Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011376Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 24 noviembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer ginecológico, neurooncología y otros cánceres

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Julia Day

    Correspondencia a: Edinburgh Centre for Neuro‐Oncology (ECNO), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Shlomit Yust‐Katz

    University of Texas ‐ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

  • David Cachia

    University of Texas ‐ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

  • Alasdair Rooney

    Edinburgh Centre for Neuro‐Oncology (ECNO), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

  • Lior H Katz

    Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

  • Jeffrey Wefel

    University of Texas ‐ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

  • Ivo Tremont

    University of Texas ‐ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

  • Terri Armstrong

    University of Texas ‐ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

Contributions of authors

Contribution

Author

Draft the protocol

All authors

Develop and run the search strategy

JD, SYK, and Cochrane Staff

Obtain copies of trials

JD, SYK, DC

Select which trials to include (3 people)

JD, SYK, DC, with advice from all authors as needed

Extract data from trials (3 people)

JD, SYK, DC

Enter data into RevMan 5.3

JD, SYK, DC

Carry out the analysis

JD, SYK, DC

Interpret the analysis

All authors

Draft the final review

All authors

Update the review

All authors

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • The review is funded in part by a grant from the European Association of Neuro‐Oncology, Italy.

Declarations of interest

Julia Day ‐ none known
Shlomit Yust‐Katz ‐ none known
David Cachia ‐ none known
Alasdair Rooney ‐ none known
Lior H Katz ‐ none known
Jeffrey Wefel ‐ none known
Ivo Tremont ‐ none known
Terri Armstrong ‐ none known

Acknowledgements

With thanks to the Cochane Neuro‐Oncology Group for their contribution and continued support and feedback throughout the editorial process.

The review is funded in part by a grant from the European Association of Neuro‐Oncology.

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the largest single funder of the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR, National Health Service (NHS), or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Sep 12

Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour

Review

Julia Day, Shlomit Yust-Katz, David Cachia, Jeffrey Wefel, Ivo W Tremont Lukats, Helen Bulbeck, Alasdair G Rooney

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011376.pub3

2016 Apr 13

Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour

Review

Julia Day, Shlomit Yust‐Katz, David Cachia, Jeffrey Wefel, Lior H Katz, Ivo W. Tremont Lukats, Helen Bulbeck, Terri Armstrong, Alasdair G Rooney

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011376.pub2

2014 Nov 24

Interventions for the management of fatigue in adults with a primary brain tumour

Protocol

Julia Day, Shlomit Yust‐Katz, David Cachia, Alasdair Rooney, Lior H Katz, Jeffrey Wefel, Ivo Tremont, Terri Armstrong

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011376

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.