Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Administración de suplementos de vitamina E en pacientes con fibrosis quística

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009422.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 09 diciembre 2014see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Fibrosis quística y enfermedades genéticas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Peter O Okebukola

    Correspondencia a: Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Sonal Kansra

    Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK

  • Joanne Barrett

    West Midlands Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

Contributions of authors

Peter Okebukola conceived of and wrote the text of the protocol and review alongside Sonal Kansra with comments from Joanne Barratt.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Larissa Shamseer for her input into an early draft of the protocol and also Helen McCabe who was an author on the published protocol. Thanks also to Nikki Jahnke for all her help with editing the review and other administrative matters. Finally we would like to thank the authors of the included Keljo study for providing additional data.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Sep 06

Vitamin E supplementation in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Peter O Okebukola, Sonal Kansra, Joanne Barrett

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009422.pub4

2017 Mar 06

Vitamin E supplementation in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Peter O Okebukola, Sonal Kansra, Joanne Barrett

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009422.pub3

2014 Dec 09

Vitamin E supplementation in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Peter O Okebukola, Sonal Kansra, Joanne Barrett

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009422.pub2

2011 Nov 09

Vitamin E supplementation in people with cystic fibrosis

Protocol

Peter O Okebukola, Sonal Kansra, Helen McCabe

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009422

Differences between protocol and review

We originally planned to present all formulations of vitamin E supplements as a single intervention, but in the full review we have presented the comparisons of water‐soluble vitamin E supplements versus control and fat‐soluble vitamin E supplements versus control separately.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Comparison 1 Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 1 Serum vitamin E levels.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 1 Serum vitamin E levels.

Comparison 1 Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 2 Weight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 2 Weight.

Comparison 2 Fat‐soluble vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 1 Serum vitamin E levels.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Fat‐soluble vitamin E supplementation versus control, Outcome 1 Serum vitamin E levels.

Comparison 1. Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Serum vitamin E levels Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Up to 1 month

2

32

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

17.66 [10.59, 24.74]

1.2 Up to 3 months

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.61 [4.77, 18.45]

1.3 Up to 6 months

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

19.74 [13.48, 26.00]

2 Weight Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Up to 6 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Water‐miscible vitamin E supplementation versus control
Comparison 2. Fat‐soluble vitamin E supplementation versus control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Serum vitamin E levels Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Up to 1 month

2

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

13.59 [9.52, 17.66]

1.2 Up to 3 months

1

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.40 [‐1.45, 14.25]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Fat‐soluble vitamin E supplementation versus control