固定性矯正装置の治療における大臼歯チューブのボンディング
Appendices
Appendix 1. Cochrane Oral Health’s Trials Register search strategy
From May 2016, searches of the Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register were undertaken using the Cochrane Register of Studies and the search strategy below:
((molar* and tube*):ti,ab) AND (INREGISTER)
Previous searches of the Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register were undertaken in March 2009, September 2010 and December 2010, using the Procite software and the search strategy below:
(molar* AND tube*)
Appendix 2. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) search strategy
#1 exp Orthodontics
#2 orthodontic*
#3 molar* near/3 tube*
#4 (#1 or #2) and #3
Appendix 3. MEDLINE (Ovid) search strategy
1. exp Orthodontics/
2. orthodontic$.mp.
3. (molar$ adj3 tube$).mp.
4. (1 or 2) and 3
5. exp Composite Resins/
6. exp Glass Ionomer Cements/
7. Resin Cements/
8. exp Dental Bonding/
9. (resin$ or cement$ or bond$ or “polyacid‐modified composite resin$” or compomer$ or composite$ or glass‐ionomer$ or “glass ionomer$” or adhesive$ or “self‐etching primer$” or “self etching primer$”)
10. or/5‐9
11. 4 and 10
Appendix 4. Embase (Ovid) search strategy
1. exp Orthodontics/
2. orthodontic$.mp.
3. (molar$ adj3 tube$).mp.
4. (1 or 2) and 3
5. exp Composite Resins/
6. exp Glass Ionomer Cements/
7. Resin Cements/
8. exp Dental Bonding/
9. (resin$ or cement$ or bond$ or “polyacid‐modified composite resin$” or compomer$ or composite$ or glass‐ionomer$ or “glass ionomer$” or adhesive$ or “self‐etching primer$” or “self etching primer$”)
10. or/5‐9
11. 4 and 10
Appendix 5. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry search strategy
adhesive and molar and tube
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Comparison 1 Molar tubes versus molar bands, Outcome 1 Failure at tooth level.
Comparison 1 Molar tubes versus molar bands, Outcome 2 Failure at participant level.
Comparison 1 Molar tubes versus molar bands, Outcome 3 Decalcification (participant level).
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Failure at tooth level Show forest plot | 2 | Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) | 2.92 [1.80, 4.72] | |
| 2 Failure at participant level Show forest plot | 2 | 186 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 2.30 [1.56, 3.41] |
| 3 Decalcification (participant level) Show forest plot | 1 | 74 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.85 [1.22, 2.79] |
