Učinkovitost različitih sestrinskih stilova primopredaje za osiguravanje kontinuiteta informacija kod hospitaliziranih pacijenata.
Referencias
References to studies excluded from this review
Ir a:
Additional references
Ir a:
Characteristics of studies
Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]
| Study | Reason for exclusion |
| Qualitative interview study with 20 nurses to develop a model structure for a standardised nursing handover. Did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| A quality improvement project on handover between institutions. Did not meet RCT study design criteria and in‐hospital nursing handover criteria | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a combination of written and verbal nursing shift handover with a safety check at the bedside. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only a post‐implementation evaluation (of nurses' experiences) | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a combination of written and verbal shift handover for residents. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as only simple before‐and‐after comparison was performed (on satisfaction with sign‐outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign‐out, and patient knowledge by on‐call residents) and not on nursing handover | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a combination of written and verbal nursing shift handover at the bedside. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on the amount of time spent for shift report, overtime expenses related to shift report, call lights, staff satisfaction, and patient falls). | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a computer‐generated written nursing shift handover. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on overtime and staff satisfaction) | |
| Opinion paper on nursing shift handover; did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| Implementation and evaluation of bedside nursing shift handover. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on nurses belief that bedside reporting improves patient safety). | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a standardised nursing shift report. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on staff opinions and overtime) | |
| Qualitative study to find out what should be included in a nursing shift handover report and to determine the extent to which nurses acted upon their beliefs. Did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of multidisciplinary structured verbal, written bedside handover from cardiac operating room to paediatric intensive care. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on handover score, staff perception, duration and number of interruptions). | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a standardised handover from ambulance to ED. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison and did not meet in‐hospital nursing handover criteria | |
| Opinion paper on nursing handover; did not meet RCT study design criteria. | |
| Simulation of the effect that manipulating the style and content of the nurse shift handover had on an individual's ability to plan patient care, not in a clinical setting. | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of bedside nursing shift handover. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on nurses' job satisfaction and time spent delivering report) | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a weekend handover for residents. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison and not on nursing handover. | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a structured handover from cardiac operation room to ICU. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on technical errors, information omissions and realised errors) | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a structured written and verbal nursing shift report in a medical ICU. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on nurse’s perception of handoff communication during shift report) | |
| Editorial; did not meet RCT study design criteria. | |
| Editorial; did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a bedside nursing shift report on a medical/surgical intermediate care unit. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on patient satisfaction) | |
| Comparison of a paper‐based and electronic‐based medical handover from day team to out‐of‐hours team consisting of specialist nurses, medical staff and surgical staff. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on patient details and patient location, primary diagnosis and current problem, plan of action and day team details) | |
| Prospective cohort study of trauma and surgical ICU teams (interns, residents, and fellows) to determine whether a structured checklist for ICU handovers prevents information loss. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on data lost) | |
| Proceedings abstract on development, implementation and evaluation of a standardised nursing shift handover in 3 paediatric ICUs. Did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| Opinion paper;did not meet RCT study design criteria | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a standardised bedside nursing shift handover on medical surgical units. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on nurse and patient satisfaction) | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of a bedside 'reading' nursing shift handover. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (the standard of record keeping) | |
| Development, implementation and evaluation of an electronic handover communication tool for transferring uncomplicated routine patients to and from a progressive care unit and cardiac laboratories. Did not meet RCT study design criteria as performed only simple before‐and‐after comparison (on implementation evaluation) |
Abbreviations
ED = emergency department
ICU = intensive care unit
RCT = randomised controlled trial
Flow diagram of search
