Pruebas al ingreso además de la cardiotocografía para la evaluación fetal durante el trabajo de parto
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008410.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 15 junio 2011see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Suthit Khunpradit (SK) initiated the review question that was approved by Pisake Lumbiganon (PL) and Malinee Laopaiboon (ML). SK and PL independently assessed potential studies, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias. SK drafted the review which was revised critically by PL and ML. All review authors approved the final version of the review.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
Lamphun Hospital, Thailand.
-
Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
External sources
-
Thai Cochrane Network, Thailand.
-
Thailand Research Fund(Senior Research Scholar Program), Thailand.
Declarations of interest
None known.
Acknowledgements
As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by three peers (an editor and two referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2011 Jun 15 | Admission tests other than cardiotocography for fetal assessment during labour | Review | Suthit Khunpradit, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon | |
| 2010 Mar 17 | Admission tests other than cardiotocography for fetal assessment during labour | Protocol | Suthit Khunpradit, Pisake Lumbiganon, Malinee Laopaiboon | |
Differences between protocol and review
We have added outcomes of cesarean section rate for fetal distress and incidence of neonatal NICU admission to the type of outcomes, because they are relevant to our review objective.
Keywords
MeSH
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords
Medical Subject Headings Check Words
Female; Humans; Pregnancy;
PICO
Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 1 Caesarean section for fetal distress.
Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 2 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min.
Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 3 Oxytocin administration.
Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 4 Neonatal admission to NICU.
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Caesarean section for fetal distress Show forest plot | 1 | 883 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 2.02 [1.08, 3.77] |
| 2 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min Show forest plot | 1 | 883 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.39 [0.54, 3.63] |
| 3 Oxytocin administration Show forest plot | 1 | 883 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.57 [1.32, 1.87] |
| 4 Neonatal admission to NICU Show forest plot | 1 | 883 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 1.03 [0.66, 1.63] |
