Computer‐assisted versus oral‐and‐written dietary history taking for diabetes mellitus

Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Ir a:

Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Table 1. Overview of study populations

Characteristic Study ID	Intervention(s) & control(s)	[n] screened	[n] randomised	[n] safety	[n] ITT	[n] finishing study	[%] of randomised participants finishing study	Comments
Probst 2008	Group A had three computerized assessments, group B had three interviewer administered assessments, group C had two computerized and one interviewer administered assessments and group D had two interviewer administered and one computerized assessment.	Total: 105	A: 10 B: 10 C: 9 D: 9 Total: 38	‐	‐	A: 9 B: 9 C: 6 D: 7 Total: 31	A: 90% B: 90% C: 66.7% D: 77.8% Total: 81.6%	[n] screened prior to randomisation or assignment to groups defined here as number of patients eligible for study. [n] safety and [n] ITT not applicable. Not specified which groups experienced attrition in publication but received from author in personal communication.
Total			A: 10 B: 10 C: 9 D: 9 Total: 38			A: 9 B: 9 C: 6 D: 7 Total: 31
ITT: intention‐to‐treat

Table 1. Overview of study populations

	Idioma de la Revisión Cochrane Escoja su idioma de preferencia para las revisiones Cochrane y otros contenidos. Las secciones sin una traducción aparecerán en inglés.

	Idioma de la web Escoja su idioma de preferencia para la web de la Biblioteca Cochrane.