009;30(9):1176‐9. [PUBMED: 19750263]CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Al‐Mendalawi 2010 {published data only}

Al‐Mendalawi MD. Role of intravenous extra fluid therapy in icteric neonates receiving phototherapy. Saudi Medical Journal 2010;31(4):459‐60. [PUBMED: 20383431]CENTRAL

Balasubramanian 2012 {published data only}

Balasubramanian K, Kumar P, Saini SS, Attri SV, Dutta S. Isotonic versus hypotonic fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia ‐ a double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial. Acta Paediatrica 2012;101(3):236‐41. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1651‐2227.2011.02508.x; PUBMED: 22040311]CENTRAL

Barone 2011 {published data only}

Barone G, Giordano L, Zecca C, Priolo F, Zecca E, Maggio L. Proactive feeding regimen in preterm SGA infants: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Maternal‐fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2011;24(Suppl 1):168. [DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.607964]CENTRAL

Brans 1987 {published data only}

Brans YW, Ritter DA, Kenny JD. Influence of intravenous fat emulsion on serum bilirubin in very low birthweight neonates. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1987;62(2):156‐60. [PUBMED: 3103546]CENTRAL

Brown 1989 {published data only}

Brown MR, Thunberg BJ, Golub L, Maniscalco W, Cox C, Shapiro DL. Decreased cholestasis with enteral instead of intravenous protein in the very low‐birth‐weight infant. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 1989;9(1):21‐7. [PUBMED: 2506323]CENTRAL

Carvalho 1981 {published data only}

Carvalho M, Hall M, Harvey D. Effects of water supplementation on physiological jaundice in breast fed babies. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1981;56(7):568‐9. [PUBMED: 7271293]CENTRAL

Dunn 1988 {published data only}

Dunn L, Hulman S, Weiner J, Kliegman R. Beneficial effects of early hypocaloric enteral feeding on neonatal gastrointestinal function: preliminary report of a randomized trial. Journal of Pediatrics 1988;112(4):622‐9. [PUBMED: 2895173]CENTRAL

Gourley 1999 {published data only}

Gourley GR, Kreamer B, Cohnen M, Kosorok MR. Neonatal jaundice and diet. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 1999;153(2):184‐8. [PUBMED: 9988249]CENTRAL

Kavvadia 2000 {published data only}

Kavvadia V, Greenough A, Dimitriou G, Forsling ML. Randomized trial of two levels of fluid input in the perinatal period ‐ effect on fluid balance, electrolyte and metabolic disturbances in ventilated VLBW infants. Acta Paediatrica 2000;89(2):237‐41. [PUBMED: 10709897]CENTRAL

Maisels 1994 {published data only}

Maisels MJ, Vain N, Acquavita AM, de Blanco NV, Cohen A, DiGregorio J. The effect of breast‐feeding frequency on serum bilirubin levels. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;170(3):880‐3. [PUBMED: 8141220]CENTRAL

Makay 2007 {published data only}

Makay B, Duman N, Ozer E, Kumral A, Yesilirmak D, Ozkan H. Randomized, controlled trial of early intravenous nutrition for prevention of neonatal jaundice in term and near‐term neonates. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2007;44(3):354‐8. [DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31802b31f2]CENTRAL

Martinez 1993 {published data only}

Martinez JC, Maisels MJ, Otheguy L, Garcia H, Savorani M, Mogni B, et al. Management of severe hyperbilirubinemia in fullterm newborns ‐ a controlled trial of 4 interventions. Pediatric Research 1993;33(6):662. [DOI: 10.1203/00006450‐199306000‐00042]CENTRAL

Nicoll 1982 {published data only}

Nicoll A, Ginsburg R, Tripp JH. Supplementary feeding and jaundice in newborns. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1982;71(5):759‐61. [PUBMED: 6897478]CENTRAL

Rosegger 1986 {published data only}

Rosegger H. Maltodextrin in a 13% solution as a supplement in the first 4 days of life in breast‐fed mature newborn infants. Effect on drinking behavior, weight curve, blood picture, blood glucose and bilirubin. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 1986;98(10):310‐5. [PUBMED: 3727591]CENTRAL

Wennberg 1966 {published data only}

Wennberg RP, Schwartz R, Sweet AY. Early versus delayed feeding of low birth weight infants: effects on physiologic jaundice. Journal of Pediatrics 1966;68(6):860‐6. [PUBMED: 5949016]CENTRAL

References to studies awaiting assessment

Demirsoy 2011 {published data only}

Demirsoy U, Nalbantoğlu B, Nalbantoğlu A, Cakan M, Say A. Effect of fluid supplementation on serum bilirubin level during phototherapy of exclusively breastfed term Infants with hyperbilirubinemia. Breastfeeding Medicine 2011 Nov 2 [Epub ahead of print]:10.1089/bfm.2011.0085. [DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2011.0085; PUBMED: 22047110]CENTRAL

IRCT2013022711145N5 {published data only}

IRCT2013022711145N5. Effect of intravenous fluid therapy on serum level of bilirubin in icteric neonates during phototherapy. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT2013022711145N5 Date first received: 26 March 2013. CENTRAL

NCT01550627 {published data only}

NCT01550627. Effect of intravenous fluid supplementation on serum bilirubin and cardiorespiratory parameters in preterm infants during phototherapy. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01550627 Date first received: 7 February 2012. CENTRAL

AAP 2004

American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2004;114(1):297‐316. [PUBMED: 15231951]

Ahlfors 2010

Ahlfors CE. Predicting bilirubin neurotoxicity in jaundiced newborns. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 2010;22(2):129‐33. [DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328336eb28; PUBMED: 20125026]

Albers 2007

Albers CA, Grieve AJ. Test Review: Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development– Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 2007;25(2):180‐98. [DOI: 10.1177/0734282906297199]

Amin 2011

Amin SB, Lamola AA. Newborn jaundice technologies: unbound bilirubin and bilirubin binding capacity in neonates. Seminars in Perinatology 2011;35(3):134‐40. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.007; PUBMED: 21641486]

Barría 2007

Barría RM, Lorca P, Muñoz S. Randomized controlled trial of vascular access in newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 2007;36(5):450‐6. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1552‐6909.2007.00171.x; PUBMED: 17880315]

Bell 1978

Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Annals of Surgery 1978;187(1):1‐7. [PUBMED: 413500]

Bell 2014

Bell EF, Acarregui MJ. Restricted versus liberal water intake for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000503.pub3]

Bhola 2015

Bhola K, Foster JP, Osborn DA. Chest shielding for prevention of a haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants receiving phototherapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009816.pub2]

Bhutani 1999

Bhutani VK, Johnson L, Sivieri EM. Predictive ability of a predischarge hour‐specific serum bilirubin for subsequent significant hyperbilirubinemia in healthy term and near‐term newborns. Pediatrics 1999;103(1):6‐14. [PUBMED: 9917432]

Bhutani 2009

Bhutani VK, Johnson L. Kernicterus in the 21st century: frequently asked questions. Journal of Perinatology 2009;29(Suppl 1):S20‐4. [DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.212; PUBMED: 19177056]

Boskabadi 2010

Boskabadi H, Maamouri G, Ebrahimi M, Ghayour‐Mobarhan M, Esmaeily H, Sahebkar A, et al. Neonatal hypernatremia and dehydration in infants receiving inadequate breastfeeding. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;19(3):301‐7. [PUBMED: 20805072]

Brown 1986

Brown KH, Creed de Kanashiro H, del Aguila R, Lopez de Romana G, Black RE. Milk consumption and hydration status of exclusively breast‐fed infants in a warm climate. Journal of Pediatrics 1986;108(5 Pt 1):677‐80. [PUBMED: 3701512]

Buiter 2008

Buiter HD, Dijkstra SS, Oude Elferink RF, Bijster P, Woltil HA, Verkade HJ. Neonatal jaundice and stool production in breast‐ or formula‐fed term infants. European Journal of Pediatrics 2008;167(5):501‐7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00431‐007‐0533‐9; PUBMED: 17619902]

Campbell 2001

Campbell MK, Mollison J, Grimshaw JM. Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(3):391‐9. [PUBMED: 11180309]

Chang 2012

Chang RJ, Chou HC, Chang YH, Chen MH, Chen CY, Hsieh WS, et al. Weight loss percentage prediction of subsequent neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in exclusively breastfed neonates. Pediatrics and Neonatology 2012;53(1):41‐4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.11.008; PUBMED: 22348493]

Davanzo 2013

Davanzo R, Cannioto Z, Ronfani L, Monasta L, Demarini S. Breastfeeding and neonatal weight loss in healthy term infants. Journal of Human Lactation 2013;29(1):45‐53. [DOI: 10.1177/0890334412444005; PUBMED: 22554678]

Dennery 2001

Dennery PA, Seidman DS, Stevenson DK. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344(8):581‐90. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200102223440807; PUBMED: 11207355]

Dewey 2003

Dewey KG, Nommsen‐Rivers LA, Heinig MJ, Cohen RJ. Risk factors for suboptimal infant breastfeeding behavior, delayed onset of lactation, and excess neonatal weight loss. Pediatrics 2003;112(3 Pt 1):607‐19. [PUBMED: 12949292]

Geiger 2001

Geiger AM, Petitti DB, Yao JF. Rehospitalisation for neonatal jaundice: risk factors and outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2001;15(4):352‐8. [PUBMED: 11703683]

Gerkensmeyer 2005

Gerkensmeyer JE, Austin JK. Development and testing of a scale measuring parent satisfaction with staff interactions. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2005;32(1):61‐73. [PUBMED: 15632798]

Gholitabar 2012

Gholitabar M, McGuire H, Rennie J, Manning D, Lai R. Clofibrate in combination with phototherapy for unconjugated neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009017.pub2]

Gourley 2002

Gourley GR. Breast‐feeding, neonatal jaundice and kernicterus. Seminars in Neonatology 2002;7(2):135‐41. [PUBMED: 12208098]

Grünhagen 2002

Grünhagen DJ, de Boer MG, de Beaufort AJ, Walther FJ. Transepidermal water loss during halogen spotlight phototherapy in preterm infants. Pediatric Research 2002;51(3):402‐5. [DOI: 10.1203/00006450‐200203000‐00022; PUBMED: 11861949]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Huang 2012

Huang HC, Yang HI, Chang YH, Chang RJ, Chen MH, Chen CY, et al. Model to predict hyperbilirubinemia in healthy term and near‐term newborns with exclusive breast feeding. Pediatrics and Neonatology 2012;53(6):354‐8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.08.012; PUBMED: 23276439]

Itoh 2001

Itoh S, Kondo M, Kusaka T, Isobe K, Onishi S. Differences in transcutaneous bilirubin readings in Japanese term infants according to feeding method. Pediatrics International 2001;43(1):12‐5. [PUBMED: 11207992]

Johnson 2002

Johnson LH, Bhutani VK, Brown AK. System‐based approach to management of neonatal jaundice and prevention of kernicterus. Journal of Pediatrics 2002;140(4):396‐403. [DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2002.123098; PUBMED: 12006952]

Johnson 2009

Johnson L, Bhutani VK, Karp K, Sivieri EM, Shapiro SM. Clinical report from the pilot USA Kernicterus Registry (1992 to 2004). Journal of Perinatology 2009;29(Suppl 1):S25‐45. [DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.211; PUBMED: 19177057]

Kjartansson 1992

Kjartansson S, Hammarlund K, Sedin G. Insensible water loss from the skin during phototherapy in term and preterm infants. Acta Paediatrica 1992;81(10):764‐8. [PUBMED: 1421879]

Kumar 2011

Kumar P, Chawla D, Deorari A. Light‐emitting diode phototherapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007969.pub2]

Maayan‐Metzger 2001

Maayan‐Metzger A, Yosipovitch G, Hadad E, Sirota L. Transepidermal water loss and skin hydration in preterm infants during phototherapy. American Journal of Perinatology 2001;18(7):393‐6. [DOI: 10.1055/s‐2001‐18698; PUBMED: 11731893]

Maisels 1986

Maisels MJ, Gifford K. Normal serum bilirubin levels in the newborn and the effect of breast‐feeding. Pediatrics 1986;78(5):837‐43. [PUBMED: 3763296]

Malwade 2014

Malwade US, Jardine LA. Home‐ versus hospital‐based phototherapy for the treatment of non‐haemolytic jaundice in infants at more than 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010212.pub2]

Manning 2007

Manning D, Todd P, Maxwell M, Jane Platt M. Prospective surveillance study of severe hyperbilirubinaemia in the newborn in the UK and Ireland. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92(5):F342‐6. [DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.105361; PUBMED: 17074786]

Mills 2001

Mills JF, Tudehope D. Fibreoptic phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002060]

Moritz 2004

Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Hospital‐acquired hyponatremia: why are there still deaths?. Pediatrics 2004;113(5):1395‐6. [PUBMED: 15121959]

Northway 1967

Northway WH, Rosan RC, Porter DY. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline‐membrane disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. New England Journal of Medicine 1967;276(7):357‐68. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196702162760701; PUBMED: 5334613]

Oddie 2001

Oddie S, Richmond S, Coulthard M. Hypernatraemic dehydration and breast feeding: a population study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2001;85(4):318‐20. [PUBMED: 11567942]

Okwundu 2012

Okwundu CI, Okoromah CA, Shah PS. Prophylactic phototherapy for preventing jaundice in preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007966.pub2]

Onyango 2009

Onyango AB, Suresh G, Were F. Intermittent phototherapy versus continuous phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008168]

Palisano 2008

Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston MH. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 2008;50(10):744‐50. [10.1111/j.1469‐8749.2008.03089.x; PUBMED: 18834387]

Patole 2005

Patole S. Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review. Journal of Maternal‐fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2005;18(1):67‐76. [DOI: 10.1080/14767050500127724; PUBMED: 16105795]

Preutthipan 1993

Preutthipan A, Siripoonya P, Ruangkanchanasetr S. Serum bilirubin levels in breast‐fed vs formula‐fed infants during the first 3‐5 days of life. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 1993;76(4):217‐21. [PUBMED: 8113642]

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Rosenbaum 2007

Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Supplement 2007;109:8‐14. [PUBMED: 17370477]

Rubaltelli 1993

Rubaltelli FF. Unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin pigments during perinatal development. IV. The influence of breast‐feeding on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Biology of the Neonate 1993;64(2‐3):104‐9. [PUBMED: 8260541]

Schünemann 2013

Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE Working Group. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Available from gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.htmlUpdated October 2013.

Seidman 1995

Seidman DS, Stevenson DK, Ergaz Z, Gale R. Hospital readmission due to neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics 1995;96(4 Pt 1):727‐9. [PUBMED: 7567338]

Shennan 1988

Shennan A, Dunn M, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins E. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics 1988;82(4):527‐32. [PUBMED: 3174313]

Springer 2001

Springer S, Soll R. High vs low dose conventional phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003308]

Srinivasjois 2011

Srinivasjois R, Sharma A, Shah P, Kava M. Effect of induction of meconium evacuation using per rectal laxatives on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in term infants: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences 2011;65(7):278‐85. [DOI: 10.4103/0019‐5359.107388; PUBMED: 23422701]

Stallard 1996

Stallard P. Validity and reliability of the Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1996;35(Pt 2):311‐8. [PUBMED: 8773805]

Suresh 2003

Suresh G, Martin CL, Soll R. Metalloporphyrins for treatment of unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004207]

Tagalakis 2002

Tagalakis V, Kahn SR, Libman M, Blostein M. The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis: a critical review. American Journal of Medicine 2002;113(2):146‐51. [PUBMED: 12133753]

Thomas 2007

Thomas JT, Muller P, Wilkinson CS. Antenatal phenobarbital for reducing neonatal jaundice after red cell isoimmunization. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005541.pub2]

Trikalinos 2009

Trikalinos TA, Chung M, Lau J, Ip S. Systematic review of screening for bilirubin encephalopathy in neonates. Pediatrics 2009;124(4):1162‐71. [DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008‐3545; PUBMED: 19786450]

Tudehope 1991

Tudehope D, Bayley G, Munro D, Townsend S. Breast feeding practices and severe hyperbilirubinaemia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 1991;27(4):240‐4. [PUBMED: 1958424]

Unal 2008

Unal S, Arhan E, Kara N, Uncu N, Aliefendioglu D. Breast‐feeding‐associated hypernatremia: retrospective analysis of 169 term newborns. Pediatrics International 2008;50(1):29‐34. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1442‐200X.2007.02507.x; PUBMED: 18279201]

Vohr 2012

Vohr BR, Stephens BE, Higgins RD, Bann CM, Hintz SR, Das A, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics 2012;161(2):222‐8.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.057; PUBMED: 22421261 ]

Walsh 1986

Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatric Clinics of North America 1986;33(1):179‐201. [PUBMED: 3081865]

Walsh 2003

Walsh MC, Wilson‐Costello D, Zadell A, Newman N, Fanaroff A. Safety, reliability, and validity of a physiologic definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Journal of Perinatology 2003;23(6):451‐6. [DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210963; PUBMED: 13679930]

Watchko 2013

Watchko JF, Tiribelli C. Bilirubin‐induced neurologic damage ‐ mechanisms and management approaches. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;369(21):2021‐30. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1308124; PUBMED: 24256380]

Wu 2012

Wu J, Mu D. Vascular catheter‐related complications in newborns. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2012;48(2):E91‐5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1440‐1754.2010.01934.x; PUBMED: 21199061]

Yang 2013

Yang WC, Zhao LL, Li YC, Chen CH, Chang YJ, Fu YC, et al. Bodyweight loss in predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia 72 hours after birth in term newborn infants. BMC Pediatrics 2013;13:145. [DOI: 10.1186/1471‐2431‐13‐145; PUBMED: 24053490]

Yu 2010

Yu Z, Han S, Guo X, Gao C, Ji C. Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of neonatal jaundice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008434]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Al‐Masri 2012

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation:

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3220 ± 1370 g;

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 39.1 ± 4.7 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 45.5 ± 9.3 hours;

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 316.35 ± 65.32 μmol/L.

No fluid supplementation:

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3150 ± 1230 g;

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 38.8 ± 4.5 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 47.2 ± 8.6 hours;

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 312.93 ± 58.31 μmol/L.

Inclusion criteria: healthy term breastfed infants with severe hyperbilirubinaemia.

Exclusion criteria: "We excluded haemolytic disease (ABO or Rh incompatibility and a positive Coomb's test), G6PD deficiency, direct hyperbilirubinaemia, infection, dehydration, and prolonged jaundice persisting beyond 14 days of life."

Pretreatment: "No major differences between the two groups."

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation:

  • "In addition to enteral feeding (milk‐fed), patients received IV fluid supplementation. The amount of extra fluid which was given to the supplemented group was 20% of the maintenance. The daily maintenance fluid level considered 80 mL/kg on day 2, 100 mL/kg on day 3 and 120 mL/kg on day 4, 140 mL/kg on day 5, 150 mL on day 6, 160 mL on day 7 and thereafter. The extra fluids were given as intravenous 10% dextrose in the second day of life, 1/5 normal saline 10% dextrose in day 3 of life and thereafter."

No fluid supplementation:

  • breastfed or formula‐fed on‐demand.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (criteria not stated)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

Identification

Sponsorship source: none stated.

Country: Jordan.

Setting: NICU in 2 medical centres.

Comments: study conducted between September 2008 and October 2009.

Author's name: Hazem A Al‐Masri.

Institution: Royal Medical Services.

Email: [email protected].

Address: Department of Pediatrics, Royal Medical Services, Jordan.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Unclear risk

Quote: "Infants were divided randomly into two groups."

Authors did not state methods of sequence generation as they only described in a simple statement that "infants were divided randomly..."

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

No statements on methods of randomisation or party involved sequence generation and allocation (or both) to enable an assessment of whether the 2 steps were performed independently from each other.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

Not stated if blinding occurred but due to nature of intervention (IV drip) as compared to oral feeding only in control group, it is highly unlikely that the researchers were blinded.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not stated if the laboratory staff knew group that participants were allocated to.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

Results for all 40 infants in each group analysed and presented in Table 2.

Selective outcome reporting

Low risk

Major outcomes specified in methods, namely serum bilirubin at different time points and number of infants who required exchange transfusion reported in sufficient detail in results.

Selective outcome reporting

Low risk

Major outcomes specified in methods, namely serum bilirubin at different time points and number of infants who required exchange transfusion reported in sufficient detail in results.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Boo 2002

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation:

  • birthweight (mean ± SD): 3147 ± 512 g;

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 39.4 ± 0.9 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 5.2 ± 2.0 days;

  • spontaneous vestex delivery (no (%)): 20 (74.1%)

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 386 ± 60 μmol/L.

Oral fluid supplementation:

  • birthweight (mean ± SD): 3003 ± 321 g;

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 39.3 ± 1.0 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 6.4 ± 1.8 days;

  • spontaneous vestex delivery (no (%)): 20 (74.1%)

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 369 ± 72 μmol/L.

Inclusion criteria: healthy term infants (≥ 37 weeks' gestation) admitted to the NICU with TSB level ≥ 300 μmol/L and conjugated serum bilirubin levels ≤ 15% of the TSB.

Exclusion criteria: unwell infants (e.g. septicaemia, feed intolerance, kernicterus), major congenital malformation, conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia > 15% of TSB levels, or prolonged jaundice persisting beyond 14 days of life.

Pretreatment: no significant differences between groups in mean birth weight, mean gestational age, ethnic distribution, gender distribution, places of birth, modes of delivery, and types of feeding. No significant differences in proportion with birth trauma, ABO incompatibility, abnormal blood film, G6PD deficiency, herbal intake for breastfeeding mothers, and clinical dehydration. Mean total indirect serum bilirubin on admission were not significantly different. The infants in the enteral group were significantly older on admission than those in IV group (P = 0.02).

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation:

  • standard fluid protocol: all infants received a daily maintenance fluid level of 90 mL/kg on day 2, 120 mL/kg on day 3, and 150 mL/kg from day 4 of life onwards;

  • additional fluid: also given an additional 10% of their respective total daily fluid requirement to compensate for fluid loss associated with intensive phototherapy. For infants with dehydration, volume of fluid deficit was replaced over 12 hours, in addition to their maintenance and supplemental fluid;

  • methods of administration: formula‐fed infants allocated to IV group given half of their total fluid volume as per protocol via 8 divided formula feeds (3 hourly), while the remaining half of the total fluid was given via IV infusion with 1/5 normal saline and 5% dextrose infusion over 24 hours;

  • duration of intervention: all infants received IV fluid infusion for 24 hours, after which they reverted to their usual feeding regimen as before enrolment.

Oral fluid supplementation:

  • standard fluid protocol: all infants received daily maintenance fluid level of 90 mL/kg on day 2, 120 mL/kg on day 3, and 150 mL/kg from day 4 of life onwards;

  • additional fluid: also given an additional 10% of their respective total daily fluid requirement to compensate for fluid loss associated with intensive phototherapy. For infants with dehydration, volume of fluid deficit was replaced over 12 hours, in addition to their maintenance and supplemental fluid;

  • methods of administration: infants kept on their feeding type (breast, formula, or mixed) as before enrolment. Once enrolled, formula‐fed infants were given their total daily fluid volume as per protocol in 8 divided doses (3 hourly). Breastfed infants received half of the total volume of fluid as per protocol in the form of formula milk at 3‐hourly intervals, while being allowed to continue breastfeeding on‐demand;

  • duration of intervention: all infants received the stipulated enteral fluid regimen for 24 hours, after which they were reverted to their usual feeding regimen as before enrolment.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Rate of decrease of serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L/hour.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: change from baseline.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (when the serum bilirubin level remained > 340 µmol/L after commencement of phototherapy)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

Number of infants with vomiting

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

Number of infants with abdominal distension

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

Identification

Sponsorship source: not stated.

Country: Malaysia.

Setting: NICU of a university hospital.

Comments: study conducted between 1 October 1999 and 30 September 2000.

Author's name: Boo NY.

Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Email: [email protected].

Address: Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.

Notes

Rate of decrease in bilirubin reported was indirect and not TSB.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Unclear risk

Quote: "assignment into groups were based on information previously inserted randomly into sealed envelopes, which were then numbered sequentially."

Unclear from the statements what method was used to generate the random sequence.

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

Quote: "Assignment into groups was based on information previously inserted randomly into sealed envelopes, which were then numbered sequentially."

Not stated if envelopes used were opaque (therefore, the contents will not be visible) although they were sealed and numbered sequentially.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

Although not clearly stated in paper, blinding appeared highly unlikely as the way of administering fluid differed between the 2 groups, 1 receiving IV supplementation while another receiving enteral supplementation.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Low risk

Authors stated that the laboratory technicians had no knowledge of which fluid regimen was given to which infant.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

All 54 randomised infants were included in analyses.

Selective outcome reporting

Low risk

Appeared that all major outcomes as specified in the methods were reported in sufficient detail in the results. We were unable to obtain trial protocol to assess whether there were any further outcomes that were not reported.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Easa 2013

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation:

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 39.03 ± 0.64 weeks;

  • age at admission (mean ± SD): 7.31 ± 1.69 days;

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3.10 ± 0.14 kg;

  • number of boys (%): 17 (53.1%);

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 323.70 ± 29.07 μmol/L.

No fluid supplementation:

  • gestational age (mean ± SD): 38.84 ± 0.72 weeks;

  • age at admission (mean ± SD): 6.96 ± 1.39 days;

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3.09 ± 0.99 kg;

  • number of boys (%): 18 (56.2%);

  • TSB on admission (mean ± SD): 333.96 ± 18.64 μmol/L.

Inclusion criteria: delivered between 38 and 41 weeks' gestation following an uneventful pregnancy with TSB > 308 μmol/L (18 mg/dL) to < 375 μmol/L (22 mg/dL).

Exclusion criteria: major congenital malformation, haemolytic disease (Rh or ABO incompatibility and a positive Coombs' test), infection (congenital or acquired), G6PD deficiency, dehydration, conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia > 15% of TSB levels, prolonged jaundice persisting beyond 14 days of life.

Pretreatment: no significant differences between groups noted.

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation:

  • in addition to breast or formula feeding, received IV fluid supplementation. Received an additional 25% of their maintenance fluid requirement. Daily maintenance fluid level set at 80 mL/kg on day 2, 100 mL/kg on day 3, and 150 mL/kg on day 4 and thereafter. Supplementary fluid given as continuous IV 1/5 normal saline and 5% dextrose.

No fluid supplementation:

  • breastfed or formula‐fed (unclear exclusive or mixed) with no IV or oral fluid supplementation.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (criteria not stated)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

Identification

Sponsorship source: none stated.

Country: Iraq.

Setting: neonatal unit of a teaching hospital.

Comments: study conducted from 2 January 2010 to 31 December 2010.

Author's name: Easa ZO.

Institution: author's affiliation not stated in paper.

Email: not provided in paper.

Address: not provided in paper.

Notes

Interventions: text under Methods stated that, "neonates were assigned randomly to two groups, either the breast‐fed or formula‐fed with IV fluid (non‐supplemented group; N=32), or breast‐fed or formula fed in addition to IV fluid (supplemented group; N=32)". Based on abstract and whole manuscript, review author believed that there was a typographical error where the statement should have READ (mistake corrected in bold) "neonates were assigned randomly to two groups, either the breast‐fed or formula‐fed WITHOUT IV fluid (non‐supplemented group; N=32), or breast‐fed or formula fed in addition to IV fluid (supplemented group; N=32)."

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Unclear risk

Quote: "assigned randomly to two groups."

Unclear if allocation sequence was genuinely randomised as authors only stated that "neonates were assigned randomly to two groups."

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

No information on how and where randomisation was performed to enable an assessment of whether random sequence was generated independently from allocation.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

No mention of blinding in study. As intervention group received IV drip compared to control group (no IV drip), it is highly unlikely that the research personnel were blinded to intervention.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not stated if laboratory personnel who tested outcome measures (serum bilirubin) were blinded to the participant's allocation to either intervention or control.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

All 64 infants initially randomised were analysed.

Selective outcome reporting

Low risk

Main outcomes which researchers stated in methodology (serum bilirubin levels) were presented adequately in mean and SD for an appropriate length of time (while infants still receiving phototherapy until TSB declined to < 14 mg/dL). Numbers of infants requiring exchange transfusion also described.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Iranpour 2004

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation in addition to breastfeeding on‐demand:

  • birthweight (mean ± SD): 3321 ± 514 g;

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3211 ± 492 g;

  • gestation (mean ± SD): 39 ± 1.01 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 7.4 ± 3.33 days;

  • number of boys (%): 13 (43.3%);

  • number of girls (%): 17 (56.7%);

  • number with vaginal delivery (%): 18 (60%);

  • number with Caesarean delivery (%): 12 (40%).

Breastfeeding on‐demand without fluid supplementation:

  • birthweight (mean ± SD): 3258 ± 502 g;

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 3176 ± 482 g;

  • gestation (mean ± SD): 38.9 ± 0.93 weeks;

  • age on admission (mean ± SD): 8.8 ± 3.19 days;

  • number of boys (%): 18 (60%);

  • number of girls (%): 12 (40%);

  • number with vaginal delivery (%): 16 (53.3%);

  • number with Caesarean delivery (%): 14 (46.7%).

Inclusion criteria: "These neonates were all Iranian race, healthy, breast‐fed, delivered between 38 and 41 weeks of gestation, following an uneventful pregnancy and had a total serum bilirubin (TSB) between 17 and 24.9 mg/dl (291 to 426 μmol/L)."

Exclusion criteria: major congenital malformation, haemolytic disease (Rh or ABO incompatibility and a positive Coombs' test), infection (congenital or acquired), G6PD deficiency, dehydration, conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia > 15% of the TSB levels, and prolonged jaundice persisting beyond 14 days of life.

Pretreatment: no statistical differences in baseline TSB at time of enrolment between groups (P = 0.17).

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation in addition to breastfeeding on‐demand:

  • standard fluid protocol: daily maintenance fluid regimen: day 2: 80 mL/kg; day 3: 120 mL/kg; day 4 and thereafter: 150 mL/kg;

  • additional fluid: additional 25% of their calculated maintenance fluid volume in addition to breastfeeding on‐demand;

  • methods of administration: 1/5 normal saline and 5% dextrose infusion via a peripheral vein;

  • duration: 24 hours.

Breastfeeding on‐demand without fluid supplementation:

  • standard fluid protocol: daily maintenance fluid regimen: day 2: 80 mL/kg; day 3: 120 mL/kg; day 4 and thereafter: 150 mL/kg;

  • additional fluid: no additional fluid on top of breastfeeding on‐demand;

  • methods of administration: breastfeeding on‐demand;

  • duration: not applicable.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (criteria not stated)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

Duration of phototherapy

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: hours.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Rate of decrease in serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L/hour.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: change from baseline.

Identification

Sponsorship source: no information provided.

Country: Iran.

Setting: NICU.

Comments: article identified via the reference list of an included article (Easa 2013). Study conducted between March and October 2003.

Author's name: Iranpour R.

Institution: Department of Pediatrics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Email: not provided.

Address: Correspondence to: Dr Iraj Haghshenas, Pediatric Department, Al‐Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Unclear risk

Sequence generation not described as there was only a simple statement that, "neonates were assigned randomly" so it is unclear if allocation sequence was genuinely randomised.

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

No information given to enable an assessment of whether random sequence was generated independently from allocation.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

Although not clearly stated, blinding appeared highly unlikely as 1 group received IV fluid while the other did not.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No mention if laboratory personnel who measured serum bilirubin levels were blinded to allocation received.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

All 60 infants initially randomised were included in analyses.

Selective outcome reporting

High risk

Authors reported only serum bilirubin at different time points. Key clinical outcomes, such as infants with symptoms of bilirubin encephalopathy or kernicterus, infants who required exchange transfusion, or infants who developed adverse effects from IV infusion such as phlebitis were not reported.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Mehta 2005

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

Fluid supplementation:

  • gestation (mean ± SD): 37.5 ± 0.8 weeks;

  • birth weight (mean ± SD): 2851 ± 473 g;

  • cumulative weight loss (mean ± SD): 4.8 ± 3.2%;

  • number of boys (%): 29 (78%);

  • TSB at inclusion (mean ± SD): 350 ± 31 μmol/L;

  • proportion of infants with exclusive breastfeeding (%): 32 (86%).

No fluid supplementation:

  • gestation (mean ± SD): 37.8 ± 1.0 weeks;

  • birth weight (mean ± SD): 3022 ± 463 g;

  • cumulative weight loss (mean ± SD): 4.2 ± 3.0%;

  • number of boys (%): 23 (62%);

  • TSB at inclusion (mean ± SD): 349 ± 32 μmol/L;

  • proportion of infants with exclusive breastfeeding (%): 28 (76%).

Inclusion criteria: term (≥ 37 weeks' gestation) neonates presenting with severe non‐haemolytic hyperbilirubinemia (TSB > 308 mmol/L (18 mg/dL).

Exclusion criteria: infants with TSB > 427 mmol/L (25 mg/dL), acute bilirubin encephalopathy (kernicterus), evidence of haemolysis, obvious signs of dehydration (i.e. sunken fontanel, reduced skin turgor, dry mucosa, tachycardia, delayed capillary refill, excessive weight loss), or major congenital malformations, and receiving IV fluids for any reason.

Pretreatment: no major differences between groups in baseline characteristics.

Interventions

Fluid supplementation:

  • IV fluid supplementation with 1/5 saline in 5% dextrose for 8 hours. Volume of supplement included a presumed deficit of 50 mL/kg (equivalent to mild dehydration); half of daily maintenance requirements for an 8‐hour period, in accordance with standard norms; and an extra 20 mL/kg/day as a phototherapy allowance. In addition, infant was allowed breast/formula feeds as given before entry into study. At end of 8‐hour period, hydration status reassessed and IV fluids discontinued. Subsequently, infant continued breast/formula feeds as before and offered 30 mL/kg/day extra oral feeds (expressed breast milk or formula) until discontinuation of phototherapy.

No fluid supplementation:

  • infant continued breast/formula feeds ad libitum or as given before the randomisation.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Rate of decrease of serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Unit of measure: %.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: change from baseline.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion

  • Outcome type: dichotomous ("exchange transfusion was done if at 4 hours into the study period, TSB increased by > 2 mg/dL (34mmol/L) over the value at the start of the study, or if at 8 hours into the study period, TSB remained at or above 20 mg/dL (342mmol/L)").

Duration of phototherapy

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: hours.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: number of infants.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Frequency of breastfeeding in the first 3 days of hospital stay

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported (upon request to the author for additional information).

  • Unit of measure: number of infants.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Identification

Sponsorship source: not stated.

Country: India.

Setting: tertiary level NICU.

Comments: study period: September 2003 to June 2004.

Author's name: Dr Praveen Kumar.

Institution: Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

Email: [email protected].

Address: Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Low risk

Quote: "Assignment to the various groups was based on stratified block randomisation with variable block size."

Methods of random sequence generation clearly stated.

Allocation concealment

Low risk

Researchers used serially numbered opaque envelopes to assign groups. Envelopes only opened after enrolment.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

In paragraph 2 under discussion, authors stated that, "they could not do complete blinding." It is noted that due to the study design, blinding would be impossible due to different management instituted to groups in which 1 group received IV drip in addition to oral feed as compared to the other group which only received oral feeding.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Low risk

In paragraph 2 of discussion (page 783), authors stated that, "the laboratory personnel performing the serum bilirubin and other biochemical investigations were sent coded samples and were unaware of the group allocation."

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

All 54 infants enrolled were included in analyses. Number of infants with serum bilirubin levels at 4, 8, and 24 hours were lower than number at inclusion as some infants required exchange transfusion and their serum bilirubin readings were not included.

Selective outcome reporting

Low risk

All major outcomes, including predefined primary outcomes of the number of infants receiving exchange transfusion; duration of phototherapy; % drop in serum bilirubin at 4, 8, and 24 hours of study; and number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy were reported in sufficient details.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Patel 2014

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation:

  • number of boys (%): 23 (54.76%);

  • age (mean): 5.1 days (SD not provided);

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 2.56 ± 0.14 kg;

  • serum bilirubin on admission (mean): 345.42 μmol/L (SD not provided).

No fluid supplementation:

  • number of boys (%): 22 (52.38%);

  • age (mean): 5.2 days (SD not provided);

  • weight on admission (mean ± SD): 2.55 ± 0.18 kg;

  • serum bilirubin on admission (mean): 359.1 μmol/L (SD not provided).

Inclusion criteria: term neonates, well‐hydrated, aged 2‐10 days who had indirect non‐haemolytic jaundice with serum bilirubin ≥ 308 μmol/L (18 mg/dL).

Exclusion criteria: jaundice in first day after birth, any manifestations of kernicterus, any form of haemolysis, dehydration, infants with symptoms of dehydration, congenital malformation, taking antibiotics, direct bilirubin > 15% of the total bilirubin, exchange transfusion if it was performed soon after admission (page 2525, column 1, paragraph 2).

Pretreatment: no significant differences between groups in terms of gender, age on admission, weight, and serum bilirubin on admission.

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation:

  • breast milk and extra IV fluid including normal saline at 20 mL/kg over 2‐3 hours administered through peripheral vein after admission to hospital.

No fluid supplementation:

  • breast milk only.

Outcomes

Rate of decrease of serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: partially reported.

  • Scale: μmol/L/hour.

  • Unit of measure: μmol/L/hour.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: change from baseline.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (criteria not stated)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

Duration of phototherapy

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Unit of measure: hours.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Identification

Sponsorship source: no information provided.

Country: India.

Setting: NICU of a hospital (level unclear).

Comments: conducted over 6‐month period but the authors did not state the month and year it was conducted.

Author's name: Patel M (first author).

Institution: Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India. B. J. Medical College.

Email: not provided.

Address: Department of Pediatrics, B. J. Medical College, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, 380016, Gujarat, India (address for all 3 study authors).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Low risk

Quote: "By using a random number table, simple randomisation was performed."

Methods of sequence generation clearly stated.

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

No relevant information to enable an assessment of whether allocation was performed independently from random sequence generation.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

Although not mentioned in text, it is highly unlikely that research personnel were blinded due to nature of intervention which was IV fluid compared to enteral feeding only in control group.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Not stated if laboratory personnel were blinded to the group allocation.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

All infants (42 in each group) appeared to have been analysed and their results presented.

Selective outcome reporting

High risk

Rates of decrement of bilirubin in first 6 and first 12 hours presented as means (without SD) as seen in Table 3. Anticipate difficulty obtaining this additional data from authors as corresponding author was not named and there was no email address included. Data for number of infants who required exchange transfusion were adequately reported. Several infants required exchange transfusion but, despite this, there was no report on numbers who developed bilirubin encephalopathy.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

Saeidi 2009

Methods

Study design: randomised controlled trial.

Study grouping: parallel group.

Participants

Baseline characteristics

IV fluid supplementation:

  • number of boys (%): 27 (54%);

  • number of girls (%): 23 (46%);

  • age on enrolment (mean ± SD): 7.7 ± 5.12 days;

  • birth weight (mean ± SD): 3031.4 ± 484.36 g;

  • serum bilirubin level on admission (mean): 362.52 μmol/L (SD not provided).

No fluid supplementation:

  • number of boys (%): 24 (48%);

  • number of girls (%): 26 (52%);

  • age on enrolment (mean ± SD): 7.9 ± 6.8 days;

  • birth weight (mean ± SD): 3072.0 ± 430.6 g;

  • serum bilirubin level on admission (mean): 359.1 μmol/L (SD not provided).

Inclusion criteria: term, healthy neonate, aged 2‐28 days, serum total bilirubin ≥ 308 μmol/L (18 mg/dL).

Exclusion criteria: jaundice in first day after birth, any manifestations of kernicterus, any form of haemolysis, dehydration, any congenital malformation, treatment with antibiotics, direct bilirubin > 15% of total bilirubin, exchange transfusion if performed soon after admission.

Pretreatment: no major differences in the baseline characteristics between groups.

Interventions

IV fluid supplementation:

  • breast milk and extra IV fluid including 1/5 normal saline in 5% dextrose at rate of 80 mL/kg for 2‐day‐old neonate, and an additional 10 mL/kg each day thereafter, to maximum 120 mL/kg through peripheral vein during first 24 hours after admission.

No fluid supplementation:

  • breastfeeding on‐demand.

Outcomes

Rate of decrease of serum bilirubin

  • Outcome type: continuous.

  • Reporting: partially reported.

  • Direction: higher was better.

  • Data value: change from baseline.

Number of infants who required exchange transfusion (criteria not stated)

  • Outcome type: dichotomous.

  • Reporting: fully reported.

  • Direction: lower was better.

  • Data value: endpoint.

Identification

Sponsorship source: not stated.

Country: Iran.

Setting: Paediatric ward of a hospital (level unclear).

Comments: study period: October 2007 to April 2008. Some outcome data reported in a manner that was insufficient for pooling in meta‐analysis. Awaiting reply from study authors.

Author's name: Associate Professor Farhad Heydarian.

Institution: Paediatrics Ward, Ghaem Hospital, Ahmad Abad Ave, Mashhad, Iran.

Email: [email protected].

Address: Paediatrics Ward, Ghaem Hospital, Ahmad Abad Ave, Mashhad, Iran.

Notes

Outcome 'rate of decrease in serum bilirubin' was incompletely reported, as authors only reported median with a single figure given as "confidence interval." We are awaiting further information from study authors.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Sequence generation

Low risk

Quote: "By using a random number table, simple randomisation was performed."

Allocation concealment

Unclear risk

Unclear how allocation carried out, in particular, whether allocation performed independently from sequence generation.

Blinding of participants and personnel
All outcomes

High risk

Blinding to care personnel very unlikely as 1 group of infants received additional IV fluid while another group did not.

Blinding of outcome assessors
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear whether assessors of laboratory outcomes were blinded to allocation status of infants.

Incomplete outcome data
All outcomes

Low risk

Appeared that all 100 infants randomised included in report for major outcomes of number of infants who required exchange transfusion and rate of decrease in serum bilirubin in first 24 hours.

Selective outcome reporting

High risk

The outcome 'Rate of decrease of serum bilirubin in the first 24 hours after admission' was incompletely reported, as authors only provided median figures with a single figure given for confidence interval (we are waiting study author's response to our request for these data). Study authors did not include any data on adverse events of IV fluids such as thrombophlebitis. Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy not reported.

Other sources of bias

Low risk

None identified.

G6PD: glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; SD: standard deviation; TSB: total serum bilirubin.

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Al‐Mendalawi 2010

Letter to editor commenting on findings of an included study (Saeidi 2009). Excluded on basis of study design.

Balasubramanian 2012

Evaluated 2 different types of intravenous fluid supplementation (hypotonic vs isotonic fluid), which was not within our prespecified comparison list. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Barone 2011

A randomised controlled trial that evaluated 2 different levels of fluid in small‐for‐gestational age babies. Inclusion criteria of infants did not include hyperbilirubinaemia and phototherapy. Excluded on basis of participant population.

Brans 1987

3‐arm randomised controlled trial that compared effects of 3 regimen of fat emulsion in total parenteral nutrition for preterm infants. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Brown 1989

Randomised controlled trial that compared 2 regimens of parenteral‐enteral nutrition combination for very‐low‐birth‐weight infants. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Carvalho 1981

Non‐randomised trial that compared effects of water supplementation to no supplementation on bilirubin level for breastfed infants. Excluded on basis of study design.

Dunn 1988

Randomised controlled trial that compared effects of early introduction of hypocaloric feeding versus no early feeding for preterm infants. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Gourley 1999

Comparative trial that evaluated effects of 2 different milk formulae (whey‐predominant versus casein‐hydrolysate) in newborn infants. Trial did not compare 2 different levels of fluid. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Kavvadia 2000

Randomised controlled trial that evaluated effects of 2 levels of fluid (1 starting with 60 mL/kg/day on day 1 and increasing to 150 mL/kg/day over the first week and the other receiving 20% less fluid over same period). Population enrolled were preterm infants in general and not infants with hyperbilirubinaemia or on phototherapy. Excluded on basis of participant population.

Maisels 1994

Randomised controlled trial that compared frequent vs usual on‐demand breastfeeding regimen at reducing serum bilirubin of healthy term infants. Infants were healthy at birth and not infants with hyperbilirubinaemia who were undergoing phototherapy. Excluded on basis of population.

Makay 2007

Randomised controlled trial that examined effects of early parenteral nutrition on prevention of jaundice in term and near‐term infants. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Martinez 1993

4‐arm randomised controlled trial that compared effects of 4 interventions for term newborn infants with severe hyperbilirubinaemia. Intervention involved a combination of continuing breastfeeding or starting formula feeding and starting or not starting phototherapy, and thus they were not related to fluid level. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Nicoll 1982

Survey on practice of giving supplementary feeds to newborn infants and occurrence of jaundice. Excluded on basis of study design.

Rosegger 1986

Randomised controlled trial comparing supplementation of formula or maltodextrin solution to breastfeeding term infants. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Wennberg 1966

4‐arm randomised controlled trial comparing feeding very‐low‐birth‐weight infants using 4 different feed regimens comprising different combinations of glucose solution, water, or saline and different timings of feed commencement. Excluded on basis of intervention.

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Demirsoy 2011

Methods

Single‐centre, parallel randomised controlled trial (Turkey).

Participants

250 Healthy term infants with hyperbilirubinaemia.

Interventions

Study group: intravenous fluid supplementation in addition to breastfeeding (125 infants) during phototherapy.

Control group: breastfeeding without fluid supplementation during phototherapy.

Outcomes

Mean indirect serum bilirubin level at time of admission to neonatal intensive care unit and at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after commencement of phototherapy, duration of phototherapy, duration of hospitalisation.

Notes

Insufficient information from the published abstract to merit inclusion, awaiting full‐text.

IRCT2013022711145N5

Methods

Single‐centre, parallel randomised controlled trial (Iran).

Participants

Inclusion criteria: gestational age > 38 weeks, age > 24 hours on admission, serum level of total bilirubin > 15 mg/dL, indirect hyperbilirubinaemia.

Exclusion criteria: fluid therapy required for conditions other than jaundice, preterm and low birth weight neonates, haemolytic jaundice, sepsis, prolonged jaundice.

Interventions

Study group: intravenous fluids containing dextrose 10% equal amounts of maintenance with sodium 30 mEq/L and potassium 20 mEq/L plus phototherapy.

Control group: phototherapy with no intravenous fluid.

Outcomes

Serum bilirubin level on admission and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postadmission, duration of hospitalisation.

Notes

Study completed in 2012 according to the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials. Study appeared not to have been published in full or in part according to our searches. Awaiting further information from the study author.

NCT01550627

Methods

Single‐centre, parallel randomised controlled trial (Germany).

Participants

Preterm infants < 33 weeks' gestation undergoing phototherapy for hyperbilirubinaemia.

Interventions

Study group: extra intravenous fluid intake of 20% of total fluid demand per 24 hours of saline 0.9% during each 2‐hour period of phototherapy (12 hours total per day). Extra fluid intake was interrupted during 12‐hours break of phototherapy.

Control group: previous fluid regimen, as intravenous fluid was given constantly, without a specific guideline according to extra fluid intake.

Outcomes

Highest TSB level within 1 week after the commencement of phototherapy. No other outcomes provided.

Notes

Study completed in 2009 according to the ClinicalTrials.gov. The study appeared not to have been published in full or in part according to our searches. Awaiting further information from the study author.

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy.

2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

2.1 4 hours postintervention

1

67

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐34.0 [‐52.29, ‐15.71]

2.2 6 hours postintervention

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [‐28.67, 32.07]

2.3 8 hours postintervention

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐44.0 [‐65.95, ‐22.05]

2.4 12 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.21 [‐18.45, ‐1.97]

2.5 18 hours postintervention

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.20 [‐33.70, 23.30]

2.6 24 hours postintervention

4

252

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.06 [‐11.12, 1.00]

2.7 36 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.25 [‐8.73, 0.23]

2.8 48 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.86 [‐14.15, ‐1.57]

2.9 60 hours postintervention

2

140

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.16 [‐21.25, 2.93]

2.10 72 hours postintervention

2

140

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐8.76, 6.83]

2.11 84 hours postintervention

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.40 [4.69, 10.11]

3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%).

3.1 0‐4 hours of study

1

67

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.5 [6.66, 14.34]

3.2 0‐8 hours of study

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.0 [7.49, 18.51]

3.3 0‐24 hours of study

1

48

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.0 [1.11, 14.89]

4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [‐0.21, 1.21]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

4.1 During the first 12 hours of study

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [‐0.21, 1.21]

5 Duration of phototherapy (hours) Show forest plot

3

218

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.70 [‐15.55, ‐5.85]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Duration of phototherapy (hours).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Duration of phototherapy (hours).

6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion Show forest plot

6

462

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.21, 0.71]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.

7.1 Day 1

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [‐0.62, 2.02]

7.2 Day 2

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐0.43, 2.23]

7.3 Day 3

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐0.40, 2.20]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs.

2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) Show forest plot

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐21.58, 43.58]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

2.1 4 hours postphototherapy

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐21.58, 43.58]

3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) Show forest plot

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [‐2.55, 4.15]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

3.1 During first 4 hours of admission

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [‐2.55, 4.15]

4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.12, 0.34]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting.

6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, outcome: 1.7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Duration of phototherapy (hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Duration of phototherapy (hours).

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation, Outcome 7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L).

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour).

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting.

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation, Outcome 6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intravenous fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia

Intravenous fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia

Patient or population: newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia undergoing phototherapy

Setting: neonatal intensive care unit

Intervention: intravenous fluid supplementation

Comparison: no fluid supplementation

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with no fluid supplementation

Risk with intravenous fluid supplementation

Incidence of acute bilirubin encephalopathy

Study population

Not estimable

74 (1 RCT)

Effects not estimable as there were no reported cases of bilirubin encephalopathy in either group.

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Bilirubin level (μmol/L): 4 hours postintervention

The mean serum bilirubin 4 hours postintervention was 344 μmol/L

The mean serum bilirubin 4 hours postintervention in the intervention group was 34 μmol/L lower (52.29 lower to 15.71 lower)

67
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low a,b

Proportion of infants who required exchange transfusion

Study population

RR 0.39
(0.21 to 0.71)

462
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowc,d

147 per 1000

57 per 1000
(31 to 105)

Frequency of breastfeeding per day: day 3

The mean frequency of breastfeeding per day on day 3 was 9.5 times per day

The mean frequency of breastfeeding per day on day 3 in the intervention group was 0.9 more feeds (0.4 fewer to 2.2 more)

60
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate e

Although the study had high risk of bias in blinding of personnel, breastfeeding frequency on‐demand was considered unlikely to be affected.

The study evaluated breastfeeding frequencies on days 1, 2, and 3. Data on day 3 were chosen because compared to the earlier period, it most closely reflected the breastfeeding frequency on discharge.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

a Although widely used, serum bilirubin is only a surrogate to the relevant clinical outcomes, namely, bilirubin encephalopathy or kernicterus. Quality of evidence downgraded one level on the basis of indirectness.

b There is at least one unpublished study that was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov that included similar outcomes (NCT01550627). Quality of evidence downgraded one level on the basis of suspected publication bias. This outcome was also assessed in a published study for which we are yet to acquire full‐text (Demirsoy 2011). Both of these studies are currently placed under Studies awaiting classification.

c Moderate degree of heterogeneity was present, as indicated by an I² statistic of 72%, which was mainly due to one included study with effect estimates in opposite direction to the other studies. Quality of evidence downgraded one level on the basis of inconsistency.

d There are two unpublished studies (NCT01550627; IRCT2013022711145N5) identified from ClinicalTrials.gov, and one published study that we are yet to acquire full‐text (Demirsoy 2011) that are likely to assess this outcome. All three studies are placed under Studies awaiting classification. Quality of evidence downgraded one level on the basis of suspected publication bias.

e Quality of evidence downgraded one level due to imprecision, as reflected by wide 95% CIs for the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Intravenous fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia
Summary of findings 2. Intravenous fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia

Intravenous fluid versus oral fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia

Patient or population: newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia undergoing phototherapy

Setting: neonatal intensive care unit

Intervention: intravenous fluid supplementation

Comparison: oral fluid supplementation

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with oral fluid supplementation

Risk with intravenous fluid supplementation

Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs

Study population

Not estimable

54
(1 RCT)

Not estimable as there were no cases reported in either group.

0 per 1000

0 per 1000
(0 to 0)

Bilirubin level (μmol/L): 4 hours postphototherapy

The mean serum bilirubin 4 hours postphototherapy was 332 μmol/L

The mean serum bilirubin 4 hours postphototherapy in the intervention group was 11 μmol/L higher (21.58 lower to 43.58 higher)

54
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate a

Rate of change in bilirubin (μmol/L/hour): during the first 4 hours of admission

The mean rate of decrease of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) during the first 4 hours of admission was 10.4 μmol/L/hour

The mean rate of decrease of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) during the first 4 hours of admission in the intervention group was 0.8 μmol/L/hour higher (2.55 lower to 4.15 higher)

54
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

a Although widely used, serum bilirubin is only a surrogate to the relevant clinical outcomes, namely, bilirubin encephalopathy or kernicterus. Quality of evidence downgraded one level on the basis of indirectness.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Intravenous fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia
Comparison 1. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of infants with bilirubin encephalopathy Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 4 hours postintervention

1

67

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐34.0 [‐52.29, ‐15.71]

2.2 6 hours postintervention

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [‐28.67, 32.07]

2.3 8 hours postintervention

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐44.0 [‐65.95, ‐22.05]

2.4 12 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.21 [‐18.45, ‐1.97]

2.5 18 hours postintervention

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.20 [‐33.70, 23.30]

2.6 24 hours postintervention

4

252

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.06 [‐11.12, 1.00]

2.7 36 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.25 [‐8.73, 0.23]

2.8 48 hours postintervention

3

204

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.86 [‐14.15, ‐1.57]

2.9 60 hours postintervention

2

140

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.16 [‐21.25, 2.93]

2.10 72 hours postintervention

2

140

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐8.76, 6.83]

2.11 84 hours postintervention

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.40 [4.69, 10.11]

3 Difference in serum bilirubin (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 0‐4 hours of study

1

67

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

10.5 [6.66, 14.34]

3.2 0‐8 hours of study

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.0 [7.49, 18.51]

3.3 0‐24 hours of study

1

48

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.0 [1.11, 14.89]

4 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [‐0.21, 1.21]

4.1 During the first 12 hours of study

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [‐0.21, 1.21]

5 Duration of phototherapy (hours) Show forest plot

3

218

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.70 [‐15.55, ‐5.85]

6 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion Show forest plot

6

462

Risk Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.21, 0.71]

7 Frequency of breastfeeding per day Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Day 1

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [‐0.62, 2.02]

7.2 Day 2

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐0.43, 2.23]

7.3 Day 3

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐0.40, 2.20]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation
Comparison 2. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of infants with abnormal neurological signs Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serum bilirubin (μmol/L) Show forest plot

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐21.58, 43.58]

2.1 4 hours postphototherapy

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [‐21.58, 43.58]

3 Rate of change of serum bilirubin (μmol/L/hour) Show forest plot

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [‐2.55, 4.15]

3.1 During first 4 hours of admission

1

54

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [‐2.55, 4.15]

4 Number of infants who required exchange transfusion Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.12, 0.34]

5 Number of infants with feed intolerance: vomiting Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Number of infants with feed intolerance: abdominal distension Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Intravenous (IV) fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation