Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Self management interventions for type 2 diabetes in adult people with severe mental illness

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011361.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 27 abril 2016see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos metabólicos y endocrinos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Hayley McBain

    Correspondencia a: School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

    [email protected]

    East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Kathleen Mulligan

    School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

    East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Mark Haddad

    School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

    East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Chris Flood

    School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

    East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Julia Jones

    School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

  • Alan Simpson

    School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK

    East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Hayley McBain (HM): protocol draft, search strategy development, acquisition of trial reports, trial selection, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, review of drafts and future review updates.

Kathleen Mulligan (KM): protocol draft, search strategy development, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, review of draft and future review updates.

Mark Haddad (MH): protocol draft, trial selection, data analysis, data interpretation, review of draft and future review updates.

Chris Flood (CF): protocol draft, trial selection, data analysis, data interpretation, review of draft and future review updates.

Julia Jones (JJ): protocol draft, data analysis, data interpretation, review of draft and future review updates.

Alan Simpson (AS): protocol draft, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, review of draft and future review updates

Declarations of interest

HM: none known.

KM: none known.

MH: none known.

CF: none known.

JJ: none known.

AS: none known.

Acknowledgements

We thank Karla Bergerhoff and Maria‐Inti Metzendorf, former and current Trials Search Co‐ordinators for the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, for designing and implementing the search strategy. We also would like to thank the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group for help and guidance provided during the review process.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Apr 27

Self management interventions for type 2 diabetes in adult people with severe mental illness

Review

Hayley McBain, Kathleen Mulligan, Mark Haddad, Chris Flood, Julia Jones, Alan Simpson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011361.pub2

2014 Nov 06

Self‐management interventions for type 2 diabetes in adult people with severe mental illness

Protocol

Hayley McBain, Kathleen Mulligan, Mark Haddad, Chris Flood, Julia Jones, Alan Simpson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011361

Differences between protocol and review

The protocol specified that review authors would search the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) for articles; however, on advice from the Trials Search Co‐ordinator in the Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, we removed this database from the search strategy.

Notes

Portions of the background and methods sections, the appendices, additional tables and Figures 1 to 3 of this review are based on a standard template established by the Cochrane Metabolic and Enocrine Disorders Group.
We have based parts of the background and methods sections, the appendices, additional tables and Figures 1 to 3 of this review on a standard template established by the Cochrane Metabolic and Enocrine Disorders Group.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Schematic representation of diabetes self management.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Schematic representation of diabetes self management.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Self management interventions for type 2 diabetes in adult people with severe mental illness

Population: adults with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness

Setting: community

Intervention: diabetes self management

Comparison: usual care + information

Outcomes

Usual care + information

Diabetes self management

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(trials)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Diabetes‐related complications

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

Not reported

All‐cause mortality

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

Not reported

Adverse events

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

Not reported

Health‐related quality of life

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

Not reported

Self care behaviours: physical activity

(measured by total energy expenditure in kcal)

Follow‐up: 6 months (6 months after the end of the intervention)

Mean energy expenditure was 2148 kcal

Mean energy expenditure was 652 kcal higher

52 (1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa

Trial authors stated that this difference reflected no improvement

HbA1c [%]

Follow‐up: 6 months (6 months after the end of the intervention)

Mean HbA1c was 7.9%

Mean HbA1c was 1% lower

52 (1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa

Trial authors stated that this difference reflected no improvement

Socioeconomic effects

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

See comment

Not reported

CI: confidence interval; HbA1c: glycosylated haemoglobin A1c; kcal: kilocalories

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate

aDowngraded by three levels because of selective reporting bias, indirectness and imprecision

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Overview of trial populations

Intervention and comparator

Sample sizea

Screened/eligible
[N]

Randomised
[N]

Analysed
[N]

Finishing trial
[N]

Randomised finishing trial
[%]

Follow‐upb

McKibbin 2010

I: Diabetes Awareness and Rehabilitation Training (DART)

77

32

26

26

81.3

24 weeks (6 months post intervention)

C: usual care plus information (UCI)

32

26

26

81.3

Total:

64

52

52

81.3

aAccording to power calculation in trial publication or report

bDuration of intervention and/or follow‐up under randomised conditions until end of trial

"‐" denotes not reported

C: comparator; I: intervention

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Overview of trial populations