Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

استفاده از تیم‌‌های تخصصی باز کننده عروق برای قرار دادن دستگاه و پیشگیری از شکست آن

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Boland 2003 {published data only}

Boland A, Haycox A, Bagust A, Fitzsimmons L. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of Hickman line insertions in adult cancer patients by nurses. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2003;7(36):iii, ix‐x, 1‐99. [PUBMED: 14611735]CENTRAL

Casey 2003 {published data only}

Casey J, Davies J. A nurse led central line insertion service. European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association. European Renal Care Association Journal 2003;29(4):203‐5. [PUBMED: 14748429]CENTRAL

Fong 2001 {published data only}

Fong NI, Holtzman SR, Bettmann MA, Bettis SJ. Peripherally inserted central catheters: outcome as a function of the operator. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2001;12(6):723‐9. [PUBMED: 11389224]CENTRAL

Gilbert 2016 {published data only}

Gilbert RE, Mok Q, Dwan K, Harron K, Moitt T, Millar M, et al. Impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of bloodstream infection in children (the CATCH trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387(10029):1732‐42. [PUBMED: 26946925]CENTRAL

Hammes 2015 {published data only}

Hammes M, Desai A, Pasupneti S, Kress J, Funaki B, Watson S, et al. Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis. Clinical Nephrology 2015;84(1):21‐8. [PUBMED: 25997503]CENTRAL

Hockley 2007 {published data only}

Hockley SJ, Hamilton V, Young RJ, Chapman MJ, Taylor J, Creed S, et al. Efficacy of the CathRite system to guide bedside placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: a pilot study. Critical Care and Resuscitation: Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine 2007;9(3):251‐5. [PUBMED: 17767451]CENTRAL

Huraib 1994 {published data only}

Huraib S, Askar A, Abu‐Aisha H, al‐Wakeel J. Prevalence of infection from subclavian dialysis catheters with two different postinsertion catheter cares: a randomized comparative study. Angiology 1994;45(12):1047‐51. [DOI: 10.1177/000331979404501208; PUBMED: 7985832]CENTRAL

Keohane 1983 {published data only}

Keohane PP, Jones BJ, Attrill H, Cribb A, Northover J, Frost P, et al. Effect of catheter tunnelling and a nutrition nurse on catheter sepsis during parenteral nutrition. A controlled trial. Lancet 1983;2(8364):1388‐90. [PUBMED: 6140494]CENTRAL

King 2010 {published data only}

King DS, da Cruz E, Kaufman J. A model for a nurse‐led programme of bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiology in the Young 2010;20(3):302‐7. [PUBMED: 20346200]CENTRAL

Larson 1984 {published data only}

Larson E, Hargiss C. A decentralized approach to maintenance of intravenous therapy. American Journal of Infection Control 1984;12(3):177‐86. [PUBMED: 6565469]CENTRAL

Meier 1998 {published data only}

Meier PA, Fredrickson M, Catney M, Nettleman MD. Impact of a dedicated intravenous therapy team on nosocomial bloodstream infection rates. American Journal of Infection Control 1998;26(4):388‐92. [PUBMED: 9721390]CENTRAL

Mokrzycki 2006 {published data only}

Mokrzycki MH, Zhang M, Golestaneh L, Laut J, Rosenberg SO. An interventional controlled trial comparing 2 management models for the treatment of tunneled cuffed catheter bacteremia: a collaborative team model versus usual physician‐managed care. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2006;48(4):587‐95. [PUBMED: 16997055]CENTRAL

Moretti 2005 {published data only}

Moretti EW, Ofstead CL, Kristy RM, Wetzler HP. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter‐related colonization and bacteraemia. Journal of Hospital Infection 2005;61(2):139‐45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.02.012; PUBMED: 16026898]CENTRAL

Møller 2005 {published data only}

Møller T, Borregaard N, Tvede M, Adamsen L. Patient education ‐ a strategy for prevention of infections caused by permanent central venous catheters in patients with haematological malignancies: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Hospital Infection 2005;61(4):330‐41. [PUBMED: 16005107]CENTRAL

Nehme 1980 {published data only}

Nehme AE. Nutritional support of the hospitalized patient. The team concept. JAMA 1980;243(19):1906‐8. [PUBMED: 6767864]CENTRAL

Neuman 1998 {published data only}

Neuman ML, Murphy BD, Rosen MP. Bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a cost‐ effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1998;206(2):423‐8. [PUBMED: 9457195]CENTRAL

Puri 1982 {published data only}

Puri P. Total parenteral nutrition in the newborn using peripheral veins: role of I.V. nursing team. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1982;37(10):50‐2. [DOI: 10.1055/s‐2008‐1059815; PUBMED: 6818788 ]CENTRAL

Robinson 2005 {published data only}

Robinson MK, Mogensen KM, Grudinskas GF, Kohler S, Jacobs DO. Improved care and reduced costs for patients requiring peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of bedside ultrasound and a dedicated team. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2005;29(5):374‐9. [DOI: 10.1177/0148607105029005374; PUBMED: 16107601]CENTRAL

Secola 2011 {published data only}

Secola R. Preliminary results from a randomized prospective pilot study evaluating a Central venous catheter (Cvc) team in reducing Cvc‐related bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2011;57(5):856. CENTRAL

Secola 2012 {published data only}

Secola R, Azen C, Lewis MA, Pike N, Needleman J, Sposto R, et al. A crossover randomized prospective pilot study evaluating a central venous catheter team in reducing catheter‐related bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology patients. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 2012;29(6):307‐15. [PUBMED: 23087249]CENTRAL

Sherertz 1997 {published data only}

Sherertz RJ, Stephens JL, Marosok RD, Carruth WA, Rich HA, Hampton KD, et al. The risk of peripheral vein phlebitis associated with chlorhexidine‐coated catheters: a randomized, double‐blind trial. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology 1997;18(4):230‐6. [PUBMED: 9131364]CENTRAL

Soifer 1998 {published data only}

Soifer NE, Borzak S, Edlin BR, Weinstein RA. Prevention of peripheral venous catheter complications with an intravenous therapy team: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 1998;158(5):473‐7. [PUBMED: 9508225]CENTRAL

Tadokoro 2015 {published data only}

Tadokoro T, Tokumine J, Lefor AT, Kawabata T, Yoza K, Kinjo T. The three‐step method for ultrasound‐guided pediatric internal jugular venous catheterization: a clinical trial. Journal of Anesthesia 2015;29(1):131‐3. [PUBMED: 24981562]CENTRAL

Taylor 2011 {published data only}

Taylor T, Massaro A, Williams L, Doering J, McCarter R, He J, et al. Effect of a dedicated percutaneously inserted central catheter team on neonatal catheter‐related bloodstream infection. Advances in Neonatal Care 2011;11(2):122‐8. [PUBMED: 21730901]CENTRAL

Tomford 1982 {published data only}

Tomford JW, Hershey CO. The effect of an intravenous therapy team on peripheral venous catheter associated phlebitis ‐ a controlled trial. Clinical Research 1982;30(4):770A. CENTRAL

Tomford 1984 {published data only}

Tomford JW, Hershey CO, McLaren CE, Porter DK, Cohen DI. Intravenous therapy team and peripheral venous catheter‐associated complications. A prospective controlled study. Archives of Internal Medicine 1984;144(6):1191‐4. [PUBMED: 6375611]CENTRAL

Treacy 2002 {published data only}

Treacy PJ, Snelling P, Ragg J, Carson P, O'rourke I. Impact of a multidisciplinary team approach upon patency rates of arteriovenous fistulae. Nephrology 2002;7(2):66‐71. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1440‐1797.2002.00089.x]CENTRAL

Ward 2000 {published data only}

Ward K, Strain NC, Wright C, James M, Makin AJ. A prospective economic evaluation of the cost of a catheter related sepsis: best case scenario V worst case scenario and the impact of a nutrition support team on cost savings. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2000;59(Suppl OCB):170A. CENTRAL

Garate‐Echenique 2014 {published data only}

Garate‐Echenique L, Armenteros‐Yeguas V, Tomas‐Lopez M‐A, Moraza‐Dulanto I, Miranda‐Serrano E, Pena‐Tejera C‐M. The effectiveness of a nurse‐led intravenous therapy team in terms of length of stay, venous access complications and satisfaction of patients requiring long‐term intravenous therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Vascular Access 2014;15(3):209. [DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000275]CENTRAL

ACTRN12616001675415 {published data only}

ACTRN12616001675415. Reliable Intravenous Access by Line Experts (RELIABLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial to compare peripheral venous catheter insertion by vascular access specialists with any clinician (generalist model, standard practice) on clinical and economic outcomes among medical and surgical patients. www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371162 (first received 7 November 2016). CENTRAL

Alexandrou 2012

Alexandrou E, Murgo M, Calabria E, Spencer TR, Carpen H, Brennan K, et al. Nurse‐led central venous catheter insertion ‐ procedural characteristics and outcomes of three intensive care based catheter placement services. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2012;49(2):162‐8. [PUBMED: 21944565]

Alexandrou 2014

Alexandrou E, Spencer TR, Frost SA, Mifflin N, Davidson PM, Hillman KM. Central venous catheter placement by advanced practice nurses demonstrates low procedural complication and infection rates ‐ a report from 13 years of service. Critical Care Medicine2014; Vol. 42, issue 3:536‐43. [PUBMED: 24145843]

Ayas 2007

Ayas NT, Norena M, Wong H, Chittock D, Dodek PM. Pneumothorax after insertion of central venous catheters in the intensive care unit: association with month of year and week of month. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:252‐5. [PUBMED: 17693670 ]

Barton 1998

Barton AJ, Danek G, Johns P, Coons M. Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access planning. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 1998;13(2):77‐85. [PUBMED: 9842178]

Brunelle 2003

Brunelle D. Impact of a dedicated infusion therapy team on the reduction of catheter‐related nosocomial infections. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2003;26(6):362‐6. [PUBMED: 14624176]

Camp‐Sorrell 2007

Camp‐Sorrell D. Clinical dilemmas: vascular access devices. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2007;23(3):232‐9. [PUBMED: 17693350]

Carr 2010

Carr PJ, Glynn RW, Dineen B, Kropmans TJB. A pilot intravenous cannulation team: an Irish perspective. British Journal of Nursing 2010;19(10):s19‐27. [PUBMED: 20622770]

Carr 2017

Carr PJ, Higgins NS, Cooke ML, Rippey J, Rickard CM. Tools, clinical prediction rules, and algorithms for the insertion of peripheral intravenous catheters in adult hospitalized patients: a systematic scoping review of literature. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12(10):851‐8. [DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2836; PUBMED: 28991954]

Castro‐Sánchez 2014

Castro‐Sánchez E, Charani E, Drumright LN, Sevdalis N, Shah N, Holmes AH. Fragmentation of care threatens patient safety in peripheral vascular catheter management in acute care ‐ a qualitative study. PLoS ONE 2014;9(1):1‐6. [PUBMED: 24454958]

Chopra 2013

Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet 2013;382(9889):311‐25. [PUBMED: 23697825]

Chopra 2017

Chopra V, Kuhn L, Ratz D, Shader S, Vaughn VM, Saint S, et al. Vascular access specialist training, experience, and practice in the United States: results from the national PICC1 survey. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2017;40(1):15‐25. [PUBMED: 28030479]

Covidence [Computer program]

Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence 2017. Version accessed 8 February 2017. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation.

da Silva 2010

da Silva GA, Priebe S, Dias FN. Benefits of establishing an intravenous team and the standardization of peripheral intravenous catheters. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2010;33(3):156‐60. [PUBMED: 20442599]

Davis 2016

Davis L, Owens AK, Thompson J. Defining the specialty of vascular access through consensus: shaping the future of vascular access. Journal of the Association for Vascular Access 2016;21(3):125‐30. [Embase: 20160904859]

Dougherty 2008

Dougherty L. IV therapy: recognizing the differences between infiltration and extravasation. British Journal of Nursing 2008;17(14):896‐901. [PUBMED: 18935841]

Egan 2013

Egan G, Healy D, O'Neill H, Clarke‐Moloney M, Grace PA, Walsh SR. Ultrasound guidance for difficult peripheral venous access: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Emergency Medicine Journal 2013;30(7):521‐6. [PUBMED: 22886890]

Endnote 2012 [Computer program]

Endnote. Thomson Reuters [Endnote X6]. Version X6. Thomson Reuters, 2012.

Ge 2012

Ge X, Cavallazzi R, Li C, Pan SM, Wang YW, Wang F. Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004084.pub3]

Glasziou 2014

Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014;383(9913):267‐76. [PUBMED: 24411647]

Gopal 2006

Gopal K, Fitzsimmons L, Lawrance JA. Nurse‐led central venous catheter service: Christie experience. British Journal of Radiology 2006;79(945):762‐5. [PUBMED: 16641413]

Gorski 2016

Gorski L, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, McGoldrick M, Orr M. Infusion therapy standards of practice. Journal of Infusion Nursing. 2016;39(Suppl 1):S1‐159. [ISSN 1533‐1458]

GRADEpro GDT [Computer program]

McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 8 February 2017. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.

Green 1998

Green C, Yohannan GC. Umbilical arterial and venous catheters: placement, use, and complications. Neonatal Network 1998;17(6):23‐8. [PUBMED: 9832755]

Guilbert 2008

Guilbert MC, Elkouri S, Bracco D, Corriveau MM, Beaudoin N, Dubois MJ, et al. Arterial trauma during central venous catheter insertion: case series, review and proposed algorithm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2008;48(4):918‐25. [PUBMED: 18703308]

Guyatt 2008

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924‐6. [PUBMED: 18436948]

Harnage 2012

Harnage S. Seven years of zero central‐line‐associated bloodstream infections. British Journal of Nursing 2012;21(21):S6‐12. [PUBMED: 23469515]

Heinrichs 2013

Heinrichs J, Fritze Z, Klassen T, Curtis S. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of new interventions for peripheral intravenous cannulation of children. Pediatric Emergency Care 2013;29(7):858‐66. [PUBMED: 23823270]

Helm 2015

Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint LM, Huang E. Accepted but unacceptable. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2015;38(3):189‐203. [Embase: 608443533]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Jackson 2012

Jackson A, Coop S. Zero central‐line infections in a 550‐bedded district general hospital. British Journal of Nursing 2012;21(14):S24, S26‐8. [PUBMED: 23252179]

Kelly 2009

Kelly LJ. The family of vascular access devices. Journal of Infection Prevention 2009;10:s7‐12. [DOI: 10.1177/1757177409342156]

Keogh 2014

Keogh S, Marsh N, Higgins N, Davies K, Rickard C. A time and motion study of peripheral venous catheter flushing practice using manually and prefilled flush syringes. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2014;37(2):96‐101. [PUBMED: 24583939]

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville F. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Legemaat 2015

Legemaat MM, Jongerden IP, van Rens RM, Zielman M, van den Hoogen A. Effect of a vascular access team on central line‐associated bloodstream infections in infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2015;52(5):1003‐10. [PUBMED: 25526669]

Liberati 2009

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000100. [PUBMED: 19621070]

Maki 2006

Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2006;81(9):1159‐71. [PUBMED: 16970212]

Marsh 2015

Marsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011070.pub2]

Mermel 2017

Mermel LA. Short‐term peripheral venous catheter–related bloodstream infections: a systematic review. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2017;65(10):1757‐62. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix562; PUBMED: 29020252 ]

Moureau 2012

Moureau N, Trick N, Nifong T, Perry C, Kelley C, Carrico R, et al. Vessel health and preservation (part 1): a new evidence‐based approach to vascular access selection and management. Journal of Vascular Access 2012;13(3):351‐6. [PUBMED: 22307471]

Moureau 2013

Moureau N, Lamperti M, Kelly LJ, Dawson R, Elbarbary M, van Boxtel AJH, et al. Evidence‐based consensus on the insertion of central venous access devices: definition of minimal requirements for training. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2013;110(3):347‐56. [PUBMED: 23361124]

O'Grady 2011

O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter‐related infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2011;52(9):162‐93. [PUBMED: 21467014]

Parker 2016

Parker SIA, Benzies KM, Hayden KA, Lang ES. Effectiveness of interventions for adult peripheral intravenous catheterization: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Emergency Nursing 2016;31:15‐21. [PUBMED: 27411965]

Reades 2011

Reades R, Studnek JR, Vandeventer S, Garrett J. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2011;58(6):509‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.020; PUBMED: 21856044 ]

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Rickard 2015

Rickard CM, Marsh NM, Webster J, Gavin NC, McGrail MR, Larsen E, et al. Intravascular device administration sets: replacement after standard versus prolonged use in hospitalised patients ‐ a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (The RSVP Trial). BMJ Open 2015;5(2):e007257. [PUBMED: 25649214]

Riker 2011

Riker MW, Kennedy C, Winfrey BS, Yen K, Dowd MD. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Academic Emergency Medicine 2011;18(11):1129‐34. [PUBMED: 22092893]

Sabri 2013

Sabri A, Szalas J, Holmes KS, Labib L, Mussivand T. Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous catheterization. Bio‐Medical Materials and Engineering 2013;23(1‐2):93‐108. [PUBMED: 23442240]

Scheer 2002

Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer U. Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Critical Care 2002;6(3):199‐204. [PUBMED: 12133178]

Schünemann 2011a

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and 'Summary of findings’ tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Schünemann 2011b

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.

Sterne 2011

Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002. [PUBMED: 21784880]

Stolz 2015

Stolz LA, Stolz U, Howe C, Farrell IJ, Adhikari S. Ultrasound‐guided peripheral venous access: a meta‐analysis and systematic review. Journal of Vascular Access 2015;16(4):321‐6. [DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000346; PUBMED: 25656255]

Tagalakis 2002

Tagalakis V, Kahn SR, Libman M, Blostein M. The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis: a critical review. American Journal of Medicine 2002;113(2):146‐51. [PUBMED: 12133753 ]

Wallis 2014

Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, Marsh N, Gowardman J, Playford EG, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology 2014;35(1):63‐8. [PUBMED: 24334800]

Webster 2008

Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, Hutton A, van Dyk S, Gale C, et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:a339. [PUBMED: 18614482]

Webster 2015

Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard CM, New K. Clinically‐indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub4]

Wu 2013

Wu SY, Ling Q, Cao LH, Wang J, Xu MX, Zeng WA. Real‐time two‐dimensional ultrasound guidance for central venous cannulation: a meta‐analysis. Anesthesiology 2013;118(2):361‐75. [PUBMED: 23249991]

Yacopetti 2010

Yacopetti N, Alexandrou E, Spencer TR, Frost SA, Davidson PM, O'Sullivan G, et al. Central venous catheter insertion by a clinical nurse consultant or anaesthetic medical staff: a single‐centre observational study. Critical Care and Resuscitation 2010;12(2):90‐5. [PUBMED: 20513216]

Carr 2014

Carr PJ, Higgins NS, Cooke ML, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Vascular access specialist teams for device insertion and prevention of failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011429]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Boland 2003

Wrong comparator: compared blind percutaneous insertion versus image guided

Casey 2003

Non‐randomized controlled study

Fong 2001

Non‐randomized controlled study

Gilbert 2016

Wrong intervention: compared impregnated catheter versus non‐impregnated

Hammes 2015

Wrong study design: incidence case control study

Hockley 2007

Wrong intervention: catheter tip positioning system versus blind positioning

Huraib 1994

Controlled clinical trial design

Keohane 1983

Wrong intervention: compared tunnelled versus untunnelled catheters

King 2010

Non‐randomized controlled study

Larson 1984

Non‐randomized controlled study

Meier 1998

Wrong study design: time series design

Mokrzycki 2006

Non‐randomized controlled study

Moretti 2005

Wrong intervention: antimicrobial central venous catheter coating versus non‐coated central venous catheter

Møller 2005

Wrong intervention: patient education

Nehme 1980

Non‐randomized controlled study

Neuman 1998

Prospective study design with no randomization

Puri 1982

Non‐randomized controlled study

Robinson 2005

Wrong design: prospective quality assurance study

Secola 2011

Initial preliminary pilot data randomized at the unit level

Secola 2012

Randomized at the unit level

Sherertz 1997

Wrong intervention: compared coated catheter versus non‐coated catheter

Soifer 1998

Controlled clinical trial design

Tadokoro 2015

Not a randomized controlled trial design

Taylor 2011

Wrong study design: before‐and‐after intervention study

Tomford 1982

Unable to locate any text or data

Tomford 1984

Non‐randomized controlled study

Treacy 2002

Not a randomized controlled trial design

Ward 2000

Unable to locate any text or data

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Garate‐Echenique 2014

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

Patients receiving intravenous therapy treatment for > 6 days

Interventions

Nurse‐led intravenous therapy team providing: vascular access device selection; insertion of the device; patient education for care and maintenance

Outcomes

Length of hospital stay; vascular access device survival; complications; patient satisfaction

Notes

The study presented as an oral abstract has been reviewed by International Journal of Nursing Studies; it will be considered for publication once a revised manuscript is accepted.

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

ACTRN12616001675415

Trial name or title

Reliable Intravenous Access by Line Experts (RELIABLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial to compare peripheral venous catheter insertion by vascular access specialists with any clinician (generalist model, standard practice) on clinical and economic outcomes among

medical and surgical patients

Methods

Randomized controlled trial

Participants

Patients from the medical and surgical departments who require a PVC for longer than 24 hours will be eligible for inclusion in this study. Consenting patients will have their PVC inserted by a vascular access specialist (intervention) or a generalist clinician (control).

Interventions

Arm 1 (control): PVC inserted as per hospital policy by a credentialed PVC inserter (generalist approach).

Arm 2 (intervention): vascular access specialist, defined as a registered nurse with advanced knowledge of vascular access including catheter technology, dressings, modalities of catheter access, and intravenous therapy management.

A substudy will consider use of ultrasound for assessment of veins, but not for the insertion procedure.

Outcomes

The primary outcome is to establish the feasibility of conducting an adequately powered randomized controlled trial in the future. Feasibility measures will include: patient eligibility (more than 90% of those screened); consent (more than 90% agree to enrol); protocol adherence (more than 90% receive the allocated intervention); and retention (less than 5% of enrolled participants lost to follow‐up). Secondary outcomes include: phlebitis: defined as 2 or more of pain, redness, swelling, palpable cord, or purulent discharge. Infiltration and extravasation: defined as the movement of IV fluids into the surrounding tissue with/without resulting tissue breakdown. Occlusion: defined as the PVC will not infuse, or leakage occurs when fluid is infused.

Dislodgement (either partial or total): partial: change in PVC length at insertion site (inner catheter visible); total: PVC completely leaves the vein. Infection (laboratory‐confirmed local or bloodstream infection): PVC skin swabs, PVC tip and blood cultures may be collected as per usual clinical practice if clinical suspicion of local infection or systemic infection. PVC dwell time: from the time of PVC insertion until removal from either device failure, routine replacement, or the completion of IV therapy. Cost‐effectiveness: estimates of costs of staff resources, equipment, and PVC failure resource usage with previously developed cost estimations. Detailed resources used for a PVC insertion and removal will be recorded for a subset of 15 participants per study group. Staff and patient acceptability of the intervention assessed on a 0‐to‐10 Likert scale

Starting date

Not yet recruiting

Contact information

Ms Nicole Marsh

Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre

Level 2, Building 34

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Cnr Bowen Bridge Road & Butterfield Street

Herston, QLD, 4029

Notes

IV: intravenous
PVC: peripheral venous catheter

Study search flowchart.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study search flowchart.