Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.1 Cry duration.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.1 Cry duration.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.2 All pain scores during injection.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.2 All pain scores during injection.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.3 NIPS.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Breastfeeding versus control, outcome: 1.3 NIPS.

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 1: Cry duration

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 1: Cry duration

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 2: All pain scores during injection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 2: All pain scores during injection

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 3: NIPS

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 3: NIPS

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 4: Heart rate after injection

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Breastfeeding versus control, Outcome 4: Heart rate after injection

Summary of findings 1. Breastfeeding compared with other interventions, oral water, or no treatment for pain during vaccination in infants 1 to 12 months

Breastfeeding compared with other interventions, oral water, or no treatment for pain during vaccination in infants 1 to 12 months

Patient or population: Infants 1 to 12 months during vaccination

Settings: Diverse community settings

Intervention: Breastfeeding

Comparison: Other interventions, such as cuddling, sweet solutions, or placebo (oral water) or no treatment

Outcomes

No of Participants
(studies)

Effect Estimates and 95% CI

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Cry duration

Seconds cry time during procedure or proportion of crying during procedure. Crying was measured during and up to 3 minutes following completion of vaccination.

547 (6 studies)

MD (seconds)

‐38 ( ‐49.84 to 26.35)

Moderate

Not further downgraded: Breastfeeding consistently resulted in a reduction of crying time. However, as most trials included infants aged 1 to 6 months, further research including older infants up to 12 months of age may have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

All pain scores during injection

Due to range of pain scores used, data analysed using SMDs. Pain scores were measured during and up to 3 minutes following completion of vaccination.

310 (5 studies)

SMD

‐1.7 ( ‐2.2 to ‐1.3)

Moderate

Downgraded once: Breastfeeding consistently resulted in a reduction of pain scores. However, only 5 studies and 310 infants were included, and most of the trials included the younger infants aged 1 to 6 months. Further research including older infants up to 12 months of age and larger sample sizes may have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect.

NIPS score during injection

The NIPS was measured during and up to 3 minutes following completion of vaccination.

174 (3 studies)

MD ‐1.89 (‐2.55 to ‐1.24)

Low

Not further downgraded: Grade of evidence already taken into account. Only 3 studies and 174 infants were included. Further studies using this pain assessment score may lead to more certainty and have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Heart rate after injection

Heart rate in the period following completion of the injections was measured in 2 studies.

186 (2 studies)

MD (beats per minute)

‐3.6 ( ‐23 to 16)

Low

Not further downgraded: Grade of evidence already taken into account. Breastfeeding did not have an effect on heart rate change from baseline. As only 2 studies were included in this outcome, further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Adverse events

No studies reported on adverse events.

Very low

No studies reported on outcomes such as coughing or gagging.

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; NIPS: Neonatal Infant Pain Scale; SMD: standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Breastfeeding compared with other interventions, oral water, or no treatment for pain during vaccination in infants 1 to 12 months
Comparison 1. Breastfeeding versus control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Cry duration Show forest plot

6

547

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐38.09 [‐49.84, ‐26.35]

1.2 All pain scores during injection Show forest plot

5

310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.73 [‐2.20, ‐1.25]

1.3 NIPS Show forest plot

3

174

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.89 [‐2.55, ‐1.24]

1.4 Heart rate after injection Show forest plot

2

186

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.56 [‐23.17, 16.05]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Breastfeeding versus control