Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

تاثیر مصرف مکمل ویتامین A در دوران بارداری بر پیامدهای مادر و نوزاد

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Ajans 1965 {published data only}

Ajans ZA, Sarrif A, Husbands M. Influence of vitamin A on human colostrum and early milk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1965;17:139‐42.

Coutsoudis 1999 {published data only}

Coutsoudis A, Moodley D, Pillay K, Harrigan R, Stone C, Moodley J, et al. Effects of vitamin A supplementation on viral load in HIV‐1 infected pregnant women. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 1997;15(1):86‐7.
Coutsoudis A, Pillay K, Spooner E, Kuhn L, Coovadia HM. Randomized trial testing the effect of vitamin A supplementation on pregnancy outcomes and early mother‐to‐child HIV‐1 transmission in Durban, South Africa. AIDS 1999;13(12):1517‐24.
Filteau SM, Rollins NC, Coutsoudis A, Sullivan KR, Willumsen JF, Tomkins AM. The effect of antenatal vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation on gut integrity of infants of HIV‐infected South African women. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2001;32(4):464‐70.
Kennedy CM, Coutsoudis A, Kuhn L, Pillay K, Mburu A, Stein Z, et al. Randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of vitamin A supplementation on maternal morbidity during pregnancy and postpartum among HIV‐infected women. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2000;24(1):37‐44.
Kennedy‐Oji C, Coutsoudis A, Kuhn L, Pillay K, Mburu A, Stein Z, et al. Effects of vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy and early lactation on body weight of South African HIV‐infected women. Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition 2001;19(3):167‐76.
Kuhn L, Coutsoudis A, Trabattoni D, Archary D, Rossi T, Segat L, et al. Synergy between mannose‐binding lectin gene polymorphisms and supplementation with vitamin A influences susceptibility to HIV infection in infants born to HIV‐positive mothers. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006;84(3):610‐5.

Cox 2005 {published data only}

Cox SE, Arthur P, Kirkwood BR, Yeboah‐Antwi K, Riley EM. Vitamin A supplementation increases ratios of proinflammatory to anti‐inflammatory cytokine responses in pregnancy and lactation. Clinical & Experimental Immunology 2006;144(3):392‐400.
Cox SE, Staalsoe T, Arthur P, Bulmer JN, Tagbor H, Hviid L, et al. Maternal vitamin A supplementation and immunity to malaria in pregnancy in Ghanaian primigravids. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2005;10(12):1286‐97.

Dijkhuizen 2004 {published data only}

Dijkhuizen MA. Vitamin A, Iron and Zinc Deficiency in Indonesia. Micronutrient Interactions and Effects of Supplementation [thesis]. Wageningen University, 2001.
Dijkhuizen MA, Wieringa FT, West CE, Muhilal. Zinc plus beta‐carotene supplementation of pregnant women is superior to beta‐carotene supplementation alone in improving vitamin A status in both mothers and infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004;80(5):1299‐307.
Wieringa FT, Dijkhuizen MA, Muhilal, Van der Meer JW. Maternal micronutrient supplementation with zinc and beta‐carotene affects morbidity and immune function of infants during the first 6 months of life. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;64(10):1072‐9.

Fawzi 1998 {published data only}

Arsenault JE, Aboud S, Manji KP, Fawzi WW, Villamor E. Vitamin supplementation increases risk of subclinical mastitis in HIV‐infected women. Journal of Nutrition 2010;140(10):1788‐92.
Baylin A, Villamor E, Rifai N, Msamanga G, Fawzi WW. Effect of vitamin supplementation to HIV‐infected pregnant women on the micronutrient status of their infants. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;59(8):960‐8.
Fawzi W, Msamanga G, Antelman G, Xu C, Hertzmark E, Spiegelman D, et al. Effect of prenatal vitamin supplementation on lower‐genital levels of HIV type 1 and interleukin type 1 beta at 36 weeks of gestation. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004;38(5):716‐22.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga G, Hunter D, Urassa E, Renjifo B, Mwakagile D, et al. Randomized trial of vitamin supplements in relation to vertical transmission of HIV‐1 in Tanzania. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2000;23(3):246‐54.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Hunter D, Renjifo B, Antelman G, Bang H, et al. Randomized trial of vitamin supplements in relation to transmission of HIV‐1 through breastfeeding and early child mortality. AIDS (London, England) 2002;16(14):1935‐44.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Kupka R, Spiegelman D, Villamor E, Mugusi F, et al. Multivitamin supplementation improves hematologic status in HIV‐infected women and their children in Tanzania. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007;85(5):1335‐43.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Spiegelman D, Urassa EJ, Hunter DJ. Rationale and design of the Tanzania Vitamin and HIV Infection Trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 1999;20(1):75‐90.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Spiegelman D, Urassa EJ, McGrath N, Mwakagile D, et al. Randomised trial of effects of vitamin supplements on pregnancy outcomes and T cell counts in HIV‐1‐infected women in Tanzania. Lancet 1998;351(9114):1477‐82.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Spiegelman D, Wei R, Kapiga S, Villamor E, et al. A randomized trial of multivitamin supplements and HIV disease progression and mortality. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;351(1):23‐32.
Fawzi WW, Msamanga GI, Wei R, Spiegelman D, Antelman G, Villamor E, et al. Effect of providing vitamin supplements to human immunodeficiency virus‐infected, lactating mothers on the child's morbidity and cd4+ cell counts. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2003;36(8):1053‐62.
Kawai K, Kupka R, Mugusi F, Aboud S, Okuma J, Villamor E, et al. A randomized trial to determine the optimal dosage of multivitamin supplements to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes among HIV‐infected women in Tanzania. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;91(2):391‐7.
Kawai K, Msamanga G, Manji K, Villamor E, Bosch RJ, Hertzmark E, et al. Sex differences in the effects of maternal vitamin supplements on mortality and morbidity among children born to HIV‐infected women in Tanzania. British Journal of Nutrition 2010;103(12):1784‐91.
Kupka R, Msamanga GI, Spiegelman D, Morris S, Mugusi F, Hunter DJ, et al. Selenium status is associated with accelerated HIV disease progression among HIV‐1‐infected pregnant women in Tanzania. Journal of Nutrition 2004;134(10):2556‐60.
McGrath N, Bellinger D, Robins J, Msamanga GI, Tronick E, Fawzi WW. Effect of maternal multivitamin supplementation on the mental and psychomotor development of children who are born to HIV‐1‐infected mothers in Tanzania. Pediatrics 2006;117(2):216‐25.
Merchant AT, Msamanga G, Villamor E, Saathoff E, O'Brien M, Hertzmark E, et al. Multivitamin supplementation of HIV‐positive women during pregnancy reduces hypertension. Journal of Nutrition 2005;135(7):1776‐81.
Olofin IO, Spiegelman D, Aboud S, Duggan C, Danaei G, Fawzi WW. Supplementation with multivitamins and vitamin A and incidence of malaria among HIV‐infected Tanzanian women. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2014;67(Suppl 4):S173‐8.
Smith Fawzi MC, Kaaya SF, Mbwambo J, Msamanga GI, Antelman G, Wei R, et al. Multivitamin supplementation in HIV‐positive pregnant women: impact on depression and quality of life in a resource‐poor setting. HIV Medicine 2007;8(4):203‐12.
Villamor E, Koulinska IN, Aboud S, Murrin C, Bosch RJ, Manji KP, et al. Effect of vitamin supplements on HIV shedding in breast milk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;92(4):881‐6.
Villamor E, Msamanga G, Saathoff E, Fataki M, Manji K, Fawzi WW. Effects of maternal vitamin supplements on malaria in children born to HIV‐infected women. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2007;76(6):1066‐71.
Villamor E, Msamanga G, Saathoff E, Manji K, Fawzi WW. Effect of vitamin supplements on the incidence of malaria among children born to HIV‐infected Women. FASEB Journal 2006;20(4 Pt 1):A125.
Villamor E, Saathoff E, Bosch RJ, Hertzmark E, Baylin A, Manji K, et al. Vitamin supplementation of HIV‐infected women improves postnatal child growth. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;81(4):880‐8.
Villamor E, Saathoff E, Manji K, Msamanga G, Hunter DJ, Fawzi WW. Vitamin supplements, socioeconomic status, and morbidity events as predictors of wasting in HIV‐infected women from Tanzania. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;82(4):857‐65.
Webb AL, Aboud S, Furtado J, Murrin C, Campos H, Fawzi WW, et al. Effect of vitamin supplementation on breast milk concentrations of retinol, carotenoids and tocopherols in HIV‐infected Tanzanian women. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009;63(3):332‐9.

Green 1931 {published data only}

Green HN, Pindar D, Davis G, Mellanby E. Diet as a prophylactic agent against puerperal sepsis. British Medical Journal 1931;2:595‐8.

Hakimi 1999 {unpublished data only}

Hakimi M, Dibley M. ZIBUVITA trial: impact of vitamin A and zinc supplementation in pregnancy on maternal post partum infections. Personal communication1999.
Prawirohartono EP, Nystrom L, Ivarsson A, Stenlund H, Lind T. The impact of prenatal vitamin A and zinc supplementation on growth of children up to 2 years of age in rural Java, Indonesia. Public Health Nutrition 2011;14(12):2197‐206.
Prawirohartono EP, Nystrom L, Nurdiati DS, Hakimi M, Lind T. The impact of prenatal vitamin A and zinc supplementation on birth size and neonatal survival ‐ a double‐blind, randomized controlled trial in a rural area of Indonesia. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 2013;83(1):14‐25.

Kirkwood 2010 {published data only}

Costello A, Osrin D. Vitamin A supplementation and maternal mortality. Lancet 2010;375:1675‐7.
Edmond K, Hurt L, Fenty J, Amenga‐Etego S, Zandoh C, Hurt C, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation in women of reproductive age on cause‐specific early and late infant mortality in rural Ghana: ObaapaVitA double‐blind, cluster‐randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. BMJ Open 2012;2(1):e000658.
Hurt L, Ten Asbroek A, Amenga‐Etego S, Zandoh C, Danso S, Edmond K, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation on cause‐specific mortality in women of reproductive age in Ghana: a secondary analysis from the ObaapaVitA trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2013;91(1):19‐27.
Kirkwood B. Trial of the impact of vitamin A on maternal mortality (ObaapaVitA). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00211341(accessed August 2010).
Kirkwood B. “ObaapaVitA” Vitamin A Supplementation and Maternal Mortality Trial: Randomized double‐blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the impact of vitamin A supplementation maternal mortality in Ghana. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/nphir/research/obaapavita/Obaapa_Trial_Protocol.pdf(accessed August 2010).
Kirkwood BR, Hurt L, Amenga‐Etego S, Tawiah C, Zandoh C, Danso S, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation in women of reproductive age on maternal survival in Ghana (ObaapaVitA): a cluster‐randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Personal communication.
Kirkwood BR, Hurt L, Amenga‐Etego S, Tawiah C, Zandoh C, Danso S, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation in women of reproductive age on maternal survival in Ghana (obaapavita): a cluster‐randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375(9726):1640‐9.

Kumwenda 2002 {published data only}

Kumwenda N, Miotti PG, Taha TE, Broadhead R, Biggar RJ, Jackson JB, et al. Antenatal vitamin A supplementation increases birth weight and decreases anemia among infants born to human immunodeficiency virus‐infected women in Malawi. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002;35(5):618‐24.

Muslimatun 2001 {published data only}

Muslimatun S, Schmidt MK, Schultink W, West CE, Hautvast JGAJ, Gross R, et al. Weekly supplementation with iron and vitamin A during pregnancy increases hemoglobin concentration but decreases serum ferritin concentration in Indonesian pregnant women. Journal of Nutrition 2001;131(1):85‐90.
Muslimatun S, Schmidt MK, West CE, Schultink W, Gross R, Hautvast JG. Determinants of weight and length of Indonesian neonates. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002;56(10):947‐51.
Muslimatun S, Schmidt MK, West CE, Schultink W, Hautvast JG, Karyadi D. Weekly vitamin A and iron supplementation during pregnancy increases vitamin a concentration of breast milk but not iron status in Indonesian lactating women. Journal of Nutrition 2001;131(10):2664‐9.
Schmidt MK, Muslimatun S, Schultink W, West CE, Hautvast JG. Randomised double‐blind trial of the effect of vitamin A supplementation of Indonesian pregnant women on morbidity and growth of their infants during the first year of life. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002;56(4):338‐46.
Schmidt MK, Muslimatun S, West CE, Schultink W, Hautvast JG. Mental and psychomotor development in Indonesian infants of mothers supplemented with vitamin A in addition to iron during pregnancy. British Journal of Nutrition 2004;91(2):279‐85.
Schmidt MK, Muslimatun S, West CE, Schultink W, Hautvast JG. Vitamin A and iron supplementation of Indonesian pregnant women benefits vitamin a status of their infants. British Journal of Nutrition 2001;86(5):607‐15.

Radhika 2003 {published data only}

Radhika MS, Bhaskaram P, Balakrishna N, Ramalakshmi BA. Red palm oil supplementation: a feasible diet‐based approach to improve the vitamin A status of pregnant women and their infants. Food & Nutrition Bulletin 2003;24(2):208‐17.

Semba 2001 {published data only}

Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Taha TE, Mtimavalye L, Broadhead R, Garrett E, et al. Impact of vitamin A supplementation on anaemia and plasma erythropoietin concentrations in pregnant women: a controlled clinical trial. European Journal of Haematology 2001;66(6):389‐95.
Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Taha TE, Mtimavalye L, Broadhead R, Miotti PG, et al. Plasma and breast milk vitamin A as indicators of vitamin A status in pregnant women. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 2000;70(6):271‐7.

Suharno 1993 {published data only}

Suharno D, West CE, Muhilal, Karyadi D, Hautvast JG. Supplementation with vitamin A and iron for nutritional anaemia in pregnant women in West Java, Indonesia. Lancet 1993;342(8883):1325‐8.

Sun 2010 {published data only}

Sun YY, Ma AG, Yang F, Zhang FZ, Luo YB, Jiang DC, et al. A combination of iron and retinol supplementation benefits iron status, IL‐2 level and lymphocyte proliferation in anemic pregnant women. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;19(4):513‐9.

Suprapto 2002 {published data only}

Suprapto B, Widardo, Suhanantyo. Effect of low‐dosage vitamin A and riboflavin on iron‐folate supplementation in anaemic pregnant women. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002;11(4):263‐7.

Tanumihardjo 2002 {published data only}

Tanumihardjo SA. Vitamin A and iron status are improved by vitamin A and iron supplementation in pregnant Indonesian women. Journal of Nutrition 2002;132:1909‐12.

van den Broek 2006 {published data only}

van den Broek NR. Double‐blind randomised trial of antenatal vitamin A supplementation in pregnant anaemic women in rural Malawi. Personal communication1999.
van den Broek NR, White SA, Flowers C, Cook JD, Letsky EA, Tanumihardjo SA, et al. Randomised trial of vitamin A supplementation in pregnant women in rural Malawi found to be anaemic on screening by HemoCue. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2006;113(5):569‐76.

West 1999 {published data only}

Checkley W, West KP, Wise RA, Baldwin MR, Wu L, LeClerq SC, et al. Maternal vitamin A supplementation and lung function in offspring. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;362(19):1784‐94.
Christian P, Khatry SK, Yamini S, Stallings R, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, et al. Zinc supplementation might potentiate the effect of vitamin A in restoring night vision in pregnant Nepalese women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001;73(6):1045‐51.
Christian P, West KP, Katz J, Kimbrough‐Pradhan E, LeClerq SC, Khatry SK, et al. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy in rural Nepal. Risk factors and effects of beta‐carotene and vitamin A supplementation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004;58(2):204‐11.
Christian P, West KP, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq S, Pradhan EK, et al. Vitamin A or beta‐carotene supplementation reduces but does not eliminate maternal night blindness in Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 1998;128:1458‐63.
Christian P, West KP, Khatry SK, Kimbrough‐Pradhan E, LeClerq SC, Katz J, et al. Night blindness during pregnancy and subsequent mortality among women in Nepal: effects of vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000;152:542‐7.
Christian P, West KP, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Kimbrough‐Pradhan E, Katz J, et al. Maternal night blindness increases risk of mortality in the first 6 months of life among infants in Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2001;131(5):1510‐2.
Christian P, West KP, Khatry SK, Katz J, LeClerq SC, Kimbrough‐Pradhan E, et al. Vitamin a or beta‐carotene supplementation reduces symptoms of illness in pregnant and lactating Nepali women. Journal of Nutrition 2000;130:2675‐82.
Congdon NG, Dreyfuss ML, Christian P, Navitsky RC, Sanchez AM, Wu LS, et al. Responsiveness of dark‐adaptation threshold to vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation in pregnant and lactating women in Nepal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;72:1004‐9.
Katz J, West KP, Khatry SK, Christian P, LeClerq SC, Pradhan EK, et al. Risk factors for early infant mortality in Sarlahi district, Nepal. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003;81(10):717‐25.
Katz J, West KP, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Christian P, Pradhan EK, et al. Twinning rates and survival of twins in rural Nepal. International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:802‐7.
Katz J, West KP, Khatry SK, Pradhan EK, LeClerq SC, Christian P, et al. Maternal low‐dose vitamin A or B‐carotene supplementation has no effect on fetal loss and early infant mortality: a randomized cluster trial in Nepal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;71:1570‐6.
Olsen SF. Effect of vitamin a and beta carotene supplementation on women's health. BMJ 1999;318(7183):551‐2.
Palmer AC, Schulze KJ, West KP. Preconceptional through post‐partum vitamin A (VA) supplementation increases natural antibody concentrations of offspring aged 9‐13 years in rural Nepal. FASEB Journal 2011;25:333.7.
Stewart CP, Christian P, Katz J, Schulze KJ, Wu LSF, LeClerq SC, et al. Maternal supplementation with vitamin A or B‐carotene and cardiovascular risk factors among pre‐adolescent children in rural Nepal. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2010;1(4):262‐70.
Stewart CP, Christian P, Schulze KJ, Arguello M, Leclerq SC, Khatry SK, et al. Low maternal vitamin B‐12 status is associated with offspring insulin resistance regardless of antenatal micronutrient supplementation in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2011;141(10):1912‐7.
West KP, Katz J, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Pradhan EK, Shrestha SR, et al. Double blind, cluster randomised trial of low dose supplementation with vitamin A or beta carotene on mortality related to pregnancy in Nepal: the nnips‐2 study group. BMJ 1999;318(7183):570‐5.
Yamini S, West KP, Wu L, Dreyfuss ML, Yang DX, Khatry SK. Circulating levels of retinol, tocopherol and carotenoid in Nepali pregnant and postpartum women following long‐term beta‐carotene and vitamin A supplementation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001;55:252‐9.

West 2011 {published data only}

Christian P, Klemm R, Shamim AA, Ali H, Rashid M, Shaikh S, et al. Effects of vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation on birth size and length of gestation in rural Bangladesh: a cluster‐randomized trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013;97(1):188‐94.
Christian P, Labrique AB, Ali H, Richman MJ, Wu L, Rashid M, et al. Maternal vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation and risk of bacterial vaginosis: a randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011;94(6):1643‐9.
Labrique AB, Christian P, Klemm RDW, Rashid M, Shamim AA, Massie A, et al. A cluster‐randomized, placebo‐controlled, maternal vitamin A or beta‐carotene supplementation trial in Bangladesh: design and methods. Trials 2011;12:102.
Shaikh S, Schulze KJ, Ali H, Labrique AB, Shamim AA, Rashid M, et al. Bioelectrical impedance among rural Bangladeshi Women during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition 2011;29(3):236‐44.
West KPJ, Christian P, Labrique AB, Rashid M, Shamim AA, Klemm RD, et al. Effects of vitamin A or beta carotene supplementation on pregnancy‐related mortality and infant mortality in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA 2011;305(19):1986‐95.

Alam 2010 {published data only}

Alam DS, van Raaij JM, Hautvast JG, Yunus M, Wahed MA, Fuchs GJ. Effect of dietary fat supplementation during late pregnancy and first six months of lactation on maternal and infant vitamin A status in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population & Nutrition 2010;28(4):333‐42.

Banerjee 2009 {published data only}

Banerjee S, Jeyaseelan S, Guleria R. Trial of lycopene to prevent pre‐eclampsia in healthy primigravidas: results show some adverse effects. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2009;35(3):477‐82.

Chawla 1995 {published data only}

Chawla PK, Puri R. Impact of nutritional supplements on hematological profile of pregnant women. Indian Pediatrics 1995;32:876‐80.

Chikobvu 2001 {published data only}

Chikobvu P, Jouvert G, Schall R, Steinberg WJ, Viljoen JI, Kotze M, et al. The effect of vitamin A on reducing mother‐to‐child transmission of HIV in Bloemfontein. 21st Conference on Priorities in Perinatal Care in South Africa; 2002 March 5‐8; Eastern Cape, South Africa. 2002.
Chikobvu P, van der Ryst E, Joubert G, Steinberg WJ, Voljoen JI, Kriel J, et al. Preliminary results of a double blind randomised controlled trial testing the effect of vitamin A in mother to child transmission of HIV‐1. 20th Conference on Priorities in Perinatal Care in Southern Africa; 2001 March 6‐9; KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa. 2001.

Christian 2003 {published data only}

Christian P, Darmstadt GL, Wu L, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Katz J, et al. The effect of maternal micronutrient supplementation on early neonatal morbidity in rural Nepal: a randomised, controlled, community trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93(8):660‐4.
Christian P, Jiang T, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, West Jr KP. Antenatal supplementation with micronutrients and biochemical indicators of status and subclinical infection in rural Nepal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006;83:788‐94.
Christian P, Khatry SK, Katz J, Pradhan EK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, et al. Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient supplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal: double blind randomised community trial. BMJ 2003;326(7389):571.
Christian P, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Dali SM. Effects of prenatal micronutrient supplementation on complications of labor and delivery and puerperal morbidity in rural Nepal. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2009;106(1):3‐7.
Christian P, Shrestha J, LeClerq SC, Khatry SK, Jiang T, Wagner T, et al. Supplementation with micronutrients in addition to iron and folic acid does not further improve the hematologic status of pregnant women in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2003;133(11):3492‐8.
Christian P, Stewart CP, LeClerq SC, Wu L, Katz J, West KP, et al. Antenatal and postnatal iron supplementation and childhood mortality in rural Nepal: a prospective follow‐up in a randomized, controlled community trial. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009;170(9):1127‐36.
Katz J, Christian P, Dominici F, Zeger SL. Treatment effects of maternal micronutrient supplementation vary by percentiles of the birth weight distribution in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2006;136(5):1389‐94.
Stewart CP, Christian P, Schulze KJ, Leclerq SC, West KP, Khatry SK. Antenatal micronutrient supplementation reduces metabolic syndrome in 6‐ to 8‐year‐old children in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2009;139(8):1575‐81.

Darboe 2007 {published data only}

Darboe MK, Thurnham DI, Morgan G, Adegbola RA, Secka O, Solon JA, et al. Effectiveness of an early supplementation scheme of high‐dose vitamin A versus standard WHO protocol in Gambian mothers and infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;369(9579):2088‐96.

Haskell 2005 {published data only}

Graham JM, Haskell MJ, Pandey P, Shrestha RK, Brown KH, Allen LH. Supplementation with iron and riboflavin enhances dark adaptation response to vitamin A‐fortified rice in iron‐deficient, pregnant, nightblind Nepali women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007;85(5):1375‐84.
Haskell MJ, Pandey P, Graham JM, Peerson JM, Shrestha RK, Brown KH. Recovery from impaired dark adaptation in nightblind pregnant Nepali women who receive small daily doses of vitamin A as amaranth leaves, carrots, goat liver, vitamin A‐fortified rice, or retinyl palmitate. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;81:461‐71.

Howells 1986 {published data only}

Howells DW, Haste F, Rosenberg D, Brown IR, Brooke OG. Investigation of vitamin a nutrition in pregnant British Asians and their infants. Human Nutrition. Clinical Nutrition 1986;40(1):43‐50.

Humphrey 2006 {published data only}

Humphrey JH, Iliff PJ, Marinda ET, Mutasa K, Moulton LH, Chidawanyika H, et al. Effects of a single large dose of vitamin A, given during the postpartum period to HIV‐positive women and their infants, on child HIV infection, HIV‐free survival, and mortality. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2006;193(6):860‐71.

Laitinen 2009 {published data only}

Laitinen K, Isolauri E, Kaipiainen L, Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Plant stanol ester spreads as components of a balanced diet for pregnant and breast‐feeding women: evaluation of clinical safety. British Journal of Nutrition 2009;101(12):1797‐804.

Lietz 2001 {published data only}

Lietz G, Henry CJK, Mulokozi G, Mugyabuso JKL, Ballart A, Ndossi GD, et al. Comparison of the effects of supplemental red palm oil and sunflower oil on maternal vitamin A status. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001;74(4):501‐9.
Lietz G, Mulokozi G, Henry JC, Tomkins AM. Xanthophyll and hydrocarbon carotenoid patterns differ in plasma and breast milk of women supplemented with red palm oil during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Nutrition 2006;136(7):1821‐7.

Roberfroid 2010 {published data only}

Roberfroid D, Huybregts L, Lanou H, Henry MC, Meda N, Kolsteren P. Effect of maternal multiple micronutrient supplements on cord blood hormones: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010;91:1649‐58.

Roy 1997 {published data only}

Roy SK, Islam A, Molla A, Akramuzzaman SM, Jahan F, Fuchs G. Impact of a single megadose of vitamin a at delivery on breastmilk of mothers and morbidity of their infants. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997;51(5):302‐7.

Sharma 2003 {published data only}

Sharma JB, Kumar A, Malhotra M, Arora R, Prasad S, Batra S. Effect of lycopene on pre‐eclampsia and intra‐uterine growth retardation in primigravidas. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2003;81:257‐62.

Van Vliet 2001 {published data only}

Van Vliet T, Boelsma E, De Vries AJ, Van den Berg H. Retinoic acid metabolites in plasma are higher after intake of liver paste compared with a vitamin a supplement in women. Journal of Nutrition 2001;131(12):3197‐203.

Ahmad 2009 {published data only}

Ahmad SM. Vitamin A and maternal‐infant flu vaccine response. ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) [accessed 1 November 2014]2009.

AIDS Report 2008

World Health Organization. 2008 Report on the global AIDS epidemic. Status of global HIV epidemic (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/unaids/2008/9789291737116_eng_Chapter2A.pdf). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008:29‐51.

Angeles‐Agdeppa 1997

Angeles‐Agdeppa I, Schultink W, Sastroamidjojo S, Gross R, Karyadi D. Weekly micronutrient supplements to build iron stores in female Indonesian adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997;66:177‐83.

Arsenault 2010

Arsenault JE, Aboud S, Manji KP, Fawzi WW, Villamor E. Vitamin supplementation increases risk of subclinical mastitis in HIV‐infected women. Journal of Nutrition 2010;140(10):1788‐92.

Bloem 1990

Bloem MW, Wedel M, Van Agtmaal EJ, Speek AJ, Soawakontha S, Schreurs WHP. Vitamin A intervention: short term effects of a single oral massive dose on iron metabolism. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1990;51:76‐9.

Borel 2005

Borel P, Drai J, Faure H. Recent knowledge about intestinal absorption and cleavage of carotenoids. Annales de Biologie Clinique 2005;63(2):165‐77.

Christian 2011

Christian P, Labrique AB, Ali H, Richman MJ, Wu L, Rashid M, et al. Maternal vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation and risk of bacterial vaginosis: a randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011;94(6):1643‐9.

Christian 2013

Christian P, Klemm R, Shamim AA, Ali H, Rashid M, Shaikh S, et al. Effects of vitamin A and beta‐carotene supplementation on birth size and length of gestation in rural Bangladesh: a cluster‐randomized trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013;97(1):188‐94.

Combs 2008

Combs GF. The Vitamins: Fundamental Aspects in Nutrition and Health. 3rd Edition. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press, 2008.

Cox 2006

Cox SE, Arthur P, Kirkwood BR. Vitamin A supplementation increases ratios of pro‐inflammatory to anti‐inflammatory cytokine responses in pregnancy and lactation. Clinical & Experimental Immunology 2006;144(3):392‐400.

Darlow 2007

Darlow BA, Graham PJ. Vitamin A supplementation to prevent mortality and short‐ and long‐term morbidity in very low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000501.pub3]

Dijkhuizen 2001

Dijkhuizen MA. Vitamin A, Iron and Zinc Deficiency in Indonesia. Micronutrient Interactions and Effects of Supplementation [thesis]. Wageningen University, 2001.

DRI 2001

Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

Edmond 2012

Edmond K, Hurt L, Fenty J, Amenga‐Etego S, Zandoh C, Hurt C, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation in women of reproductive age on cause‐specific early and late infant mortality in rural Ghana: ObaapaVitA double‐blind, cluster‐randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. BMJ Open 2012;2(1):e000658.

FAO and WHO 2002

FAO, WHO 2002. Vitamin A. Human Vitamin and Mineral Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation Bangkok, Thailand. Rome: WHO, 2002:87‐107.

Fawzi 1993

Fawzi WW, Chalmers TC, Herrera MG, Mosteller F. Vitamin A supplementation and child mortality. A meta‐analysis. JAMA 1993;269(7):898‐903.

FNB 2001

Food, Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

Glasziou 1993

Glasziou PP, Mackerras DE. Vitamin A supplementation in infectious diseases: a meta‐analysis. BMJ 1993;306:366‐70.

Haider 2008

Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Multiple‐micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004905.pub3]

HAP 2008

Health in Asia and the Pacific. Mortality. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/3156FAEA‐AE96‐4C3D‐ADF9‐302C5831A618/0/10_Chapter5Mortality.pdf(accessed 2008).

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Hodges 1978

Hodges RE, Sauberlich HE, Canham JE, Wallace DL, Rucker RB, Meija LA, et al. Hematopoietic studies in vitamin A deficiency. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1978;31:876‐85.

Hurt 2013

Hurt L, Ten Asbroek A, Amenga‐Etego S, Zandoh C, Danso S, Edmond K, et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation on cause‐specific mortality in women of reproductive age in Ghana: a secondary analysis from the ObaapaVitA trial. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2013;91(1):19‐27.

ICD‐10 2007

World Health Organization. International classification of diseases and related heath problems. 10th revision. Version for 2007. http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/(accessed June 2010).

IMCI‐ TAG 2008

World Health Organization. Technical Advisory Group on IMCI (IMCI‐TAG). Integrated Management in the Context of the Maternal‐Newborn‐Child Health Continuum. Report of the Fifth Meeting; Texas Children's Hospital; 2006 May 16‐17; Houston, Texas, USA. Washington: Pan American Health Organization, 2008.

Karyadi 1996

Karyadi D, Bloem MW. The role of vitamin A deficiency in iron deficiency anaemia and implications for interventions. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 1996;9:316‐24.

Lidén 2006

Lidén M, Eriksson U. Understanding retinol metabolism: structure and function of retinol dehydrogenases. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2006;281(19):13001‐4.

Long 2007

Long KZ, Rosado JL, DuPont HL. Supplementation with vitamin A reduces watery diarrhoea and respiratory infections in Mexican children. British Journal of Nutrition 2007;97(2):337‐43.

Mahalanabis 1979

Mahalanabis D, Simpson TN, Chakraborty ML, Ganguli C, Bhattacharjee AK, Mukherjee KL. Malabsorption of water miscible vitamin A in children with giardiasis and ascariasis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1979;32:313‐8.

McGuire 2007

McGuire M, Beerman KA. Nutritional Sciences: From Fundamentals to Food. 1st Edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2007.

Mejia 1977

Mejia LA, Hodges RE, Arroyave G. Vitamin A deficiency and anaemia in Central American children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1977;30:1175‐84.

Mejia 1982

Mejia LA, Arroyave G. The effect of vitamin A fortification of sugar on iron metabolism in preschool children in Guatemala. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1982;36(1):87‐93. [PUBMED: 7091038]

Mejia 1988

Mejia LA, Chew F. Hematological effect of supplementing anemic children with vitamin A alone and in combination with iron. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1988;48:595‐600.

Miller 1998

Miller RK, Hendrckx AG, Mills JL, Hummler H, Wiegand UW. Periconceptional vitamin A use: how much is teratogenic?. Reproductive Toxicology 1998;12(1):75‐88.

Mills 1997

Mills JL, Simpson JL, Cunningham GC, Conley MA, Rhoads GG. Vitamin A and birth defects. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;177:31‐6.

Moffa 1970

Moffa DJ, Lotspeich FJ, Krause RF. Preparation and properties of retinal‐oxidizing enzyme from rat intestinal mucosa. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1970;245:439‐47.

Muhilal 1988

Muhilal, Permeisih D, Idjradinata YR. Vitamin A fortified monosodium glutamate and health, growth and survival of children: a controlled field trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1988;48:1271‐6.

NCCWCH 2008

National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. London: RCOG Press, 2008.

Oliveira 2010

Oliveira‐Menegozzo JM, Bergamaschi DP, Middleton P, East CE. Vitamin A supplementation for postpartum women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005944.pub2]

Olofin 2014

Olofin IO, Spiegelman D, Aboud S, Duggan C, Danaei G, Fawzi WW. Supplementation with multivitamins and vitamin A and incidence of malaria among HIV‐infected Tanzanian women. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2014;67(Suppl 4):S173‐8.

PNM 2005

World Health Organization. Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.

Prawirohartono 2011

Prawirohartono EP, Nystrom L, Ivarsson A, Stenlund H, Lind T. The impact of prenatal vitamin A and zinc supplementation on growth of children up to 2 years of age in rural Java, Indonesia. Public Health Nutrition 2011;14(12):2197‐206.

Prawirohartono 2013

Prawirohartono EP, Nystrom L, Nurdiati DS, Hakimi M, Lind T. The impact of prenatal vitamin A and zinc supplementation on birth size and neonatal survival ‐ a double‐blind, randomized controlled trial in a rural area of Indonesia. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 2013;83(1):14‐25.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Ross 1994

Ross AC, Gardner EM. The function of vitamin A in cellular growth and differentiation, and its roles during pregnancy and lactation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1994;352:187‐200.

Rothman 1995

Rothman KJ, Moore LL, Singer MR, Nguyen UDT, Mannino S, Milunsky A. Teratogenecity of high Vitamin A intake. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;333:1367‐73.

Rousseau 1992

Rousseau EJ, Davison AJ, Dunn B. Protection by beta‐carotene and related compounds against oxygen‐mediated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity: implications for carcinogenesis and anticarcinogenesis. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 1992;13:407‐33.

Semba 2000

Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Taha TE, Mtimavalye L, Broadhead R, Miotti PG, et al. Plasma and breast milk vitamin A as indicators of vitamin A status in pregnant women. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 2000;70(6):271‐7.

Sivakumar 1972

Sivakumar B, Reddy V. Absorption of labelled vitamin A in children during infection. British Journal of Nutrition 1972;27:297‐304.

Sommer 1982

Sommer A. Nutritional Blindness. Xerophthalmia and Keratomalacia. 1st Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

Sommer 1995

Sommer A. Vitamin A Deficiency and its Consequences: a Field Guide to Detection and Control. 3rd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1995.

Stephens 1996

Stephens D, Jackson PL, Gutierrez Y. Subclinical vitamin A deficiency: a potentially unrecognized problem in the United States. Pediatric Nursing 1996;22(5):377‐89.

Stipanuk 2006

Stipanuk MH. Biochemical, Physiological and Molecular Aspects of Human Nutrition. 2nd Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2006.

Suharno 1992

Suharno D, West CE, Muhilal, Logman MHGM, De Waart FG, Karyadi D, et al. Cross‐sectional study on the iron and Vitamin A status of pregnant women in West Java, Indonesia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992;56:988‐93.

Tang 2005

Tang G, Qin J, Dolnikowski GG, Russell RM, Grusak MA. Spinach or carrots can supply significant amounts of vitamin A as assessed by feeding with intrinsically deuterated vegetables. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;82(4):821‐8.

Thurnham 1989

Thurnham DI. Vitamin A deficiency and its role in infection. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Hygiene and Medicine 1989;83:721‐3.

Tomkins 1989

Tomkins A, Hussey G. Vitamin A, immunity and infection. Nutrition Research Reviews 1989;2:17‐28.

Underwood 1990

Underwood BA. Methods for assessment of vitamin A status. Journal of Nutrition 1990;120:1459‐63.

Underwood 1994

Underwood BA. Maternal vitamin A status and its importance in infancy and early childhood. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1994;59:517S‐522S.

Van den Broek 1998

Van den Broek N. Anaemia in pregnancy in developing countries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998;105:385‐90.

Van den Broek 2000

Van den Broek NR, Letsky EA. Etiology of anemia in south Malawi. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;72(1):247S‐256S.

Von Lintig 2000

Von Lintig J, Vogt K. Filling the gap in vitamin A research: molecular identification of an enzyme cleaving beta‐carotene to retinal. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000;275(16):11915‐20.

WHO 1995

World Health Organization. Global Prevalence of Vitamin A Deficiency. Micronutrient Deficiency Information System (WHO/NUT/95). Geneva: WHO, 1995.

WHO 1996

World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing vitamin A deficiency and their application in monitoring and evaluating intervention programmes. 1st Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996:66.

WHO 1998

World Health Organization. Safe vitamin A dosage during pregnancy and lactation. Recommendations and report of a consultation. Geneva: WHO (WHO/NUT/98), 1998. Geneva: WHO, 1998.

WHR 2005

World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2005 ‐ make every mother and child count. http://www.who.int/whr/2005/en/ (accessed June 2010)2005.

Wiysonge 2011

Wiysonge CS, Shey M, Kongnyuy EJ, Sterne JAC, Brocklehurst P. Vitamin A supplementation for reducing the risk of mother‐to‐child transmission of HIV infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003648.pub3]

Wolde‐Gabriel 1993

Wolde‐Gabriel Z, West CE, Speek AJ. Interrelationship between Vitamin A, iodine and iron status in school children in the Shoa Region ‐ Central Ethiopia. British Journal of Nutrition1993; Vol. 70:593‐607.

Van den Broek 2002

Van den Broek N, Kulier R, Gülmezoglu AM, Villar J. Vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001996]

van den Broek 2010

van den Broek N, Dou L, Othman M, Neilson JP, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM. Vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy for maternal and newborn outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008666.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Ajans 1965

Methods

RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: 44 parturient women in good health from the lower and middle socioeconomic groups (in a population in which vitamin A deficiency occurs).

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 15 women.

Single intramuscular injection of 600,000 lU of vitamin A palmitate in oil at parturition. 4 samples of 2 to 3 mL of colostrum were collected. 1 antepartum sample and 3 postpartum samples, 1 on each consecutive day of hospitalisation.

Intervention group 2: 11 women.

Given 600,000 lU of water‐dispersible vitamin A palmitate orally shortly before delivery. 4 samples of 2 to 3 mL of colostrum were collected. 1 antepartum sample and 3 postpartum samples, 1 on each consecutive day of hospitalisation. Followed by public health nurses at their homes where bi‐weekly samples of milk were collected during the first week after discharge and then weekly samples for a total period ranging between 38 and 59 days postpartum.

Control group: 18 women not given any form of vitamin A therapy prepartum. 4 samples of 2 to 3 mL of colostrum were collected. 1 antepartum sample and 3 postpartum samples, 1 on each consecutive day of hospitalisation.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: levels of vitamin A and carotenoids in the maternal blood. Other outcomes: levels of vitamin A and carotenoids in the colostrum prenatal and postnatal.

Notes

Vitamin A levels measured before starting supplementation in group 1 and 2.

Study was done in a population in which vitamin A deficiency occurs.

Study setting: American university hospital.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No description except allotted at random.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No description except allotted at random.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

No blinding methods were reported. The routes of medication administration methods varied across groups.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information was provided.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No exclusion or loss of follow‐up reported.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

High risk

The 3 groups were not studied during the same period. The authors reported "subjects in groups 1 and 2 were studied in the summer and those of group 3 in the following winter".

Coutsoudis 1999

Methods

Double‐blind RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women 28‐32 weeks' gestation;

  • HIV‐positive.

(HIV‐seropositive women identified through antenatal screening programmes. All the women enrolled were black Africans.)

Interventions

Intervention group: 368 women received daily dose of 5000 IU retinyl palmitate and 30 mg beta‐carotene during the third trimester of pregnancy (together corresponding to 43,400 IU vitamin A daily for 12 weeks) and 200,000 IU retinyl palmitate at delivery.

Control group: 360 women received placebo on the same schedule.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: effects of vitamin A on HIV viral load and HIV transmission.

Other outcomes: neonatal mortality (the number of deaths during the first 28 completed days of life per 1000 live births in a given year or period) and anaemia, maternal anaemia, clinical infection (fever > 1 week at 1 week postnatally), preterm birth (delivery less than 37 completed weeks' gestational age estimated using LMP), low birthweight and morbidity.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: South Africa.

Study setting: King Edward VIII Hospital and McCords Hospital, in Durban, South Africa.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "double‐blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

57 (7.8%) women did not deliver in the hospitals and cannot be traced.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Cox 2005

Methods

A randomised double‐blind controlled trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • primigravid pregnant women;

  • resident within the study area;

  • in good health;

  • less than 24 weeks pregnant.

Exclusion criteria: HIV infection or tuberculosis.

Interventions

Intervention group: 48 women received weekly capsules of 10,000 IU of vitamin A as retinyl palmitate in groundnut oil, plus tocopherol as a preservative from enrolment until 6 weeks postpartum. Suplimintation was for a minimum of 18 weeks.

Control group: 50 women received groundnut oil and tocopherol only in the placebo capsules from enrolment until 6 weeks postpartum.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: maternal infections (presence of placental malaria and peripheral parasitaemia).

Other outcomes: Hb and birthweight.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Ghana.

Study setting: Nkoranza District Hospital and 3 rural health clinics in Brong Ahafo region, Central Ghana.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"balanced block randomisation."    

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "double‐blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

12 (12%) women were excluded from the analysis: 1 false pregnancy, 1 early miscarriage, 10 missed late pregnancy visit.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Unclear risk

The most marked difference was in educational level and gestational age at enrolment. Levels of anti‐VSACSA IgG to the FCR3CSA parasite line differed between the treatment groups at baseline. There were considerably fewer data available for the placebo than the vitamin A group at the late pregnancy follow‐up.

Dijkhuizen 2004

Methods

Double‐blind RCT, factorial design.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: all women were recruited before 20 weeks' gestational age.

Exclusion criteria: twin pregnancy and congenital abnormalities that interfered with growth, development, or metabolism.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 37 women received iron and folic acid supplements together with ß ‐carotene (4.5 mg as water‐soluble granulate/d (representing 5750 IU of vitamin A)). Each woman was supplemented daily during pregnancy until delivery for a minimum of 16 weeks.

Intervention group 2: 37 women received iron and folic acid supplements together with zinc (30 mg zinc as sulphate/d). Each woman was supplemented daily during pregnancy until delivery.

Intervention group 3: 37 women received iron and folic acid supplements together with zinc and carotene. Each woman was supplemented daily during pregnancy until delivery.

Control group: 37 women received iron and folic acid.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: maternal and fetal Hb and zinc levels.

Other outcomes: maternal and fetal ferritin, retinol and carotene levels.

Other outcomes from this same trial were recorded by Dijkhuizen 2001‐ see notes below.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were not measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Indonesia.

Study setting: 13 adjacent villages in a rural area in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia.

Dijkhuizen 2001 assessed maternal and neonatal complications in this same trial described above. Outcomes described included maternal puerperal fever, preterm delivery, stillbirth, neonatal mortality and birthweight.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided except factorial randomisation.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Capsules were indistinguishable and given a letter code."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel double‐blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

35 (20%) women were not followed up or included in the analyses.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Fawzi 1998

Methods

2‐by‐2 factorial design.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women 12‐27 weeks' gestation;

  • HIV‐positive women;

  • resident in Dar es Salaam at the time of baseline interview;

  • intend to stay in the city until delivery and 1 year breastfeeding thereafter.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 270 women received a daily (for at least 10 weeks) oral dose of multivitamins including vitamin A (30 mg b‐carotene (representing 38,000 IU vitamin A) and 5000 IU of preformed vitamin A, 20 mg of B1, 20 mg of B2, 25 mg of B6, 100 mg of niacin, 50 mg of B12, 500 mg of C, 30 mg of vitamin E, and 0.8 mg of folic acid); an additional oral dose of vitamin A (200,000 IU) at delivery.

Intervention group 2: 269 women received a daily oral dose of vitamin A alone (30 mg b‐carotene and 5000 IU of preformed vitamin A), plus an additional oral dose of vitamin A (200,000 IU) at delivery.

Intervention group 3: 269 women received a daily oral dose of multivitamins excluding vitamin A, plus an additional oral placebo at delivery.

Intervention group 4: 267 women received a daily oral dose of placebo. An additional oral placebo at delivery.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: CD levels in both mother and fetus and HIV transmission.

Other outcomes: birthweight, preterm birth (delivery less than 37 completed weeks estimated using LMP) and Hb in both mother and fetus (Hb < 10.0 g/dL).

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Tanzania.

Duration: 1995‐1997.

Study setting: 4 ANCs with several smaller peripheral clinics.

Other secondary outcomes of interest in this review (maternal infection) from this trial are described by Arsenault 2010 and Olofin 2014.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"Randomisation was done in blocks of 20."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"At enrolment, we assigned each eligible women the next numbered bottle of regimen."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No information.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

117 (10.8%) women were excluded from the analysis:

  • 3 not pregnant;

  • 7 died before delivery and excluded;

  • 54 lost to follow‐up;

  • 53 no date of delivery or gestational age.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Green 1931

Methods

Quasi‐RCT, multi‐centred.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: pregnant women.

Exclusion criteria: cases not delivered in hospital.

Interventions

Intervention group: 275 women received 1 oz of the vitamin preparation radiostoleum, an amount equivalent in vitamins A and D roughly to 30 oz of a good cod‐liver oil (equivalent to 444,000 IU vitamin A), should have been taken daily commencing 1 month previous to the calculated day of labour.

The first 76 cases prior to June 1929 were given the preparation for only 14 days before delivery (daily). It was, however, continued for the first 7 days of the puerperium. It was then decided that a more logical procedure would probably be to begin the administration earlier and thus build up a larger reserve at the time of labour.

Control group: 275 women received an untreated version.

Outcomes

Maternal infection (puerperal fever > 38o C) and maternal and baby mortality and morbidity.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were not measured before starting supplementation.

Country: UK.

Study setting: the Jessop Hospital and the Nether Edge municipal hospital.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

High risk

"the first patient was given the preparation and the next due for delivery about the same time was indexed as a control."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

High risk

"the first patient was given the preparation and the next due for delivery about the same time was indexed as a control."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

High risk

The control group received no intervention.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

50 (8.3%) women delivered somewhere else and were excluded.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Hakimi 1999

Methods

Randomised, placebo‐controlled double masked community‐based trial.

Participants

Inclusion: women with positive pregnancy test in the first 120 days of pregnancy.

Exclusion:

  • women who were not married or did not have a life partner;

  • women whose gestational age > first trimester;

  • women using hormonal contraception or intrauterine device;

  • peri‐menopausal women.

Interventions

Group 1: 248 received vitamin A 2400 retinol equivalent, second group 254 received zinc 20 mg/day, third group 243 received both vitamin A and zinc, while the fourth group 263 received placebo.

Outcomes

Maternal sepsis (temp ≽ 38oC between day 2‐14 postpartum), haemorrhage (bleeding during labour or within 2 days of delivery).

Notes

Trial run between 1995 and 1997 in Indonesia termed the ZIBUVITA trial.

Setting: Central Java, Indonesia.

Of note this study information is from a draft of a publication which was not published in any peer review journal.

However, 2 follow‐up studies using this original trial have been published, Prawirohartono 2011 and Prawirohartono 2013.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"1:1:1:1 ratio in blocks of 12 based on a list of treatment numbers derived from a pseudo‐random number generator in SAS."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"treatment allocation sequence was prepared and held at ..a site remote from the trial."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"supplements were packaged in ..identical opaque pink capsules."

"all investigators, field and laboratory staff and participants were blinded to the treatment code."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"a survey of sample of field workers and their supervisors revealed they were unable to identify which treatments the study participants were receiving."

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

> 20% loss to follow‐up.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of this study is not available.

Other bias

High risk

Of note this information is from a draft of a publication which was not published in any peer review journal. However, 2 follow‐up studies using this original trial have been published, Prawirohartono 2011 and Prawirohartono 2013.

Kirkwood 2010

Methods

Cluster‐randomised trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: women aged 15 to 45 years giving informed consent and who planned to live in the trial area for at least 3 months were eligible for enrolment.

Interventions

Intervention group: 104,484 women in 544 clusters received weekly vitamin A capsule consisted of 25,000 IU (7500 ug) retinol equivalents (equivalent to 25,000 IU vitamin A) in soybean oil in a dark red opaque soft gel for 12 weeks.

Control group: 103,297 women in 542 clusters received placebo capsule consisted of soybean oil only.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: maternal mortality and all‐cause female mortality.

Other outcomes: maternal morbidity, perinatal and neonatal mortality (the number of deaths during the first 28 completed days of life per 1000 live births in a given year or period).

Notes

Setting: 7 districts in Brong Ahafo region in Ghana.

Sample size: more that 207,000 pregnant women.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"A computer‐generated randomisation list."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"The capsules were packaged in labelled jars."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

44% of enrolled women initially reported as loss to follow‐up: 1% withdrew consent, 43% moved. However, supplementary information provided by authors in February 2011 at the time of more detailed analysis reported overall loss to follow‐up for analysis for pregnancy‐related mortality analysis as 8%: 4657 pregnancies excluded because outcome not known (with 2340 in vitamin A arm and 2317 in placebo arm). 4192 pregnancies excluded because status of woman at 42 days not known (2174 vitamin A; 2018 placebo). Before these exclusions, the total number of pregnancies captured was 111,801; after exclusions, the total number of pregnancies with a known outcome was 102,952.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The study protocol is not available.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Kumwenda 2002

Methods

RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women of 18‐28 weeks’ gestation;

  • HIV‐positive women.

Interventions

Intervention group: 340 women received daily doses of orally administered vitamin A (3 mg retinol equivalent (10,000 IU of vitamin A) + iron and folate for minimum of 12 weeks. Oral vitamin A (30 mg retinol equivalent) at 6 weeks' postpartum.

Control group: 357 women received daily doses of iron (30 mg of elemental iron) and folate (400 mg) from the time of study enrolment until delivery. Oral vitamin A (30 mg retinol equivalent) at 6 weeks postpartum.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: maternal vitamin A levels in blood and breast milk and HIV transmission in mother and baby.

Other outcomes: Hb and birthweight.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Malawi.

Study setting: Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (Blantyre, Malawi).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"a computer random‐number generator."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"pre packing study supplements in sequentially numbered series assigned to study identification numbers."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

63 (9%) women were excluded from the analysis: 57 moved out, 6 could not be located.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

Not aware of any other bias.

Muslimatun 2001

Methods

A randomised double‐blind community‐based trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria: 16 to 20 weeks pregnant, aged 17‐35 years and parity < 6.

Interventions

Intervention group: 122 women received each week from enrolment until delivery 2 tablets each of which contained 3000 RE vitamin A in addition to the ferrous sulphate and folic acid. So intervention was 6000 RE vitamin A (20,000 IU) weekly for a minimum of 16 weeks.

Control group: 121 women received each week from enrolment until delivery 2 tablets each containing 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 250 mg folic acid.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: infant growth in 1 year of life.

Other outcomes: maternal Hb and fetal morbidity.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Indonesia.

Study setting: 9 villages in the rural subdistrict of Leuwiliang, West Java, Indonesia.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"Assigned randomly."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Out of 243 pregnant women initially enrolled, 18 dropped out during pregnancy, 5 gave birth to a stillborn child, 1 had twins (only 1 survived), 7 had infants who died before reaching 3 months of age and 11 moved from the research area. Among the remaining 201 eligible participants, 182 participants attended the postpartum examination. Overall, the loss to follow‐up of the intervention group was 32.8 % and the control group was 27.3%.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

Not aware of any other bias.

Radhika 2003

Methods

"double‐blinded, randomized, controlled study."

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • 16 and 24 weeks' gestation;

  • willing to have a follow‐up every 2 weeks and who resided in the city area were chosen for the study.

Exclusion criteria: women with recurrent pregnancy loss or earlier preterm delivery and those with diabetes, hypertension, or any other metabolic disorder.

Interventions

Intervention group: 85 women received red palm oil providing 2173 to 2307 µg of β‐carotene per day with a dosage schedule of 1 sachet per day (8 mL), which provided 91% to 96% of the daily requirement of vitamin A in pregnancy, (i.e. 2400 µg of β‐carotene which is equivalent to 3000 IU of vitamin A) daily for a period of 8 weeks.

Control group: 85 women received 1 sachet of groundnut oil (8 mL) for a period of 8 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: maternal and neonatal vitamin A status.

Other outcomes: Hb levels in mother and baby, preterm birth (delivery less than 37 completed weeks as confirmed by ultrasound examination), birthweight and gestational age.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: India.

Study setting: the outpatient department of Niloufer Hospital,  Hyderabad, India.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

41 (24.1%) women were excluded from the analysis: 23 were not available for supplementation, while 18 dropped out after initiating supplementation.

Overall, the loss to follow‐up of the intervention group was 9.5 % and the control group was 15.1%.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Semba 2001

Methods

A randomised, double‐blind, controlled clinical trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women;

  • 18‐28 weeks' gestation;

  • HIV‐negative women.

Interventions

Intervention group: 109 women received daily supplement containing iron (30 mg elemental iron), folate (400 mg), and vitamin A (3000 µg retinol equivalent, which is 10,000 IU of vitamin A) until delivery for a minimum of 8 weeks.

Control group: 94 women received daily supplement containing iron (30 mg) and folate (400 mg) until delivery.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: Hb concentrations and plasma erythropoietin concentrations.

Other outcomes: levels of ferritin, ? 1‐acid glycoprotein, CRP and plasma vitamin A.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Malawi.

Study setting: the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, Malawi.

Semba 2001 is linked to the Semba 2000 trial; the difference being that Semba 2000 investigated slightly different outcomes in HIV‐positive women and Semba 2001 assessed HIV negative women.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"a computer random‐number generator."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"sequentially numbered opaque bottle."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

66 (32.5%) women were excluded from the analysis: 42 missed the study visit, 9 did not have their Hb analysed, 15 moved out.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Suharno 1993

Methods

Double‐blinded RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • middle and low socioeconomic;

  • 16‐24 weeks pregnant;

  • 17‐35 years old;

  • parity 0‐4;

  • Hb 80‐109 g/L.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 63 women received vitamin A (2.4 mg retinol as retinyl palmitate) (equivalent to 8000 IU of vitamin A) and placebo iron tablets daily for 8 weeks.

Intervention group 2: 63 women received iron tablets (60 mg ferrous sulphate) and placebo vitamin A daily for 8 weeks.

Intervention group 3: 63 women received vitamin A and iron daily for 8 weeks.

Control group: 62 women received both placebo daily for 8 weeks.

Outcomes

Maternal anaemia indices.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Indonesia.

Study setting: rural villages in 3 subdistricts of Bogo, West Java.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"randomly."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

'An independent researcher randomly labelled' the preparations.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "Double blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

54 (17%) women were excluded from the analysis: 11 moved, 23 taken supplement less than 8 weeks, 10 refused blood sample, 10 not available for 2nd blood sample.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

Sun 2010

Methods

Double‐blind RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • anaemic (Hb > 80 but < 110g/L);

  • pregnant women, 12‐24 weeks' gestation, age between 20‐30 years;

  • no dietary supplements during previous 2 months;

  • no abnormal pregnancy response.

Interventions

4 groups:

  • group 1 (n = 47) was supplemented daily with 60 mg iron as ferrous sulphate;

  • group 2 (n = 46) with 60 mg and 0.4 mg folic acid;

  • group 3 (n = 46) with 60 mg iron, 2.0 mg retinol and 0.4 mg folic acid;

  • group 4 (n = 47) was the placebo control group.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes:

  • iron status;

  • Cytokine Interleukin ‐2 (IL ‐2) levels;

  • Lymphocyte proliferation.

Notes

Short intervention time of 2 months duration.

Patient were recruited between March 2004 ‐ September 2005.

Setting: Shen county in a central rural area of China.

Total number of patients ‐ 186.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

High risk

"Patients were randomised in order of enrolment."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

High risk

"Patients were randomised in order of enrolment."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate blinding of participants and personnel reported.

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No details given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Loss of participants < 5% ‐ 6 women did not complete the trial due to moving to other villages (3), and stopped taking supplements during the trial (3).

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

No details given.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No details given.

Suprapto 2002

Methods

Quasi‐RCT. A double‐blind, placebo, controlled trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • aged less than 35 years;

  • between 13 and 28 weeks' gestation;

  • single pregnancy;

  • in good health;

  • anaemia (Hb < 11.0 g/dL).

Exclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women with pre‐eclampsia, congestive heart disease, tuberculosis and acute infections;

  • women in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 22 women; group IFR received iron‐folate tablets + 5 mg riboflavin 7 days a week for 60 days.

Intervention group 2: 29 women; group IFA received iron‐folate tablets + 2.75 mg retinyl palmitate (equal to 5000 IU vitamin A) 7 days a week for 60 days.

Intervention group 3: 23 women; group IFRA received iron‐folate tablets + 5 mg riboflavin + 2.75 mg retinyl palmitate 7 days a week for 60 days.

Control group: 29 women; group IF received iron‐folate tablets + 5 mg glucose 7 days a week for 60 days.

Outcomes

Maternal levels of vitamin A and riboflavin.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Indonesia.

Study setting: health centre ANC.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

High risk

"allocated alternately."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

High risk

"allocated alternately."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"participants and personnel double‐blind."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not given.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

19 (18.4%) were excluded from the analyses: 9 premature labour, 1 stillbirth, 1 migration, 1 refusal to give blood, 2 nausea and vomiting and 5 incorrect dates given for last menstruation but with normal deliveries.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

High risk

Women in group IFRA were shorter and lighter than those in other groups.

Tanumihardjo 2002

Methods

RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • pregnant women in the second or early third trimester;

  • 18 to 37 years old;

  • parity from 0 to 4 children.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 5 women received 1.07 mmol (60 mg) ferrous sulphate with a vitamin A placebo daily for 8 weeks.

Intervention group 2: 8 women received vitamin A plus iron.

Intervention group 3: 7 women received 8.4 µmol (8000 IU) vitamin A as retinyl palmitate with an iron placebo.

Control group: 7 women received placebo.

Outcomes

Maternal Hb and retinol levels.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Indonesia.

Study setting: local health posts the suburban areas of Bogor in West Java.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"Subjects and village volunteers were unaware of group assignment."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

No information provided.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No loss of follow‐up reported.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Not enough information provided.

van den Broek 2006

Methods

RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • (Hb) < 11.0 g/dl by HemoCue screening method at first antenatal visit;

  • singleton pregnancy with gestational age > 12 weeks and < 24 weeks measured by ultrasound scan;

  • no fetal abnormality detectable by ultrasound at time of booking;

  • residing in the catchment area of the health centre;

  • signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria: twin pregnancy.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 234 women; 5000 IU vitamin A and iron tablets daily (60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg folic acid) and antimalarial prophylaxis as 2 doses of Fansidar (500 mg sulphadoxine with 25 mg pyrimethamine. Tablets given daily from enrolment till delivery minimum of 8 weeks.

Intervention group 2: 234 women; 10,000 IU vitamin A and iron tablets daily (60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg folic acid) and antimalarial prophylaxis as 2 doses of Fansidar (500 mg sulphadoxine with 25 mg pyrimethamine).

Control group: 232 women; placebo and iron tablets daily (60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg folic acid) and antimalarial prophylaxis as 2 doses of Fansidar (500 mg sulphadoxine with 25 mg pyrimethamine.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: Hb concentrations and anaemia.

Other outcomes: iron status, preterm birth (delivery less than 37 completed weeks as confirmed by ultrasound examination), markers of infections included CRP, malaria parasitaemia and HIV status.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Malawi.

Study setting: rural southern Malawi attending ANC at Health Centres.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"a random‐generation procedure."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"consecutive numbers" "in sealed envelopes."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"The supplements in vitamin A and placebo treatments allocated were prepared in identical capsules."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"The supplements in vitamin A and placebo treatments allocated were prepared in identical capsules."

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

96 (13.7%) women were excluded from the analyses: 18 women moved out from the area, 68 declined to continue, 10 missed appointment.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

Not aware of other bias.

West 1999

Methods

Double‐blind cluster RCT.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • women of childbearing age who were married and living with their husbands;

  • newly married women.

Exclusion criteria: women who were already married who had moved into study wards.

Interventions

Intervention group 1: 15,305 women in 90 wards received opaque, gelatinous capsules containing peanut oil and 23,300 IU of preformed vitamin A (7000 µg retinol equivalents) as retinyl palmitate weekly for a minimum of 12 weeks.

Intervention group 2: 14,536 women in 90 wards received 42 mg of all trans‐b carotene (7000 µg retinol equivalents, assuming a conversion ratio to retinol of 6 to 1 after uptake) weekly.

Control group: 14,805 women in 90 wards received no vitamin A or b carotene (placebo) weekly.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: mortality of mother and baby (the number of deaths during the first 28 completed days of life per 1000 live births in a given year or period).

Other outcomes: maternal vitamin A and retinol levels, and maternal morbidity.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were not measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Nepal.

Study setting: 270 wards in 30 subdistricts.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"All wards were assigned in Kathmandu by a random draw of numbered chits, blocked on subdistrict, for eligible women to receive one of three identical coded supplements."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"'three identical coded supplements."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Participants and personnel "double‐blind".

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Details not included.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

1136 (2.5%) women were excluded because they emigrated before becoming pregnant or dying or because they declined to be recruited. 157 women were lost to follow‐up during the postpartum period (their median follow‐up time postpartum was around 2 weeks in each group).

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

The protocol of the study is not available at the moment.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

West 2011

Methods

Double‐blind cluster‐randomised placebo‐controlled trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

all married women of reproductive age (13‐45 years of age) were under surveillance living in the study settings and all who became pregnant were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria:

> first trimester of pregnancy;

women who during surveillance:

  • permanently moved outside study settings;

  • became menopausal;

  • were sterilised;

  • who died;

  • whose husbands died.

Sample size: 60,294.

Interventions

7000 ug of retinol equivalent as retinyl palmitate, 42 mg of all‐trans beta‐carotene or placebo.

Outcomes

Primary outcome: all‐cause mortality of women related to pregnancy, stillbirth, and infant mortality up to 12 weeks (84 days) following pregnancy outcome.

Notes

Vitamin A levels were not measured before starting supplementation.

Country: Bangladesh.

Duration: 2001‐2007 termed the JiVitA‐1 trial.

Study setting: 596 sectors in the rural northwestern district of Gaibandha and Rangpur between 2001 and 2007.

Christian 2013 is a follow‐up study of this trials that describes secondary outcomes of interest (low birthweight and preterm birth) in this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"cluster randomization" "sectors were randomized in blocks of nine, to one of three codes ‐ 1,2,3."

"field supervisor [were engaged] to in the process of randomization to increase the transparency of sector allocation."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"three sets of 3 identical coins on which the numbers 1, 2 or 3 were written were placed into a container, mixed and removed randomly, without replacement and the 3 digit code of each sector was read aloud sequentially."

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"study participants, interviewers, field supervisors, and investigators remained masked to treatment assignments until the end of the trial."

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

"study participants, interviewers, field supervisors, and investigators remained masked to treatment assignments until the end of the trial."

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Loss of participants < 5%, except for outcome of low birthweight, which was only measured for less than 36%.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Nil reported in the protocol.

Other bias

Low risk

No other bias awarded.

ANC: antenatal clinic
CRP: C‐reactive protein
Hb: haemoglobin
IU: international unit
LMP: last menstrual period
RCT: randomised controlled trial
RE: retinol equivalents

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Alam 2010

The intervention did not include vitamin A.

Banerjee 2009

Intervention uses lycopene which is a compound that lacks beta‐ion ring (in the β‐carotene), so lycopene cannot form vitamin A and its biological effects are due to mechanism other than forming vitamin A.

Chawla 1995

Not a randomised trial.

Chikobvu 2001

Double‐blind randomised trial with outcomes on HIV transmission and HIV complications, only abstract available.

Christian 2003

Cluster‐randomised trial with all arms of intervention containing vitamin A and no comparison for vitamin A.

Darboe 2007

Intervention started after delivery.

Haskell 2005

Both arms of intervention containing vitamin A and no comparison for vitamin A.

Howells 1986

Not a randomised trial.

Humphrey 2006

Intervention started after delivery.

Laitinen 2009

Not a randomised trial and vitamin A present in both arms of intervention.

Lietz 2001

Both arms of intervention containing vitamin A and no comparison for vitamin A.

Roberfroid 2010

Both arms of intervention containing iron and folic acid and no comparison for vitamin A.

Roy 1997

Intervention started after delivery.

Sharma 2003

Intervention uses lycopene which is a compound that lacks beta‐ion ring (in the β‐carotene), so lycopene cannot form vitamin A and its biological effects are due to mechanism other than forming vitamin A.

Van Vliet 2001

Participants are non‐pregnant women.

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Ahmad 2009

Trial name or title

Vitamin A and maternal‐infant flu vaccine response

Methods

Placebo‐controlled double‐masked and randomised trial.

Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • female 22‐35 years;

  • mothers at the beginning of second trimester ˜ 12 weeks' gestation;

  • willing to stay in Dhaka during pregnancy and willing to admit in the clinic at delivery.

Exclusion criteria:

  • history of systemic disease;

  • previous complicated pregnancies or of a preterm delivery;

  • abortion;

  • congenital anomaly;

  • hypersensitivity to influenza vaccine or receipt of the vaccine.

Interventions

Weekly 10,000 IU vitamin A or placebo.

Outcomes

Main outcomes: IgG cord blood plasma; vitamin A cord blood; plasma influenza IgG; colostrum vitamin A; colostrum influenza sIgA.

Other outcomes:

  • mothers (6 months postpartum) serum vitamin A;

  • serum influ IgG;

  • breast milk vitamin A;

  • Influ sIgA;

  • infants (6 months) anthropometry;

  • serum vitamin A;

  • serum influ IgG;

  • nasal Influ sIgA.

Starting date

February 2009.

Contact information

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.

Notes

66 women randomised.

Setting: Dhaka, Bangladesh.

3 urban maternity clinics.

2010 ‐ no results reported.

IgG: immunoglobulin G

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.65, 1.20]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Maternal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Maternal mortality.

2 Perinatal mortality Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

3 Neonatal mortality Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.90, 1.05]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

4 Stillbirth Show forest plot

2

122850

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.98, 1.10]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

5 Maternal anaemia Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.43, 0.94]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.20, 0.99]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

7 Maternal night blindness Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.64, 0.98]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Maternal night blindness.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Maternal night blindness.

8 Preterm birth Show forest plot

5

40137

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.94, 1.01]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

9 Neonatal anaemia Show forest plot

1

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.92, 1.08]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Low birthweight Show forest plot

4

14599

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.89, 1.16]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neonatal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Stillbirth

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Maternal anaemia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

2

591

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.83, 1.18]

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 2 Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

7 Maternal night blindness

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Preterm birth

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Neonatal anaemia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Low birthweight

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

3 Neonatal mortality Show forest plot

1

594

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.32, 1.31]

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

4 Stillbirth Show forest plot

2

866

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.57, 3.47]

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

5 Maternal anaemia Show forest plot

3

706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.09]

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

2

597

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.80, 1.13]

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

7 Maternal night blindness

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Preterm birth Show forest plot

1

136

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.08, 1.93]

Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

9 Neonatal anaemia Show forest plot

2

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.38, 1.51]

Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.04, 3.18]

Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 11 Congenital malformations.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 11 Congenital malformations.

12 Low birthweight Show forest plot

1

594

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.47, 0.96]

Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.65, 1.20]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level).

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

1

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 9.44]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

3

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.64, 1.23]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.76, 1.08]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level).

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.76, 1.08]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

1

73743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

1

73743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 9 Maternal mortality (dose).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 9 Maternal mortality (dose).

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 11 Maternal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 11 Maternal mortality (regimen).

11.1 Daily

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

11.2 Weekly

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

12.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Weekly

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention) Show forest plot

2

60216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.82, 1.64]

Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention).

13.1 One month or less

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

13.2 More than one month

1

59666

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.83, 1.68]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

Analysis 4.15

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

2

101024

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.50, 1.17]

15.2 First trimester

1

59666

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.83, 1.68]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

Analysis 4.17

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 17 Maternal mortality (randomisation).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 17 Maternal mortality (randomisation).

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

12.1 Daily

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

12.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Maternal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Maternal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Maternal night blindness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Maternal night blindness.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Comparison 2 Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 3 Neonatal mortality.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 4 Stillbirth.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 5 Maternal anaemia.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 6 Maternal clinical infection.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 8 Preterm birth.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 9 Neonatal anaemia.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 11 Congenital malformations.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 11 Congenital malformations.

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A, Outcome 12 Low birthweight.

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 9 Maternal mortality (dose).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 9 Maternal mortality (dose).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 11 Maternal mortality (regimen).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 11 Maternal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.15

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 17 Maternal mortality (randomisation).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.17

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 17 Maternal mortality (randomisation).

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 10 Perinatal mortality (dose).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.12

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 12 Perinatal mortality (regimen).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.16

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy).

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.18

Comparison 6 Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups), Outcome 18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment

Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment

Patient or population: Pregnant women
Settings: Areas with endemic vitamin A deficiency (inadequate intake)/areas with adequate intake as defined by the WHO global database on vitamin A deficiency
Intervention: Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with placebo or no treatment

Risk with vitamin A alone

Maternal mortality

Study population

RR 0.88
(0.65 to 1.20)

154,039
(4 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH 1

Inverse variance.

5 per 1000

5 per 1000

(4 to 7)

Perinatal mortality

Study population

RR 1.01
(0.95 to 1.07)

76,176
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

Inverse variance.

54 per 1000

54 per 1000

(51 to 57)

Maternal anaemia

Study population

RR 0.64
(0.43 to 0.94)

15,649
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

Inverse variance.

191 per 1000

122 per 1000

(82 to 180)

Maternal clinical infection

Study population

RR 0.45
(0.20 to 0.99)

17,313
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2 3

Inverse variance.

18 per 1000

8 per 1000

(4 to 18)

Preterm birth

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.94 to 1.01)

48,007
(5 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

249 per 1000

244 per 1000
(234 to 251)

Moderate

190 per 1000

186 per 1000
(178 to 192)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 The authors considered that the pooled effect estimate was not biased by the design of the studies or their analysis of data. Following correspondence received from the trialists for Kirkwood 2010, the loss to follow‐up for this study was 8%: the data from this study are not at risk of attrition bias.

2 Statistical Heterogeneity (I² > 60%).

3 Most studies contributing data had design limitations.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment
Summary of findings 2. Combination vitamin A and micronutrients for maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity

Combination vitamin A and micronutrients for maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity

Patient or population: Pregnant women
Settings: Areas with endemic vitamin A deficiency (inadequate intake)/areas with adequate intake as defined by the WHO global database on vitamin A deficiency
Intervention: Combination vitamin A and micronutrients
Comparison: Other micronutrients

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

№ of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with micronutrient supplements without vitamin A

Risk with vitamin A with other micronutrients

Maternal mortality

Study population

not estimable

(0 studies)

See comment

No study reported results for this outcome.

not pooled

not pooled

Perinatal mortality

Study population

RR 0.51
(0.10 to 2.69)

179
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1

44 per 1000

23 per 1000
(4 to 120)

Moderate

44 per 1000

23 per 1000
(4 to 119)

Maternal anaemia

Study population

RR 0.86
(0.68 to 1.09)

706
(3 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

269 per 1000

231 per 1000
(183 to 293)

Moderate

346 per 1000

298 per 1000
(235 to 377)

Maternal clinical infection

Study population

RR 0.95
(0.80 to 1.13)

597
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

382 per 1000

363 per 1000
(306 to 432)

Moderate

339 per 1000

322 per 1000
(271 to 383)

Preterm birth

Study population

RR 0.39
(0.08 to 1.93)

136
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2

75 per 1000

29 per 1000
(6 to 144)

Moderate

75 per 1000

29 per 1000
(6 to 144)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect, few events & small sample size.

2 Wide confidence interval crossing the line of no effect & small sample size.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Combination vitamin A and micronutrients for maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity
Table 1. Retinol supplementation to vitamin A conversion table

Retinol supplementation in mcg

Vitamin A in IU

1

3.33

2

6.66

3

9.99

IU: international units

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Retinol supplementation to vitamin A conversion table
Table 2. Serum retinol conversion table

Serum retinol mcg/dL

Serum retinol mc mol/L

10

0.35

20

0.7

30

1.05

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Serum retinol conversion table
Comparison 1. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.65, 1.20]

2 Perinatal mortality Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

3 Neonatal mortality Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.90, 1.05]

4 Stillbirth Show forest plot

2

122850

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.98, 1.10]

5 Maternal anaemia Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.43, 0.94]

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.20, 0.99]

7 Maternal night blindness Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.64, 0.98]

8 Preterm birth Show forest plot

5

40137

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.94, 1.01]

9 Neonatal anaemia Show forest plot

1

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.92, 1.08]

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Low birthweight Show forest plot

4

14599

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.89, 1.16]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment
Comparison 2. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neonatal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Stillbirth

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Maternal anaemia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

2

591

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.83, 1.18]

7 Maternal night blindness

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Preterm birth

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Neonatal anaemia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Low birthweight

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A
Comparison 3. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

3 Neonatal mortality Show forest plot

1

594

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.32, 1.31]

4 Stillbirth Show forest plot

2

866

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.57, 3.47]

5 Maternal anaemia Show forest plot

3

706

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.68, 1.09]

6 Maternal clinical infection Show forest plot

2

597

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.80, 1.13]

7 Maternal night blindness

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Preterm birth Show forest plot

1

136

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.08, 1.93]

9 Neonatal anaemia Show forest plot

2

1052

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.38, 1.51]

10 Neonatal clinical infection

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Congenital malformations Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.04, 3.18]

12 Low birthweight Show forest plot

1

594

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.47, 0.96]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A
Comparison 4. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

2 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.65, 1.20]

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

1

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 9.44]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

3

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.64, 1.23]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.76, 1.08]

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.76, 1.08]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

1

73743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

1

73743

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

11.1 Daily

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

11.2 Weekly

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

12.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Weekly

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention) Show forest plot

2

60216

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.82, 1.64]

13.1 One month or less

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

13.2 More than one month

1

59666

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.83, 1.68]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

4

161240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.64, 1.20]

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

2

101024

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.50, 1.17]

15.2 First trimester

1

59666

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.83, 1.68]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

1

550

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.15]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

3

160690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.63, 1.23]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

1

76176

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.95, 1.07]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Vitamin A alone versus placebo or no treatment (subgroups)
Comparison 5. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Vitamin A alone versus micronutrient supplement without vitamin A (subgroups)
Comparison 6. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal mortality (infant mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Countries with high infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Perinatal mortality (infant mortality level) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

2.1 Countries with low infant mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Countries with high infant mortality

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

3 Maternal mortality (maternal mortality level)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Perinatal mortality (maternal mortality level) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

4.1 Countries with low maternal mortality

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Countries with high maternal mortality

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

5 Maternal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

5.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

6 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of vitamin A deficiency) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

6.1 Low prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

6.2 High prevalence of vitamin A deficiency

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Maternal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Perinatal mortality (prevalence of HIV in the general population) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

8.1 Countries with low HIV prevalence

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

8.2 Countries with high HIV prevalence

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Maternal mortality (dose)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Others

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Perinatal mortality (dose) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

10.1 Daily 10,000 IU

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Others

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

11 Maternal mortality (regimen)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.1 Daily

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Perinatal mortality (regimen) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

12.1 Daily

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

12.2 Weekly

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Other regimen

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Maternal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Perinatal mortality (duration of intervention)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Maternal mortality (trimester of pregnancy)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Mixed

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Perinatal mortality (trimester of pregnancy) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

16.1 Pre‐pregnancy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 First trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Second trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 Third trimester

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.5 Mixed

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

17 Maternal mortality (randomisation)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Individual‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Perinatal mortality (randomisation) Show forest plot

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

18.1 Cluster‐randomised

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Individual‐randomised

1

179

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.10, 2.69]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Vitamin A with other micronutrients versus micronutrient supplements without vitamin A (subgroups)