Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Intervenciones para mejorar la cobertura de vacunación infantil en países de ingresos bajos y medios

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategies

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2022, Issue 3), part of Cochrane Library, Wiley (www.cochranelibrary.com/) (searched 11 July 2022)

No.

Search terms

Results

#1

MeSH descriptor: [Immunization] this term only

691

#2

MeSH descriptor: [Immunization Schedule] this term only

1157

#3

MeSH descriptor: [Immunization, Secondary] this term only

941

#4

MeSH descriptor: [Immunotherapy, Active] this term only

101

#5

MeSH descriptor: [Mass Vaccination] this term only

40

#6

MeSH descriptor: [Immunization Programs] this term only

202

#7

MeSH descriptor: [Vaccination] this term only

2811

#8

MeSH descriptor: [Vaccination Coverage] this term only

31

#9

#1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8

4965

#10

MeSH descriptor: [Child] explode all trees

61542

#11

MeSH descriptor: [Infant] explode all trees

34960

#12

MeSH descriptor: [Mothers] this term only

2193

#13

MeSH descriptor: [Women] this term only

248

#14

MeSH descriptor: [Pregnant Women] this term only

480

#15

#10 or #11 or #12 or #13 or #14

82076

#16

#9 and #15

2480

#17

(immunization or immunisation or vaccination) next (program* or rate* or coverage or adher*):ti

315

#18

(vaccinat* or revaccinat* or immunization or immunisation) near/3 (child* or infant* or newborn* or neonat* or baby or babies or kid or kids or toddler* or woman or women or mother or mothers):ti,ab,kw

3469

#19

#16 or #17 or #18

5177

#20

(Africa or Asia or Caribbean or "West Indies" or "South America" or "Latin America" or "Central America"):ti,ab,kw

13832

#21

(Afghanistan or Albania or Algeria or Angola or Antigua or Barbuda or Argentina or Armenia or Armenian or Aruba or Azerbaijan or Bahrain or Bangladesh or Barbados or Benin or Byelarus or Byelorussian or Belarus or Belorussian or Belorussia or Belize or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or Hercegovina or Botswana or Brazil or Brasil or Bulgaria or "Burkina Faso" or "Burkina Fasso" or "Upper Volta" or Burundi or Urundi or Cambodia or "Khmer Republic" or Kampuchea or Cameroon or Cameroons or Cameron or Camerons or "Cape Verde" or "Central African Republic" or Chad or Chile or China or Colombia or Comoros or "Comoro Islands" or Comores or Mayotte or Congo or Zaire or "Costa Rica" or "Cote d'Ivoire" or "Ivory Coast" or Croatia or Cuba or Cyprus or Czechoslovakia or "Czech Republic" or Slovakia or "Slovak Republic"):ti,ab,kw

32468

#22

(Djibouti or "French Somaliland" or Dominica or "Dominican Republic" or "East Timor" or "East Timur" or "Timor Leste" or Ecuador or Egypt or "United Arab Republic" or "El Salvador" or Eritrea or Estonia or Ethiopia or Fiji or Gabon or "Gabonese Republic" or Gambia or Gaza or Georgia or Georgian or Ghana or "Gold Coast" or Greece or Grenada or Guatemala or Guinea or Guam or Guiana or Guyana or Haiti or Honduras or Hungary or India or Maldives or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or "Isle of Man" or Jamaica or Jordan or Kazakhstan or Kazakh or Kenya or Kiribati or Korea or Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan or Kirghizia or "Kyrgyz Republic" or Kirghiz or Kirgizstan or "Lao PDR" or Laos or Latvia or Lebanon or Lesotho or Basutoland or Liberia or Libya or Lithuania):ti,ab,kw

41449

#23

(Macedonia or Madagascar or "Malagasy Republic" or Malaysia or Malaya or Malay or Sabah or Sarawak or Malawi or Nyasaland or Mali or Malta or "Marshall Islands" or Mauritania or Mauritius or "Agalega Islands" or Mexico or Micronesia or "Middle East" or Moldova or Moldovia or Moldovian or Mongolia or Montenegro or Morocco or Ifni or Mozambique or Myanmar or Myanma or Burma or Namibia or Nepal or "Netherlands Antilles" or "New Caledonia" or Nicaragua or Niger or Nigeria or "Northern Mariana Islands" or Oman or Muscat or Pakistan or Palau or Palestine or Panama or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Philipines or Phillipines or Phillippines or Poland or Portugal or "Puerto Rico"):ti,ab,kw

17150

#24

(Romania or Rumania or Roumania or Russia or Russian or Rwanda or Ruanda or "Saint Kitts" or "St Kitts" or Nevis or "Saint Lucia" or "St Lucia" or "Saint Vincent" or "St Vincent" or Grenadines or Samoa or "Samoan Islands" or "Navigator Island" or "Navigator Islands" or "Sao Tome" or "Saudi Arabia" or Senegal or Serbia or Montenegro or Seychelles or "Sierra Leone" or Slovenia or "Sri Lanka" or Ceylon or "Solomon Islands" or Somalia or Sudan or Suriname or Surinam or Swaziland or Syria or Tajikistan or Tadzhikistan or Tadjikistan or Tadzhik or Tanzania or Thailand or Togo or "Togolese Republic" or Tonga or Trinidad or Tobago or Tunisia or Turkey or Turkmenistan or Turkmen or Uganda or Ukraine or Uruguay or USSR or "Soviet Union" or "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics" or Uzbekistan or Uzbek or Vanuatu or "New Hebrides" or Venezuela or Vietnam or "Viet Nam" or "West Bank" or Yemen or Yugoslavia or Zambia or Zimbabwe or Rhodesia):ti,ab,kw

18701

#25

(developing or less* next developed or "under developed" or underdeveloped or "middle income" or low* next income or underserved or "under served" or deprived or poor*) next (countr* or nation* or population* or world):ti,ab,kw

8181

#26

(developing or less* next developed or "under developed" or underdeveloped or "middle income" or low* next income) next (economy or economies):ti,ab,kw

22

#27

low* next (gdp or gnp or "gross domestic" or "gross national"):ti,ab,kw

48

#28

(low near/3 middle near/3 countr*):ti,ab,kw

1939

#29

(lmic or lmics or "third world" or "lami country" or "lami countries"):ti,ab,kw

643

#30

("transitional country" or "transitional countries"):ti,ab,kw

5

#31

(#20 or #21 or #22 or #23 or #24 or #25 or #26 or #27 or #28 or #29 or #30)

113064

#32

#19 and #31 in Trials

1826

Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL <1946 to July 08, 2022> (searched 11 July 2022)

No.

Search terms

Results

1

Immunization/

52999

2

Immunization Schedule/

11378

3

Immunization, Secondary/

8879

4

Immunotherapy, Active/

2493

5

Mass Immunization/

3486

6

Immunization Programs/

12465

7

Vaccination/

97213

8

Vaccination Coverage/

2148

9

or/1‐8

168947

10

exp Child/

2086962

11

exp Infant/

1223438

12

Mothers/

52175

13

Women/

15147

14

Pregnant Women/

12489

15

or/10‐14

2735264

16

9 and 15

41580

17

((vaccinat* or revaccinat* or immunization or immunisation) adj3 (child* or infant? or newborn? or neonat* or baby or babies or kid? or toddler? or woman or women or mother?)).ti,ab,kf.

24505

18

((immunization or immunisation or vaccination) adj (program* or rate* or coverage or adher*)).ti.

6184

19

16 or 17 or 18

56959

20

Developing Countries.sh,kf.

91410

21

(Africa or Asia or Caribbean or West Indies or South America or Latin America or Central America).hw,kf,ti,ab,cp.

322694

22

(Afghanistan or Albania or Algeria or Angola or Antigua or Barbuda or Argentina or Armenia or Armenian or Aruba or Azerbaijan or Bahrain or Bangladesh or Barbados or Benin or Byelarus or Byelorussian or Belarus or Belorussian or Belorussia or Belize or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or Hercegovina or Botswana or Brazil or Brasil or Bulgaria or Burkina Faso or Burkina Fasso or Upper Volta or Burundi or Urundi or Cambodia or Khmer Republic or Kampuchea or Cameroon or Cameroons or Cameron or Camerons or Cape Verde or Central African Republic or Chad or Chile or China or Colombia or Comoros or Comoro Islands or Comores or Mayotte or Congo or Zaire or Costa Rica or Cote d'Ivoire or Ivory Coast or Croatia or Cuba or Cyprus or Czechoslovakia or Czech Republic or Slovakia or Slovak Republic or Djibouti or French Somaliland or Dominica or Dominican Republic or East Timor or East Timur or Timor Leste or Ecuador or Egypt or United Arab Republic or El Salvador or Eritrea or Estonia or Ethiopia or Fiji or Gabon or Gabonese Republic or Gambia or Gaza or Georgia Republic or Georgian Republic or Ghana or Gold Coast or Greece or Grenada or Guatemala or Guinea or Guam or Guiana or Guyana or Haiti or Honduras or Hungary or India or Maldives or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or Isle of Man or Jamaica or Jordan or Kazakhstan or Kazakh or Kenya or Kiribati or Korea or Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan or Kirghizia or Kyrgyz Republic or Kirghiz or Kirgizstan or Lao PDR or Laos or Latvia or Lebanon or Lesotho or Basutoland or Liberia or Libya or Lithuania or Macedonia or Madagascar or Malagasy Republic or Malaysia or Malaya or Malay or Sabah or Sarawak or Malawi or Nyasaland or Mali or Malta or Marshall Islands or Mauritania or Mauritius or Agalega Islands or Mexico or Micronesia or Middle East or Moldova or Moldovia or Moldovian or Mongolia or Montenegro or Morocco or Ifni or Mozambique or Myanmar or Myanma or Burma or Namibia or Nepal or Netherlands Antilles or New Caledonia or Nicaragua or Niger or Nigeria or Northern Mariana Islands or Oman or Muscat or Pakistan or Palau or Palestine or Panama or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Philipines or Phillipines or Phillippines or Poland or Portugal or Puerto Rico or Romania or Rumania or Roumania or Russia or Russian or Rwanda or Ruanda or Saint Kitts or St Kitts or Nevis or Saint Lucia or St Lucia or Saint Vincent or St Vincent or Grenadines or Samoa or Samoan Islands or Navigator Island or Navigator Islands or Sao Tome or Saudi Arabia or Senegal or Serbia or Montenegro or Seychelles or Sierra Leone or Slovenia or Sri Lanka or Ceylon or Solomon Islands or Somalia or Sudan or Suriname or Surinam or Swaziland or Syria or Tajikistan or Tadzhikistan or Tadjikistan or Tadzhik or Tanzania or Thailand or Togo or Togolese Republic or Tonga or Trinidad or Tobago or Tunisia or Turkey or Turkmenistan or Turkmen or Uganda or Ukraine or Uruguay or USSR or Soviet Union or Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or Uzbekistan or Uzbek or Vanuatu or New Hebrides or Venezuela or Vietnam or Viet Nam or West Bank or Yemen or Yugoslavia or Zambia or Zimbabwe or Rhodesia).hw,kf,ti,ab,cp.

4076834

23

((developing or less* developed or under developed or underdeveloped or middle income or low* income or underserved or under served or deprived or poor*) adj (countr* or nation? or population? or world)).ti,ab.

122720

24

((developing or less* developed or under developed or underdeveloped or middle income or low* income) adj (economy or economies)).ti,ab.

824

25

(low* adj (gdp or gnp or gross domestic or gross national)).ti,ab.

314

26

(low adj3 middle adj3 countr*).ti,ab.

25440

27

(lmic or lmics or third world or lami countr*).ti,ab.

11008

28

transitional countr*.ti,ab.

175

29

or/20‐28

4312143

30

19 and 29

19334

31

randomized controlled trial.pt.

572472

32

controlled clinical trial.pt.

94938

33

pragmatic clinical trial.pt.

2119

34

multicenter study.pt.

323336

35

non‐randomized controlled trials as topic/

1047

36

interrupted time series analysis/

1659

37

controlled before‐after studies/

699

38

(randomis* or randomiz* or randomly allocat* or random allocat*).ti,ab.

769053

39

groups.ab.

2376408

40

(trial or impact or effect or multicenter or multi center or multicentre or multi centre).ti.

1557028

41

(intervention* or controlled or control group? or (before adj5 after) or (pre adj5 post) or pretest or pre test or posttest or post test or quasiexperiment* or quasi experiment* or evaluat* or time series or time point? or repeated measur*).ti,ab.

6256139

42

or/31‐41

8751629

43

exp Animals/

25629738

44

Humans/

20604224

45

43 not (43 and 44)

5025514

46

review.pt.

3011335

47

meta analysis.pt.

163588

48

news.pt.

213393

49

comment.pt.

970355

50

editorial.pt.

610622

51

cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn.

15911

52

comment on.cm.

970302

53

(systematic review or literature review).ti.

234449

54

or/45‐53

9539804

55

42 not 54

6604356

56

30 and 55

7661

CINAHL 1981‐present, EbscoHost (searched 11 July 2022)

No.

Search terms

Results

S54

S16 AND S34 AND S52 [Limiters ‐ Exclude MEDLINE records]

923

S53

S16 AND S34 AND S52

3.041

S52

S35 OR S36 OR S37 OR S38 OR S39 OR S40 OR S41 OR S42 OR S43 OR S44 OR S45 OR S46 OR S47 OR S48 OR S49 OR S50 OR S51

3.012.637

S51

TI (randomis* or randomiz* or randomly or trial or effect* or impact* or intervention* or multicenter or "multi center" or multicentre or "multi centre" or controlled or groups or before N5 after or pre N5 post or ((pretest or "pre test") and (posttest or "post test")) or quasiexperiment* or quasi W0 experiment* or pseudo experiment* or pseudoexperiment* or evaluat* or "time series" or time W0 point* or repeated W0 measur*) OR AB (randomis* or randomiz* or randomly or trial or effect* or impact* or intervention* or multicenter or "multi center" or multicentre or "multi centre" or controlled or groups or before N5 after or pre N5 post or ((pretest or "pre test") and (posttest or "post test")) or quasiexperiment* or quasi W0 experiment* or evaluat* or "time series" or time W0 point* or repeated W0 measur*)

2.839.333

S50

(MH "Health Services Research")

16.391

S49

(MH "Experimental Studies+")

400.556

S48

(MH "Time Series")

3.052

S47

(MH "Multiple Time Series")

17

S46

(MH "Interrupted Time Series Analysis")

777

S45

(MH "Repeated Measures")

54.988

S44

(MH "Multicenter Studies")

343.672

S43

(MH "Quasi‐Experimental Studies")

15.043

S42

(MH "Pretest‐Posttest Design")

49.689

S41

(MH "Pretest‐Posttest Control Group Design")

1.186

S40

(MH "Nonrandomized Trials")

768

S39

(MH "Intervention Trials")

7.745

S38

(MH "Clinical Trials")

183.365

S37

(MH "Randomized Controlled Trials")

129.893

S36

PT clinical trial

111.274

S35

PT randomized controlled trial

143.187

S34

S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22 OR S23 OR S24 OR S25 OR S26 OR S27 OR S28 OR S29 OR S30 OR S31 OR S32 OR S33

677.033

S33

TI transitional W0 countr* OR AB transitional W0 countr*

85

S32

TI ( lmic or lmics or third W0 world or lami W0 countr* ) OR AB ( lmic or lmics or third W0 world or lami W0 countr* )

3.743

S31

TI low N3 middle N3 countr* OR AB low N3 middle N3 countr*

11.241

S30

TI ( low* W0 (gdp or gnp or gross W0 domestic or gross W0 national) ) OR AB ( low* W0 (gdp or gnp or gross W0 domestic or gross W0 national) )

78

S29

TI ( (developing or less* W0 developed or under W0 developed or underdeveloped or middle W0 income or low* W0 income) W0 (economy or economies) ) OR AB ( (developing or less* W0 developed or under W0 developed or underdeveloped or middle W0 income or low* W0 income) W0 (economy or economies) )

169

S28

TI ( (developing or less* W0 developed or under W0 developed or underdeveloped or middle W0 income or low* W0 income or underserved or under W0 served or deprived or poor*) W0 (countr* or nation or nations or population* or world or area or areas) ) OR AB ( (developing or less* W0 developed or under W0 developed or underdeveloped or middle W0 income or low* W0 income or underserved or under W0 served or deprived or poor*) W0 (countr* or nation or nations or population* or world or area or areas) )

42.309

S27

MW ( Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Benin or "Burkina Faso" or Burundi or Cambodia or "Central African Republic" or Chad or Comoros or Congo or "Cote d'Ivoire" or Eritrea or Ethiopia or Gambia or Ghana or Guinea or Haiti or India or Kenya or Korea or Kyrgyz or Kyrgyzstan or Lao or Laos or Liberia or Madagascar or Malawi or Mali or Mauritania or Melanesia or Mongolia or Mozambique or Burma or Myanmar or Nepal or Niger or Nigeria or Pakistan or Rwanda or "Salomon Islands" or "Sao Tome" or Senegal or "Sierra Leone" or Somalia or Sudan or Tajikistan or Tanzania or Timor or Togo or Uganda or Uzbekistan or Vietnam or "Viet Nam" or Yemen or Zambia or Zimbabwe ) or TI ( Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Benin or "Burkina Faso" or Burundi or Cambodia or "Central African Republic" or Chad or Comoros or Congo or "Cote d'Ivoire" or Eritrea or Ethiopia or Gambia or Ghana or Guinea or Haiti or India or Kenya or Korea or Kyrgyz or Kyrgyzstan or Lao or Laos or Liberia or Madagascar or Malawi or Mali or Mauritania or Melanesia or Mongolia or Mozambique or Burma or Myanmar or Nepal or Niger or Nigeria or Pakistan or Rwanda or "Salomon Islands" or "Sao Tome" or Senegal or "Sierra Leone" or Somalia or Sudan or Tajikistan or Tanzania or Timor or Togo or Uganda or Uzbekistan or Vietnam or "Viet Nam" or Yemen or Zambia or Zimbabwe ) or AB ( Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Benin or "Burkina Faso" or Burundi or Cambodia or "Central African Republic" or Chad or Comoros or Congo or "Cote d'Ivoire" or Eritrea or Ethiopia or Gambia or Ghana or Guinea or Haiti or India or Kenya or Korea or Kyrgyz or Kyrgyzstan or Lao or Laos or Liberia or Madagascar or Malawi or Mali or Mauritania or Melanesia or Mongolia or Mozambique or Burma or Myanmar or Nepal or Niger or Nigeria or Pakistan or Rwanda or "Salomon Islands" or "Sao Tome" or Senegal or "Sierra Leone" or Somalia or Sudan or Tajikistan or Tanzania or Timor or Togo or Uganda or Uzbekistan or Vietnam or "Viet Nam" or Yemen or Zambia or Zimbabwe )

178.821

S26

MW ( Albania or Algeria or Angola or Armenia or Azerbaijan or Belarus or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or "Cape Verde" or Cameroon or China or Colombia or Congo or Cuba or Djibouti or "Dominican Republic" or Ecuador or Egypt or "El Salvador" or Fiji or Gaza or Georgia or Guam or Guatemala or Guyana or Honduras or "Indian Ocean Islands" or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or Jamaica or Jordan or Kiribati or Lesotho or Macedonia or Maldives or "Marshall Islands" or Micronesia or "Middle East" or Moldova or Morocco or Namibia or Nicaragua or Palestin* or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Samoa or "Sri Lanka" or Suriname or Swaziland or Syria or "Syrian Arab Republic" or Thailand or Tonga or Tunisia or Turkmenistan or Ukraine or Vanuatu or "West Bank" ) or TI ( Albania or Algeria or Angola or Armenia or Azerbaijan or Belarus or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or "Cape Verde" or Cameroon or China or Colombia or Congo or Cuba or Djibouti or "Dominican Republic" or Ecuador or Egypt or "El Salvador" or Fiji or Gaza or Georgia or Guam or Guatemala or Guyana or Honduras or "Indian Ocean Islands" or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or Jamaica or Jordan or Kiribati or Lesotho or Macedonia or Maldives or "Marshall Islands" or Micronesia or "Middle East" or Moldova or Morocco or Namibia or Nicaragua or Palestin* or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Samoa or "Sri Lanka" or Suriname or Swaziland or Syria or "Syrian Arab Republic" or Thailand or Tonga or Tunisia or Turkmenistan or Ukraine or Vanuatu or "West Bank" ) or AB ( Albania or Algeria or Angola or Armenia or Azerbaijan or Belarus or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or "Cape Verde" or Cameroon or China or Colombia or Congo or Cuba or Djibouti or "Dominican Republic" or Ecuador or Egypt or "El Salvador" or Fiji or Gaza or Georgia or Guam or Guatemala or Guyana or Honduras or "Indian Ocean Islands" or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or Jamaica or Jordan or Kiribati or Lesotho or Macedonia or Maldives or "Marshall Islands" or Micronesia or "Middle East" or Moldova or Morocco or Namibia or Nicaragua or Palestin* or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Samoa or "Sri Lanka" or Suriname or Swaziland or Syria or "Syrian Arab Republic" or Thailand or Tonga or Tunisia or Turkmenistan or Ukraine or Vanuatu or "West Bank" )

203.543

S25

MW ( "American Samoa" or Argentina or Belize or Botswana or Brazil or Brasil or Bulgaria or Chile or Comoros or "Costa Rica" or Croatia or Dominica or Guinea or Gabon or Grenada or Grenadines or Hungary or Kazakhstan or Latvia or Lebanon or Libia or libyan or Libya or Lithuania or Malaysia or Mauritius or Mayotte or Mexico or Micronesia or Montenegro or Nevis or "Northern Mariana Islands" or Oman or Palau or Panama or Poland or Romania or Russia or "Russian Federation" or Samoa or "Saint Lucia" or "St Lucia" or "Saint Kitts" or "St Kitts" or "Saint Vincent" or "St Vincent" or Serbia or Seychelles or Slovakia or "Slovak Republic" or "South Africa" or Turkey or Uruguay or Venezuela or Yugoslavia ) or TI ( "American Samoa" or Argentina or Belize or Botswana or Brazil or Bulgaria or Chile or Comoros or "Costa Rica" or Croatia or Dominica or Guinea or Gabon or Grenada or Grenadines or Hungary or Kazakhstan or Latvia or Lebanon or Libia or libyan or Libya or Lithuania or Malaysia or Mauritius or Mayotte or Mexico or Micronesia or Montenegro or Nevis or "Northern Mariana Islands" or Oman or Palau or Panama or Poland or Romania or Russia or "Russian Federation" or Samoa or "Saint Lucia" or "St Lucia" or "Saint Kitts" or "St Kitts" or "Saint Vincent" or "St Vincent" or Serbia or Seychelles or Slovakia or "Slovak Republic" or "South Africa" or Turkey or Uruguay or Venezuela or Yugoslavia ) or AB ( "American Samoa" or Argentina or Belize or Botswana or Brazil or Bulgaria or Chile or Comoros or "Costa Rica" or Croatia or Dominica or Guinea or Gabon or Grenada or Grenadines or Hungary or Kazakhstan or Latvia or Lebanon or Libia or libyan or Libya or Lithuania or Malaysia or Mauritius or Mayotte or Mexico or Micronesia or Montenegro or Nevis or "Northern Mariana Islands" or Oman or Palau or Panama or Poland or Romania or Russia or "Russian Federation" or Samoa or "Saint Lucia" or "St Lucia" or "Saint Kitts" or "St Kitts" or "Saint Vincent" or "St Vincent" or Serbia or Seychelles or Slovakia or "Slovak Republic" or "South Africa" or Turkey or Uruguay or Venezuela or Yugoslavia )

179.243

S24

TI ( Africa or Asia or "South America" or "Latin America" or "Central America" ) or AB ( Africa or Asia or "South America" or "Latin America" or "Central America" )

52.444

S23

(MH "Asia+")

328.566

S22

(MH "West Indies+")

11.084

S21

(MH "South America+")

67.917

S20

(MH "Latin America")

3.317

S19

(MH "Central America+")

4.521

S18

(MH "Africa+")

94.828

S17

(MH "Developing Countries")

19.862

S16

S13 OR S14 OR S15

19.013

S15

TI (immunization or immunisation or vaccination) W0 (program* or rate* or coverage or adher*)

2.729

S14

TI ( (vaccinat* or revaccinat* or immunization or immunisation) N3 (child* or infant or infants or newborn or neonat* or baby or babies or kid or kids or toddler* or woman or women or mother*) ) OR AB ( (vaccinat* or revaccinat* or immunization or immunisation) N3 (child* or infant or infants or newborn or neonat* or baby or babies or kid or kids or toddler* or woman or women or mother*) )

9.005

S13

S5 AND S12

12.716

S12

S6 OR S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11

730.564

S11

(MH "Expectant Mothers")

11.469

S10

(MH "Women")

22.388

S9

(MH "Mothers")

35.111

S8

(MH "Infant, Newborn")

141.864

S7

(MH "Infant")

185.508

S6

(MH "Child")

509.979

S5

S1 or S2 or S3 or S4

47.549

S4

(MH "Immunization Programs")

6.448

S3

(MH "Immunotherapy")

12.674

S2

(MH "Immunization Schedule")

3.309

S1

(MH "Immunization") or (MH "Vaccination Coverage")

28.954

Embase 1980 to 2014 Week 34, Ovid (searched 2 September 2014)

#

Searches

Results

1

Immunization/

75652

2

Active Immunization/

6595

3

Mass Immunization/

2421

4

Vaccination/

96045

5

Revaccination/

1059

6

(vaccinat$ or revaccinat$ or immunization or immunisation or immunotherapy).tw.

226888

7

or/1‐6

289620

8

Tetanus Prophylaxis/

1259

9

BCG Vaccination/

7072

10

Measles Vaccination/

2189

11

or/8‐10

10339

12

Tetanus Toxoid/

10548

13

Diphtheria Toxoid/

2535

14

Diphtheria Toxoid crm197/

216

15

Diphtheria Tetanus Toxoid/

427

16

BCG Vaccine/

27645

17

Diphtheria Pertussis Poliomyelitis Tetanus Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Hepatitis B Vaccine/

380

18

Diphtheria Pertussis Poliomyelitis Tetanus Vaccine/

393

19

Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Hepatitis B Vaccine/

158

20

Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Vaccine/

464

21

Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus Vaccine/

6524

22

Diphtheria Poliomyelitis Tetanus Vaccine/

74

23

Diphtheria Tetanus Vaccine/

675

24

Diphtheria Vaccine/

1902

25

Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Hepatitis B Vaccine/

230

26

Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Vaccine/

4269

27

Haemophilus Influenzae Vaccine/

944

28

Haemophilus Vaccine/

764

29

Pertussis Vaccine/

6378

30

Triple Vaccine/

715

31

Hepatitis a Hepatitis B Vaccine/

502

32

Hepatitis B Vaccine/

15773

33

Hepatitis Vaccine/

2126

34

Recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine/

1776

35

Measles Mumps Rubella Vaccine/

5594

36

Measles Mumps Vaccine/

102

37

Measles Rubella Vaccine/

100

38

Measles Vaccine/

7860

39

Mumps Vaccine/

2031

40

Rubella Vaccine/

3477

41

Chickenpox Measles Mumps Rubella Vaccine/

219

42

Poliomyelitis Vaccine/

7207

43

Oral Poliomyelitis Vaccine/

4250

44

((tetanus or diphtheria) adj toxoid).tw.

5484

45

((tetanus or diphtheria? or pertussis or whooping cough or measles or mumps or rubella? or rubeola or mmr or polio$ or tuberculosis or tuberculoses or bcg or calmette$ or hepatitis b or haemophilus or triple) adj vaccine?).tw.

17760

46

or/12‐45

86597

47

Tetanus/

12351

48

Diphtheria/

9102

49

Measles/

15582

50

Mumps/

5967

51

Rubella/

9019

52

Pertussis/

10521

53

Poliomyelitis/

18525

54

Tuberculosis/

89886

55

Lung Tuberculosis/

63542

56

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis/

48597

57

Hepatitis B/

69010

58

Chronic Hepatitis/

21541

59

Haemophilus Influenzae/

18964

60

Haemophilus Influenzae Type B/

3868

61

(tetanus or diphtheria? or measles or rubella? or rubeola or mumps or epidemic parotit$ or pertussis or whooping cough or polio$ or infantile paralysis or tuberculosis or tuberculoses or hepatitis b or haemophilus influenza?).tw.

333094

62

or/47‐61

440846

63

exp Child/

2005016

64

exp Newborn/

450384

65

Child Care/

30274

66

(child$ or infant? or newborn? or neonat$ or baby or babies or kid? or toddler?).tw.

1614491

67

or/63‐66

2499583

68

7 and (Tetanus/ or tetanus.tw.)

10450

69

Tetanus Toxoid/ or Tetanus Prophylaxis/ or (tetanus toxoid or tetanus vaccin$ or tetanus prophylaxis).tw.

13141

70

or/68‐69

18159

71

exp Mother/

86127

72

Female/

5983316

73

(woman or women or mother? or female?).tw.

1819414

74

or/71‐73

6295611

75

70 and 74

5326

76

Developing Country.sh.

75918

77

(Africa or Asia or Caribbean or West Indies or South America or Latin America or Central America).hw,ti,ab,cp.

227844

78

(Afghanistan or Albania or Algeria or Angola or Antigua or Barbuda or Argentina or Armenia or Armenian or Aruba or Azerbaijan or Bahrain or Bangladesh or Barbados or Benin or Byelarus or Byelorussian or Belarus or Belorussian or Belorussia or Belize or Bhutan or Bolivia or Bosnia or Herzegovina or Hercegovina or Botswana or Brazil or Brasil or Bulgaria or Burkina Faso or Burkina Fasso or Upper Volta or Burundi or Urundi or Cambodia or Khmer Republic or Kampuchea or Cameroon or Cameroons or Cameron or Camerons or Cape Verde or Central African Republic or Chad or Chile or China or Colombia or Comoros or Comoro Islands or Comores or Mayotte or Congo or Zaire or Costa Rica or Cote d'Ivoire or Ivory Coast or Croatia or Cuba or Cyprus or Czechoslovakia or Czech Republic or Slovakia or Slovak Republic or Djibouti or French Somaliland or Dominica or Dominican Republic or East Timor or East Timur or Timor Leste or Ecuador or Egypt or United Arab Republic or El Salvador or Eritrea or Estonia or Ethiopia or Fiji or Gabon or Gabonese Republic or Gambia or Gaza or Georgia Republic or Georgian Republic or Ghana or Gold Coast or Greece or Grenada or Guatemala or Guinea or Guam or Guiana or Guyana or Haiti or Honduras or Hungary or India or Maldives or Indonesia or Iran or Iraq or Isle of Man or Jamaica or Jordan or Kazakhstan or Kazakh or Kenya or Kiribati or Korea or Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan or Kirghizia or Kyrgyz Republic or Kirghiz or Kirgizstan or Lao PDR or Laos or Latvia or Lebanon or Lesotho or Basutoland or Liberia or Libya or Lithuania or Macedonia or Madagascar or Malagasy Republic or Malaysia or Malaya or Malay or Sabah or Sarawak or Malawi or Nyasaland or Mali or Malta or Marshall Islands or Mauritania or Mauritius or Agalega Islands or Mexico or Micronesia or Middle East or Moldova or Moldovia or Moldovian or Mongolia or Montenegro or Morocco or Ifni or Mozambique or Myanmar or Myanma or Burma or Namibia or Nepal or Netherlands Antilles or New Caledonia or Nicaragua or Niger or Nigeria or Northern Mariana Islands or Oman or Muscat or Pakistan or Palau or Palestine or Panama or Paraguay or Peru or Philippines or Philipines or Phillipines or Phillippines or Poland or Portugal or Puerto Rico or Romania or Rumania or Roumania or Russia or Russian or Rwanda or Ruanda or Saint Kitts or St Kitts or Nevis or Saint Lucia or St Lucia or Saint Vincent or St Vincent or Grenadines or Samoa or Samoan Islands or Navigator Island or Navigator Islands or Sao Tome or Saudi Arabia or Senegal or Serbia or Montenegro or Seychelles or Sierra Leone or Slovenia or Sri Lanka or Ceylon or Solomon Islands or Somalia or Sudan or Suriname or Surinam or Swaziland or Syria or Tajikistan or Tadzhikistan or Tadjikistan or Tadzhik or Tanzania or Thailand or Togo or Togolese Republic or Tonga or Trinidad or Tobago or Tunisia or Turkey or Turkmenistan or Turkmen or Uganda or Ukraine or Uruguay or USSR or Soviet Union or Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or Uzbekistan or Uzbek or Vanuatu or New Hebrides or Venezuela or Vietnam or Viet Nam or West Bank or Yemen or Yugoslavia or Zambia or Zimbabwe or Rhodesia).hw,ti,ab,cp.

2838905

79

((developing or less* developed or under developed or underdeveloped or middle income or low* income or underserved or under served or deprived or poor*) adj (countr* or nation? or population? or world)).ti,ab.

68123

80

((developing or less* developed or under developed or underdeveloped or middle income or low* income) adj (economy or economies)).ti,ab.

351

81

(low* adj (gdp or gnp or gross domestic or gross national)).ti,ab.

187

82

(low adj3 middle adj3 countr*).ti,ab.

4139

83

(lmic or lmics or third world or lami countr*).ti,ab.

3741

84

transitional countr*.ti,ab.

138

85

or/76‐84

3019888

86

Randomized Controlled Trial/

348266

87

Controlled Clinical Trial/

386406

88

Quasi Experimental Study/

2013

89

Pretest Posttest Control Group Design/

206

90

Time Series Analysis/

14239

91

Experimental Design/

10019

92

Multicenter Study/

109759

93

(randomis* or randomiz* or randomly or random allocat*).ti,ab.

727521

94

groups.ab.

1698086

95

(trial or multicentre or multicenter or multi centre or multi center).ti.

192503

96

(intervention* or controlled or control group or compare or compared or (before adj5 after) or (pre adj5 post) or pretest or pre test or posttest or post test or quasiexperiment* or quasi experiment* or evaluat* or effect or impact or time series or time point? or repeated measur*).ti,ab.

8028793

97

or/86‐96

8766538

98

(systematic review or literature review).ti.

62313

99

"cochrane database of systematic reviews".jn.

3777

100

Nonhuman/

4359920

101

or/98‐100

4424301

102

97 not 101

6927465

103

7 and 62 and 67 and 85 and 102

4433

104

11 and 67 and 85 and 102

865

105

46 and 67 and 85 and 102

4231

106

103 or 104 or 105

5462

107

limit 106 to embase

4043

Sociological Abstracts 1952 – current, ProQuest (searched 9 February 2014)

ALL(vaccination or vaccine or vaccines or immunization)

AND

ALL(child* or infant* or newborn or neonat* or baby or babies or kid or kids or toddler* or mother* or woman or women or female)

LILACS, Virtual Health Library (VHL) (searched 9 February 2014)

(immunization or inmunizacion or imunizacao or vaccination or vacunacion or vacinacao or vaccine or vaccines or vacuna or vacunas or vacina or vacinas) AND (tetanus or tetanico or diphtheria or difterico or pertussis or "whooping cough" or tosferina or "tosferina" or "tosconvulsa" or "tosseconvulsa" or coqueluche or measles or sarampion or sarampo or mumps or paperas or caxumba or rubella or rubeola or mmr or polio* or tubercul* or "mycobacterium bovis" or bcg or calmette* or hepatitis or hepatite or haemophilus) AND (child or children or infant or infants or newborn or neonat* or baby or babies or kid or kids or toddler* or nino or ninos or crianca or criancas or lactante* or lactente* or "reciennacido" or "reciennacidos" or "recemnascido" or "recemnascidos") AND (randomi* or randomly or azar or acaso or control* or intervention* or evaluat* or effect* or impact or impacts or intervencion* or intervencao* or evaluar or evaluacion or avaliacao or efecto or efectos or efeito or efeitos or impacto or impactos or "serie de tiempo" or "series de tiempo" or "serie de tempo" or "series de tempo" or "serie temporal" or "series temporal" or "serietemporales" or "series temporales" or "serietemporais" or "series temporais" or "puntos de tiempo" or "pontos de tiempo" or "puntos de tempo" or "puntos de tempo" or "puntostemporales" or "pontostemporales" or "puntotemporais" or "pontotemporais" or "medidarepetida" or "medidarepetidas" or "medidasrepetida" or "medidasrepetidas" or "medicionrepetida" or "medicionrepetidas" or "medicionesrepetida" or "medicionesrepetidas")

Global Index Medicus, WHO (www.globalindexmedicus.net/) (searched 11 July 2022)

No.

Search terms

Results

Two independent strategies

1.

"childhood immunisation" OR "childhood immunization" OR "childhood vaccination" OR "child immunisation" OR "child immunization" OR "child vaccination" OR "infant immunisation" OR "infant immunization" OR "infant vaccination" [in Title, Abstract, Subject]

AND

randomis* OR randomiz* OR trial or impact OR effect OR evaluat* OR intervention* OR "control group" OR "control groups" OR "before and after" OR "time series" OR "repeated measures" OR "repeated measurements" [in Title, Abstract, Subject]

2.

"immunisation coverage" OR "immunization coverage" OR "vaccination coverage" OR "vaccine coverage" [in Title, Abstract, Subject]

AND

child OR children OR childhood OR infant OR infants OR newborn OR "new born" OR woman OR women OR mother OR mothers [in Title, Abstract, Subject]

AND

randomis* OR randomiz* OR trial or impact OR effect OR evaluat* OR intervention* OR "control group" OR "control groups" OR "before and after" OR "time series" OR "repeated measures" OR "repeated measurements" [in Title, Abstract, Subject]

International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP), WHO (searched 11 July 2022)

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Word Health Organization (WHO) (www.who.int/ictrp/en/) (searched 11 July 2022)

Five separate search strategies; 1‐4 using Advanced search, 5 using Basic search, limited to Recruitment status: All

1

(immunization coverage OR immunisation coverage OR vaccination coverage) AND (child OR children OR childhood OR infant OR infants) in the Title

2

(immunization coverage OR immunisation coverage OR vaccination coverage) AND (child OR children OR childhood OR infant OR infants) in the Condition

3

(childhood immunisation OR childhood immunization OR childhood vaccination OR child immunisation OR child immunization OR child vaccination OR infant immunisation OR infant immunization OR infant vaccination) AND (coverage) in the Title

4

(childhood immunisation OR childhood immunization OR childhood vaccination OR child immunisation OR child immunization OR child vaccination OR infant immunisation OR infant immunization OR infant vaccination) AND (coverage) in the Condition

5

(child OR children OR childhood OR infant OR infants) AND (immunization OR immunisation OR vaccination) AND (coverage)

ClinicalTrials.gov, NIH (searched 11 July 2022)

Two separate search strings ‐ Advanced search ‐ Search field: Outcome Measure ‐ Limited to: Interventional Studies (Clinical Trials)

1. "immunization coverage" OR "immunisation coverage" OR "vaccination coverage"

2. "childhood immunisation" OR "childhood immunization" OR "childhood vaccination" OR "child immunisation" OR "child immunization" OR "child vaccination" OR "infant immunisation" OR "infant immunization" OR "infant vaccination"

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Study flow diagram.

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 2: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 2: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 3: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 3: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 4: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 4: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 5: Uptake of BCG + DTP3 + OPV vaccines

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 5: Uptake of BCG + DTP3 + OPV vaccines

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 7: Uptake of at least 1 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 7: Uptake of at least 1 vaccine

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 8: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Health education, Outcome 8: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 1: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 1: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 2: Uptake of measles/MMR vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 2: Uptake of measles/MMR vaccine

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 3: Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Monetary incentive, Outcome 3: Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccine

Comparison 3: Home‐based record, Outcome 1: Uptake of DTP3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Home‐based record, Outcome 1: Uptake of DTP3 vaccine

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 1: Uptake of DTP3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 1: Uptake of DTP3 vaccine

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 2: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 2: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 4: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 4: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 5: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 5: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4: Digital register, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 2 years of age

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 2: Uptake of DTP3 (SMS + monetary incentive intervention)

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 2: Uptake of DTP3 (SMS + monetary incentive intervention)

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 3: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 3: Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 4: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 4: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 5: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 5: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 7: Uptake of yellow fever vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5: Phone call/SMS, Outcome 7: Uptake of yellow fever vaccine

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 2 years of age

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 2: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 2: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 3: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6: Wearable reminder, Outcome 3: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 7: Training of health providers ‐ IPC, Outcome 1: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7: Training of health providers ‐ IPC, Outcome 1: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 1: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 1: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 2: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 2: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 3: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8: Home visit, Outcome 3: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 2: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 2: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 4: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 4: Uptake of HBV3 vaccine

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 5: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 5: Uptake of OPV3 vaccine

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 6: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 7: Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9: Immunisation outreach, Outcome 7: Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 2: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 2: Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 3: Uptake of BCG vaccine

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 4: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 4: Uptake of measles vaccine

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 5: Uptake of yellow fever vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10: Integration of immunisation with other health services, Outcome 5: Uptake of yellow fever vaccine

Comparison 11: Engagement of community leaders, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 1 year of age

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11: Engagement of community leaders, Outcome 1: Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 1 year of age

Comparison 11: Engagement of community leaders, Outcome 2: Uptake of measles vaccine

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11: Engagement of community leaders, Outcome 2: Uptake of measles vaccine

Summary of findings 1. Health education compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Health education compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: India, Pakistan, Nepal, China, Kenya
Intervention: health education
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants (studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with health education

Proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 3 months to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.36
(1.15 to 1.62)

4375

(6 RCTs)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Health educationk may improve the proportion of children who receive DTP3 by 1 year of age.

501 per 1000

682 per 1000
(576 to 812)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

Follow‐up: 7 to 12 months

Study population

RR 0.99
(0.96 to 1.01)

1557

(2 RCTs)c

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderated

Health education probably makes little or no difference in improving the proportion of children who receive BCG.

940 per 1000

931 per 1000
(903 to 950)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.08
(1.04 to 1.11)

851

(1 RCT)e

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Health education may slightly improve the proportion of children who receive OPV3.

910 per 1000

983 per 1000
(946 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.07

(1.03 to 1.10)

851

(1 RCT)e

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Health education may slightly improve the proportion of children who receive HBV3.

919 per 1000

984 per 1000

(947 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles vaccine)

Follow‐up: 7 to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.25
(1.06 to 1.47)

3343

(4 RCTs)f

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Health education may improve the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

665 per 1000

831 per 1000
(705 to 978)

Proportion of children who received other vaccine under study (BCG + DTP3 + OPV)

Follow‐up: 6 months

Study population

RR 1.02
(0.96 to 1.09)

393

(1 RCT)g

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Health education may make little or no difference in improving the proportion of children that receive a combination of BCG, DTP3, and OPV vaccines.

929 per 1000

947 per 1000
(891 to 1000)

Received at least one vaccine

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.58
(1.21 to 2.05)

228

(1 RCT)h

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatej

Health education probably improves the proportion of children that receive at least 1 vaccine.

582 per 1000

483 per 1000
(373 to 623)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

Follow‐up: 7 to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.24

(1.06 to 1.44)

2387

(3 RCTs)i

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Health education may make little or no difference in improving the proportion of children under the age of 5 years fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines.

653 per 1000

810 per 1000

(693 to 941)

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention ‐ reported narratively in 2 studies

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; HBV: hepatitis B vaccine; OPV: oral polio vaccine; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded studies were Andersson 2009; Hu 2017; Owais 2011; Powell‐Jackson 2018; Usman 2009; Usman 2011.
bWe downgraded by two levels due to serious study limitations and unexplained heterogeneity.
cIncluded studies were Hu 2017 and Powell‐Jackson 2018.
dWe downgraded by one level for study limitations.
eIncluded study was Hu 2017.
fIncluded studies were Andersson 2009; Hu 2017; Maldonado 2020; Powell‐Jackson 2018.
gIncluded study was Bolam 1998.
hIncluded study was Pandey 2007.
iIncluded studies were Hu 2017; Maldonado 2020; Powell‐Jackson 2018.
jWe downgraded by one level as there was only one study.
kHealth education was community‐based group discussions held with mothers in their community settings, which involved the use of visual aids in some instances, and facility‐based health education conducted in the clinic setting with individual mothers or groups of mothers.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Health education compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 2. Monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Household monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: Mexico, Honduras, Nicaragua, Zimbabwe
Intervention: household monetary incentives
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with household monetary incentives

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.00
(0.99 to 1.01)

2175
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We do not know if household monetary incentives improve the proportion of children that receive BCG vaccine because the certainty of evidence is very low.

981 per 1000

981 per 1000
(971 to 990)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles/MMR) ‐ household monetary incentivef

Follow‐up: 12 to 24 months

Study population

RR 1.06
(0.93 to 1.21)

2709
(2 RCTs)c

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We do not know if household monetary incentives improve the proportion of children that receive MMR vaccine because the certainty of evidence is very low.

869 per 1000

921 per 1000
(808 to 895)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ service‐level monetary incentiveg

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.06
(0.95 to 1.18)

615
(1 RCT)d

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We do not know if service‐level monetary incentives improve the proportion of children that receive MMR vaccine because the certainty of evidence is very low.

766 per 1000

812 per 1000
(728 to 904)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (MMR) ‐ household + service‐level monetary incentive

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.09
(0.96 to 1.14)

456
(1 RCT)d

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We do not know if household plus service‐level monetary incentives improve the proportion of children that receive MMR vaccine because the certainty of evidence is very low.

766 per 1000

835 per 1000
(736 to 950)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

Follow‐up: 13 to 24 months

Study population

RR 1.05
(0.92 to 1.20)

1000
(2 RCTs)e

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We do not know if household monetary incentives improve the proportion of children that receive full vaccination because the certainty of evidence is very low.

701 per 1000

736 per 1000
(645 to 841)

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; MMR: measles, mumps, rubella; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aThe included study was Barham 2005.
bWe downgraded by two levels for very serious study limitations.
cThe included studies were Morris 2004 and Barham 2005.
dThe included study is Morris 2004.
eThe included studies were Maluccio 2004 and Robertson 2013.
fHousehold monetary incentives ‐ vouchers worth GBP 2.53 to 3.69 given to mothers conditionally.
gService monetary incentives ‐ logistic support to health facilities.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 3. Home‐based record combined with other interventions compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Home‐based record compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children aged 1 year

Setting: Pakistan and Indonesia
Intervention: home‐based record
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with home‐based record

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBRf only

Follow‐up: 3 to 7 months

Study population

RR 1.36
(1.06 to 1.75)

4019
(3 RCTs)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Home‐based record may improve the proportion of children who receive DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age.

552 per 1000

751 per 1000
(586 to 967)

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + health educationg

Follow‐up: 3 months

Study population

RR 1.49
(1.22 to 1.82)

1502
(2 RCTs)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

HBR in combination with health education may increase the proportion of children who receive DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age.

470 per 1000

700 per 1000
(574 to 856)

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + stickerh

Follow‐up: 7 months

Study population

RR 1.46
(1.02 to 2.09)

2182
(1 RCT)d

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowe

HBR in combination with sticker may improve the proportion of children who receive DTP3/Penta 3.

610 per 1000

890 per 1000
(622 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention presented narratively in 2 studies

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; HBR: home‐based record; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded studies were Usman 2009; Usman 2011; Wallace 2019. We downgraded for study limitations.
bWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and for heterogeneity.
cIncluded studies were Usman 2009; Usman 2011. We downgraded for study limitations.
dIncluded study was Wallace 2019.
eWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and because there was only one study.
fHBR only ‐ redesigned immunisation card, which was larger than the normal card and had the date of the next appointment on the front and back pages.
gHBR plus health education ‐ redesigned card described above plus facility‐based health education.
hHBR plus sticker ‐ usual immunisation card with a bright yellow sticker.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Home‐based record combined with other interventions compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 4. Digital register compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Digital register compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: India and China
Intervention: digital register
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with digital register

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 2 to 12 months

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.89 to 1.09)

328
(2 RCTs)a

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderateb

Digital register probably makes little or no difference in improving the proportion of children who receive DPT3/Penta3 by 1 year of age.

904 per 1000

886 per 1000
(804 to 985)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.03 (0.88 to 1.20)

205

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Digital register may not improve the proportion of children who receive full vaccination by 2 years of age.

346 per 1000

357 per 1000

(305 to 415)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.92 to 1.04)

205
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Digital register may not improve the proportion of children who receive BCG.

894 per 1000

876 per 1000
(823 to 930)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.06
(0.97 to 1.17)

205
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Digital register may not improve the proportion of children who receive OPV3.

904 per 1000

958 per 1000
(877 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.06
(0.97 to 1.17)

205
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Digital register may not improve the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

904 per 1000

958 per 1000
(877 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.89 to 1.07)

205
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Digital register may not improve the proportion of children who receive HBV3 vaccine.

942 per 1000

923 per 1000
(839 to 1000)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; HBV: hepatitis B vaccine; OPV: oral polio vaccine; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded studies were Chen 2016; Nagar 2018.
bWe downgraded by one level for serious study limitations.
cIncluded study was Chen 2016.
dWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and because there was only one study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Digital register compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 5. Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: Côte d'Ivoire, Georgia, Guatemala, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, India
Intervention: phone call/SMS
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with phone call/SMS

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age (phone call/SMS)

Follow‐up: 3 to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.12
(1.00 to 1.25)

3869
(6 RCTs)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Phone call/SMS may slightly increase the proportion of children vaccinated with DTP3/Penta 3.

700 per 1000

784 per 1000
(700 to 875)

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age (SMS + monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.01

(0.98 to 1.03)

766

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

A combination of SMS and monetary incentive may make little or no difference in improving the proportion of children that receive DTP3 vaccination.

953 per 1000

962 per 1000

(934 to 981)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age (phone call/SMS only)

Follow‐up: 3 to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.06

(0.99 to 1.12)

10,414

(5 RCTs)e

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowf

Phone call/SMS may make little or no difference in improving the proportion of children that receive full vaccination.

679 per 1000

720 per 1000

(673 to 761)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age (SMS + monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.09

(1.02 to 1.16)

766

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

A combination of SMS and monetary incentive may slightly improve the proportion of children that receive full vaccination by 2 years of age.

822 per 1000

896 per 1000

(839 to 954)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG (phone call/SMS only)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 0.98
(0.82 to 1.18)

748
(1 RCT)g

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Phone call/SMS may make no difference in improving the proportion of children that receive BCG vaccination.

1000 per 1000

990 per 1000
(980 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG (SMS + monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.00

(0.84 to 1.20)

766

(1 RCT)g

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Phone call/SMS in combination with monetary incentive may make no difference in improving the proportion of children that receive BCG.

1000 per 1000

1000 per 1000

(840 per 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3 (phone call/SMS only)

Follow‐up: 6 to 12 months

Study population

RR 0.99
(0.94 to 1.05)

1069
(2 RCTs)h

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatei

Phone call/SMS probably has no effect in increasing the proportion of children that receive OPV3 vaccination.

919 per 1000

910 per 1000
(864 to 965)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ OPV3 (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 3 months

Study population

RR 1.01 (0.99 to 1.04)

766

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝

Lowd

Phone call/SMS in combination with monetary incentive may have little or no effect in increasing the proportion of children that receive OPV3.

969 per 1000

979 per 1000

(960 to 1000

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ measles/MMR (phone call/SMS + monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.07

(1.01 to 1.14)

766

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Phone call/SMS in combination with monetary incentive may have little or no effect in improving the proportion of children that receive measles vaccination.

987 per 1000

1000 per 1000

(997 to 1000)

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention ‐ reported narratively for 2 studiesk

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; MMR: measles, mumps, rubella; OPV: oral polio vaccine; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded studies were Bangure 2015; Dissieka 2019; Domek 2016; Ekhaguere 2019; Gibson 2017; Kazi 2018.
bWe downgraded by two levels for study limitations and inconsistency.
cIncluded study was Gibson 2017. We downgraded for serious study limitations.
dWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and having a single study.
eIncluded studies were Domek 2016; Domek 2019; Gibson 2017; Kawakatsu 2020; Uddin 2016.
fWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and inconsistency.
gIncluded study was Gibson 2017.
hIncluded studies were Domek 2016; Gibson 2017.
iWe downgraded by one level for study limitations.
jIncluded studies were Dissieka 2019; Domek 2016; Ekhaguere 2019.
kIncluded studies wereBangure 2015; Ekhaguere 2019.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 5. Phone call/SMS with/without combination with monetary incentives compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 6. Wearable reminders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Wearable reminders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: India and Pakistan
Intervention: wearable reminders
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with wearable reminders

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 2 to 12 months

Study population

RR 1.02
(0.97 to 1.07)

1567
(2 RCTs)a

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderateb

Wearable reminders probably have little or no effect in improving DTP3/Penta 3 uptake. The 95% confidence interval includes both benefit and harm.

630 per 1000

642 per 1000
(611 to 674)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ BCG

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 0.84
(0.74 to 0.94)

1382
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Wearable reminders may not increase the proportion of children receiving BCG vaccine.

517 per 1000

434 per 1000
(382 to 486)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study ‐ measles

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.04
(0.97 to 1.12)

1440
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowd

Wearable reminders may make little or no difference in improving the proportion of children vaccinated with measles vaccine.

685 per 1000

713 per 1000
(665 to 768)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention ‐ reported narratively for 1 study

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded studies are Nagar 2018; Siddiqi 2020.
bWe downgraded by one level for study limitations.
cIncluded study was Siddiqi 2020.
dWe downgraded by two levels for study limitations and because there was a single study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 6. Wearable reminders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 7. Training of health providers compared with routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Training of health providers compared with routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under the age of 5 years

Settings: Nigeria

Intervention: training of health providers

Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Routine care

Training of health providers

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Follow‐up: 5 months

Study population

RR 5.65

(3.62 to 8.83)

420
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether interpersonal communication improves the proportion of children that receive full vaccination.

95 per 1000

538 per 1000
(345 to 841)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded study is Basheer 2021, a non‐randomised controlled trial.
bWe downgraded by three levels for very serious study limitations and because this was a single study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 7. Training of health providers compared with routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 8. Home visit compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Home visit compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: Ghana
Intervention: home visit
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with home visit

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Follow‐up: 6 months

Study population

RR 1.29

(1.15 to 1.45)

419

(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether home visits increase the proportion of children who receive full vaccination.

667 per 1000

860 per 1000

(767 to 967)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3)

Follow‐up: 6 months

Study population

RR 1.22
(1.10 to 1.35)

419
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether home visits increase the proportion of children who receive OPV3.

731 per 1000

891 per 1000
(804 to 986)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles)

Follow‐up: 6 months

Study population

RR 1.26
(1.14 to 1.39)

419
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain if home visits increase the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

726 per 1000

915 per 1000
(828 to 1000)

Number of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines ‐ not reported

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; OPV: oral polio vaccine; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded study is Brugha 1996.
bWe downgraded by three levels for very serious study limitations and because this was a single study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 8. Home visit compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 9. Immunisation outreach compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Regular immunisation outreach compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: India
Intervention: regular immunisation outreach
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with regular immunisation outreach

Proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.32
(1.11 to 1.56)

541
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach improves the proportion of children who receive DPT3.

605 per 1000

799 per 1000
(671 to 944)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 25 years of age

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.33
(1.00 to 1.76)

309
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach improves the proportion of children who receive all vaccines.

516 per 1000

686 per 1000
(516 to 908)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.06
(0.99 to 1.13)

647
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach increases the proportion of children who receive BCG vaccine. The 95% confidence interval includes both benefit and harm.

896 per 1000

949 per 1000
(887 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (HBV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.36
(1.13 to 1.64)

541
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach increases the proportion of children who receive HBV3 vaccine.

588 per 1000

800 per 1000
(665 to 965)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (OPV3)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.38
(1.16 to 1.65)

541
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach increases the proportion of children who receive OPV3 vaccine.

580 per 1000

801 per 1000
(673 to 957)

Proportion of children who received measles vaccine

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.26

(0.91 to 1.74)

647

(1 RCT)a

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowb

We are uncertain whether regular immunisation outreach increases the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine. The 95% confidence interval includes both benefit and harm.

299 per 1000

376 per 1000

(272 to 519)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines (outreach only)

Follow‐up: 18 months

Study population

RR 3.09

(2.11 to 4.53)

1239
(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊕⊝

Moderated

Regular immunisation outreach probably increases the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

58 per 1000

180 per 1000
(123 to 263)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines (outreach + health education)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.28

(1.23 to 1.33)

49444

(1 RCT)e

⊕⊕⊕⊝

Moderatef

Regular immunisation outreach in combination with health education probably increases the proportion of children who receive full vaccination by the age of 5 years.

250 per 1000

320 per 1000

(308 to 333)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines (outreach + non‐monetary incentive)

Follow‐up: 18 months

Study population

RR 6.66

(4.78 to 9.28)

1242

(1 RCT)c

⊕⊕⊕⊝

Moderated

Regular immunisation outreach with incentives probably increases the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

58 per 1000

387 per 1000

(278 to 540)

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention ‐ reported narratively in one studyc

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; HBV: hepatitis B vaccine; OPV: oral polio vaccine; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded study was Sengupta 2017.
bWe downgraded by three levels for very serious risk of bias due to study limitations (the included study was a quasi‐RCT) and for serious indirectness because there was only one study.
cIncluded study was Banerjee 2010.
dWe downgraded by one level for serious indirectness because there was a single study.
eIncluded study was Habib 2017.
fWe downgraded by one level for serious risk of bias due to study limitations.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 9. Immunisation outreach compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 10. Integration of immunisation with other health services compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Integration of immunisation with other health services compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: Ghana
Intervention: integration of immunisation with other health services
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with integration of immunisation with other health services

Proportion of children who received DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.27
(1.17 to 1.38)

2192
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Integration of immunisation with other health services may increase the proportion of children who receive DPT3/Penta3 by 1 year of age. However, the 95% CI includes both benefits and harms.

602 per 1000

764 per 1000
(704 to 831)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.29
(1.16 to 1.44)

1700
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Integration of immunisation with other health services may increase the proportion of children who receive full vaccination by 2 years of age.

538 per 1000

694 per 1000
(624 to 774)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (BCG)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 0.97
(0.93 to 1.01)

2089
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Integration of immunisation with other health services may have little or no effect in increasing the proportion of children who receive BCG.

916 per 1000

888 per 1000
(852 to 925)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (yellow fever)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.13

(1.04 to 1.22)

1383

(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Integration of immunisation with other health services may increase the proportion of children who receive yellow fever vaccine by 1 year of age.

732 per 1000

827 per 1000

(659 to 1000)

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles)

Follow‐up: 12 months

Study population

RR 1.13
(1.04 to 1.22)

1370
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊝⊝
Lowb

Integration of immunisation with other health services may increase the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

739 per 1000

835 per 1000
(739 to 902)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

BCG: Bacille Calmette‐Guérin;CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded study is Dicko 2011.
bWe downgraded by two levels for serious study limitations and because there was only one study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 10. Integration of immunisation with other health services compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Summary of findings 11. Engagement of community leaders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Engagement of community leaders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Patient or population: children under 5 years of age
Setting: Nigeria
Intervention: engagement of community leaders
Comparison: routine care

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with routine care

Risk with engagement of community leaders

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 by 1 year of age

Follow‐up: 18 months

Study population

RR 1.37

(1.11 to 1.69)

2020

(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderateb

Engagement of community leaders probably improves the proportion of children who receive Penta 3 vaccine.

240 per 1000

329 per 1000

(266 to 405)

Proportion of children who received all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Proportion of children who received the vaccine under study (measles)

Follow‐up: 18 months

Study population

RR 1.96
(1.61 to 2.39)

1227
(1 RCT)a

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderateb

Engagement of community leaders probably increases the proportion of children who receive measles vaccine.

240 per 1000

470 per 1000
(386 to 573)

Proportion of children under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Occurrence of vaccine‐preventable diseases

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Cost of the intervention

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

Adverse events

None of the included studies reported this outcome.

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: confidence interval; DTP: diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aIncluded study was Oyo‐Ita 2021.
bWe downgraded by one level because there was only one study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 11. Engagement of community leaders compared to routine care for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Table 1. Interventions to improve vaccination uptake and how they work

Target

Interventions

Purpose of the interventions

Recipients

Communication interventions to inform and educate targeting individuals, groups, communities or providers, or a combination of these through face‐to‐face interaction, use of mass media, printed material, etc.

To improve understanding of vaccination; its relevance; benefits and risks of vaccination; where, when, and how to receive vaccine services; and who should receive vaccine services (Willis 2013)

Communication interventions to recall or remind using face‐to‐face interaction, telephone, mail, etc.

To remind those who are overdue for vaccination in order to reduce the dropout rate (Willis 2013)

Communication interventions to teach skills, e.g. parenting skills

To provide people with the ability to operationalise knowledge through the adoption of practical skills (Willis 2013)

Communication interventions to provide support

To provide assistance or advice for consumers (Willis 2013)

Interventions to facilitate decision‐making, e.g. decision aids on vaccination for parents

To assist carers in participating in decision‐making (Dubé 2013)

Interventions to enable communication through traditional media, internet, etc.

To make communication possible (Dubé 2013)

Interventions, including communication, to enhance community ownership, e.g. community dialogues involving traditional and religious rulers

To increase demand for vaccination

To ensure sustainability

To build trust in vaccination and vaccination services

To drive demand for vaccination

Incentives

To reward service uptake; to cover out‐of‐pocket costs

Providers

Training

To improve knowledge about vaccination, to improve skills, to improve attitudes to clients, to reduce missed opportunities for vaccination

Audit and feedback

To ensure quality and client satisfaction with services

Supportive supervision

To ensure quality and maintain standards, to reduce missed opportunities for vaccination

Incentives

To boost morale and enhance performance

Health system

Infrastructural development, e.g. provision of health facilities, provision of road to improve access to health facilities

To ensure access to services

Logistic support

To improve service quality and so improve utilisation to ensure availability of services

Service delivery, e.g. outreach; home visits; integration of vaccination with other services; guidelines/protocol for vaccination; increased resources

Outreach to improve access to services

Home visits to remind parents about vaccination and identify unimmunised children for immunisation

Integration to encourage vaccine uptake

Guidelines and protocols to ensure quality of services

Improved resources to ensure availability of services

Policy‐makers

Advocacy for: development of supporting policies, increased funding of health services

To promote the development of policies to support vaccine uptake

To increase funding to the health sector

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Interventions to improve vaccination uptake and how they work
Table 2. WHO Classification of Digital Interventions

1.0 Clients

1.1 Targeted client communication

1.1.1 Transmit health event alerts to specific population group(s)

1.1.2 Transmit targeted health information to client(s) based on health status or demographics

1.1.3 Transmit targeted alerts and reminders to client(s)

1.1.4 Transmit diagnostics result, or availability of result, to client(s)

1.2 Untargeted client communication

1.2.1 Transmit untargeted health information to an undefined population

1.2.2 Transmit untargeted

1.3 Client to client communication

1.3.1 Peer group for clients

1.4 Personal health tracking

1.4.1 Access by client to own medical records

1.4.2 Self monitoring of health or diagnostic data by client 1.4.3 Active data capture/ documentation by client

1.4.3 Active data capture/ documentation by client

1.5 Citizen‐based reporting

1.5.1 Reporting of health system feedback by clients

1.5.2 Reporting of public health events by clients

1.6 On‐demand information services to clients

1.6.1 Client look‐up of health information

1.7 Client financial transactions

1.7.1 Transmit or manage out‐of‐pocket payments by client(s)

1.7.2 Transmit or manage vouchers to client(s) for health services

1.7.3 Transmit or manage incentives to client(s) for health services

2.0 Health workers

2.1 Client identification and registration

2.1.1 Verify client unique identity

2.1.2 Enrol client for health services/clinical care plan

2.2 Client health records

2.2.1 Longitudinal tracking of clients’ health status and services

2.2.2 Manage client’s structured clinical records

2.2.3 Manage client’s unstructured clinical records

2.2.4 Routine health indicator data collection and management

2.3 Health worker decision support

2.3.1 Provide prompts and alerts based according to protocol

2.3.2 Provide checklist according to protocol

2.3.3 Screen clients by risk or other health status

2.4 Telemedicine

2.4.1 Consultations between remote client and health worker

2.4.2 Remote monitoring of client health or diagnostic data by provider

2.4.3 Transmission of medical data to health worker

2.4.4 Consultations for case management between health worker(s)

2.5 Health worker communication

2.5.1 Communication from health worker(s) to supervisor

2.5.2 Communication and performance feedback to health worker(s)

2.5.3 Transmit routine news and workflow notifications to health worker(s)

2.5.4 Transmit non‐routine health event alerts to health worker(s)

2.5.5 Peer group for health workers

2.6 Referral co‐ordination

2.6.1 Coordinate emergency response and transport

2.6.2 Manage referrals between points of service within health sector

2.6.3 Manage referrals between health and other sectors

2.7 Health worker activity planning and scheduling

2.7.1 Identify client(s) in need of services

2.7.2 Schedule health worker's activities

2.8 Health worker training

2.8.1 Provide training content to health worker(s)

2.8.2 Assess capacity of health worker(s)

2.9 Prescription and medication management

2.9.1 Transmit or track prescription orders

2.9.2 Track client's medication consumption

2.9.3 Report adverse drug events

2.10 Laboratory and Diagnostics Imaging Management

2.10.1 Transmit diagnostic result to health worker

2.10.2 Transmit and track diagnostic orders

2.10.3 Capture diagnostic results from digital devices

2.10.4 Track biological specimens

3.0 Health system managers

3.1 Human resource management

3.1.1 List health workforce cadres and related identification information

3.1.2 Monitor performance of health worker(s)

3.1.3 Manage certification/registration of health worker(s)

3.1.4 Record training credentials of health worker(s)

3.2 Supply chain management

3.2.1 Manage inventory and distribution of health commodities

3.2.2 Notify stock levels of health commodities

3.2.3 Monitor cold‐chain sensitive commodities

3.2.4 Register licensed drugs and health commodities

3.2.5 Manage procurement of commodities

3.2.6 Report counterfeit or substandard drugs by clients

3.3 Public health event notification

3.3.1 Notification of public health events from point of diagnosis

3.4 Civil Registration and Vital Statistics

3.4.1 Notify birth event

3.4.2 Register birth event

3.4.3 Certify birth event

3.4.4 Notify death event

3.4.5 Register death event

3.4.6 Certify death event

3.5 Health financing

3.5.1 Register and verify client insurance membership

3.5.2 Track insurance billing and claims submission

3.5.3 Track and manage insurance reimbursement

3.5.4 Transmit routine payroll payment to health worker(s)

3.5.5 Transmit or manage incentives to health worker(s)

3.5.6 Manage budget and expenditures

3.6 Equipment and asset management

3.6.1 Monitor status of health equipment

3.6.2 Track regulation and licensing of medical equipment

3.7 Facility management

3.7.1 List health facilities and related information

3.7.2 Assess health facilities

4.0 Data services

4.1 Data collection, management, and use

4.1.1 Non‐routine data collection and management

4.1.2 Data storage and aggregation

4.1.3 Data synthesis and visualisation

4.1.4 Automated analysis of data to generate new information or predictions on future events

4.2 Data coding

4.2.1 Parse unstructured data into structured data

4.2.2 Merge, de‐duplicate, and curate coded datasets or terminologies

4.2.3 Classify disease codes or cause of mortality

4.3 Location mapping

4.3.1 Map location of health facilities/structures

4.3.2 Map location of health events

4.3.3 Map location of clients and households

4.3.4 Map location of health worker

4.4 Data exchange and interoperability

4.4.1 Data exchange across systems

Excerpt from WHO 2019b.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. WHO Classification of Digital Interventions
Comparison 1. Health education

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age Show forest plot

6

4375

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.15, 1.62]

1.1.1 Facility‐based health education

3

2355

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.01, 1.46]

1.1.2 Community‐based health education

3

2020

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [1.27, 1.88]

1.2 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

2

1557

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.01]

1.3 Uptake of OPV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

851

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [1.04, 1.11]

1.4 Uptake of HBV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

851

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [1.03, 1.10]

1.5 Uptake of BCG + DTP3 + OPV vaccines Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.6 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

4

3343

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [1.06, 1.47]

1.6.1 Facility‐based education

1

851

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [1.02, 1.07]

1.6.2 Community‐based education

3

2492

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [1.12, 1.70]

1.7 Uptake of at least 1 vaccine Show forest plot

1

228

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.58 [1.21, 2.05]

1.8 Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

3

2387

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.24 [1.06, 1.44]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Health education
Comparison 2. Monetary incentive

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.2 Uptake of measles/MMR vaccine Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.2.1 Household monetary incentive

2

2709

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.93, 1.21]

2.2.2 Service‐level monetary incentive

1

615

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.95, 1.18]

2.2.3 Household + service‐level monetary incentive

1

456

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.96, 1.24]

2.3 Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccine Show forest plot

2

1000

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.92, 1.20]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Monetary incentive
Comparison 3. Home‐based record

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Uptake of DTP3 vaccine Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1.1 Home‐based record only

3

4019

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.06, 1.75]

3.1.2 HBR + health education

2

1502

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.49 [1.22, 1.82]

3.1.3 HBR + sticker

1

2182

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.46 [1.02, 2.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Home‐based record
Comparison 4. Digital register

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Uptake of DTP3 vaccine Show forest plot

2

328

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.89, 1.09]

4.2 Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.3 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

1

205

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.92, 1.04]

4.4 Uptake of OPV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

205

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.97, 1.17]

4.5 Uptake of HBV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

205

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.89, 1.07]

4.6 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

205

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.97, 1.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Digital register
Comparison 5. Phone call/SMS

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

5.1 Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 2 years of age Show forest plot

6

3869

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [1.00, 1.25]

5.1.1 Urban

3

1204

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.99, 1.35]

5.1.2 Rural

2

1069

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.03]

5.1.3 Urban + rural

1

1596

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.27 [1.19, 1.37]

5.2 Uptake of DTP3 (SMS + monetary incentive intervention) Show forest plot

1

766

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.98, 1.03]

5.3 Reception of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.3.1 Phone call/SMS only

5

10414

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.99, 1.12]

5.3.2 SMS + monetary incentive

1

766

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [1.02, 1.16]

5.4 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.4.1 Phone call/SMS only

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.4.2 SMS + monetary incentive

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.5 Uptake of OPV3 vaccine Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.5.1 Phone call/SMS only

2

1069

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.94, 1.05]

5.5.2 SMS + monetary incentive

1

766

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.99, 1.04]

5.6 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.6.1 Phone call/SMS only

1

2230

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.06 [1.64, 2.60]

5.6.2 Phone call/SMS + monetary incentive

1

766

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [1.01, 1.14]

5.7 Uptake of yellow fever vaccine Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Phone call/SMS
Comparison 6. Wearable reminder

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

6.1 Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 2 years of age Show forest plot

2

1567

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.97, 1.07]

6.2 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

1

1382

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.74, 0.94]

6.3 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

1440

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.97, 1.12]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Wearable reminder
Comparison 7. Training of health providers ‐ IPC

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

7.1 Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

1

420

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.65 [3.62, 8.83]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Training of health providers ‐ IPC
Comparison 8. Home visit

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

8.1 Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

1

419

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.15, 1.45]

8.2 Uptake of OPV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

419

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [1.10, 1.35]

8.3 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

419

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.14, 1.39]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Home visit
Comparison 9. Immunisation outreach

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

9.1 Reception of DTP3 by 1 year of age Show forest plot

1

541

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.32 [1.11, 1.56]

9.2 Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

1

309

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.33 [1.00, 1.76]

9.3 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

1

647

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.99, 1.13]

9.4 Uptake of HBV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

541

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.13, 1.64]

9.5 Uptake of OPV3 vaccine Show forest plot

1

541

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [1.16, 1.65]

9.6 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

647

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.26 [0.91, 1.74]

9.7 Under 5 years of age fully immunised with all scheduled vaccines Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.7.1 Outreach only

1

1239

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.09 [2.11, 4.53]

9.7.2 Outreach + Health Education

1

49444

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.23, 1.33]

9.7.3 Outreach + incentive

1

1242

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

6.66 [4.78, 9.28]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Immunisation outreach
Comparison 10. Integration of immunisation with other health services

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

10.1 Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 by 1 year of age Show forest plot

1

2192

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.27 [1.17, 1.38]

10.2 Uptake of all recommended vaccines by 2 years of age Show forest plot

1

1700

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.16, 1.44]

10.3 Uptake of BCG vaccine Show forest plot

1

2089

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.93, 1.01]

10.4 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

1370

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [1.04, 1.22]

10.5 Uptake of yellow fever vaccine Show forest plot

1

1383

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [1.04, 1.22]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Integration of immunisation with other health services
Comparison 11. Engagement of community leaders

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

11.1 Reception of DTP3/Penta 3 vaccine by 1 year of age Show forest plot

1

2020

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.11, 1.69]

11.2 Uptake of measles vaccine Show forest plot

1

1227

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.96 [1.61, 2.39]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Engagement of community leaders