Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cold water immersion (CWI) versus passive, outcome: 1.1 Pain (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS)
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cold water immersion (CWI) versus passive, outcome: 1.1 Pain (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS)

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 2 Pain ‐ random effects analysis (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 2 Pain ‐ random effects analysis (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 72 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 72 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 10 Tenderness (pain on palpation).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 10 Tenderness (pain on palpation).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 11 Subjective recovery (10 point or 10 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 11 Subjective recovery (10 point or 10 cm VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 12 Fatigue (10 point / 10 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 12 Fatigue (10 point / 10 cm VAS).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 13 Strength (Final value: Nm).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 13 Strength (Final value: Nm).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 14 Strength (% of baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 14 Strength (% of baseline).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 15 Power (jump height: centimetres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 15 Power (jump height: centimetres).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 16 Power (% decrease in jump height over 5 jumps).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 16 Power (% decrease in jump height over 5 jumps).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 17 Power (cycle ergometer power: Watts).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 17 Power (cycle ergometer power: Watts).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 18 Functional performance (time to complete exercise test: seconds).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 18 Functional performance (time to complete exercise test: seconds).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 19 Functional performance (time to fatigue).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 19 Functional performance (time to fatigue).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 20 Range of movement (ROM).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 20 Range of movement (ROM).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 21 Swelling (limb girth in centimetres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 21 Swelling (limb girth in centimetres).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 22 Biomarker: creatine kinase.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 22 Biomarker: creatine kinase.

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 23 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 23 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase.

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 24 Biomarker: myoglobin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 24 Biomarker: myoglobin.

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 25 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 25 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 26 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/dL / mg/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 26 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/dL / mg/L).

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 27 Pain (muscle soreness: all converted to 10 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive, Outcome 27 Pain (muscle soreness: all converted to 10 cm VAS).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 2 Subjective recovery (10 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 2 Subjective recovery (10 cm VAS).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 3 Strength.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 3 Strength.

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 4 Power (squat jump in Watts).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 4 Power (squat jump in Watts).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 5 Power (% decrease in jump performance).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 5 Power (% decrease in jump performance).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 6 Functional performance (time to complete running task: seconds).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 6 Functional performance (time to complete running task: seconds).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 7 Functional performance (time to fatigue).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 7 Functional performance (time to fatigue).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 8 Swelling (thigh girth: centimetres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 8 Swelling (thigh girth: centimetres).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 9 Range of movement (degrees).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 9 Range of movement (degrees).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 10 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 10 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 11 Biomarker: myoglobin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 11 Biomarker: myoglobin.

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 12 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 12 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 13 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 13 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/L).

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 14 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/mL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion, Outcome 14 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/mL).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 2 Subjective recovery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 2 Subjective recovery.

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 3 Subjective recovery (Intervention associated with NO benefit for recovery).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 3 Subjective recovery (Intervention associated with NO benefit for recovery).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 4 Strength.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 4 Strength.

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 5 Power.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 5 Power.

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 6 Functional performance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 6 Functional performance.

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 7 Range of movement (ROM).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 7 Range of movement (ROM).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 8 Swelling.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 8 Swelling.

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 9 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 9 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 10 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 10 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 11 Biomarker: myoglobin (ng/mL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 11 Biomarker: myoglobin (ng/mL).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 12 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 12 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 13 Biomarker: interleukin‐10 (pg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 13 Biomarker: interleukin‐10 (pg/ml).

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 14 Biomarker: interleukin‐1b (pg/ml).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI), Outcome 14 Biomarker: interleukin‐1b (pg/ml).

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS).

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 2 Power (% decrement in jump performance).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 2 Power (% decrement in jump performance).

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 3 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery, Outcome 3 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds).

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS).

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 2 Subjective recovery (rating of fatigue: 10 point VAS ).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 2 Subjective recovery (rating of fatigue: 10 point VAS ).

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 3 Power (vertical jump height: centimetres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 3 Power (vertical jump height: centimetres).

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 4 Range of movement (centimetres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 4 Range of movement (centimetres).

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 5 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression, Outcome 5 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds).

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 5 point VAS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 1 Pain (muscle soreness: 5 point VAS).

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 2 Range of movement (degrees).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 2 Range of movement (degrees).

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 3 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 3 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L).

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 4 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI, Outcome 4 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L).

Comparison 1. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

12

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediately post intervention

7

128

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.43, 0.28]

1.2 24 hours

10

218

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.84, ‐0.27]

1.3 48 hours

8

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.97, ‐0.35]

1.4 72 hours

4

104

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.93 [‐1.36, ‐0.51]

1.5 96 hours

5

97

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [1.00, ‐0.16]

2 Pain ‐ random effects analysis (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

12

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Immediately post intervention

7

128

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.43, 0.28]

2.2 24 hours

10

218

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐1.06, ‐0.10]

2.3 48 hours

8

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐1.18, ‐0.21]

2.4 72 hours

4

104

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.88 [‐1.83, 0.07]

2.5 96 hours

5

97

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐1.12, 0.01]

3 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

10

218

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.84, ‐0.27]

3.1 parallel group

7

136

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.58, 0.12]

3.2 cross‐over

3

82

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.17 [‐1.65, ‐0.69]

4 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

8

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.97, ‐0.35]

4.1 parallel group

6

117

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.77, ‐0.02]

4.2 cross‐over

2

62

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.26 [‐1.81, ‐0.70]

5 Subgroup analysis. Study design: Pain at 72 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

4

104

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.93 [‐1.36, ‐0.51]

5.1 parallel groups

3

64

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.93, 0.07]

5.2 cross‐over

1

40

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.27 [‐3.08, ‐1.46]

6 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

10

218

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.84, ‐0.27]

6.1 Single CWI

6

110

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.90, ‐0.11]

6.2 Multiple CWI

4

108

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐1.00, ‐0.20]

7 Subgroup analysis. Immersion frequency: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

8

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.97, ‐0.35]

7.1 Single CWI

4

71

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐1.25, ‐0.26]

7.2 Multiple CWI

4

108

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐1.01, ‐0.20]

8 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 24 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

10

218

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.84, ‐0.27]

8.1 Lab controlled muscle damage (DOMS)

6

137

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.57, 0.12]

8.2 Other sporting activity

4

81

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.23 [‐1.72, ‐0.74]

9 Subgroup analysis. Exercise type: Pain at 48 hours (muscle soreness: various scales Likert and VAS) Show forest plot

8

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.97, ‐0.35]

9.1 Lab controlled muscle damage (DOMS)

6

137

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐0.83, ‐0.14]

9.2 Other sporting activity

2

42

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.39 [‐2.09, ‐0.69]

10 Tenderness (pain on palpation) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Subjective recovery (10 point or 10 cm VAS) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Physical recovery (Immediately post intervention)

2

42

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [‐0.10, 2.05]

11.2 Mental recovery (immediately post intervention)

1

22

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.60 [‐0.86, 2.06]

12 Fatigue (10 point / 10 cm VAS) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 Fatigue (immediately post intervention)

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.70 [‐2.49, ‐0.90]

12.2 Fatigue (24 hrs post intervention)

1

19

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐1.88, 0.48]

13 Strength (Final value: Nm) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Immediate

3

58

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐19.92 [‐33.24, ‐6.59]

13.2 24 hours

4

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.94 [‐6.44, 2.56]

13.3 48 hours

5

103

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.44 [‐5.46, 2.57]

13.4 72 hours

3

61

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐5.33, 3.56]

13.5 96 hours

2

46

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐4.06, 2.89]

14 Strength (% of baseline) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Immediate

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 24 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.3 48 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.4 72 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.5 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Power (jump height: centimetres) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Immediate (cross‐over trial)

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.80 [‐6.29, 2.69]

15.2 24 hours

3

52

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐2.04, 2.56]

15.3 24 hours (cross‐over trial)

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.40 [2.12, 8.68]

15.4 48 hours

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐2.63, 2.63]

15.5 48 hours (cross‐over trial)

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

9.60 [6.40, 12.80]

15.6 72 hours (cross‐over trial)

1

40

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.60 [3.16, 10.04]

16 Power (% decrease in jump height over 5 jumps) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Power (cycle ergometer power: Watts) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17.1 Peak power output (Immediate)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Functional performance (time to complete exercise test: seconds) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 1 km cycle time (immediate)

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐2.64, 3.24]

18.2 Agility circuit time (24 hours)

1

19

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.26, 0.20]

18.3 Sprint time (24 hours)

2

39

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.10, 0.07]

18.4 Multisprint / Agilty circuit time (24 hours)

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐2.49, 1.91]

18.5 Multisprint time (24 hours)

2

32

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.19 [‐1.06, 0.68]

18.6 Sprint time (48 hours)

1

20

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.11, 0.15]

18.7 Multisprint time (48 hours)

1

22

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐1.37, 1.23]

19 Functional performance (time to fatigue) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 % decrease from baseline (immediate)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Range of movement (ROM) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Degrees (Immediate)

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Degrees (24 hours)

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.3 Centimetres (24 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.4 Degrees (48 hours)

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.5 Degrees (72 hours)

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.6 Degrees (96 hours)

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Swelling (limb girth in centimetres) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

21.1 Final value immediate

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐5.16, 5.36]

21.2 Final value 24 hours

2

33

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.41 [‐5.63, 2.80]

21.3 Final value 48 hours

2

33

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.53 [‐5.57, 2.51]

21.4 Final value 72 hours

2

33

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.54 [‐5.65, 2.56]

21.5 Final value 96 hours

1

18

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐5.80, 4.60]

22 Biomarker: creatine kinase Show forest plot

10

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

22.1 Immediately post

4

68

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.66, 0.67]

22.2 24 hours

7

146

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.03, 0.63]

22.3 48 hours

7

152

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐1.36, 0.37]

22.4 72 hours

3

51

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.52, 0.79]

22.5 96 hours

3

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.70, 0.73]

23 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 U/L (immediate)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 % change 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Biomarker: myoglobin Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

24.1 Immediate

2

36

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐1.18, 0.17]

24.2 24 hours

2

33

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐1.36, 0.05]

24.3 48 hours

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐1.66, 0.17]

25 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Immediate

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/dL / mg/L) Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

26.1 Immediate

2

30

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.40, 1.04]

26.2 24 hours

1

22

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐1.07, 0.61]

26.3 48 hours

1

22

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.21 [‐1.05, 0.63]

27 Pain (muscle soreness: all converted to 10 cm VAS) Show forest plot

12

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

27.1 Immediately post intervention

7

128

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.59, 0.61]

27.2 24 hours

10

218

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.27 [‐1.70, ‐0.84]

27.3 48 hours

8

179

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.58 [‐2.07, ‐1.10]

27.4 72 hours

4

104

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.16 [‐2.79, ‐1.53]

27.5 96 hours

5

97

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐1.21, ‐0.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus passive
Comparison 2. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS) Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate

3

63

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.66, 0.73]

1.2 24 hours

4

97

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.65, 0.64]

1.3 48 hours

3

77

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.87, 0.91]

1.4 72 hours

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.16 [‐0.37, 0.69]

1.5 96 hours

1

28

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.86, 0.62]

2 Subjective recovery (10 cm VAS) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Fatigue (immediate)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Strength Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate

1

27

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.72, 0.80]

3.2 24 hours

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.79, 0.28]

3.3 48 hours

3

77

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.46, 0.44]

3.4 72 hours

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.70, 0.37]

3.5 96 hours

1

28

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐1.19, 0.32]

4 Power (squat jump in Watts) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Power (% decrease in jump performance) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Functional performance (time to complete running task: seconds) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Multisprint/Agility circuit time (24 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Sprint time (24 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Multisprint time (48 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Functional performance (time to fatigue) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 % decrease from baseline (immediate)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Swelling (thigh girth: centimetres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Range of movement (degrees) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.3 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.4 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Immediate

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 24 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 48 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Biomarker: myoglobin Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Immediate

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Immediate

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Biomarker: C‐reactive protein (mg/L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/mL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus contrast immersion
Comparison 3. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point or 10 or 12 cm VAS) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.5 [‐2.09, 1.09]

1.2 24 hours

3

64

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.40, 0.73]

1.3 48 hours

2

51

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [‐0.94, 1.99]

1.4 72 hours

2

51

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐1.83, 1.03]

1.5 96 hours

1

28

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.64 [‐7.72, ‐1.56]

2 Subjective recovery Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Fatigue (24 hours post intervention)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Subjective recovery (Intervention associated with NO benefit for recovery) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 24 hours

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Strength Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate

1

23

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.42 [‐0.41, 1.25]

4.2 24 hours

2

51

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [‐0.27, 0.84]

4.3 48 hours

2

51

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐0.27, 0.86]

4.4 72 hours

2

51

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.20 [‐0.36, 0.75]

4.5 96 hours

1

28

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.90, 0.58]

5 Power Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 24 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Functional performance Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Multisprint time at 24 hours (seconds)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Range of movement (ROM) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.4 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Swelling Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Immediate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐66.0 [‐328.29, 196.29]

9.2 24 hours

2

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐65.27 [‐236.38, 105.84]

9.3 48 hours

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐14.0 [‐210.29, 182.29]

9.4 72 hours

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

53.0 [‐143.97, 249.97]

10 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 24 hours

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.4 72 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Biomarker: myoglobin (ng/mL) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Immediate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.40 [‐35.63, 26.83]

11.2 24 hours

2

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [‐17.14, 19.46]

12 Biomarker: interleukin‐6 (pg/ml) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 Immediate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.2 [‐1.72, 6.12]

12.2 24 hours

2

36

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.90, 1.03]

13 Biomarker: interleukin‐10 (pg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Biomarker: interleukin‐1b (pg/ml) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus warm‐water immersion (WWI)
Comparison 4. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Power (% decrement in jump performance) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Sprint time (24 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Multisprint/Agility time (24 hours)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus active recovery
Comparison 5. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: 10 point VAS) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Subjective recovery (rating of fatigue: 10 point VAS ) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Power (vertical jump height: centimetres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Range of movement (centimetres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Functional performance (time to complete running test: seconds) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Agility circuit time (24 hrs)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Multisprint time (24 hrs)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus compression
Comparison 6. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain (muscle soreness: 5 point VAS) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Range of movement (degrees) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Immediate

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 24 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Biomarker: creatine kinase (U/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 48 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Biomarker: lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 96 hours

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Cold‐water immersion (CWI) versus double CWI