Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Дренаж раны после паховой диссекции при злокачественном заболевании у взрослых

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies excluded from this review

Danuser 2013 {published data only}

Danuser H, Di Pierro GB, Stucki P, Mattei A. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary?. British Journal of Urology International 2013;111(6):963‐9.

Franchi 1997 {published data only}

Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Zanaboni F, Scarabelli C, Beretta P, Donadello N. Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: a randomized study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;90(4):622‐7.

Franchi 2007 {published data only}

Franchi M, Trimbos JB, Zanaboni F, v d Velden J, Reed N, Coens C, et al. Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer‐Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC‐GCG) study in 234 patients. European Journal of Cancer 2007;43(8):1265‐8.

Lopes 1995 {published data only}

Lopes AD, Hall JR, Monaghan JM. Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;86(6):960‐3.

Morice 2001 {published data only}

Morice P, Lassau N, Pautier P, Haie‐Meder C, Lhomme C, Castaigne D. Retroperitoneal drainage after complete para‐aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: a randomized trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;97(2):243‐7.

Ozdemir 2013 {published data only}

OzdemIr AT, Altinova S, Serefoglu EC, Atmaca AF, Balbay MD. Is placement of pelvic drain indispensable after radical cystectomy, extended lymph node dissection, and orthotopic neobladder substitution?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2013;43(2):263‐7.

Patsner 1995 {published data only}

Patsner B. Closed‐suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 1995;57(2):232‐4.

Youssef 2005 {published data only}

Youssef F, Jenkins MP, Dawson KJ, Berger L, Myint F, Hamilton G. The value of suction wound drain after carotid and femoral artery surgery: a randomised trial using duplex assessment of the volume of post‐operative haematoma. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2005;29(2):162‐6.

Additional references

Carlson 2008

Carlson JW, Kauderer J, Walker JL, Gold MA, O'Malley D, Tuller E, et al. A randomized phase III trial of VH fibrin sealant to reduce lymphedema after inguinal lymph node dissection: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecologic Oncology 2008;110(1):76‐82.

Coblentz 2002

Coblentz TR, Theodorescu D. Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Journal of Urology 2002;168(4):1386‐9.

de Vries 2006

de Vries M, Vonkeman WG, van Ginkel RJ, Hoekstra HJ. Morbidity after inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2006;32(7):785‐9.

Gaarenstroom 2003

Gaarenstroom KN, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, Agous I, Amant F, Peters AA, et al. Postoperative complications after vulvectomy and inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy using separate groin incisions. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2003;13(4):522‐7.

Hakim 2006

Hakim AA, Terada KY. Sentinel node dissection in vulvar cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 2006;7(2):85‐91.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.

Hollis 1999

Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319(7211):670‐4.

Horan 1992

Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1992;13(10):606‐8.

HSCIC

Health & Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/AttachmentRetriever?site_id=1937&file_name=d:\efmfiles\1937\Accessing\DataTables\Annual%20inpatient%20release%202012\MainOp4_1112.xls&short_name=MainOp4_1112.xls&u_id=9539 (accessed 18 January 2014).

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Margulis 2010

Margulis V, Sagalowsky AI. Penile cancer: management of regional lymphatic drainage. Urology Clinics of North America 2010;37(3):411‐9.

Morton 2006

Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, et al. Sentinel‐node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355(13):1307‐17.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Samraj 2007

Samraj K, Gurusamy KS. Wound drains following thyroid surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006099.pub2]

Schünemann 2011a

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH, et al. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings' tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Schünemann 2011b

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Serpell 2003

Serpell JW, Carne PW, Bailey M. Radical lymph node dissection for melanoma. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2003;73(5):294‐9.

SIGN 2011

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random2011.

Swan 2003

Swan MC, Furniss D, Cassell OC. Surgical management of metastatic inguinal lymphadenopathy. BMJ 2004;329:1272‐6.

Tauber 2013

Tauber R, Schmid S, Horn T, Thalgott M, Heck M, Haller B, et al. Inguinal lymph node dissection: epidermal vacuum therapy for prevention of wound complications. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 2013;66(3):390‐6.

Ul‐Mulk 2012

Ul‐Mulk J, Holmich LR. Lymph node dissection in patients with malignant melanoma is associated with high risk of morbidity. Danish Medical Journal 2012;59(6):A4441.

Yeung 2013

Yeung LL, Brandes SB. Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as the new paradigm for the management of penile cancer. Urologic Oncology 2013;31(5):693‐6.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Danuser 2013

Extent of dissection superior to Cloquet's node; obturator, external iliac and hypogastric nodes excised in extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, no inguinal lymph node dissection

Danuser studied 331 consecutive patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection to include obturator, external iliac and hypogastric lymph nodes, following radical prostatectomy. Their patient groups were divided into three series: the first series (132 participants) underwent open radical prostatectomy with two 'easy flow' drains placed in the right and left obturator fossae, with randomisation by coin toss just after surgery into two groups: Group 1 (66 participants) had shortening of the drains on post‐operative days three and five, with drain removal at day seven. Group 2 (66 participants) had their drains removed on post‐operative day one. Drain removal was delayed across both groups, if required, until drainage volume was less than 100 mL over 24 hours. The next 73 consecutive patients (Group 3) underwent open radical prostatectomy with no drain inserted. The final 126 consecutive patients (Group 4) were treated with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy, with no drain inserted. Seroma (asymptomatic and symptomatic) occurred in 6% of Group 1, 12% of Group 2, 10% of Group 3 and 3% of Group 4. Significant differences were reported between Groups 2 and 4 (P value 0.02). There were no wound complications noted in any of the groups, however, drain insertion necessitated two to five days longer in hospital, although the authors did note that "drain management, care and removal could also be carried out on an outpatient basis".

Franchi 1997

Pelvic drainage following hysterectomy and dissection of common external iliac and obturator nodes, no inguinal lymph node dissection

Franchi 2007

Pelvic drainage following hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, no inguinal lymph node dissection.

Franchi studied 234 patients following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection with 117 patients randomised (no details given on randomisation methods) to insertion of two suction drains, placed in the retroperitoneal fossa via a vaginal or abdominal route. Drains were removed when drainage volume was less than 50 mL over 24 hours. There was no difference in incidence of asymptomatic or symptomatic seroma between the two trial arms and no difference for other post‐operative complications.

Lopes 1995

Pelvic drainage following hysterectomy and external iliac, internal iliac and obturator node dissection, no inguinal lymph node dissection.

Lopes studied 100 consecutive patients following radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection of the external iliac, internal iliac and obturator nodes. Fifty‐one patients were randomised, using numbered envelopes, to insertion of a suction drain into each pelvic sidewall. Drains were removed when drainage volume was less than 100 mL over 24 hours.The incidence of seroma in the drained group that was revealed by clinical examination (5.9%) and ultrasound (15.6%) did not different significantly from the undrained group for both clinical examination (6.1%) and ultrasound (17.4%), leading the authors to conclude that there "appears to be no advantage to the routine use of pelvic suction drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy".

Morice 2001

Pelvic and para‐aortic lymphadenectomy, no inguinal node dissection

Ozdemir 2013

Extent of dissection superior to Cloquet's node; extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, no inguinal node dissection.

Ozdemir studied 58 patients with bladder carcinoma, treated surgically with radical cystectomy, extended bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and orthotopic bladder pouch substitution. Patients underwent pseudo‐randomisation by coin‐tossing, with 22/58 given a pelvic drain, which was removed when the drainage was less than 100 mL over 24 hours. There were no statistically significant differences observed between groups for length of hospital stay, or early or late postoperative complications, including wound infection, haematoma and seroma.

Patsner 1995

Not an RCT; pelvic drainage following hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, no inguinal lymph node dissection.

Patsner studied 120 consecutive patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent radical abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with removal of common iliac and pelvic lymph nodes. The first 60 patients had bilateral Jackson‐Pratt closed suction drains placed in the retroperitoneal spaces, and the next 60 patients had no drains inserted. No difference in rates of post‐operative infection or seroma were reported between groups (no statistical analysis presented).

Youssef 2005

Groin dissection for vascular reconstruction, no lymph nodes excised

Abbreviation

RCT; randomised controlled trial