Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Concentración de oxígeno baja versus alta ajustada según objetivos de saturación de oxígeno durante la reanimación de neonatos prematuros en el momento del parto

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010239.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 04 mayo 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Neonatología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kei Lui

    Correspondencia a: Department of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia

    [email protected]

    School of Women's and Children's Health, Lei Lui, Sydney, Australia

  • Lisa J Jones

    Central Clinical School, Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia

    Department of Neonatology, John Hunter Children's Hospital, New Lambton, Australia

  • Jann P Foster

    Central Clinical School, Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia

    School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith DC, Australia

    Ingham Research Institute, Liverpool, Australia

  • Peter G Davis

    Newborn Research Centre and Neonatal Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

  • See Kwee Ching

    STAR NICU, Hospital Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Ju Lee Oei

    Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia

  • David A Osborn

    Central Clinical School, Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Contributions of authors

Kei Lui conceived and wrote the protocol. Jann Foster wrote the protocol and provided general advice.
Julee Oei, Peter Davis, See Kwee Ching and David Osborn provided general advice on the protocol. Lisa Jones and Jann Foster performed the initial and updated searches and extracted the data. Kei Lui, David Osborn, Jann Foster and Lisa Jones performed the eligibility assessments. Lisa Jones performed the data analyses and wrote up the results sections. David Osborn and Jann Foster cross‐checked the data analyses. Lisa Jones and David Osborn wrote the text of the review. Kei Lui, Jann Foster, Lisa Jones, Peter Davis and David Osborn had input into the final version of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Australian Satellite of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, Australia.

Declarations of interest

Kei Lui and Ju lee Oei were the investigators of a randomised controlled trial titled Targeted oxygenation in the development of premature infants and their developmental outcome (the TO2RPIDO study).

Acknowledgements

None.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 May 04

Lower versus higher oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth

Review

Kei Lui, Lisa J Jones, Jann P Foster, Peter G Davis, See Kwee Ching, Ju Lee Oei, David A Osborn

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010239.pub2

2012 Nov 14

Higher versus lower oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth

Protocol

Kei Lui, Jann P Foster, Peter G Davis, See Kwee Ching, Ju Lee Oei, David A Osborn

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010239

Differences between protocol and review

Grading of degree of heterogeneity changed to reflect that used by the Neonatal Review Group.

Methods for converting non‐parametric data to parametric data documented and used.

We added the methodology and plan for 'Summary of findings' tables and GRADE recommendations, which were not included in the original protocol.

We included additional outcomes post hoc, including duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation), duration of respiratory support (CPAP) and patent ductus arteriosus.

The following statement was added to the inclusion criteria post hoc: 'trials were eligible for inclusion if groups had similar oxygenation saturation targeting at any time during resuscitation and NICU admission periods up to 20 (or 30) minutes'.

We performed updated searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL on 13 October 2017 to obtain further reports of published literature.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 6 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 6 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 7 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 7 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 8 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 10 Periventricular leukomalacia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 10 Periventricular leukomalacia.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 11 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 11 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.14

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.15

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 17 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.17

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 17 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 18 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 18 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 19 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.19

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 19 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.20

Comparison 4 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes, Outcome 20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 11 Periventricular leukomalacia.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 12 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.20

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.21

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 21 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.22

Comparison 5 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age, Outcome 22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 2 Neurodevelopmental disability.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 3 IPPV in the delivery room.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 4 Intubation in the delivery room.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 7 Retinopathy of prematurity.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 9 Intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 11 Necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 11 Necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.13

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 16 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 16 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration.

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 17 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.17

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 17 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 18 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 18 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 19 Duration of hospitalisation (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.19

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 19 Duration of hospitalisation (days).

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.20

Comparison 6 Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis, Outcome 20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Lower versus higher oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth

Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentrations titrated to oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth

Patient or population: preterm infants
Settings: at birth
Intervention: lower oxygen concentrations (FiO2 < 0.4) titrated to oxygen saturations during resuscitation
Comparison: higher oxygen concentrations (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) titrated to oxygen saturations during resuscitation

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration

Mortality, near term corrected age or discharge

Study population

RR 1.05
(0.68 to 1.63)

914
(10 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

Subgroup analyses:

single study targeting lowest SpO2 < 85% reported increased mortality for infants resuscitated with air compared to 100% oxygen (Oei 2016).

Meta‐analysis of 9 studies (627 infants) targeting lowest SpO2 85% to 90% found no difference in mortality.

No subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, highest SpO2 limit, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

76 per 1000

80 per 1000
(52 to 124)

Moderate

68 per 1000

71 per 1000
(46 to 111)

Neurodevelopmental disability
Follow‐up: 2 years

Study population

RR 0.82
(0.49 to 1.35)

208
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

Subgroup analyses:

both studies compared FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0 and had a lowest SpO2 target 85 to 90%.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision.

242 per 1000

199 per 1000
(119 to 327)

Moderate

170 per 1000

139 per 1000
(83 to 230)

Intubation in the delivery room

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.82 to 1.18)

875
(9 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

Subgroup analyses:

no subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, lowest or highest SpO2 target, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

352 per 1000

345 per 1000
(289 to 416)

Moderate

386 per 1000

378 per 1000
(317 to 455)

Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3)

Study population

RR 0.57
(0.24 to 1.36)

453
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,4

Subgroup analyses:

no subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, lowest SpO2 target, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

58 per 1000

33 per 1000
(14 to 79)

Moderate

70 per 1000

40 per 1000
(17 to 95)

Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4)

Study population

RR 0.93
(0.51 to 1.71)

596
(6 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,4

Subgroup analyses:

no subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, lowest or highest SpO2 target, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

63 per 1000

59 per 1000
(32 to 108)

Moderate

79 per 1000

73 per 1000
(40 to 135)

Necrotising enterocolitis

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.51 to 1.87)

807
(8 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

Subgroup analyses:

no subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, lowest or highest SpO2 target, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision.

47 per 1000

46 per 1000
(24 to 88)

Moderate

41 per 1000

40 per 1000
(21 to 77)

Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age)

Study population

RR 0.91
(0.72 to 1.14)

862
(9 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,3

Subgroup analyses:

no subgroup differences according to inspired oxygen concentration strata, lowest or highest SpO2 target, or gestational age.

Quality of evidence downgraded due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.

269 per 1000

244 per 1000
(193 to 306)

Moderate

250 per 1000

228 per 1000
(180 to 285)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; FiO2: fractional inspired oxygen;SpO2: oxygen saturation

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Two studies at low risk of bias.
2 Wide confidence intervals.
3 Moderate heterogeneity.
4 A single study at low risk of bias.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Lower versus higher oxygen concentrations titrated to target oxygen saturations during resuscitation of preterm infants at birth
Comparison 1. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration Show forest plot

10

914

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.68, 1.63]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

2

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.35]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

5

249

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.83, 1.06]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

9

875

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.82, 1.18]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

7 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.43, 1.49]

8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

4

453

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.24, 1.36]

9 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

3

271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.46, 1.44]

10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

6

596

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.51, 1.71]

11 Periventricular leukomalacia Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.09, 4.73]

12 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

8

807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.51, 1.87]

13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age) Show forest plot

2

148

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.41, 1.21]

14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

9

862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.72, 1.14]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

2

326

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.39 [‐13.49, ‐11.29]

16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

6

510

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [‐1.33, 2.54]

17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

4

249

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐5.39, 2.19]

18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

5

639

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.23 [6.52, 11.95]

19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

3

540

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.59, 1.70]

20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

21 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

3

216

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.75 [‐12.22, 8.71]

22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

7

766

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.77, 1.14]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration
Comparison 2. Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) subgrouped by inspired oxygen concentration Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.09, 14.92]

1.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

5

495

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.84, 3.46]

1.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

5

412

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.42, 1.32]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.35]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.7 [0.28, 1.77]

3.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.77, 1.12]

3.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

102

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.84, 1.09]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.16, 2.14]

4.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

5

495

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.72, 1.21]

4.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.81, 1.34]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

7 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.43, 1.49]

8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.15, 1.05]

8.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.86 [0.19, 77.05]

9 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.01, 2.92]

9.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.47, 1.53]

10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.27, 2.24]

10.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.49, 2.18]

11 Periventricular leukomalacia Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.97]

11.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.08, 18.09]

12 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.07, 4.95]

12.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

434

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.31, 1.76]

12.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.40 [0.52, 3.78]

13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.23, 0.98]

13.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.53, 3.05]

14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.4 to < 0.6

1

13

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.05, 2.83]

14.2 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

5

492

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.63, 1.09]

14.3 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

363

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.72, 1.60]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.70 [‐14.85, ‐12.55]

15.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [‐2.63, 4.75]

16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

197

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐4.16, 3.93]

16.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [‐1.38, 3.02]

17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

129

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.79 [‐5.84, 2.25]

17.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

120

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐11.00, 10.53]

18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

5

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.4 [9.25, 15.55]

18.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

373

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐5.37, 5.38]

19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

19.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.32 [0.92, 5.86]

19.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.28, 1.14]

20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

20.1 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

21 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

21.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

2

156

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.35 [‐15.26, 6.57]

21.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.0 [‐8.96, 64.96]

22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

7

766

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.77, 1.14]

22.1 FiO2 0.21 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

3

393

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.57, 1.14]

22.2 FiO2 ≥ 0.3 to < 0.4 versus FiO2 ≥ 0.6 to 1.0

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.82, 1.29]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Lower versus higher oxygen concentration subgrouped by FiO2
Comparison 3. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) Show forest plot

10

914

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.68, 1.63]

1.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.78 [1.03, 7.52]

1.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

9

627

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.46, 1.27]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

2

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.35]

2.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

2

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.35]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

5

249

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.83, 1.06]

3.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

5

249

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.83, 1.06]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

9

875

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.82, 1.18]

4.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.73, 1.49]

4.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

8

588

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.78, 1.18]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

5.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

6.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

7 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.43, 1.49]

7.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

4

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.43, 1.49]

8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

4

453

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.24, 1.36]

8.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.15, 1.61]

8.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

3

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.19, 2.48]

9 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

3

271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.46, 1.44]

9.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

3

271

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.46, 1.44]

10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

6

596

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.51, 1.71]

10.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.07, 1.61]

10.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

5

309

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.61, 2.39]

11 Periventricular leukomalacia Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.09, 4.73]

11.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.09, 4.73]

12 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

8

807

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.51, 1.87]

12.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.97 [0.59, 41.97]

12.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

7

520

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.36, 1.52]

13 Chronic lung disease (28 days' age) Show forest plot

2

148

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.41, 1.21]

13.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

2

148

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.41, 1.21]

14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

9

862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.64, 1.29]

14.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.57, 1.25]

14.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

8

575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.58, 1.43]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

2

326

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.39 [‐13.49, ‐11.29]

15.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.70 [‐14.85, ‐12.55]

15.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [‐2.63, 4.75]

16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

6

510

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [‐1.15, 2.72]

16.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

6

510

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [‐1.15, 2.72]

17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

4

249

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.83 [‐5.62, 1.96]

17.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

4

249

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.83 [‐5.62, 1.96]

18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

5

639

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.67 [6.96, 12.39]

18.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.4 [9.25, 15.55]

18.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

4

373

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.73 [‐3.64, 7.11]

19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

3

540

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.59, 1.70]

19.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.32 [0.92, 5.86]

19.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.28, 1.14]

20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

20.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

21 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

3

216

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.75 [‐12.22, 8.71]

21.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

3

216

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.75 [‐12.22, 8.71]

22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

7

766

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.79, 1.15]

22.1 SpO2 target < 85%

1

287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.59, 1.28]

22.2 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

6

479

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.79, 1.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by lower limit of oxygen saturation range at 5 to 10 mintues
Comparison 4. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) Show forest plot

7

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.02]

1.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.61 [0.41, 6.34]

1.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

6

695

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.67, 2.01]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

1

177

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.42, 1.21]

2.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

1

177

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.42, 1.21]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

4

189

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.77, 1.08]

3.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.60, 1.27]

3.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

3

147

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.76, 1.12]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

7

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.78, 1.18]

4.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.49, 1.68]

4.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

6

695

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.77, 1.20]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.70 [‐3.28, ‐0.12]

5.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.70 [‐3.28, ‐0.12]

6 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

2

235

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.36, 2.79]

6.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.06, 6.17]

6.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

1

193

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.36, 3.61]

7 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

3

393

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.16, 1.14]

7.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

3

393

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.16, 1.14]

8 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.30, 1.64]

8.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

2

211

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.30, 1.64]

9 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

4

458

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.30, 1.73]

9.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.12, 2.95]

9.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

3

416

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.27, 2.24]

10 Periventricular leukomalacia Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.09, 4.73]

10.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.08, 18.09]

10.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.97]

11 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

6

669

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.39, 1.67]

11.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.4 [0.02, 9.29]

11.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

5

627

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.40, 1.79]

12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age) Show forest plot

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.23, 0.98]

12.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

1

88

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.23, 0.98]

13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

7

734

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.73, 1.19]

13.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.20, 2.65]

13.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

6

692

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.74, 1.21]

14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.70 [‐14.85, ‐12.55]

14.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

1

266

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.70 [‐14.85, ‐12.55]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

5

432

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [‐1.02, 2.85]

15.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.75 [‐37.24, 27.74]

15.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

4

390

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [‐1.01, 2.88]

16 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

3

171

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.11 [‐7.08, 0.86]

16.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

12.0 [‐9.18, 33.18]

16.2 Higher SpO2 target 91 to 95%

2

129

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.66 [‐7.71, 0.38]

17 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

3

501

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.87 [7.12, 12.62]

17.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐10.25 [‐50.97, 30.47]

17.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

2

459

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.96 [7.21, 12.71]

18 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

2

480

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.65, 2.29]

18.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

2

480

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.65, 2.29]

19 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

2

156

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.35 [‐15.26, 6.57]

19.1 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

2

156

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.35 [‐15.26, 6.57]

20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

5

628

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.75, 1.22]

20.1 SpO2 target 85 to 90%

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.60, 2.01]

20.2 SpO2 target 91 to 95%

4

586

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.72, 1.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by highest SpO2 limit at 10 minutes
Comparison 5. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) Show forest plot

8

832

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.66, 1.55]

1.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

8

516

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.68, 1.61]

1.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

4

316

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.05, 5.26]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

1

31

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.64 [0.42, 31.27]

2.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

31

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.64 [0.42, 31.27]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

2

102

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.84, 1.09]

3.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

2

102

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.84, 1.09]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

4

467

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.85, 1.35]

4.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

4

338

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.84, 1.34]

4.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

1

129

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.49, 2.97]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

5.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

2

102

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.83, 0.79]

6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

6.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

7 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

4

259

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.38, 1.33]

7.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

4

259

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.38, 1.33]

8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

5

464

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.46, 1.89]

8.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

5

317

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.43, 1.82]

8.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

1

147

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.26 [0.09, 54.54]

9 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

2

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.52, 1.48]

9.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

2

217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.52, 1.48]

10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

6

537

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.55, 1.87]

10.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

6

388

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.51, 1.79]

10.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

2

149

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.27 [0.15, 72.23]

11 Periventricular leukomalacia Show forest plot

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.08, 18.09]

11.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

42

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.08, 18.09]

12 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

7

731

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [0.78, 3.17]

12.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

7

483

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.80, 4.01]

12.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

3

248

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.23, 4.47]

13 Chronic lung disease (28 days age) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.53, 3.05]

13.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.53, 3.05]

14 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

8

694

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.72, 1.13]

14.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

8

411

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.72, 1.13]

14.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

3

283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.36, 2.33]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [‐2.63, 4.75]

15.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [‐2.63, 4.75]

16 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

2

120

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.64 [‐32.62, 5.33]

16.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

2

120

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐13.64 [‐32.62, 5.33]

17 Duration of respiratory support (CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

2

120

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.09 [‐12.85, 8.67]

17.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

2

120

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.09 [‐12.85, 8.67]

18 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

3

180

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐16.90, 15.91]

18.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

3

180

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐16.90, 15.91]

19 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.20, 1.53]

19.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.20, 1.53]

20 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

20.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

21 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.0 [‐8.96, 64.96]

21.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.0 [‐8.96, 64.96]

22 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

7

710

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.81, 1.14]

22.1 Gestation ≤ 28 weeks

7

483

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.80, 1.14]

22.2 Gestation > 28 to 32 weeks

2

227

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.54, 2.05]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration subgrouped by gestational age
Comparison 6. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mortality near term corrected age or discharge (latest reported) Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.25, 1.07]

2 Neurodevelopmental disability Show forest plot

2

208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.49, 1.35]

3 IPPV in the delivery room Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.94, 1.07]

4 Intubation in the delivery room Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.79, 1.70]

5 Time to reach desired oxygen saturation target Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.09 [‐0.26, 4.44]

6 Time to reach heart rate > 100 bpm (not prespecified) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐1.21, 1.75]

7 Retinopathy of prematurity Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.39, 1.86]

8 Severe retinopathy of prematurity (≥ stage 3) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.86 [0.19, 77.05]

9 Intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.47, 1.53]

10 Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 or 4) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.17, 3.48]

11 Necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.54 [0.46, 5.19]

12 Chronic lung disease (28 days age) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.53, 3.05]

13 Chronic lung disease (36 weeks' corrected age) Show forest plot

2

243

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.49 [0.90, 2.47]

14 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or CPAP) (days from birth) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.06 [‐2.63, 4.75]

15 Duration of respiratory support (mechanical ventilation) (days from birth) Show forest plot

1

193

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [‐0.97, 3.47]

16 Duration of supplemental oxygen administration Show forest plot

2

253

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.72 [‐2.78, 8.22]

17 Mortality to follow up (> 18 months) Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.28, 1.14]

18 Postnatal growth failure (weight < 10th percentile at discharge) Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.55, 1.33]

19 Duration of hospitalisation (days) Show forest plot

1

60

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

28.0 [‐8.96, 64.96]

20 Patent ductus arteriosus (not prespecified) Show forest plot

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.88, 1.59]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Lower (FiO2 < 0.4) versus higher (FiO2 ≥ 0.4) oxygen concentration ‐ sensitivity analysis