Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Farmacoterapias paliativas para la disnea de la fibrosis quística

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011855.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 10 agosto 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nishant Jaiswal

    ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence‐Based Child Health, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

  • Meenu Singh

    Correspondencia a: Department of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    [email protected]

  • Amit Agarwal

    ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence‐Based Child Health, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

  • Kiran K Thumburu

    ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence‐Based Child Health, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Contributions of authors

Roles and responsibilities

TASK

WHO WILL UNDERTAKE THE TASK?

Protocol stage: draft the protocol

NJ, MS, AA, KKT

Review stage: select which trials to include (2 + 1 arbiter)

NJ, KKT, MS

Review stage: extract data from trials (2 people)

NJ, AA

Review stage: enter data into RevMan

NJ

Review stage: carry out the analysis

NJ, MS, AA, KKT

Review stage: interpret the analysis

NJ, MS, AA, KKT

Review stage: draft the final review

NJ, MS, AA, KKT

Update stage: update the review

NJ, MS, AA, KKT

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

All authors: none known.

Acknowledgements

ICMR Advanced Centre for Evidence‐based Child Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

The Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Review Group and Nikki Jahnke (Managing Editor) for helping with and co‐ordinating this review.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Apr 28

Palliative drug treatments for breathlessness in cystic fibrosis

Review

Nishant Jaiswal, Meenu Singh, Amit Agarwal, Anil Chauhan, Nikita Jaiswal

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011855.pub3

2017 Aug 10

Palliative drug treatments for breathlessness in cystic fibrosis

Review

Nishant Jaiswal, Meenu Singh, Amit Agarwal, Kiran K Thumburu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011855.pub2

2015 Sep 02

Drug treatments for breathlessness in end‐stage cystic fibrosis

Protocol

Nishant Jaiswal, Meenu Singh, Amit Agarwal, Kiran K Thumburu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011855

Differences between protocol and review

The authors have removed the term 'end‐stage' from the title of the review. While this alters the scope of the review which was originally focused on end‐stage disease, we are aware that treatments previously seen as palliative are now used earlier rather than waiting until end of life and can be used simultaneously with therapies designed to prolong life.

It was also clinically relevant to include comparisons of any pharmacological interventions to placebo, hence this possible comparison was also added as a post hoc change.

Following statistical advice, it was decided to present any results for dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio rather than the odds ratio.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.