Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acetato de eslicarbazepina como tratamiento complementario para la epilepsia focal farmacorresistente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008907.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 22 junio 2021see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Epilepsia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Xian-Chao Chang

    Department of Neurology, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China

    Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China

  • Hai Yuan

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Second People’s Hospital of Hefei City, Hefei, China

  • Yi Wang

    Division of Preventive Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

  • Hui-Qin Xu

    Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

  • Wen-Ke Hong

    Department of Neurology, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China

    Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China

  • Rong-Yuan Zheng

    Correspondencia a: Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

XCC: drafting protocol and review versions; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.
HY: selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data.
YW: methodology expert.
HQX: drafting review versions; updating review.
WKH: drafting review versions; updating review.
RYZ: correspondence; arbiter of selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support provided

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK

Declarations of interest

XCC: none known.
HY: none known.
YW: none known.
HQX: none known.
WKH: none known.
RYZ: none.

Acknowledgements

This review update was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Epilepsy Group. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service or the Department of Health and Social Care.

We would like to acknowledge the Cochrane Epilepsy Group for their technical support. We also thank Graham Chan for his assistance in the search of relevant trials.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Jun 22

Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on therapy for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Review

Xian-Chao Chang, Hai Yuan, Yi Wang, Hui-Qin Xu, Wen-Ke Hong, Rong-Yuan Zheng

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008907.pub4

2017 Oct 25

Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Review

Xian‐Chao Chang, Hai Yuan, Yi Wang, Hui‐Qin Xu, Wen‐Ke Hong, Rong‐Yuan Zheng

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008907.pub3

2011 Dec 07

Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant partial epilepsy

Review

Xian‐Chao Chang, Hai Yuan, Yi Wang, Hui‐Qin Xu, Rong‐Yuan Zheng

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008907.pub2

2010 Dec 08

Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant partial epilepsy

Protocol

Xian‐Chao Chang, Hai Yuan, Yi Wang, Hui‐Qin Xu, Rong‐Yuan Zheng

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008907

Differences between protocol and review

The term 'partial' has been replaced by 'focal', in accordance with the most recent classification of epilepsies of the International League Against Epilepsy (Scheffer 2017)

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram for update.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram for update.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 1: Primary analysis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 1: Primary analysis

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 2: Best‐case scenario

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 2: Best‐case scenario

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 3: Worst‐case scenario

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, Outcome 3: Worst‐case scenario

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 1: Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 1: Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 2: Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 2: Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 3: Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 3: Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 4: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 4: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 5: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 5: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 6: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2: Freedom from seizures, Outcome 6: Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

Comparison 3: Treatment withdrawal, Outcome 1: Treatment withdrawal (any reason)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Treatment withdrawal, Outcome 1: Treatment withdrawal (any reason)

Comparison 3: Treatment withdrawal, Outcome 2: Treatment withdrawal (adverse effect)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Treatment withdrawal, Outcome 2: Treatment withdrawal (adverse effect)

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 1: Ataxia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 1: Ataxia

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 2: Dizziness

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 2: Dizziness

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 3: Fatigue

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 3: Fatigue

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 4: Nausea

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 4: Nausea

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 5: Somnolence

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 5: Somnolence

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 6: Rash

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 6: Rash

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 7: Headache

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 7: Headache

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 8: Vomiting

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 8: Vomiting

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 9: Diplopia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4: Adverse effects, Outcome 9: Diplopia

Summary of findings 1. Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy

Patient or population: people with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy
Setting: outpatients
Intervention: ESL: all doses
Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with ESL

≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency (adults)

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

RR 1.71
(1.42 to 2.05)

1799
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,b,c,d

Results presented for ITT population.

203 per 1000

347 per 1000
(288 to 416)

≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency (children aged 618 years)

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

RR 1.35 (0.98 to 1.87)

322

(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,e

ESL may reduce seizures in children aged 6–18 years with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy.

294 per 1000

397 per 1000
(288 to 550)

Freedom from seizures

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

RR 3.16
(1.73 to 5.78)

1922
(6 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,c

20 per 1000

63 per 1000
(34 to 115)

Treatment withdrawal (any reason)

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

RR 1.25
(0.93 to 1.70)

2185
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,c

164 per 1000

205 per 1000
(153 to 279)

Treatment withdrawal (adverse effect)

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

RR 2.72
(1.66 to 4.46)

2185
(7 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,c

38 per 1000

104 per 1000
(64 to 171)

Adverse effects

Follow‐up: up to 18 weeks

Study population

See comment

See comment

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea,c

ESL was associated with dizziness, nausea, somnolence, diplopia and vomiting.

See comment

See comment

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; ESL: eslicarbazepine acetate; ITT: intention to treat; RCT: randomized controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aThese studies were funded by BIAL – Portela & Ca, SA. There was no indication that the source of funding introduced bias.
bDose‐response analysis indicated an increase in effect with increasing dose.
cDowngraded one level due to risk of bias: the five included studies in adults were at high risk of attrition bias due to large proportions of missing data.
dBest‐case and worst‐case scenario analyses were inconsistent with results of ITT analyses.
eDowngraded one level due to risk of bias: there was an investigational medicinal product recall in children aged two to six years; therefore, we excluded its data here.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Eslicarbazepine acetate add‐on for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy
Table 1. Estimated percentage responders per dose

Dose (mg/day)

Responders (%)

95% Confidence intervals

0

19.0

15.9 to 22.7

400

24.5

19.0 to 30.0

800

30.9

27.1 to 35.2

1200

38.2

34.1 to 42.7

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Estimated percentage responders per dose
Table 2. Percentage difference in responders per dose compared to placebo

Dose (mg/day)

Difference

95% Confidence intervals

400

6

–1 to 12

800

13

7 to 17

1200

21

14 to 25

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Percentage difference in responders per dose compared to placebo
Comparison 1. 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Primary analysis Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.80, 1.85]

1.1.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.66 [1.34, 2.07]

1.1.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.56, 2.37]

1.1.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children (aged 2–18 years)

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.88, 1.61]

1.1.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children (aged 6–18 years)

2

322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.98, 1.87]

1.1.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [1.42, 2.05]

1.1.7 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.34, 1.83]

1.2 Best‐case scenario Show forest plot

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.47 [1.84, 3.31]

1.3 Worst‐case scenario Show forest plot

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.79, 1.00]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency
Comparison 2. Freedom from seizures

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo Show forest plot

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.21, 5.02]

2.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo Show forest plot

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.42 [1.38, 8.46]

2.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo Show forest plot

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.46 [1.40, 8.54]

2.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children Show forest plot

1

123

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.34 [1.06, 17.79]

2.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults Show forest plot

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.90 [1.49, 5.68]

2.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children Show forest plot

6

1922

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.16 [1.73, 5.78]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Freedom from seizures
Comparison 3. Treatment withdrawal

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Treatment withdrawal (any reason) Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.38, 2.30]

3.1.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.74, 1.39]

3.1.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.75 [1.26, 2.41]

3.1.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.01 [0.58, 6.93]

3.1.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.86, 1.64]

3.1.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.93, 1.70]

3.2 Treatment withdrawal (adverse effect) Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.2.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.12 [0.53, 8.48]

3.2.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.52 [1.47, 4.35]

3.2.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.66 [2.68, 8.09]

3.2.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.62 [0.78, 8.76]

3.2.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.66 [1.42, 4.96]

3.2.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.72 [1.66, 4.46]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Treatment withdrawal
Comparison 4. Adverse effects

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Ataxia Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.04 [0.21, 5.09]

4.1.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

2

373

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.49 [0.75, 8.29]

4.1.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

2

365

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.59 [0.77, 8.64]

4.1.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Not estimable

4.1.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

2

647

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.14 [0.71, 6.48]

4.1.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

2

647

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.14 [0.71, 6.48]

4.2 Dizziness Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.2.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.25 [0.97, 5.22]

4.2.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.41 [1.52, 3.80]

4.2.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

3.58 [2.33, 5.52]

4.2.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.02 [0.37, 11.21]

4.2.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.81 [1.86, 4.27]

4.2.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.77 [1.85, 4.15]

4.3 Fatigue Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.3.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

0.83 [0.15, 4.51]

4.3.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

2

643

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.21 [0.43, 3.40]

4.3.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

2

635

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.72 [0.66, 4.50]

4.3.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

1

263

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.60 [0.25, 10.25]

4.3.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

2

1048

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.39 [0.58, 3.31]

4.3.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

3

1352

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.42 [0.65, 3.13]

4.4 Nausea Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.4.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.08 [0.45, 9.66]

4.4.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

3

815

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.12 [0.99, 4.55]

4.4.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

3

802

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

3.64 [1.80, 7.39]

4.4.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.20 [0.46, 10.55]

4.4.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

4

1397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.61 [1.36, 5.01]

4.4.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

6

1824

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.55 [1.39, 4.67]

4.5 Somnolence Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.5.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.15 [0.54, 2.45]

4.5.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.39 [0.83, 2.31]

4.5.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.10 [1.31, 3.37]

4.5.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.04 [0.73, 5.72]

4.5.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.71 [1.11, 2.63]

4.5.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.75 [1.18, 2.61]

4.6 Rash Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.6.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo

4

1702

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.24 [0.38, 4.01]

4.7 Headache Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.7.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.17 [0.49, 2.80]

4.7.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.20 [0.71, 2.01]

4.7.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.55 [0.95, 2.53]

4.7.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.41 [0.64, 3.09]

4.7.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

5

1799

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.30 [0.84, 2.02]

4.7.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

7

2185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.32 [0.90, 1.94]

4.8 Vomiting Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.8.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

1

196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.39 [0.20, 9.59]

4.8.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

3

815

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.59 [0.96, 7.02]

4.8.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

3

802

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

4.59 [1.80, 11.70]

4.8.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

1.17 [0.38, 3.60]

4.8.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

4

1397

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

3.30 [1.34, 8.13]

4.8.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

6

1783

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.37 [1.19, 4.74]

4.9 Diplopia Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

Subtotals only

4.9.1 Eslicarbazepine acetate 400 mg/day vs placebo

2

398

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

2.42 [0.59, 10.01]

4.9.2 Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg/day vs placebo

4

1015

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

4.03 [1.61, 10.08]

4.9.3 Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg/day vs placebo

4

1006

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

5.12 [2.07, 12.62]

4.9.4 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in children

2

386

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

3.74 [0.63, 22.34]

4.9.5 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo in adults

4

1702

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

4.14 [1.74, 9.84]

4.9.6 Eslicarbazepine acetate any dose vs placebo, adults and children

6

2088

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 99% CI)

4.07 [1.86, 8.89]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Adverse effects