Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Nieinwazyjne metody stymulacji mózgu w przewlekłym bólu

Appendices

Appendix 1. Main database search strategies for current update

CENTRAL (CRSO)

#1 MESH DESCRIPTOR pain EXPLODE ALL TREES 32731

#2 (((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*)):TI,AB,KY 15073

#3 ((sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*))):TI,AB,KY 6757

#4 #1 OR #2 OR #3 45871

#5 MESH DESCRIPTOR Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 974

#6 MESH DESCRIPTOR Electronarcosis 33

#7 (((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*)):TI,AB,KY 4072

#8 (((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*))):TI,AB,KY 64

#9 (((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*)):TI,AB,KY 337

#10 ((theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS)):TI,AB,KY 150

#11 ((transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy)):TI,AB,KY 2912

#12 ((electrosleep or electronarco*)):TI,AB,KY 47

#13 #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 4355

#14 #4 AND #13 310

#15 31/07/2013 TO 30/09/2016:DL 264060

#16 #14 AND #15 176

MEDLINE (OVID)

1 exp Pain/ (283010)

2 ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (74023)

3 (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (28679)

4 or/1‐3 (325946)

5 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (6328)

6 ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (25872)

7 ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (147)

8 ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (822)

9 (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (575)

10 (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (7423)

11 (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (357)

12 or/5‐11 (28316)

13 randomized controlled trial.pt. (337806)

14 controlled clinical trial.pt. (84996)

15 randomized.ab. (241501)

16 placebo.ab. (134421)

17 drug therapy.fs. (1571905)

18 randomly.ab. (173459)

19 trial.ab. (248492)

20 groups.ab. (1134392)

21 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 (2928552)

22 exp animals/ not humans.sh. (3751730)

23 21 not 22 (2487755)

24 4 and 12 and 23 (295)

25 (200911* or 200912* or 2010* or 2011* or 2012* or 2013*).ed. (2428299)

26 24 and 25 (112)

Embase (OVID)

1 exp Pain/ (1006798)

2 ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (158849)

3 (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (52041)

4 or/1‐3 (1044575)

5 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (18453)

6 ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (50617)

7 ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (237)

8 ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (2843)

9 (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (1549)

10 (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (17745)

11 (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (383)

12 or/5‐11 (57298)

13 random$.tw. (1121981)

14 factorial$.tw. (28563)

15 crossover$.tw. (58949)

16 cross over$.tw. (26241)

17 cross‐over$.tw. (26241)

18 placebo$.tw. (244121)

19 (doubl$ adj blind$).tw. (172110)

20 (singl$ adj blind$).tw. (18218)

21 assign$.tw. (295873)

22 allocat$.tw. (107828)

23 volunteer$.tw. (211373)

24 Crossover Procedure/ (48595)

25 double‐blind procedure.tw. (236)

26 Randomized Controlled Trial/ (419274)

27 Single Blind Procedure/ (23071)

28 or/13‐27 (1749640)

29 (animal/ or nonhuman/) not human/ (5110486)

30 28 not 29 (1554658)

31 4 and 12 and 30 (1112)

32 (201307* or 201308* or 201309* or 201310* or 201311* or 201312* or 2014* or 2015* or 2016*).dd. (5443542)

33 31 and 32 (527)

34 limit 33 to embase (487)

PsycINFO (OVID)

1 exp Pain/ (48364)

2 ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (25922)

3 (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (4998)

4 or/1‐3 (56650)

5 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (5956)

6 ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (17936)

7 ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (89)

8 ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (983)

9 (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (791)

10 (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (7884)

11 (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (139)

12 or/5‐11 (18853)

13 clinical trials/ (9724)

14 (randomis* or randomiz*).tw. (62274)

15 (random$ adj3 (allocat$ or assign$)).tw. (35100)

16 ((clinic$ or control$) adj trial$).tw. (52603)

17 ((singl$ or doubl$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj3 (blind$ or mask$)).tw. (22429)

18 (crossover$ or "cross over$").tw. (8346)

19 random sampling/ (699)

20 Experiment Controls/ (856)

21 Placebo/ (4606)

22 placebo$.tw. (35030)

23 exp program evaluation/ (18184)

24 treatment effectiveness evaluation/ (20144)

25 ((effectiveness or evaluat$) adj3 (stud$ or research$)).tw. (70971)

26 or/13‐25 (221762)

27 4 and 12 and 26 (180)

28 limit 27 to yr="2013 ‐Current" (82)

CINAHL (EBSCO)

S26 S25 Limiters ‐ Published Date from: 20130701‐20160914

S25 S15 AND S24

S24 S16 OR S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22 OR S23

S23 (allocat* random*)

S22 (MH "Quantitative Studies")

S21 (MH "Placebos")

S20 placebo*

S19 (random* allocat*)

S18 (MH "Random Assignment")

S17 (Randomi?ed control* trial*)

S16 (singl* blind* ) or (doubl* blind* ) or (tripl* blind* ) or (trebl* blind* ) or (trebl* mask* ) or (tripl* mask* ) or (doubl* mask* ) or (singl* mask* )

S15 S4 AND S14

S14 S5 OR S6 OR S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13

S13 TI ( (electrosleep OR electronarco*) ) OR AB ( (electrosleep OR electronarco*) )

S12 TI ( ("transcranial magnetic stimulation" OR rTMS OR "transcranial direct current stimulation" OR tDCS OR "cranial electrostimulation" OR "cranial electrotherapy") ) OR AB ( ("transcranial magnetic stimulation" OR rTMS OR "transcranial direct current stimulation" OR tDCS OR "cranial electrostimulation" OR "cranial electrotherapy") )

S11 TI ( ("theta burst stimulat*" OR iTBS OR cTBS) ) OR AB ( ("theta burst stimulat*" OR iTBS OR cTBS) )

S10 TI ( (("non‐invasive brain" OR "non*invasive brain") AND stimulat*) ) OR AB ( (("non‐invasive brain" OR "non*invasive brain") AND stimulat*) )

S9 TI ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) ) OR AB ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) )

S8 TI ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) ) OR AB ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) )

S7 TI ( ((brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti*) AND stimulat*) ) OR AB ( ((brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti*) AND stimulat*) )

S6 (MH "Electric Stimulation")

S5 (MH "Electronarcosis")

S4 S1 OR S2 OR S3

S3 TI ( (sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR "trigemin* neuralg*" OR "herp* neuralg*" OR "diabet* neuropath*" OR "reflex dystroph*" OR "sudeck* atroph*" OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR "failed back surg*" OR "failed back syndrome*") ) OR AB ( (sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR "trigemin* neuralg*" OR "herp* neuralg*" OR "diabet* neuropath*" OR "reflex dystroph*" OR "sudeck* atroph*" OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR "failed back surg*" OR "failed back syndrome*") )

S2 TI ( ((chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR "temporomandib* joint*" OR "temperomandib* joint*" OR "tempromandib* joint*" OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord) AND pain*). ) OR AB ( ((chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR "temporomandib* joint*" OR "temperomandib* joint*" OR "tempromandib* joint*" OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord) AND pain*))

S1 (MH "Pain+")

LILACS

1. Pain$ or dolor$ or intractabl$ or neuropath$ or phantom or fantom or myofasc$ or temp$romandibular or sciatic$ or back‐ache or backache or ache or lumbago or fibromyalg$ or neuralg$ or dystroph$ or atroph$ or causalgi$ or whip‐lash or whiplash or polymyalg$ [Words]¬

2. ((Estimulaci$ or stimulat$) and (cerebra$ or brain$ or cortex or cortical or crania$ or transcranial$ or magneti$)) or electrostim$ or electrotherapy$ or electro‐therap$ or “theta burst stimul$” or iTBS or Ctbs or “transcrani$ magnet$ stimulat$” or rTMS or “transcrani$ direct current stimulat$” or tDCS or “cranial electrostimulat$” or “cranial electrotherapy$ or electrosleep or electronarco$ [Words]¬

3. ((Pt randomized controlled trial OR Pt controlled clinical trial OR Mh randomized controlled trials OR Mh random allocation OR Mh double‐blind method OR Mh single‐blind method) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal)) OR (Pt clinical trial OR Ex E05.318.760.535$ OR (Tw clin$ AND (Tw trial$ OR Tw ensa$ OR Tw estud$ OR Tw experim$ OR Tw investiga$)) OR ((Tw singl$ OR Tw simple$ OR Tw doubl$ OR Tw doble$ OR Tw duplo$ OR Tw trebl$ OR Tw trip$) AND (Tw blind$ OR Tw cego$ OR Tw ciego$ OR Tw mask$ OR Tw mascar$)) OR Mh placebos OR Tw placebo$ OR (Tw random$ OR Tw randon$ OR Tw casual$ OR Tw acaso$ OR Tw azar OR Tw aleator$) OR Mh research design) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal)) OR (Ct comparative study OR Ex E05.337$ OR Mh follow‐up studies OR Mh prospective studies OR Tw control$ OR Tw prospectiv$ OR Tw volunt$ OR Tw volunteer$) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal))) [Words]

Appendix 2. Trials register search results for current update

Register

Date of search

Search terms

Number of records

Clinical trials.gov

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

91

Clinical trials.gov

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

1

Clinical trials.gov

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

0

Clinical trials.gov

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

0

WHO ICTRP

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

01/01/2009 to 07/02/2013

adult

60

WHO ICTRP

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

WHO ICTRP

20/9/16

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

2

WHO ICTRP

20 September 2016

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

Register

Date of search

Search terms

Number of records

Clinical trials.gov

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp*romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

6

Clinical trials.gov

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp*romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

3

Clinical trials.gov

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

3

Clinical trials.gov

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

0

WHO ICTRP

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp*romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

01/01/2009 to 07/02/2013

adult

36

WHO ICTRP

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp*romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

8

WHO ICTRP

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME: pain

0

WHO ICTRP

18 Octoberr 2017

Field ‐ Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME: pain

0

Appendix 3. Search results summary table for current update

Database searched

Date last searched

Number of results

CENTRAL (CRSO) 31/07/2013 TO 30/09/2016

11/10/17

243

MEDLINE (OVID) July 2013 to Aug week 5 2016

11/10/17

217

Embase (OVID) July 2013 to 2016 week 37

11/10/17

595

PsycINFO (OVID) 2013 to July week 4 2016

11/10/17

117

CINAHL (EBSCO) July 2013 to Sept 2016

11/10/17

42

LILACS (Birme) 2013 to Sept 2016

11/10/17

42

Total

1256

Appendix 4. Main database search strategies for 2014 update

CENTRAL (years 2009 to 2013 searched)

#1           MeSH descriptor: [Pain] explode all trees

#2           (chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint" or "temperomandib* joint" or "tempromandib* joint" or central or (post next stroke) or complex or regional or "spinal cord") near/4 pain*:ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#3           (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* near/2 neuralg*) or (herp* near/2 neuralg*) or (diabet* near/2 neuropath*) or (reflex near/4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* near/2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back near/4 surg*) or (failed back near/4 syndrome*)):ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#4           #1 or #2 or #3

#5           MeSH descriptor: [Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation] this term only

#6           MeSH descriptor: [Electronarcosis] explode all trees

#7           (brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) near/4 stimulat*:ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#8           (transcrani* or crani* or brain*) near/4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*):ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#9           (non‐invasive or non*invasive) near/4 stimulat*:ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#10         "theta burst stimulat*" or iTBS or cTBS:ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#11         "transcranial magnetic stimulation" or rTMS or "transcranial direct current stimulat*" or tDCS or "cranial electrostimulation" or "cranial electrotherap*":ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#12         (electrosleep* or electronarco*):ti,ab,kw  (Word variations have been searched)

#13         #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10 or #11 or #12

#14         #4 and #13 from 2009 to 2013

MEDLINE and MEDLINE IN PROCESS (OVID)  

1     exp Pain/ (283010)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (74023)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (28679)

4     or/1‐3 (325946)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (6328)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (25872)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (147)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (822)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (575)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (7423)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (357)

12     or/5‐11 (28316)

13     randomized controlled trial.pt. (337806)

14     controlled clinical trial.pt. (84996)

15     randomized.ab. (241501)

16     placebo.ab. (134421)

17     drug therapy.fs. (1571905)

18     randomly.ab. (173459)

19     trial.ab. (248492)

20     groups.ab. (1134392)

21     13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 (2928552)

22     exp animals/ not humans.sh. (3751730)

23     21 not 22 (2487755)

24     4 and 12 and 23 (295)

25     (200911* or 200912* or 2010* or 2011* or 2012* or 2013*).ed. (2428299)

26     24 and 25 (112)

Embase (OVID)

1     exp Pain/ (729490)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (112128)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (41462)

4     or/1‐3 (759765)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (11875)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (35587)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (194)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (1314)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (770)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (10413)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (375)

12     or/5‐11 (39959)

13     4 and 12 (3078)

14     random$.tw. (793677)

15     factorial$.tw. (20700)

16     crossover$.tw. (46383)

17     cross over$.tw. (21096)

18     cross‐over$.tw. (21096)

19     placebo$.tw. (189884)

20     (doubl$ adj blind$).tw. (140353)

21     (singl$ adj blind$).tw. (13272)

22     assign$.tw. (220119)

23     allocat$.tw. (74677)

24     volunteer$.tw. (170305)

25     Crossover Procedure/ (36109)

26     double‐blind procedure.tw. (224)

27     Randomized Controlled Trial/ (338884)

28     Single Blind Procedure/ (16955)

29     or/14‐28 (1300700)

30     (animal/ or nonhuman/) not human/ (4566449)

31     29 not 30 (1146950)

32     13 and 31 (574)

33     (200911* or 200912* or 2010* or 2011* or 2012* or 2013*).dd. (4384183)

34     32 and 33 (303)

PsycINFO (OVID)

1     exp Pain/ (33859)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).tw. (17914)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).tw. (3654)

4     or/1‐3 (39372)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (3412)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (9508)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).tw. (55)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).tw. (401)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).tw. (441)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).tw. (4745)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).tw. (6)

12     or/5‐11 (9914)

13     4 and 12 (481)

14     clinical trials/ (6486)

15     (randomis* or randomiz*).tw. (39676)

16     (random$ adj3 (allocat$ or assign$)).tw. (22629)

17     ((clinic$ or control$) adj trial$).tw. (33763)

18     ((singl$ or doubl$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj3 (blind$ or mask$)).tw. (15332)

19     (crossover$ or "cross over$").tw. (5478)

20     random sampling/ (445)

21     Experiment Controls/ (435)

22     Placebo/ (2892)

23     placebo$.tw. (23869)

24     exp program evaluation/ (12521)

25     treatment effectiveness evaluation/ (11860)

26     ((effectiveness or evaluat$) adj3 (stud$ or research$)).tw. (45199)

27     or/14‐26 (142131)

28     13 and 27 (95)

29     limit 28 to yr="2009 ‐Current" (60)

CINAHL (EBSCO)

S26         S25         Limiters ‐ Published Date from: 20091101‐20130231

S25         S15 AND S24      

S24         S16 OR S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22 OR S23               

S23         (allocat* random*)        

S22         (MH "Quantitative Studies")      

S21         (MH "Placebos")             

S20         placebo*            

S19         (random* allocat*)        

S18         (MH "Random Assignment")     

S17         (Randomi?ed control* trial*)     

S16         (singl* blind* ) or (doubl* blind* ) or (tripl* blind* ) or (trebl* blind* ) or (trebl* mask* ) or (tripl* mask* ) or (doubl* mask* ) or (singl* mask* )         

S15         S4 AND S14        

S14         S5 OR S6 OR S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13            

S13         TI ( (electrosleep OR electronarco*) ) OR AB ( (electrosleep OR electronarco*) )               

S12         TI ( ("transcranial magnetic stimulation" OR rTMS OR "transcranial direct current stimulation" OR tDCS OR "cranial electrostimulation" OR "cranial electrotherapy") ) OR AB ( ("transcranial magnetic stimulation" OR rTMS OR "transcranial direct current stimulation" OR tDCS OR "cranial electrostimulation" OR "cranial electrotherapy") )    

S11         TI ( ("theta burst stimulat*" OR iTBS OR cTBS) ) OR AB ( ("theta burst stimulat*" OR iTBS OR cTBS) )          

S10         TI ( (("non‐invasive brain" OR "non*invasive brain") AND stimulat*) ) OR AB ( (("non‐invasive brain" OR "non*invasive brain") AND stimulat*) )                

S9           TI ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) ) OR AB ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) )                

S8           TI ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) ) OR AB ( ((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)) )                

S7           TI ( ((brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti*) AND stimulat*) ) OR AB ( ((brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti*) AND stimulat*) )     

S6           (MH "Electric Stimulation")         

S5           (MH "Electronarcosis")

S4           S1 OR S2 OR S3

S3           TI ( (sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR "trigemin* neuralg*" OR "herp* neuralg*" OR "diabet* neuropath*" OR "reflex dystroph*" OR "sudeck* atroph*" OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR "failed back surg*" OR "failed back syndrome*") ) OR AB ( (sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR "trigemin* neuralg*" OR "herp* neuralg*" OR "diabet* neuropath*" OR "reflex dystroph*" OR "sudeck* atroph*" OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR "failed back surg*" OR "failed back syndrome*") )  

S2           TI ( ((chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR "temporomandib* joint*" OR "temperomandib* joint*" OR "tempromandib* joint*" OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord) AND pain*). ) OR AB ( ((chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR "temporomandib* joint*" OR "temperomandib* joint*" OR "tempromandib* joint*" OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord) AND pain*))      

S1           (MH "Pain+")

LILACS  (7 February 2013)

1.       (chronic$ or back or musculoskel$ or intractabl$ or neuropath$ or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc$ or temporomandib$ or temperomandib$ or tempromandib$ or central or (post stroke) or complex or regional or spinal cord sciatica or back‐ache or back ache or lumbago or fibromyalg$ or trigemin$ neuralg$ or herp$  neuralg$ or diabet$ neuropath$ or reflex dystroph$ or sudeck$  atrophy$ or causalg$ or whip‐lash or whip$lash or polymyalg$ or failed back)  69863

2.       (brain$ or cortex or cortical or transcrani$ or cranial or magneti$ stimulat$ or electrostim$ or electro‐stim$ or electrotherapy$ or electro‐therap$ or non‐invasive or non invasive or stimul$ or theta burst stimulat$ or iTBS or cTBS or transcranial magnetic stimulat$ or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulat$ or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy$ or electrosleep$ or electronarco$) 24787

3.       1&2  5559

4.       (randomized controlled trial or controlled clinical trial or placebo or sham or randomly or trial or groups) 31227

5.       3&4  545

6.       REMOVE ANY PRE 2009 (removed 292) 253

Appendix 5. Trials register search results for 2014 update

Register

Date of search

Search terms

Number of records

Number of relevant records

NRR archive

7 February 2013

(chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or temp*romandib joint or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord or sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or trigem* neuralg* or herp* neuralg* or diabet* neuropath* or reflex dystroph* or sudeck* atroph* or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or failed back surg* or failed back syndrome) AND (brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti* or direct current or DC or electric or crani* or electrostim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap* or non‐invasive or non*invasive or theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or Ctbs or transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy or electrosleep or electronarco*) al fields AND (2009 OR 2010 OR 2011 OR 2012 OR 2013) date started

2

0

Clinical trials.gov

7 February 2013

Field ‐  Interventional studies

 

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

 

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

 

OUTCOME:  pain

01/01/2009 to 07/02/2013

adult

89

10

Clinical trials.gov

7 February 2013

Field ‐  Interventional studies

 

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

 

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

 

OUTCOME:  pain 

20

Clinical trials.gov

7 February 2013

Field ‐  Interventional studies

 

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

 

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

 

OUTCOME:  pain

 

 

2

Clinical trials.gov

7 February 2013

 

Field ‐  Interventional studies

 

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

 

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

 

OUTCOME:  pain

0

HSRProj

11 February 2013

((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or temp?romandib joint or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord or sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or trigem* neuralg* or herp* neuralg* or diabet* neuropath* or reflex dystroph* or sudeck* atroph* or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or failed back surg* or failed back syndrome) AND (brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti* or direct current or DC or electric or crani* or electrostim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap* or non‐invasive or non*invasive or theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or Ctbs or transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy or electrosleep or electronarco*))

152

0

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

11 February 2013

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

0

1

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

11 February 2013

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (Ctbs OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation)

0

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25 February 2013

TRANSCRANIAL and PAIN

1

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25 February 2013

CRANIAL AND PAIN

4

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25/2/13

STIMULATION AND PAIN

75

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25 February 2013

(Cortex or cortical) and pain

8

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25 February 2013

Brain and pain

33

Current controlled trials (excl clinicatrials.gov)

25 February 2013

(Electro or electrical) and pain

46

Total current controlled trials

25 February 2013

 

167

Total relevant trial records, all databases

11

Appendix 6. Search results summary table for 2014 update

Database searched

Date searched

Number of results

CENTRAL Issue 6 of 12, 2013 (The Cochrane Library)

24 July 2013

2

MEDLINE (OVID) June 2013 to 19/7/2013

MEDLINE In Process (OVID) – current week

24 July 2013

24 July 2013

5

19

Embase (OVID) June 2013 to 2013 week 29

24 July 2013

8

PsycINFO (OVID) June 2013 to July week 3 2013

24 July 2013

1

CINAHL (EBSCO) June 2013 to July 2013

24 July 2013

4

Total

39

After de‐duplication

35

After title abstract screening

0

After expert checking

2

Appendix 7. Full list of searches and results for 2009 version of review

1. Cochrane PaPaS Group Specialised Register, saved search: 177 results

“electric* stimulat* therap*” or “brain* stimulat*” or “cort* stimulat*” or “transcranial* stimulat*” or “cranial stimulat*” or “magneti* stimulat*” or “direct current stimulat*” or “electric* stimulat*” or electrostim* or electrotherapy* or electro‐therap* or “theta burst stimulat*” or “transcran* magnet* stimulat*” or iTBS or cTBS or rTMS or “transcran* direct current stimulat*” or tDCS or electrosleep or electronarco*

2. CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library

#1

MeSH descriptor Pain explode all trees

25049

#2

(chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint" or "temperomandib* joint" or "tempromandib* joint" or central or (post NEXT stroke) or complex or regional or "spinal cord") near/4 pain*:ti,ab,kw

7785

#3

(sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* near/2 neuralg*) or (herp* near/2 neuralg*) or (diabet* near/2 neuropath*) or (reflex near/4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* near/2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back near/4 surg*) or (failed back near/4 syndrome*)):ti,ab,kw

3040

#4

(#1 OR #2 OR #3)

30353

#5

MeSH descriptor Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation explode all trees

328

#6

MeSH descriptor Electronarcosis explode all trees

34

#7

(brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) near/4 stimulat*:ti,ab,kw

1388

#8

(transcrani* or crani* or brain*) near/4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*):ti,ab,kw

45

#9

(non‐invasive or non*invasive) near/4 stimulat*:ti,ab,kw

55

#10

"theta burst stimulat*" or iTBS or cTBS:ti,ab,kw

9

#11

"transcranial magnetic stimulation" or rTMS or "transcranial direct current stimulat*" or tDCS or "cranial electrostimulation" or "cranial electrotherap*":ti,ab,kw

747

#12

(electrosleep* or electronarco*):ti,ab,kw

45

#13

(#5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12)

1505

#14

(#4 AND #13)

106

3a. MEDLINE

Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) <1950 to November Week 3 2009>

1     exp Pain/ (252061)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).ab,ti. (61945)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).ab,ti. (25802)

4     1 or 3 or 2 (288507)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (4240)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (21248)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).ab,ti. (116)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (526)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).ab,ti. (359)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).ab,ti. (5306)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).ab,ti. (357)

12     8 or 6 or 11 or 7 or 10 or 9 or 5 (23212)

13     4 and 12 (1069)

14     randomised controlled trial.pt. (291031)

15     controlled clinical trial.pt. (82962)

16     randomized.ab. (196258)

17     (placebo or sham).ab,ti. (164609)

18     drug therapy.fs. (1385685)

19     randomly.ab. (141449)

20     trial.ab. (203139)

21     groups.ab. (961704)

22     or/14‐21 (2562312)

23     exp animals/ not humans.sh. (3518581)

24     22 not 23 (2157467)

25     24 and 13 (219)

3b. Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) In‐process & Other non‐indexed citations

<25 November 2009>

1     exp Pain/ (6)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).ab,ti. (4772)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).ab,ti. (1251)

4     1 or 3 or 2 (5661)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (0)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (1057)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).ab,ti. (5)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (42)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).ab,ti. (38)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).ab,ti. (375)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).ab,ti. (0)

12     8 or 6 or 11 or 7 or 10 or 9 or 5 (1113)

13     4 and 12 (39)

4. Database: Embase

<1980 to 2009 Week 47>

1     exp Pain/ (394924)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or "temporomandib* joint*" or "temperomandib* joint*" or "tempromandib* joint*" or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).ab,ti. (57196)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).ab,ti. (21356)

4     1 or 3 or 2 (410258)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electronarcosis/ (5841)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (18227)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).ab,ti. (74)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (498)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).ab,ti. (330)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).ab,ti. (5259)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).ab,ti. (20)

12     8 or 6 or 11 or 7 or 10 or 9 or 5 (19954)

13     4 and 12 (1331)

14     random*.ti,ab. (415216)

15     factorial*.ti,ab. (8708)

16     (crossover* or cross over* or cross‐over*).ti,ab. (40788)

17     placebo*.ti,ab. (114266)

18     (doubl* adj blind*).ti,ab. (87525)

19     (singl* adj blind*).ti,ab. (7775)

20     assign*.ti,ab. (113729)

21     allocat*.ti,ab. (36179)

22     volunteer*.ti,ab. (102464)

23     CROSSOVER PROCEDURE.sh. (21985)

24     DOUBLE‐BLIND PROCEDURE.sh. (74829)

25     RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.sh. (176320)

26     SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE.sh. (8721)

27     or/14‐26 (691134)

28     ANIMAL/ or NONHUMAN/ or ANIMAL EXPERIMENT/ (3551150)

29     HUMAN/ (6702208)

30     28 and 29 (569432)

31     28 not 30 (2981718)

32     27 not 31 (601828)

33     32 and 13 (234)

5. Database: PsycINFO

<1806 to November Week 4 2009>

1     exp Pain/ (26560)

2     ((chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or temp?romandib* joint or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord) adj4 pain*).ab,ti. (14094)

3     (sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or (trigemin* adj2 neuralg*) or (herp* adj2 neuralg*) or (diabet* adj2 neuropath*) or (reflex adj4 dystroph*) or (sudeck* adj2 atroph*) or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or (failed back adj4 surg*) or (failed back adj4 syndrome*)).ab,ti. (2649)

4     1 or 3 or 2 (30822)

5     Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/ or Electrosleep treatment/ (1830)

6     ((brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti*) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (7832)

7     ((transcrani* or crani* or brain*) adj4 (electrostim* or electro‐stim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap*)).ab,ti. (47)

8     ((non‐invasive or non*invasive) adj4 stimulat*).ab,ti. (144)

9     (theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or cTBS).ab,ti. (259)

10     (transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy).ab,ti. (2652)

11     (electrosleep or electronarco*).ab,ti. (140)

12     8 or 6 or 11 or 7 or 10 or 9 or 5 (8307)

13     4 and 12 (277)

14     (random* or placebo* or sham or trial or groups).ti,ab. (391590)

15     13 and 14 (64)

6. CINAHL

<Search run 11 January 2010>

1

exp PAIN/

64959

2

((chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR "temporomandib* joint*" OR "temperomandib* joint*" OR "tempromandib* joint*" OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord) AND pain*).ti,ab

25127

3

(sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR "trigemin* neuralg*" OR "herp* neuralg*" OR "diabet* neuropath*" OR "reflex dystroph*" OR "sudeck* atroph*" OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR "failed back surg*" OR "failed back syndrome*").ti,ab

4111

4

1 OR 2 OR 3

75018

5

ELECTRONARCOSIS/

1

6

ELECTRIC STIMULATION/

3829

7

((brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR "magneti*) AND stimulat*).ti,ab

545

8

((transcrani* OR crani* OR brain*) AND (electrostim* OR electro‐stim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)).ti,ab

26

9

(("non‐invasive brain" OR "non*invasive brain") AND stimulat*).ti,ab

12

10

("theta burst stimulat*" OR iTBS OR cTBS).ti,ab

16

11

("transcranial magnetic stimulation" OR rTMS OR "transcranial direct current stimulation" OR tDCS OR "cranial electrostimulation" OR "cranial electrotherapy").ti,ab

437

12

(electrosleep OR electronarco*).ti,ab

1

13

5 OR 6 OR 7 OR 8 OR 9 OR 10 OR 11 OR 12

4387

14

4 AND 13

836

15

exp CLINICAL TRIALS/

79642

16

(clinical AND trial*).af

148411

17

((singl* OR doubl* OR trebl* OR tripl*) AND (blind* OR mask*)).ti,ab

11736

18

(Randomi?ed AND control* AND trial*).af

65515

19

RANDOM ASSIGNMENT/

22506

20

(Random* AND allocat*).ti,ab

3666

21

placebo*.af

34556

22

PLACEBOS/

5386

23

QUANTITATIVE STUDIES/

5131

24

15 OR 16 OR17 OR 18 OR 19 OR 20 OR 21 OR 22 OR 23

176918

25

14 AND 24

226

7. SCOPUS

We did not search this database as it includes all of MEDLINE, all of Embase and some of CINAHL, which have been searched separately.

8. Search strategy for LILACS

http://bases.bireme.br/cgi‐bin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/

1. Pain$ or dolor$ or intractabl$ or neuropath$ or phantom or fantom or myofasc$ or temp$romandibular or sciatic$ or back‐ache or backache or ache or lumbago or fibromyalg$ or neuralg$ or dystroph$ or atroph$ or causalgi$ or whip‐lash or whiplash or polymyalg$ [Words] 

2. ((Estimulaci$ or stimulat$) and (cerebra$ or brain$ or cortex or cortical or crania$ or transcranial$ or magneti$)) or electrostim$ or electrotherapy$ or electro‐therap$ or “theta burst stimul$” or iTBS or Ctbs or “transcrani$ magnet$ stimulat$” or rTMS or “transcrani$ direct current stimulat$” or tDCS or “cranial electrostimulat$” or “cranial electrotherapy$ or electrosleep or electronarco$ [Words] 

3. ((Pt randomized controlled trial OR Pt controlled clinical trial OR Mh randomized controlled trials OR Mh random allocation OR Mh double‐blind method OR Mh single‐blind method) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal)) OR (Pt clinical trial OR Ex E05.318.760.535$ OR (Tw clin$ AND (Tw trial$ OR Tw ensa$ OR Tw estud$ OR Tw experim$ OR Tw investiga$)) OR ((Tw singl$ OR Tw simple$ OR Tw doubl$ OR Tw doble$ OR Tw duplo$ OR Tw trebl$ OR Tw trip$) AND (Tw blind$ OR Tw cego$ OR Tw ciego$ OR Tw mask$ OR Tw mascar$)) OR Mh placebos OR Tw placebo$ OR (Tw random$ OR Tw randon$ OR Tw casual$ OR Tw acaso$ OR Tw azar OR Tw aleator$) OR Mh research design) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal)) OR (Ct comparative study OR Ex E05.337$ OR Mh follow‐up studies OR Mh prospective studies OR Tw control$ OR Tw prospectiv$ OR Tw volunt$ OR Tw volunteer$) AND NOT (Ct animal AND NOT (Ct human and Ct animal))) [Words]

4. 1 and 2 and 3 (68)

Appendix 8. Trials register search results for 2009 version of review

Database

Date of search

Search strategy

No. hits

Agreed potential studies

National Research Register (NRR) Archive (NIHR)

23 October 2009

(chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or temp?romandib joint or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord or sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or trigem* neuralg* or herp* neuralg* or diabet* neuropath* or reflex dystroph* or sudeck* atroph* or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or failed back surg* or failed back syndrome) AND (brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti* or direct current or DC or electric or crani* or electrostim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap* or non‐invasive or non*invasive or theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or Ctbs or transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy or electrosleep or electronarco*) IN “TITLE” Field 

366

2

Clinicaltrials.gov

23 October 2009

Search 1

Field ‐  Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME:  pain

62

 

Clinicaltrials.gov

23 October 2009

Search 2

Field ‐  Interventional studies

CONDITION: chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck OR myofasc* OR temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica OR back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME:  pain 

8 (all also picked up in search 1)

 

Clinicaltrials.gov

23 October 2009

Search 3

Field ‐  Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs

OUTCOME:  pain

0

 

Clinicaltrials.gov

23 October 2009

Search 4

Field ‐  Interventional studies

CONDITION: fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph* OR sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash or polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome

INTERVENTION: transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*

OUTCOME:  pain

0

 

 

 

TOTAL UNIQUE RESULTS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV

62

7

HSRProj (Health Services Research Projects in Progress)

23 October 2009

(chronic* or back or musculoskel* or intractabl* or neuropath* or phantom limb or fantom limb or neck or myofasc* or temp?romandib joint or central or post*stroke or complex or regional or spinal cord or sciatica or back‐ache or back*ache or lumbago or fibromyalg* or trigem* neuralg* or herp* neuralg* or diabet* neuropath* or reflex dystroph* or sudeck* atroph* or causalg* or whip‐lash or whip*lash or polymyalg* or failed back surg* or failed back syndrome) AND (brain* or cortex or cortical or transcranial* or cranial or magneti* or direct current or DC or electric or crani* or electrostim* or electrotherap* or electro‐therap* or non‐invasive or non*invasive or theta burst stimulat* or iTBS or Ctbs or transcranial magnetic stimulation or rTMS or transcranial direct current stimulation or tDCS or cranial electrostimulation or cranial electrotherapy or electrosleep or electronarco*)

77

0

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 1

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 2

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (Ctbs OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 3

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS)

4

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 4

(sudeck* atroph* OR causalg* OR whip‐lash OR whip*lash OR polymyalg* OR failed back surg* OR failed back syndrome) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC)

13

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 5

(back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (cranial electrostimulation  OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 6

(back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (Ctbs OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS )

9

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 7

(back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)

36

 

Current Controlled Trials

23 October 2009

Search 8

 (back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS)

53

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 9

(back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC)

52

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 10

(back‐ache OR back*ache OR lumbago OR fibromyalg* OR trigem* neuralg* OR herp* neuralg* OR diabet* neuropath* OR reflex dystroph*) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial*)

63

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 11

(temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica) AND (cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 12

(temp?romandib joint OR central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica) AND (transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS)

11

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 13

(central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica) AND (iTBS OR cTBS OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS)

48

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 14

(central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica) AND (electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat*)

199

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 15

(central OR post*stroke OR complex OR regional OR spinal cord OR sciatica) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR crani* OR electrostim*)

1905

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 16

(temp?romandib joint) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap*)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 17

 (temp?romandib joint) AND (iTBS OR cTBS OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR rTMS)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 18

(temp?romandib joint) AND (non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat*)

0

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 19

(chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck) AND (transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

16

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 20

(chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck) AND (Ctbs OR transcranial magnetic stimulation OR Rtms)

 

55

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 21

(chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck) AND (crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap* OR electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS)

557

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 22

(chronic* OR back OR musculoskel* OR intractabl* OR neuropath* OR phantom limb OR fantom limb OR neck) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC)

 

2385

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 23

(temp*romandibular joint) AND (brain* OR cortex OR cortical OR transcranial* OR cranial OR magneti* OR direct current OR DC OR electric OR crani* OR electrostim* OR electrotherap*)

8

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 24

(temp*romandibular joint) AND (electro‐therap* OR non‐invasive OR non*invasive OR theta burst stimulat* OR iTBS OR Ctbs OR transcranial magnetic stimulation)

1

 

Current Controlled Trials

3 November 2009

Search 25

(temp*romandibular joint) AND (rTMS OR transcranial direct current stimulation OR tDCS OR cranial electrostimulation OR cranial electrotherapy OR electrosleep OR electronarco*)

0

 

 

 

TOTAL RESULTS FOR  CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS

5415

14

 

 

TOTAL RESULTS FROM ALL DATABASES

 

23

 

 

DUPLICATES BETWEEN DATABASES

 

7

 

 

FINAL TOTAL FROM TRIALS REGISTERS SEARCHES

 

16

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Funnel plot of comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), outcome 3.1. Pain: short‐term follow‐up
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), outcome 3.1. Pain: short‐term follow‐up

Funnel plot of comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), outcome 3.5. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), outcome 3.5. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 2 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: multiple‐dose vs single‐dose studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 2 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: multiple‐dose vs single‐dose studies.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 3 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic pain participants only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 3 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic pain participants only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 4 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, non‐neuropathic pain participants only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 4 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, non‐neuropathic pain participants only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 6 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 6 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 7 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 7 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 8 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 8 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 9 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 9 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 10 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 10 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 11 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 11 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 12 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 12 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 13 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 13 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 14 Pain: short term responder analysis 30% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 14 Pain: short term responder analysis 30% pain reduction.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 15 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 15 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 16 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 16 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 17 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 17 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 18 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 18 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 19 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 19 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 20 Pain: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 20 Pain: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 21 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 21 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 22 Disability: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 22 Disability: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 23 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 23 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 24 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 24 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 25 Pain: short term responder analysis 50% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 25 Pain: short term responder analysis 50% pain reduction.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 26 Disability: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 26 Disability: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 27 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 28 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 28 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 29 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 29 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 30 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 30 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire).

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 31 Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 31 Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 32 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), Outcome 32 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 2 Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 2 Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), Outcome 2 Quality of life: short term follow up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES), Outcome 2 Quality of life: short term follow up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 2 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation increased.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 2 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation increased.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 3 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 3 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 4 Pain: short term sensitivity analysis, inclusion of high risk of bias studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 4 Pain: short term sensitivity analysis, inclusion of high risk of bias studies.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 6 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation increased.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 6 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation increased.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 7 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 7 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 8 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic and non neuropathic pain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 8 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic and non neuropathic pain.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 9 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 9 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 10 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 10 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 11 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 11 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 12 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 12 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 13 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 13 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 15 Pain: long‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 15 Pain: long‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 16 Disability: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 16 Disability: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 17 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 17 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 18 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 18 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 19 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Outcome 19 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 2 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 2 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up.

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 3 Quality of Life: short term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 3 Quality of Life: short term follow‐up.

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 4 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: short term follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE), Outcome 4 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: short term follow‐up.

Comparison 5 Transcranial random noise stimulation, Outcome 1 Pain.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Transcranial random noise stimulation, Outcome 1 Pain.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham for chronic pain

rTMS compared with sham for chronic pain

Patient or population: adults with chronic pain

Settings: laboratory/ clinic

Intervention: active rTMS

Comparison: sham rTMS

Outcomes

Effect size

Relative and absolute effect

(average % improvement (reduction) in pain (95% CIs) in relation to post‐treatment score from sham group)*

*Where 95%CIs do not cross the line of no effect.

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Pain intensity (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using visual analogue scales or numerical rating scales

SMD ‐0.22 (‐0.29 to ‐0.16)

This equates to a 7% (95% CI 5% to 9%) reduction in pain intensity, or a 0.40 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.32) point reduction on a 0 to 10 pain intensity scale.

655 (27)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1

Disability (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using self‐reported disability/pain interference scales

SMD ‐0.29, 95% CI ‐0.87 to 0.29

119 (5)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low2

Quality of life (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

MD ‐10.80, 95% CI ‐15.04 to ‐6.55

105 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ low3

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; rTMS: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SMD: standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;

Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different;

Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect;

Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias and once for inconsistency due to heterogeneity.
2Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias, once for inconsistency due to heterogeneity and once for imprecision due to low participant numbers.
3Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias and once for imprecision due to low participant numbers.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham for chronic pain
Summary of findings 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) compared with sham for chronic pain

CES compared with sham for chronic pain

Patient or population: adults with chronic pain

Settings: laboratory/ clinic

Intervention: active CES

Comparison: sham CES

Outcomes

Effect size

Relative effect

(average % improvement (reduction) in pain (95% CIs) in relation to post‐treatment score from sham group)*

*Where 95%CIs do not cross the line of no effect.

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Pain intensity (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using visual analogue scales or numerical rating scales

SMD ‐0.24 (‐0.48 to 0.01)

270 (5)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ low1

Disability (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using self‐reported disability/pain interference scales

No data available

No data available

No data available

No data available

Quality of life (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

MD ‐25.05 (‐37.82 to ‐12.28)

36 (1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low2

CI: confidence interval; CES: cranial electrotherapy stimulation; MD: mean difference; SMD: standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;

Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different;

Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect;

Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias and once for imprecision due to low participant numbers.
2Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias, once for inconsistency (single study) and once for imprecision due to low participant numbers.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) compared with sham for chronic pain
Summary of findings 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared with sham for chronic pain

tDCS compared with sham for chronic pain

Patient or population: adults with chronic pain

Settings: laboratory/ clinic

Intervention: active tDCS

Comparison: sham tDCS

Outcomes

Effect size

Relative effect

(average % improvement (reduction) in pain (95% CIs) in relation to post‐treatment score from sham group)*

*Where 95%CIs do not cross the line of no effect.

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Pain intensity (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using visual analogue scales or numerical rating scales

SMD ‐0.43 (‐0.63 to ‐0.22)

This equates to a 17% (95% CI 9% to 25%) reduction in pain intensity or a 0.82 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.2) point reduction on a 0 to 10 pain intensity scale.

747 (27)

⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low1

Disability (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using self‐reported disability/pain interference scales

SMD ‐0.01, (95% CI ‐0.28 to 0.26)

212 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ low2

Quality of life (0 to < 1 week postintervention)

measured using different scales across studies

SMD 0.66, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.11

82 (4)

⊕⊕⊝⊝ low2

CI: confidence interval; MD: mean difference; SMD: standardised mean difference; tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect;

Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different;

Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect;

Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias, once for inconsistency due to heterogeneity and once for evidence of possible publication bias.
2Downgraded once for study limitations due to high or unclear risk of bias and once for imprecision due to low participant numbers.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared with sham for chronic pain
Table 1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation

Study

Location of stimulation

Coil orientation

Frequency (Hz)

Intensity (% RMT)

Number of trains

Duration of trains

Inter‐train intervals (sec)

Number of pulses per session

Treatment sessions per group

Ahmed 2011

M1 stump region

45° angle from sagittal line

20

80

10

10 sec

50

2000

5, x 1 daily

Attal 2016

M1 contralateral to painful side

Anteroposterior induced current

10

80

30

10

20

3000

3, x1 daily

André‐Obadia 2006

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

20, 1

90

20 Hz: 20

1 Hz: 1

20 Hz: 4 sec

1 Hz: 26 min

20 Hz: 84

1600

1

André‐Obadia 2008

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

Medial‐lateral

20

90

20

4 sec

84

1600

1

André‐Obadia 2011

M1 hand area, not clearly reported but likely contralateral to painful side

Not specified

20

90

20

4 sec

84

1600

1

Avery 2013

Left DLPFC

Not specified

10

120

75

4

26

3000

15

Borckardt 2009

Left PFC

Not specified

10

100

40

10 sec

20

4000

3 over a 5‐day period

Boyer 2014

Left M1

anteroposterior

10

90

20

10

50

2000

14, 10 sessions in 2 weeks followed by maintenance phase of 1 session at weeks 4, 6, 8, and 10

Carretero 2009

Right DLPFC

Not specified

1

110

20

60 sec

45

1200

Up to 20 on consecutive working days

Dall'Agnol 2014

Left M1

45° angle from sagittal line

10

80

16

10

26

1600

10, timescale not specified

Defrin 2007

M1 midline

Not specified

5

115

500

10 sec

30

? 500*

10, x 1 daily

de Oliveira 2014

Left DLPFC/premotor

not specified

10

120

25

5 sec

25

1250

10, x 1 daily (working days) for 2 weeks

Fregni 2005

Left and right SII

Not specified

1 or 20

90

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

1600

1

Fregni 2011

Right SII

Not specified

1

70% maximum stimulator output intensity (not RMT)

1

Not specified

Not specified

1600

10, x 1 daily (weekdays only)

Hirayama 2006

M1, S1, PMA, SMA

Not specified

5

90

10

10 sec

50

500

1

Hosomi 2013

M1 corresponding to painful region

Not specified

5

90

10

10 sec

50

500

10, x 1 daily (weekdays only)

Irlbacher 2006

M1 contralateral to painful side

Not specified

5, 1

95

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

500

1

Jetté 2013

M1 hand or leg area with neuro navigation

45º postero‐lateral

10

90

40

5

25

2000

1, per stimulation condition

Kang 2009

Right M1

45º postero‐lateral

10

80

20

5 sec

55

1000

5, x 1 daily

Khedr 2005

M1 contralateral to painful side

Not specified

20

80

10

10 sec

50

2000

5, x 1 daily

Lee 2012

Right DLPFC (low‐frequency)

Left M1 (high‐frequency)

Not specified

10, 1

10 Hz: 80

1 Hz: 110

10 Hz: 25

1 Hz: 2

10 Hz: 8 sec

1 Hz: 800 sec

10 Hz: 10

1 Hz: 60

10 Hz: 2000

1 Hz: 1600

10, x 1 daily (weekdays only)

Lefaucheur 2001a

M1 contralateral to painful side

Not specified

10

80

20

5 sec

55

1000

1

Lefaucheur 2001b

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10, 0.5

80

10 Hz: 20

0.5 Hz: 1

10 Hz: 5 sec

0.5 Hz: 20 min

10 Hz: 55

10 Hz: 1000

0.5 Hz: 600

1

Lefaucheur 2004

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10

80

20

5 sec

55

1000

1

Lefaucheur 2006

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10, 1

90

10 Hz: 20

1 Hz: 1

10 Hz: 6 sec

1 Hz: 20 min

10 Hz: 54

10 Hz: 1200

1 Hz: 1200

1

Lefaucheur 2008

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10, 1

90

10 Hz: 20

1 Hz: 1

10 Hz: 6 sec

1 Hz: 20 min

10 Hz: 54

10 Hz: 1200

1 Hz: 1200

1

Malavera 2013

M1 contralateral to painful side

45° angle from sagittal line

10

90

20

6

54

1200

10, x 1 daily (weekdays only)

Medeiros 2016

Left M1

45° angle from sagittal line

10

80

not reported

not reported

not reported

1600

10, x 1 daily

Mhalla 2011

Left M1

Posteroanterior

10

80

15

10 sec

50

1500

14, 5 x 1 daily (working days), then 3 x 1 weekly, then 3 x 1 fortnightly, then 3 x 1 monthly

Nardone 2017

Left PFC

Posteroanterior

10

120

25

5 sec

25

1250

10, x5 per week for 2 weeks

Nurmikko 2016

M1 hotspot contralateral to pain

M1 in reorganised area contralateral to pain

Posteroanterior

10

90

20

10 sec

60

2000

5, x 3‐5 times per week

Onesti 2013

M1 deep central sulcus

H‐coil

20

100

30

2.5 sec

30

1500

5, x 1 daily on consecutive days

Passard 2007

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10

80

25

8 sec

52

2000

10, x 1 daily (working days)

Picarelli 2010

M1 contralateral to painful side

Posteroanterior

10

100

25

10 sec

60

2500

10, x 1 daily (working days)

Pleger 2004

M1 hand area

Not specified

10

110

10

1.2 sec

10

120

1

Rollnik 2002

M1 midline

Not specified

20

80

20

2 sec

Not specified

800

1

Saitoh 2007

M1 over motor representation of painful area

Not specified

10, 5, 1

90

10 Hz; 5

5 Hz: 10

1 Hz: 1

10 Hz: 10 sec

5 Hz: 10 sec

1 Hz: 500 sec

10 Hz: 50

5 Hz: 50

500

1

Short 2011

Left DLPFC

Parasagittal

10

120

80

5 sec

10 sec

4000

10, x 1 daily (working days) for 2 weeks

Tekin 2014

M1 midline

45° angle from sagittal line

10

100

30

5

12

1500

10, x 1 daily (not clear if only work days)

Tzabazis 2013

Targeted to ACC

4‐coil configuration

1 Hz (10 Hz data excluded as not randomised)

110

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

1800

20, x 1 daily (working days)

Umezaki 2016

Left DLPFC

Not specified

10

100

10

5

10

3000

10, x1 daily (working days)

Yagci 2014

Left M1

Not specified

1

90

20

60

45

1200

10, x1 daily (working days)

Yilmaz 2014

M1 midline

Handle pointing posteriorly

10

10

30

5

25

1500

10, x1 daily (working days)

ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; M1: primary motor cortex; PFC: prefrontal cortex; PMA: pre‐motor area; RMT: resting motor threshold; dS1: primary somatosensory cortex; SII: secondary somatosensory cortex; SMA: supplementary motor area

*Inconsistency between stimulation parameters and reported total number of pulses in study report. See Included studies section for mored detail.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation
Table 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation

Study

Electrode placement

Frequency (Hz)

Pulse width (ms)

Waveform shape

Intensity

Duration (min)

Treatment sessions per group

Capel 2003

Ear clip electrodes

10

2

Not specified

12 μA

53

x 2 daily for 4 days

Cork 2004

Ear clip electrodes

0.5

Not specified

Modified square‐wave biphasic

100 μA

60

? daily for 3 weeks

Gabis 2003

Mastoid processes and forehead

77

3.3

Biphasic asymmetric

≤ 4 mA

30

x 1 daily for 8 days

Gabis 2009

Mastoid processes and forehead

77

3.3

Biphasic asymmetric

≤ 4 mA

30

x 1 daily for 8 days

Katsnelson 2004

Mastoid processes and forehead

Not specified

Not specified

2 conditions: symmetric, asymmetric

11 to 15 mA

40

x 1 daily for 5 days

Lichtbroun 2001

Ear clip electrodes

0.5

Not specified

Biphasic square wave

100 μA

60

x 1 daily for 30 days

Rintala 2010

Ear clip electrodes

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

100 μA

40

x 1 daily for 6 weeks

Tan 2000

Ear clip electrodes

0.5

Not specified

Not specified

10 to 600 μA

20

12 (timing not specified)

Tan 2006

Ear clip electrodes

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

100 to 500 μA

60

x 1 daily for 21 days

Tan 2011

Ear clip electrodes

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

100 μA

60

x 1 daily for 21 days

Taylor 2013

Ear clip electrodes

0.5

Not specified

Modified square‐wave biphasic

100 μA

60

x 1 daily for 8 weeks

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation
Table 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation

Study

Location of stimulation (Anode)

Electrode pad size

Intensity (mA)

Anodal or cathodal?

Stimulus duration (min)

Treatment sessions per group

Ahn 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Antal 2010

M1 left hand area

35 cm2

1 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Ayache 2016

Left DLPFC

25 cm2

2mA

Anodal

20

3, x 1 daily

Bae 2014

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

x 3 per week for 3 weeks

Boggio 2009

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

30

1

Brietzke 2016

Left M1

25‐35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Chang 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

1 mA

Anodal

20

16, x 2 weekly for 8 weeks

Donnell 2015

M1 contralateral to painful side

HD‐tDCS

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Fagerlund 2015

M1, side not specified

35 cm2

2mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Fenton 2009

M1 dominant hemisphere

35 cm2

1 mA

Anodal

20

2

Fregni 2006a

M1 contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Fregni 2006b

M1 and DLPFC contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Hagenacker 2014

M1 contralateral to painful side

40 cm2

1mA

Anodal

20

Daily, self‐administered for 14 days

Harvey 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Hazime 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

12, x 3 per week for 4 weeks

Jales Junior 2015

Left M1

15 cm2

1mA

Anodal

20

x 1 weekly for 10 weeks

Jensen 2013

M1 left

35cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

1

Khedr 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

24 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

10, x 1 daily, 5 days per week for 2 weeks

Kim 2013

M1, side not specified

DLPFC

25 cm2

2mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Lagueux 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

14, x 5 weekly for 2 weeks, x 1 weekly for 4 weeks

Luedtke 2015

M1 left side not specified

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Mendonca 2011

Group 1: anodal left M1

Group 2: cathodal left M1

Group 3: anodal supraorbital

Group 4: cathodal supraorbital

Group 5: sham

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal or cathodal

20

1

Mendonca 2016

Left M1

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Mori 2010

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Ngernyam 2015

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

1

Oliveira 2015

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily, then x 2 weekly for 3 weeks, up to 10 sessions

Portilla 2013

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

x 1 per condition

Riberto 2011

M1 contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

10, x 1 weekly

Sakrajai 2014

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

1 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Soler 2010

M1 contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

10, x 1 daily (weekdays only)

Souto 2014

Left M1

25 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Thibaut 2017

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Valle 2009

M1 and DLPFC contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Villamar 2013

M1 left

HD‐tDCS 4 x 1‐ring montage

2 mA

Anodal or cathodal

20

x 1 per condition

Wrigley 2014

M1 contralateral to painful side or dominant hand

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

Volz 2016

M1 contralateral to painful side

35 cm2

2 mA

Anodal

20

5, x 1 daily

DLPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; HD‐tDCS: high definition tDCS; M1: primary motor cortex

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies ‐ characteristics of stimulation
Comparison 1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

27

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.29, ‐0.16]

1.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

7

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.03, 0.28]

1.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

25

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.37, ‐0.23]

2 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: multiple‐dose vs single‐dose studies Show forest plot

27

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.40, ‐0.13]

2.1 Single‐dose studies

13

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.36, ‐0.10]

2.2 Multiple‐dose studies

14

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.76, ‐0.05]

3 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic pain participants only Show forest plot

17

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.28, ‐0.13]

3.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

5

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [‐0.02, 0.32]

3.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

17

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.36, ‐0.20]

4 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, non‐neuropathic pain participants only Show forest plot

8

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.39 [‐0.61, ‐0.17]

4.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

1

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [‐0.29, 0.61]

4.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

7

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.81, ‐0.31]

5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded Show forest plot

21

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.51, ‐0.22]

5.1 Single‐dose studies

13

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.38 [‐0.49, ‐0.27]

5.2 Multiple‐dose studies

8

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.34 [‐0.73, 0.05]

6 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

29

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.40, ‐0.14]

6.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.01, 0.29]

6.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

28

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐0.49, ‐0.22]

7 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation coefficient decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

28

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.40, ‐0.13]

7.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.06, 0.33]

7.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.34 [‐0.49, ‐0.19]

8 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation increased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded Show forest plot

20

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.50, ‐0.24]

8.1 Single‐dose studies

13

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.39 [‐0.50, ‐0.28]

8.2 Multiple‐dose studies

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐0.71, 0.04]

9 Sensitivity analysis ‐ imputed correlation decreased. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded Show forest plot

20

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.52, ‐0.22]

9.1 Single‐dose studies

13

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.47, ‐0.26]

9.2 Multiple‐dose studies

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.36 [‐0.81, 0.09]

10 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

31

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.34, ‐0.20]

10.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

10

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.07, 0.22]

10.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

28

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.36 [‐0.44, ‐0.29]

11 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, low‐frequency studies excluded Show forest plot

24

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.55, ‐0.26]

11.1 Single‐dose studies

15

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐0.46, ‐0.24]

11.2 Multiple‐dose studies

10

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.91, ‐0.15]

12 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only Show forest plot

6

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐1.48, 0.15]

12.1 Low frequency ≤ 1 Hz

1

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.16 [‐0.29, 0.61]

12.2 High frequency ≥ 5 Hz

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.92 [‐1.95, 0.12]

13 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐1.36, 0.08]

13.1 Multiple‐dose studies

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐1.36, 0.08]

14 Pain: short term responder analysis 30% pain reduction Show forest plot

2

89

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.11 [1.17, 3.80]

15 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.42 [‐1.01, 0.17]

16 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

11

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.61, 0.05]

16.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

2

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.41, 0.69]

16.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

9

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.36 [‐0.73, 0.00]

17 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

15

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.50 [‐0.80, ‐0.20]

17.1 Low‐frequency ≤ 1 Hz

3

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.52, 0.56]

17.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

13

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.57 [‐0.90, ‐0.25]

18 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only Show forest plot

6

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.46, 0.02]

18.1 Low frequency ≤ 1Hz

1

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.86, 0.70]

18.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.49, 0.03]

19 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: prefrontal cortex studies only Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐1.08 [‐2.49, 0.32]

19.1 Low frequency ≤ 1 Hz

1

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [‐0.41, 1.13]

19.2 High‐frequency ≥ 5 Hz

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐1.74 [‐3.66, 0.19]

20 Pain: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.44, 0.17]

21 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.89, 0.10]

22 Disability: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.87, 0.29]

23 Sensitivity analysis‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.72, 0.12]

24 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐1.07, 0.33]

25 Pain: short term responder analysis 50% pain reduction Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.89 [1.03, 3.47]

26 Disability: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.62, 0.16]

27 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Disability: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.87, 0.05]

28 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) Show forest plot

4

105

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐10.80 [‐15.04, ‐6.55]

29 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) Show forest plot

4

105

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐11.49 [‐16.73, ‐6.25]

30 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire) Show forest plot

5

143

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.93 [‐13.49, ‐4.37]

31 Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

2

51

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐6.78 [‐13.43, ‐0.14]

32 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

3

89

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐8.58 [‐13.84, ‐3.33]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Comparison 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

5

270

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.48, 0.01]

2 Quality of life: short term follow up Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES)
Comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.63, ‐0.22]

1.1 Single‐dose studies

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.38, 0.02]

1.2 Multiple‐dose studies

22

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.77, ‐0.25]

2 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation increased Show forest plot

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.62, ‐0.23]

3 Pain: short‐term sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased Show forest plot

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.64, ‐0.23]

4 Pain: short term sensitivity analysis, inclusion of high risk of bias studies Show forest plot

31

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.48 [‐0.67, ‐0.29]

4.1 Single‐dose studies

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.38, 0.02]

4.2 Multiple‐dose studies

27

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.79, ‐0.32]

5 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only Show forest plot

25

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.67, ‐0.28]

5.1 Single‐dose studies

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.38, 0.02]

5.2 Multiple‐dose studies

21

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.84, ‐0.33]

6 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation increased Show forest plot

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.64, ‐0.26]

6.1 Single‐dose studies

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.37, 0.01]

6.2 Multiple‐dose studies

22

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.81, ‐0.30]

7 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis: motor cortex studies only, sensitivity analysis: correlation decreased Show forest plot

26

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.58, ‐0.22]

7.1 Single‐dose studies

4

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.38, 0.03]

7.2 Multiple‐dose studies

22

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.49 [‐0.72, ‐0.26]

8 Pain: short‐term follow‐up, subgroup analysis, neuropathic and non neuropathic pain Show forest plot

25

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.56, ‐0.19]

8.1 Neuropathic

9

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.53, 0.01]

8.2 Non neuropathic

16

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.42 [‐0.67, ‐0.17]

9 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10 Pain: short term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11 Pain: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

14

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.72, ‐0.13]

12 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 30% pain reduction Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13 Pain: medium term follow‐up responder analysis 50% pain reduction Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

16

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.72, ‐0.18]

15 Pain: long‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.43, 0.41]

16 Disability: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

4

212

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.28, 0.26]

17 Disability: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18 Quality of life: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

4

82

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.21, 1.11]

19 Quality of life: medium‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

3

87

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [‐0.09, 0.76]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Comparison 4. Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Pain: short‐term follow‐up Show forest plot

2

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐0.99, ‐0.18]

3 Quality of Life: short term follow‐up Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4 Sensitivity analysis ‐ inclusion of high risk of bias studies. Quality of life: short term follow‐up Show forest plot

2

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.91, 0.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Reduced impedance non‐invasive cortical electrostimulation (RINCE)
Comparison 5. Transcranial random noise stimulation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pain Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.19 [‐0.64, 0.26]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Transcranial random noise stimulation