Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Les antibiotiques pour le traitement des exacerbations de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search methods used in the previous version of this review (published 2012)

Electronic searches

We identified trials using the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO, and handsearching of respiratory journals and meeting abstracts (see appendix for further details). All records in the Specialised Register coded as 'COPD' were searched using the following terms:

  • antibiotic* or penicillin* or amoxycillin or ampicillin or cefalosporin* or cefaclor or cefalexine or cephalotin or cefazolin or cefixime or cefotaxime or cefpodoxime or cephradine or ceftizoxime or ceftriaxone or cefuroxime or tetracyclin* or demeclocycline or doxycycline or minocycline or oxytetracycline or *cycline or macrolides or azithromycin or clarithromycin or dirithromycin or erythromycin or roxithromycin or telithromycin or troleandomycin or *thromycin or (*mycin) or fluoroquinoln* or ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin or gemfloxacin or grepafloxacin or levofloxacin or lomefloxacin or moxifloxacin or ofloxacin or sparfloxacin or trovafloxacin or *floxacin or chloramphenicol or clindamycin or trimethoprim or sulfamethxazole or cotrimoxazole or carbapenem* or meropenem or imipenem.

A search of ClinicalTrials.gov was also conducted. Databases were searched from 2005 (their inception) to April 2012. The search from inception to 2006 is described elsewhere (Puhan 2007). There was no restriction on the language of publication.

Searching other resources

Bibliographies of each selected RCT, as well as other systematic reviews, were scrutinised for additional potential RCTs. Authors of identified RCTs and pharmaceutical companies producing antibiotics were contacted for other published, unpublished, or ongoing studies.

Appendix 2. Sources and search methods for the Cochrane Airways Register of Trials

Electronic searches: core databases

Database

Frequency of search

CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library)

Monthly

MEDLINE (Ovid)

Weekly

Embase (Ovid)

Weekly

PsycINFO (Ovid)

Monthly

CINAHL (EBSCO)

Monthly

AMED (EBSCO)

Monthly

 

Handsearches: core respiratory conference abstracts

Conference

Years searched

American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI)

2001 onwards

American Thoracic Society (ATS)

2001 onwards

Asia Pacific Society of Respirology (APSR)

2004 onwards

British Thoracic Society Winter Meeting (BTS)

2000 onwards

Chest Meeting

2003 onwards

European Respiratory Society (ERS)

1992, 1994, 2000 onwards

International Primary Care Respiratory Group Congress (IPCRG)

2002 onwards

Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ)

1999 onwards

 

MEDLINE search strategy used to identify trials for the CAGR

COPD search

1. Lung Diseases, Obstructive/

2. exp Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/

3. emphysema$.mp.

4. (chronic$ adj3 bronchiti$).mp.

5. (obstruct$ adj3 (pulmonary or lung$ or airway$ or airflow$ or bronch$ or respirat$)).mp.

6. COPD.mp.

7. COAD.mp.

8. COBD.mp.

9. AECB.mp.

10. or/1‐9

Filter to identify RCTs

1. exp "clinical trial [publication type]"/

2. (randomised or randomised).ab,ti.

3. placebo.ab,ti.

4. dt.fs.

5. randomly.ab,ti.

6. trial.ab,ti.

7. groups.ab,ti.

8. or/1‐7

9. Animals/

10. Humans/

11. 9 not (9 and 10)

12. 8 not 11

The MEDLINE strategy and RCT filter are adapted to identify trials in other electronic databases

Appendix 3. Search strategy to identify relevant trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register

Via the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS)

#1 MeSH DESCRIPTOR Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Explode All

#2 MeSH DESCRIPTOR Bronchitis, Chronic

#3 (obstruct*) near3 (pulmonary or lung* or airway* or airflow* or bronch* or respirat*)

#4 COPD:MISC1

#5 (COPD OR COAD OR COBD):TI,AB,KW

#6 #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5

#7 antibiotic*

#8 penicillin*

#9 amoxycillin

#10 amoxicillin

#11 ampicillin

#12 cefalosporin*

#13 cefaclor

#14 cefazolin

#15 cefixime

#16 cefotaxime

#17 cefpodoxime

#18 cephradine

#19 ceftizoxime

#20 ceftriaxone

#21 cefuroxime

#22 tetracyclin*

#23 demeclocycline

#24 doxycycline

#25 minocycline

#26 oxytetracycline

#27 *cycline

#28 macrolides

#29 azithromycin

#30 clarithromycin

#31 dirithromycin

#32 erythromycin

#33 roxithromycin

#34 telithromycin

#35 troleandomycin

#36 *thromycin

#37 *mycin

#38 ciprofloxacin

#39 gatifloxacin

#40 grepafloxacin

#41 levofloxacin

#42 lomefloxacin

#43 moxifloxacin

#44 ofloxacin

#45 sparfloxacin

#46 trovafloxacin

#47 *floxacin

#48 chloramphenicol

#49 clindamycin

#50 trimethoprim

#51 cotrimoxazole

#52 carbapenem*

#53 meropenem

#54 imipenem

#55 cefalexin*

#56 cephalothin

#57 cefalotin

#58 fluoroquinolone*

#59 gemifloxacin

#60 sulfamethoxazole

#61 cephalosporin

#62 #7 or#8 or #9 or #10 or #11 or #12 or #13 or #14 or #15 or #16 or #17 or #18 or #19 or #20 or #21 or #22 or #23 or #24 or #25 or #26 or #27 or #28 or #29 or #30 or #31 or #32 or #33 or #34 or #35 or #36 or #37 or #38 or #39 or #40 or #41 or #42 or #43 or #44 or #45 or #46 or #47 or #48 or #49 or #50 or #51 or #52 or #53 or #54 or #55 or #56 or #57 or #58 or #59 or #60 or #61

#63 #6 and #62

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus placebo. Outpatients, outcome: 1.2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus placebo. Outpatients, outcome: 1.2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antibiotics versus placebo. Inpatients, outcome: 2.2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antibiotics versus placebo. Inpatients, outcome: 2.2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Antibiotics vs placebo overall, outcome: 3.1 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Antibiotics vs placebo overall, outcome: 3.1 Adverse events.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antibiotics versus placebo. Inpatients, outcome: 2.4 Duration of hospital stay (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antibiotics versus placebo. Inpatients, outcome: 2.4 Duration of hospital stay (days).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 4 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 4 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates).

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 5 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 5 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 6 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 6 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures.

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 7 Days off work.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients, Outcome 7 Days off work.

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics).

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only.

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 3 All‐cause mortality.

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 4 Duration of hospital stay (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 4 Duration of hospital stay (days).

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 5 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 5 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates).

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 6 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 6 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period.

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 7 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 7 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures.

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 8 Days off work.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients, Outcome 8 Days off work.

Comparison 3 Antibiotics versus placebo: adverse events, Outcome 1 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Antibiotics versus placebo: adverse events, Outcome 1 Adverse events.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: outpatients

Outpatients: antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patient or population: exacerbations of COPD
Setting: outpatients
Intervention: antibiotics
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with antibiotics

Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only

Study population

RR 0.72
(0.56 to 0.94)

1191
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWa,b

Antibiotics: amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid, trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole, oxytetracycline, amoxicillin‐cotrimoxazole, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, or amoxicillin

295 per 1000

212 per 1000
(165 to 277)

All‐cause mortality

Study population

OR 1.27
(0.49 to 3.30)

301
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOWc,d

Antibiotics: doxycycline

53 per 1000

66 per 1000
(27 to 156)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngrading for inconsistency: I² of 31% is not that high, but results of trials differ and are imprecise.

bFor one trial (Allegra), not all results are available.

cOnly one study existing; additional trials likely to change the estimates.

dThe 95% CIs of the RR 1.27 are very wide (95% CI 0.49 to 3.30).

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: outpatients
Summary of findings 2. Antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: inpatients

Inpatients: antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patient or population: exacerbations of COPD
Setting: inpatients and ICU
Intervention: antibiotics
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with antibiotics

Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only ‐ inpatient

Study population

RR 0.65
(0.38 to 1.12)

576
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

Antibiotics: amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, doxycycline, tetracycline hydrochloride, chloramphenicol, penicillin, streptomycin, piperacillin‐sulbactam, ceftazidime, or levofloxacin

314 per 1000

204 per 1000
(119 to 352)

Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ drugs not currently used ‐ ICU

Study population

RR 0.19
(0.08 to 0.45)

93
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEb

Antibiotics: ofloxacin

565 per 1000

107 per 1000
(45 to 254)

Duration of hospital stay (days) ‐ inpatients

Range of duration of hospital stay (days) was from 8.1 to 12.3 days

MD 0.09 (‐0.79 lower to 0.96 higher)

300

(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕

HIGH

Antibiotics: piperacillin‐sulbactam, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, or cefaclor

Duration of hospital stay (days) ‐ ICU patients

Mean duration of hospital stay (days) was 24.5 days

MD ‐9.60 (‐12.84 lower to ‐6.36 lower)

94
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEb

Antibiotics: ofloxacin

All‐cause mortality ‐ inpatients

Study population

OR 2.48
(0.94 to 6.55)

214

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
MODERATEc

Antibiotics: tetracycline hydrochloride, chloramphenicol, penicillin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, piperacillin‐sulbactam, ceftazidime, or levofloxacin

31 per 1000

41 per 1000
(18 to 90)

All‐cause mortality ‐ ICU patients

Study population

OR 0.21
(0.06 to 0.72)

93
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEb

Antibiotics: ofloxacin

217 per 1000

45 per 1000
(13 to 152)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngrading for imprecision: the upper limit of the 95% CI overlaps 1.0.

bOnly one study existing; the effect estimate may be substantially different with additional trials.

cDowngrading for imprecision: wide 95% CI of the pooled estimate that precludes any conclusion about the effects of antibiotics on mortality in inpatients.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Antibiotics compared to placebo for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: inpatients
Summary of findings 3. Antibiotics compared to placebo overall for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; adverse events

Antibiotics compared to placebo overall for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patient or population: exacerbations of COPD
Setting: outpatients and inpatients
Intervention: antibiotics
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with antibiotics

Adverse events ‐ diarrhoea

Study population

OR 1.68
(0.92 to 3.07)

1099
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

Antibiotics: amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid, amoxicillin, ofloxacin, piperacillin‐sulbactam, ceftazidime, or levofloxacin‐doxycycline

31 per 1000

52 per 1000
(29 to 90)

Adverse events ‐ overall (any adverse events not specified)

Study population

OR 1.20
(0.89 to 1.63)

1544
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATEa

Antibiotics: amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid, doxycycline, amoxicillin, or ofloxacin

129 per 1000

151 per 1000
(116 to 194)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR: odds ratio; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngrading for imprecision: the lower limit of the 95% CI overlaps 1.0.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Antibiotics compared to placebo overall for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; adverse events
Table 1. Type and dose of antibiotic used

Study

Antibiotic

Dose (g/d)

Duration (days)

Currently available and used?

Co‐interventions

Control

Setting

Allegra 1991

Amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid (oral)

2

5

Yes

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Alonso Martinez 1992

Trimethoprim‐sulphamethoxazole or amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid

 

1.9

8

Yes

 Prednisone

Placebo and prednisone

Hospital

Anthonisen 1987

Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (oral)

1.9

10

Yes

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Amoxicillin (oral)

1

Doxycycline (oral)

0.1‐0.2

Berry 1960

Oxytetracycline (oral)

1 g/d

5

No

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Brusse‐Keizer 2009

Amoxicillin‐clavulanic acid (oral)

1.5

7

Yes

Oral prednisolone 30 mg for 7 days

Placebo for 7 days and oral prednisolone 30 mg for 7 days

Outpatient

Daniels 2010

Doxycycline (oral)

Not stated

7

Yes

IV prednisolone taper

Placebo plus IV prednisolone taper

Hospital

Elmes 1957

Oxytetracycline (oral)

1

5‐7

No

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Fear 1962

Oxytetracycline (oral)

1

7

No

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Hassan 2015

Ciprofloxacin (oral)

1

10

Yes

Oral prednisolone 40 mg/d for 3
days followed by 5–10 mg for 12 days if steroid responsive

Placebo

Outpatient

Amoxicillin (oral)

1.5

Jørgensen 1992

Amoxicillin (oral)

1.5

7

Yes

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Llor 2012

Amoxicillin‐clavulanate (oral)

1.5

8

Yes

Placebo

Outpatient

Manresa 1987

Cefaclor (oral)

1.5

8

 Yes

 

Placebo

Hospital

Nouira 2001

Ofloxacin (oral)

0.4

10

 Yes

 

Placebo

Medical ICU

Petersen 1967

Chloramphenicol (oral)

2

10

 No

 

Placebo

Hospital

Pines 1968

Penicillin (parenteral)

1

14

Yes

 

Placebo

Hospital

Pines 1972

Tetracycline hydrochloride (oral) or chloramphenicol

2

12

No

 

Placebo

Hospital

Sachs 1995

Amoxicillin (oral)

1.5 or 1.9

7

yes

 

Placebo

Outpatient

Co‐trimoxazole

1.9

van Velzen 2017

Doxycycline (oral)

0.1

7

Yes

30 mg oral prednisolone daily for

10 days

Placebo and 30 mg oral prednisolone daily for 10 days

Outpatient

Wang 2016

Piperacillin‐sulbactam, ceftazidine, or levofloxacin

Not stated

As needed

Yes

No

Placebo

Hospital

IV: intravenous.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Type and dose of antibiotic used
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics) Show forest plot

9

1332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.53, 0.90]

2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only Show forest plot

7

1191

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.56, 0.94]

3 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Days off work Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus placebo: outpatients
Comparison 2. Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Treatment failure up to 4 weeks (no resolution or deterioration after trial medication of any duration or death when explicitly stated due to exacerbation or additional course of antibiotics) Show forest plot

6

896

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.39, 0.91]

1.1 Inpatient

5

803

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.58, 1.00]

1.2 ICU

1

93

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.08, 0.45]

2 Treatment failure within 4 weeks ‐ current drugs only Show forest plot

4

576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.38, 1.12]

2.1 Inpatient

4

576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.38, 1.12]

3 All‐cause mortality Show forest plot

3

507

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.45, 2.02]

3.1 Inpatients

2

414

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.48 [0.94, 6.55]

3.2 ICU patients

1

93

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.06, 0.72]

4 Duration of hospital stay (days) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Inpatients

3

300

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [‐0.79, 0.96]

4.2 ICU

1

93

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐9.6 [‐12.84, ‐6.36]

5 Re‐exacerbations within ≥ 2 to 6 weeks since beginning of index exacerbation (rates) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Improvement in dyspnoea measured at the end of the study period Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Inpatients

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Health‐related quality of life or functional status measures Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8 Days off work Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Antibiotics versus placebo: inpatients
Comparison 3. Antibiotics versus placebo: adverse events

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Adverse events Show forest plot

7

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Diarrhoea

5

1099

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.68 [0.92, 3.07]

1.2 Dyspepsia

3

705

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.28, 1.55]

1.3 Pain in mouth

1

270

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.73 [0.80, 74.98]

1.4 Exanthema, itching

4

798

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.26 [0.65, 7.87]

1.5 Overall (adverse events not separated)

6

1544

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.89, 1.63]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Antibiotics versus placebo: adverse events