Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Resección del tabique en mujeres en edad reproductiva con un útero tabicado

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Judith FW Rikken

    Correspondencia a: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Claudia R Kowalik

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Mark H Emanuel

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Hospital, Hoofddorp, Netherlands

  • Ben Willem J Mol

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

  • Fulco van der Veen

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdan UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Madelon van Wely

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Mariëtte Goddijn

    Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

All authors contributed to the 2016 update of this review, and approved the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • New Source of support, Other.

Declarations of interest

The authors of this review are conducting a trial: TRUST (The Randomised Uterine Septum Transsection Trial). In this study, women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and a septate uterus are being randomised between surgical intervention (hysteroscopic metroplasty) and expectant management.

Mark Emanuel has received consultancy fees and royalties from Smith & Nephew Endoscopy and holds patents for hysteroscopic morcellation and tubal patency foam ultrasonography testing.

For the version of this Cochrane review published in 2017, Mark Emanuel declared that he holds patents for hysteroscopic morcellation and tubal patency foam ultrasonography testing. These conflicts were declared prior to publication and applied during the period that the review was in preparation.

Clarification statement added from the Co‐ordinating Editor Professor Cindy Farquhar on 25 February 2020: this review was found by the Cochrane Funding Arbiters, post‐publication, to be noncompliant with theCochrane conflict of interest policy, which includes the relevant parts of theCochrane commercial sponsorship policy.In line with the policy, Dr Emanuel cannot be an author on the review while holding patents relevant to the topic of this review. We expect it will be updated by 25 February 2021. The update will have a majority of authors and lead author free of conflicts."

Acknowledgements

M Showell, CGF Group Information Specialist

H Nagels, CGF Group Managing Editor

We acknowledge the contributions of Professor Maas Jan Heineman, Professor Marlies Bongers, Dr Jan de Kruif, and Dr Taeke Spinder to previous versions of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Jan 17

Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus

Review

Judith FW Rikken, Claudia R Kowalik, Mark H Emanuel, Ben Willem J Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely, Mariëtte Goddijn

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub4

2011 Jun 15

Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus

Review

C R Kowalik, M Goddijn, M H Emanuel, M Y Bongers, T Spinder, J H de Kruif, Ben Willem J Mol, Maas Jan Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub3

2010 Nov 10

Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus

Protocol

C R Kowalik, M Goddijn, M H Emanuel, M Y Bongers, T Spinder, J H de Kruif, Ben Willem J Mol, Maas Jan Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub2

2010 Jul 07

Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus

Protocol

C R Kowalik, M Goddijn, M H Emanuel, M Y Bongers, T Spinder, J H de Kruif, Ben Willem J Mol, Maas Jan Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576

Differences between protocol and review

In this updated review, we changed the inclusion criteria to include all women of reproductive age with a septate uterus.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

The ESHRE/ESGE classification system for female genital congenital anomalies (Grimbizis 2013).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

The ESHRE/ESGE classification system for female genital congenital anomalies (Grimbizis 2013).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Study flow diagram.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva