Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Lokalni lijekovi za genitalni lichen sclerosus

Abstract

Background

Lichen sclerosus is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition that most commonly occurs in adult women, although it may also be seen in men and children. It primarily affects the genital area and around the anus, where it causes persistent itching and soreness. Scarring after inflammation may lead to severe damage by fusion of the vulval lips (labia); narrowing of the vaginal opening; and burying of the clitoris in women and girls, as well as tightening of the foreskin in men and boys, if treatments are not started early. Affected people have an increased risk of genital cancers.

Objectives

To assess the effects of topical interventions for genital lichen sclerosus and adverse effects reported in included trials.

Search methods

We searched the following databases up to 16 September 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2007), LILACS (from 1982), CINAHL (from 1981), British Nursing Index and Archive (from 1985), Science Citation Index Expanded (from 1945), BIOSIS Previews (from 1926), Conference Papers Index (from 1982), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index ‐ Science (from 1990). We also searched ongoing trial registries and scanned the bibliographies of included studies, published reviews, and papers that had cited the included studies.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of topical interventions in genital lichen sclerosus.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. A third author was available for resolving differences of opinion.

Main results

We included 7 RCTs, with a total of 249 participants, covering 6 treatments. Six of these RCTs tested the efficacy of one active intervention against placebo or another active intervention, while the other trial tested three active interventions against placebo.

When compared to placebo in one trial, clobetasol propionate 0.05% was effective in treating genital lichen sclerosus in relation to the following outcomes: 'participant‐rated improvement or remission of symptoms' (risk ratio (RR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45 to 5.61) and 'investigator‐rated global degree of improvement' (standardised mean difference (SMD) 5.74, 95% CI 4.26 to 7.23).

When mometasone furoate 0.05% was compared to placebo in another trial, there was a significant improvement in the 'investigator‐rated change in clinical grade of phimosis' (SMD ‐1.04, 95% CI ‐1.77 to ‐0.31).

Both trials found no significant differences in reported adverse drug reactions between the corticosteroid and placebo groups.

The data from four trials found no significant benefit for topical testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and progesterone. When used as maintenance therapy after an initial treatment with topical clobetasol propionate in another trial, topical testosterone worsened the symptoms (P < 0.05), but the placebo did not.

One trial found no differences between pimecrolimus and clobetasol propionate in relieving symptoms through change in pruritus (itching) (SMD ‐0.33, 95% CI ‐0.99 to 0.33) and burning/pain (SMD 0.03, 95% CI ‐0.62 to 0.69). However, pimecrolimus was less effective than clobetasol propionate with regard to the 'investigator‐rated global degree of improvement' (SMD ‐1.64, 95% CI ‐2.40 to ‐0.87). This trial found no significant differences in reported adverse drug reactions between the pimecrolimus and placebo groups.

Authors' conclusions

The current limited evidence demonstrates the efficacy of clobetasol propionate, mometasone furoate, and pimecrolimus in treating genital lichen sclerosus. Further RCTs are needed to determine the optimal potency and regimen of topical corticosteroids, examine other topical interventions, assess the duration of remission or prevention of flares, evaluate the reduction in the risk of genital squamous cell carcinoma or genital intraepithelial neoplasia, and examine the efficacy in improving the quality of the sex lives of people with this condition.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Plain language summary

Lokalni lijekovi za genitalni lichen sclerosus

Lichen sclerosus je kronična kožna bolest koja uglavnom pogađa odrasle žene, ali može se javiti i kod muškaraca i djece. Obično se javlja u području spolovila i oko anusa. Žene i djevojke koje obole od lichena sclerosusa obično opisuju simptome svrbeža, boli i peckanja u zahvaćenim područjima. Nastanak ožiljka nakon upale može dovesti do srastanja vaginalnih usana, suženja otvora vagine i zakapanja klitorisa u tkivo. Spolni odnosi su često bolni, manje ugodni ili nemogući zbog boli. LIchen sclerosus kod muškaraca i dječaka može uzrokovati stezanje prepucija, dovesti do otežanog mokrenja ili bolne erekcije. Može biti prisutna i bol prilikom pražnjenja crijeva, što može dovesti do zatvora stolice (konstipacija), osobito u djece. Liječenje bolesti je preporučljivo jer se na taj način ublažavaju simptomi, a i liječenjem je moguće spriječiti daljnja oštećenja u genitalnom području i anusu. Za lichen sclerosus nude se razne vrste lokalnih lijekova. Ovaj Cochrane sustavni pregled je istražio koji su lokalni lijekovi sigurni i učinkoviti za liječenje lichena sclerosusa.

U sustavni pregled je uključeno 7 kliničkih ispitivanja s ukupno 249 sudionika, u kojima je istraženo 6 vrsta terapija. Lokalni klobetazol propionat i  mometazon furoat bili su učinkoviti u liječenju genitalnog lichena sclerosusa. Nije bilo značajne razlike u učinkovitosti ublažavanja simptoma (npr. svrbeža i boli) između kreme pimekrolimusa   i  klobetazol propionata, ali je pimekrolimus bio manje učinkovit u popravljanju izgleda pogođenog dijela tijela.

Potrebno je više istraživanja na ovu temu iz niza razloga: kako bi se utvrdila vrsta steroida koju je najbolje koristiti, kao i učestalost i duljina primjene lijeka na kožu koja daje najbolje rezultate, da bi se istražili drugi mogući lijekovi za kožu, za procjenu dugoročne učinkovitosti lokalnih lijekova u smislu ublažavanja simptoma i smanjenja rizika od pojave genitalnih karcinoma te da bi se istražili učinci terapija na kvalitetu spolnog života oboljelih od lichena sclerosusa.