Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008884Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 diciembre 2010see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Anestesia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jørn Wetterslev

    Correspondencia a: Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 3344, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    [email protected]

  • Christian S Meyhoff

    Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Lars N Jørgensen

    Department of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Christian Gluud

    Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 3344, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Lars S Rasmussen

    Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Jørn Wetterslev (JW), Christian Meyhoff (CM), Lars N. Jørgensen (LNJ), Lars S. Rasmussen (LSR), Christian Gluud (CG)
Co‐ordinating the review: JW
Undertaking manual searches: JW
Screening search results: JW, CM
Organizing retrieval of papers: JW, CM
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: JW, CM
Appraising quality of papers: JW, CM
Abstracting data from papers: JW, CM
Writing to authors of papers for additional information: JW
Providing additional data about papers: JW
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: JW, CM, LSR
Data management for the review: JW, CM

Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.0): JW, CM
RevMan statistical data: JW, CM
Other statistical analysis not using RevMan (TSA): JW
Double entry of data: (data entered by person one: JW; data entered by person two: CM)
Interpretation of data: JW, CM, LNJ, LSR, CG
Statistical analysis: JW, CM, CG
Writing the review: JW, CM, LNJ, LSR, CG

Securing funding for the review: JW, CG
Performing previous work that was the foundation of the present study: JW, CM, LNJ, LSR, and the PROXI‐Trial group.
Guarantor for the review (one author): JW
Person responsible for reading and checking review before submission: JW

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Copenhagen Trial Unit (CTU), Denmark.

    CTU funded the work of JW during the work with the review.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

JW, CM, LNJ, and LSR were all members of the Steering Committee for the PROXI‐Trial.

Acknowledgements

We thank Karen Hovhannisyan (Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group, Trials Search Co‐ordinator) for his valuable help with the phrasing of the search strategies.

We would also like to thank Mathew Zacharias (content editor), Nathan Pace (statistical editor), Barbara Kabon, Mark Rollins, Robert Greif (peer reviewers) and Janet Wale and Donna Ydreos (representatives of the Cochrane Consumer Network) for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of this protocol for the systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Jun 25

The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients

Review

Jørn Wetterslev, Christian S Meyhoff, Lars N Jørgensen, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, Lars S Rasmussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008884.pub2

2010 Dec 08

The effects of high perioperative inspiratory oxygen fraction for adult surgical patients

Protocol

Jørn Wetterslev, Christian S Meyhoff, Lars N Jørgensen, Christian Gluud, Lars S Rasmussen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008884

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.