Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009453Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 diciembre 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Consumidores y comunicación

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sarah Clement

    Correspondencia a: Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Francesca Lassman

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Elizabeth Barley

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Sara Evans‐Lacko

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Paul Williams

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Rowena Pagdin

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Mike Slade

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

  • Nicolas Rüsch

    Social and General Psychiatry Department, Psychiatric University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

  • Sosei Yamaguchi

    Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), Tokyo, Japan

  • Graham Thornicroft

    Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Sarah Clement wrote the protocol, with Paul Williams writing some sections and Sara Evans‐Lacko co‐writing some sections. All authors contributed ideas to the protocol and critically revised it.

Sarah Clement produced an initial draft search strategy which was developed further and finalised by John Kis‐Rigo (CCCRG).

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.

    Salary support for PW

External sources

  • This review presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (RP‐PG‐0606‐1053), UK.

    The Programme grant supports the salary of SC, FL and RP and contributes to the time of GT and MS.  The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

  • NIHR Specialist Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at the Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London and the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

    This contributes to the time of GT.

  • Big Lottery and Comic Relief grant for Evaluation of the Time to Change Programme, UK.

    This supports the salary of SEL.

Declarations of interest

Review authors have been involved in some studies which may be eligible for inclusion in the review. GT leads the independent evaluation team for England's national ‘Time to Change: Let’s end mental health discrimination now’ programme (Henderson 2009) and has received research funding for this. SEL is employed as a researcher on this evaluation team.  GT has been a member of the independent evaluation team for Scotland’s ‘See Me’ campaign (Dunion 2005) and received research funding for this.  Both Time to Change and See Me are multifaceted initiatives with mass media components. GT is chief investigator and SC study lead for an RCT on the effectiveness of an anti‐stigma DVD (Clement in press). GT received research funding for this study from the England's National Institute for Health Research and SC is employed on this study.

Acknowledgements

We thank staff and editors of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group for their support, advice and assistance, especially Megan Prictor, Sandy Oliver, and John Kis‐Rigo. We also thank our stakeholder group for their thoughtful contributions, including Nisha Mehta and Vanessa Pinfold. We are very grateful to Ken Ichikawa for agreeing to screen 20% of the items yielded by the Japanese database search, and for making inclusions decisions and data extraction for Japanese studies. We thank Lara Marinello for assistance with proof reading.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Jul 23

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

Review

Sarah Clement, Francesca Lassman, Elizabeth Barley, Sara Evans‐Lacko, Paul Williams, Sosei Yamaguchi, Mike Slade, Nicolas Rüsch, Graham Thornicroft

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009453.pub2

2011 Dec 07

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

Protocol

Sarah Clement, Francesca Lassman, Elizabeth Barley, Sara Evans‐Lacko, Paul Williams, Rowena Pagdin, Mike Slade, Nicolas Rüsch, Sosei Yamaguchi, Graham Thornicroft

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009453

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.