Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Flow chart of studies
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow chart of studies

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.1 Dropout.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.1 Dropout.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.3 Severity of depression continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.3 Severity of depression continuous measures.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, outcome: 1.4 Adverse events.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.1 Dropout.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.1 Dropout.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.3 Severity of depression continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 10

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.3 Severity of depression continuous measures.

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 11

Forest plot of comparison: 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, outcome: 2.4 Adverse events.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 1 Dropout.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 1 Dropout.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition, Outcome 7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score).

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 1 Dropout.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 1 Dropout.

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 1 Drupout.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 1 Drupout.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 3 Severity of depression continuous measures.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 4 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 4 Adverse events.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 5 Drug use dichotomous measure.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 6 Drug use continuous measures.

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score): SSRI versus placebo .
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Different class of antidepressant, Outcome 7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score): SSRI versus placebo .

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antidepressants compared to placebo according to any definition for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Antidepressants compared to placebo according to any definition for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Patient or population: patients with depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Settings:
Intervention: Antidepressants
Comparison: placebo according to any definition

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

placebo according to any definition

Antidepressants

Dropout ‐ All studies
objective
Follow‐up: mean 4 weeks

Study population

RR 1.15
(0.88 to 1.51)

406
(6 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,2

320 per 1000

368 per 1000
(282 to 483)

Medium risk population

271 per 1000

312 per 1000
(238 to 409)

Dropout ‐ Studies with low risk of bias

Study population

RR 1.4
(1 to 1.96)

325
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

250 per 1000

350 per 1000
(250 to 490)

Medium risk population

199 per 1000

279 per 1000
(199 to 390)

Severity of depression dichotomous measures ‐ >50% reduction in depressive severity from baseline

Study population

RR 0.96
(0.54 to 1.71)

95
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3

333 per 1000

320 per 1000
(180 to 569)

Medium risk population

333 per 1000

320 per 1000
(180 to 569)

Severity of depression dichotomous measures ‐ "very much" or "much" improved on the Clinical Global Impression Scale

Study population

RR 1.92
(1.26 to 2.94)

183
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low4,5

247 per 1000

474 per 1000
(311 to 726)

Medium risk population

276 per 1000

530 per 1000
(348 to 811)

Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment

The mean Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment in the intervention groups was
0.31 standard deviations lower
(0.64 lower to 0.01 higher)

346
(5 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,5

SMD ‐0.31 (‐0.64 to 0.01)

Adverse events ‐ Withdrawn for medical reasons

Study population

RR 2.9
(1.23 to 6.86)

311
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

40 per 1000

116 per 1000
(49 to 274)

Medium risk population

45 per 1000

131 per 1000
(55 to 309)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Clinical and methodological heterogeneity
2 Incomplete outcome data not addressed in 2/6 studies
3 Only 1 study, few participants
4 sequence generation, allocation concealment addressed in 1/2 studies
5 incomplete utcome data addressed in 1/2 studies

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Antidepressants compared to placebo according to any definition for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Summary of findings 2. Antidepressants compared to placebo for operationally defined depression for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Antidepressants compared to placebo for operationally defined depression for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Patient or population: patients with depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Settings:
Intervention: Antidepressants
Comparison: placebo for operationally defined depression

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

placebo for operationally defined depression

Antidepressants

Dropout

Study population

RR 1.2
(0.88 to 1.64)

322
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

297 per 1000

356 per 1000
(261 to 487)

Medium risk population

262 per 1000

314 per 1000
(231 to 430)

Severity of depression dichotomous measures ‐ "very much" or "much" improved on the Clinical Global Impression scale

Study population

RR 2.03
(1.17 to 3.53)

137
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

206 per 1000

418 per 1000
(241 to 727)

Medium risk population

206 per 1000

418 per 1000
(241 to 727)

Severity of depression dichotomous measures ‐ >50% reduction in depressive severity from baseline

Study population

RR 0.96
(0.54 to 1.71)

95
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2

333 per 1000

320 per 1000
(180 to 569)

Medium risk population

333 per 1000

320 per 1000
(180 to 569)

Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment

The mean Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment in the intervention groups was
0.23 standard deviations lower
(0.69 lower to 0.23 higher)

276
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate3

SMD ‐0.23 (‐0.69 to 0.23)

Adverse events ‐ Withdrawn for medical reasons

Study population

RR 3.03
(1.2 to 7.68)

276
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate3

38 per 1000

115 per 1000
(46 to 292)

Medium risk population

42 per 1000

127 per 1000
(50 to 323)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Allocation concealment unclear in 2/4 studies
2 Only one study
3 Allocation concealment unclear in 1 study

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Antidepressants compared to placebo for operationally defined depression for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Summary of findings 3. Different class of antidepressant for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Different class of antidepressant for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence

Patient or population: patients with depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Settings:
Intervention: Different class of antidepressant

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Different class of antidepressant

Drupout ‐ Tricyclics versus placebo

Study population

RR 1.01
(0.74 to 1.37)

218
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

433 per 1000

437 per 1000
(320 to 593)

Medium risk population

522 per 1000

527 per 1000
(386 to 715)

Drupout ‐ SSRI versus placebo

Study population

RR 1.53
(0.91 to 2.56)

188
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

194 per 1000

297 per 1000
(177 to 497)

Medium risk population

191 per 1000

292 per 1000
(174 to 489)

Severity of depression dichotomous measures ‐ Tricyclics versus placebo: "very much" or "much" improvement on the Clinical Global Impression scale

Study population

RR 1.92
(1.26 to 2.94)

183
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

247 per 1000

474 per 1000
(311 to 726)

Medium risk population

276 per 1000

530 per 1000
(348 to 811)

Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment: Tricyclics versus placebo

The mean Severity of depression continuous measures ‐ HDRS total score at the end of the treatment: Tricyclics versus placebo in the intervention groups was
0.57 standard deviations lower
(0.85 to 0.29 lower)

207
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate1

SMD ‐0.57 (‐0.85 to ‐0.29)

Adverse events ‐ Withdrawn for medical reasons: Tricyclics versus placebo

Study population

RR 3.11
(1.06 to 9.12)

172
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

49 per 1000

152 per 1000
(52 to 447)

Medium risk population

52 per 1000

162 per 1000
(55 to 474)

Adverse events ‐ Withdrawn for medical reasons: SSRI versus placebo

Study population

RR 2.55
(0.61 to 10.75)

139
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
high

29 per 1000

74 per 1000
(18 to 312)

Medium risk population

21 per 1000

54 per 1000
(13 to 226)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Allocation concealment and sequence generation unclear in 1/3 studies
2 Allocation concealment and sequence generation unclear in 1/2 studies

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Different class of antidepressant for depression during opioid agonist treatment for opioid dependence
Comparison 1. Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dropout Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 All studies

6

406

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.88, 1.51]

1.2 Studies with low risk of bias

4

325

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.40 [1.00, 1.96]

2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 "very much" or "much" improved on the Clinical Global Impression Scale

2

183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.26, 2.94]

2.2 >50% reduction in depressive severity from baseline (HDRS score)

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.54, 1.71]

3 Severity of depression continuous measures Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 HDRS total score at the end of the treatment

5

346

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.31 [‐0.64, 0.01]

3.2 MADRS score at the end of the treatment

1

49

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.39, 0.74]

3.3 POMS score at the end of the treatment

1

44

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐1.12, 0.11]

3.4 AUSSI at the end of the treatment

1

49

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.24, 0.89]

3.5 Global Improvement Rating at the end of the treatment

1

29

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.26, 0.22]

3.6 BDI score at the end of the treatment

2

68

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐2.30, 1.14]

4 Adverse events Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Withdrawn for medical reasons

4

311

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.90 [1.23, 6.86]

4.2 Nausea/stomach discomfort

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.40, 1.17]

4.3 Dry mouth

2

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.74, 3.62]

4.4 Drowsiness

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.8 [0.66, 4.88]

4.5 Sluggishness/fatigue

2

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.51, 1.99]

4.6 Dizziness

2

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.18, 3.29]

4.7 Increased sweating

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.33, 27.57]

4.8 Headache

2

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.97 [0.89, 4.39]

4.9 Jitteriness

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.61, 3.51]

4.10 Constipation

2

171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.49, 3.95]

4.11 Weight gain

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.43, 6.72]

4.12 Insomnia

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.15 [0.38, 134.67]

4.13 Diarrhea

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.56, 5.71]

4.14 Libido loss

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [0.52, 12.52]

4.15 Memory problems

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.09 [0.47, 35.21]

5 Drug use dichotomous measure Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 >50% reduction in substance use from baseline

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.60, 1.57]

5.2 >50% urine negative for substance of abuse

1

32

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [0.82, 3.00]

5.3 Continuous abstinence (4 of 4 weeks abstinent at the end of the study)

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.0 [0.75, 47.71]

6 Drug use continuous measures Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Use of heroin or cocaine at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days)

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.16, 0.04]

6.2 Use of any drug or alcohol at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days)

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.23, 0.03]

6.3 Polydrug use at the end of treatment (Opiate Treatment Index)

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [‐0.69, 1.11]

6.4 Frequency of use of any drug (days of use per week)

1

137

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.17 [‐1.90, ‐0.44]

6.5 Use of cocaine at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.10 [‐5.74, 1.54]

6.6 Use of heroin at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.3 [‐4.83, 2.23]

6.7 Use of drugs at the end of the treatment (ASI drug composite score)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.01]

7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score) Show forest plot

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.5 [‐13.76, 8.76]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Antidepressants vs placebo according to any definition
Comparison 2. Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dropout Show forest plot

4

322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.88, 1.64]

2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 "very much" or "much" improved on the Clinical Global Impression scale

1

137

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.03 [1.17, 3.53]

2.2 >50% reduction in depressive severity from baseline (HDRS score)

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.54, 1.71]

3 Severity of depression continuous measures Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 HDRS total score at the end of the treatment

3

276

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.69, 0.23]

3.2 Global Improvement Rating at the end of the treatment

1

29

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.26, 0.22]

3.3 BDI score at the end of the treatment

1

44

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.33, 0.85]

4 Adverse events Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Withdrawn for medical reasons

3

276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.03 [1.20, 7.68]

4.2 Nausea/stomach discomfort

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.40, 1.17]

4.3 Dry mouth

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.06 [0.33, 28.41]

4.4 Sluggishness/fatigue

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.38, 2.15]

4.5 Dizziness

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.15, 6.95]

4.6 Headache

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.90 [0.83, 4.33]

4.7 Jitteriness

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.61, 3.51]

4.8 Constipation

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.56, 5.71]

4.9 Weight gain

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.43, 6.72]

4.10 Insomnia

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.15 [0.38, 134.67]

4.11 Diarrhea

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.56, 5.71]

4.12 Libido loss

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [0.52, 12.52]

4.13 Memory problems

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.09 [0.47, 35.21]

5 Drug use dichotomous measure Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 >50% reduction in substance use from baseline

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.60, 1.57]

5.2 Continuous abstinence (4 of 4 weeks abstinent at the end of the study)

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.0 [0.75, 47.71]

6 Drug use continuous measures Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Use of heroin or cocaine at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days)

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.16, 0.04]

6.2 Use of any drug or alcohol at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days)

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.23, 0.03]

6.3 Frequency of use of any drug (days of use per week)

1

137

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.17 [‐1.90, ‐0.44]

6.4 Use of cocaine at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.10 [‐5.74, 1.54]

6.5 Use of heroin at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.3 [‐4.83, 2.23]

6.6 Use of drugs at the end of the treatment (ASI drug composite score)

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.01]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Antidepressants vs placebo for operationally defined depression
Comparison 3. Different class of antidepressant

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Drupout Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Tricyclics versus placebo

3

218

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.74, 1.37]

1.2 SSRI versus placebo

3

188

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.91, 2.56]

2 Severity of depression dichotomous measures Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Tricyclics versus placebo: "very much" or "much" improvement on the Clinical Global Impression scale

2

183

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.92 [1.26, 2.94]

2.2 SSRI versus placebo:>50% reduction in depressive severity from baseline (HDRS score)

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.54, 1.71]

3 Severity of depression continuous measures Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 HDRS total score at the end of the treatment: Tricyclics versus placebo

3

207

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.85, ‐0.29]

3.2 HDRS total score at the end of the treatment: SSRI versus placebo

2

139

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.34, 0.32]

3.3 MADRS score at the end of the treatment: SSRI versus placebo

1

49

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.39, 0.74]

3.4 POMS score at the end of the treatment: Tricyclics versus placebo

1

44

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐1.12, 0.11]

3.5 AUSSI at the end of the treatment: SSRI versus placebo

1

49

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.24, 0.89]

3.6 Global Improvement Rating at the end of the treatment: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

29

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐1.26, 0.22]

3.7 BDI score at the end of the treatment: Tricyclics versus placebo

1

24

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.50 [‐2.43, ‐0.57]

3.8 BDI score at the end of the treatment: SSRI versus placebo

1

44

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.33, 0.85]

4 Adverse events Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Withdrawn for medical reasons: Tricyclics versus placebo

2

172

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.11 [1.06, 9.12]

4.2 Withdrawn for medical reasons: SSRI versus placebo

2

139

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [0.61, 10.75]

4.3 Nausea/stomach discomfort: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.40, 1.17]

4.4 Dry mouth: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.61, 3.36]

4.5 Dry mouth: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.06 [0.33, 28.41]

4.6 Drowsiness: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.8 [0.66, 4.88]

4.7 Sluggishness/fatigue: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.2 [0.40, 3.60]

4.8 Sluggishness/fatigue: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.38, 2.15]

4.9 Dizziness: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.05, 5.28]

4.10 Dizziness: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.15, 6.95]

4.11 Increased sweating: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.33, 27.57]

4.12 Headache: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 71.40]

4.13 Headache: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.90 [0.83, 4.33]

4.14 Jitteriness: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.61, 3.51]

4.15 Constipation: Tricyclic versus placebo

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.93]

4.16 Constipation: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.56, 5.71]

4.17 Weight gain: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.70 [0.43, 6.72]

4.18 Insomnia: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

7.15 [0.38, 134.67]

4.19 Diarrhea: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.79 [0.56, 5.71]

4.20 Libido loss: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.55 [0.52, 12.52]

4.21 Memory problems: SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.09 [0.47, 35.21]

5 Drug use dichotomous measure Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Tricyclic versus placebo

1

32

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [0.82, 3.00]

5.2 SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.60, 1.57]

6 Drug use continuous measures Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Use of heroin or cocaine at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days): SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.16, 0.04]

6.2 Use of any drug or alcohol at the end of treatment (proportion of days of use in the past 30 days): SSRI versus placebo

1

95

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.1 [‐0.23, 0.03]

6.3 Polydrug use at the end of treatment (Opiate Treatment Index): SSRI versus placebo

1

49

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [‐0.69, 1.11]

6.4 Frequency of use of any drug (days of use per week): Tricyclics versus placebo

1

137

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.17 [‐1.90, ‐0.44]

6.5 Use of cocaine at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days): SSRI versus placebo

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.10 [‐5.74, 1.54]

6.6 Use of heroin at the end of treatment (days of use in the past 30 days): SSRI versus placebo

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.3 [‐4.83, 2.23]

6.7 Use of drugs at the end of the treatment (ASI drug composite score): SSRI versus placebo

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.01]

7 Psychiatric symptoms/psychological distress: Functional health and well‐being at the end of treatment (SF‐36 Health Survey score): SSRI versus placebo Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Different class of antidepressant