Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Single dose oral codeine, as a single agent, for acute postoperative pain in adults

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single dose oral codeine using methods that permit comparison with other analgesics evaluated in the same way, using wider criteria of efficacy recommended by an in‐depth study at the individual patient level (Moore 2005).

Background

Acute pain occurs as a result of tissue damage either accidentally due to an injury or as a result of surgery. Acute postoperative pain is a manifestation of inflammation due to tissue injury. The management of postoperative pain and inflammation is a critical component of patient care. This is one of a series of reviews whose aim is to increase awareness of the range of analgesics that are potentially available, and present evidence for relative analgesic efficacy through indirect comparisons with placebo, in very similar trials performed in a standard manner, with very similar outcomes, and over the same duration. Such relative analgesic efficacy does not in itself determine choice of drug for any situation or patient, but guides policy‐making at the local level. Recently published reviews include paracetamol (Toms 2008), celecoxib (Derry 2008), naproxen (Derry C 2009a), ibuprofen (Derry C 2009b), diclofenac (Derry P 2009) and etoricoxib (Clarke 2009).

Single dose trials in acute pain are commonly short in duration, rarely lasting longer than 12 hours. The numbers of participants are small, allowing no reliable conclusions to be drawn about safety. To show that the analgesic is working it is necessary to use placebo (McQuay 2005). There are clear ethical considerations in doing this. These ethical considerations are answered by using acute pain situations where the pain is expected to go away, and by providing additional analgesia, commonly called rescue analgesia, if the pain has not diminished after about an hour. This is reasonable, because not all participants given an analgesic will have significant pain relief. Approximately 18% of participants given placebo will have significant pain relief (Moore 2005), and up to 50% may have inadequate analgesia with active medicines. The use of additional or rescue analgesia is hence important for all participants in the trials.

Clinical trials measuring the efficacy of analgesics in acute pain have been standardised over many years. Trials have to be randomised and double blind. Typically, in the first few hours or days after an operation, patients develop pain that is moderate to severe in intensity, and will then be given the test analgesic or placebo. Pain is measured using standard pain intensity scales immediately before the intervention, and then using pain intensity and pain relief scales over the following 4 to 6 hours for shorter acting drugs, and up to 12 or 24 hours for longer acting drugs. Pain relief of half the maximum possible pain relief or better (at least 50% pain relief) is typically regarded as a clinically useful outcome. For patients given rescue medication it is usual for no additional pain measurements to be made, and for all subsequent measures to be recorded as initial pain intensity or baseline (zero) pain relief (baseline observation carried forward). This process ensures that analgesia from the rescue medication is not wrongly ascribed to the test intervention. In some trials the last observation is carried forward, which gives an inflated response for the test intervention compared to placebo, but the effect has been shown to be negligible over 4 to 6 hours (Moore 2005). Patients usually remain in the hospital or clinic for at least the first 6 hours following the intervention, with measurements supervised, although they may then be allowed home to make their own measurements in trials of longer duration.

Codeine is an opioid. Its analgesic effects are attributed to its metabolism in the liver to the active compounds morphine and codeine‐6‐glucuronide. Normally between 5% and 10% is converted to morphine, and a dose of about 30 mg codeine phosphate is considered equivalent to 3 mg morphine. The capacity to metabolise codeine to its active metabolites varies between individuals, however, with up to 10% of Caucasians, 2% of Asians and 1% of Arabs being "poor metabolizers". In these individuals codeine is a relatively ineffective analgesic. A few individuals are "extensive metabolizers" and are able to convert more of the codeine to morphine, putting them at increased risk of toxicity from standard doses. Various medications interfere with the enzymes that catalyse the metabolism of codeine, increasing or decreasing the extent of conversion and hence the analgesic effect. For example, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine and paroxetine reduce conversion, while rifampicin and dexamethasone increase it.

As with other opioids, repeated administration of codeine can cause dependence and tolerance, but long term use, or use of high doses, tends to be limited by adverse effects, in particular constipation and drowsiness. In severe or persistent pain, or both, for which large amounts of codeine are required, smaller doses of stronger opioids are thought to be better tolerated. Respiratory depression is dose‐related and may have serious consequences in "extensive metabolizers" and the elderly.

Codeine is administered by mouth (as tablets or syrup) or intramuscular injection, and in some countries as suppositories. In many countries it is a controlled substance, but may be available in small quantities without prescription, in combination analgesics such as paracetamol plus codeine, and in cough syrups. In 2007 in England, there were almost 2.5 million prescriptions for codeine phosphate, mostly as 30 mg and 15 mg tablets, with many more for combination products (PCA 2007).

Objectives

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single dose oral codeine using methods that permit comparison with other analgesics evaluated in the same way, using wider criteria of efficacy recommended by an in‐depth study at the individual patient level (Moore 2005).

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Studies will be included if they are full publications of double blind trials of single dose oral codeine as a single agent compared with placebo for the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain in adults, with at least 10 participants randomly allocated to each treatment group. Multiple dose studies will be included if appropriate data from the first dose are available, and cross‐over studies will be included provided that data from the first arm are presented separately. Comparisons using codeine in combination with a non‐opioid analgesic, such as paracetamol, aspirin or ibuprofen, will not be included in this review (paracetamol with codeine is reviewed in Toms 2009).

 Studies will be excluded if they are:

  • posters or abstracts not followed up by full publication;

  • reports of studies concerned with pain other than postoperative pain (including experimental pain);

  • studies using healthy volunteers;

  • studies where pain relief is assessed by clinicians, nurses or carers (i.e., not patient‐reported);

  • studies of less than 4 hours' duration or which fail to present data over 4 to 6 hours post‐dose.

Types of participants

Studies of adult participants (15 years old or above) with established moderate to severe postoperative pain will be included. For studies using a visual analogue scale (VAS), pain of at least moderate intensity will be assumed when the VAS score is greater than 30 mm (Collins 1997). Studies of participants with postpartum pain will be included provided the pain investigated results from episiotomy or Caesarean section (with or without uterine cramp). Studies investigating participants with pain due to uterine cramps alone will be excluded.

Types of interventions

Orally administered codeine or matched placebo for relief of postoperative pain.

Types of outcome measures

Data collected will include the following:

  • characteristics of participants;

  • pain model;

  • patient‐reported pain at baseline (physician, nurse, or carer reported pain was not included in the analysis);

  • patient‐reported pain relief or pain intensity, or both, expressed hourly over 4 to 6 hours using validated pain scales (pain intensity and pain relief in the form of visual analogue scales (VAS) or categorical scales, or both), or reported total pain relief (TOTPAR) or summed pain intensity difference (SPID) at 4 to 6 hours;

  • patient‐reported global assessment of treatment (PGE), using a standard five‐point scale;

  • number of participants using rescue medication, and the time of assessment;

  • time to use of rescue medication;

  • withdrawals ‐ all cause, adverse event;

  • adverse events ‐ participants experiencing one or more, and any serious adverse event, and the time of assessment.

Search methods for identification of studies

The following electronic databases will be searched:

  • Cochrane CENTRAL;

  • MEDLINE via Ovid;

  • EMBASE via Ovid;

  • Oxford Pain Database (Jadad 1996a);

A search strategy will be developed for use in MEDLINE, and revised appropriately for other databases, in co‐operation with the Cochrane Pain, Palliative Care and Supportive Care Cochrane Review Group. For the Medline search, the strategy will combine the subject search with The Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (CHSSS) for identifying randomized trials in MEDLINE: sensitivity maximizing version as referenced in Chapter 6.4.11.1 and detailed in box 6.4.c of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 (Higgins 2008). A similar study design filter will be used for other databases, as appropriate.

The subject search will use a combination of controlled vocabulary and free text terms based on the search strategy for MEDLINE via OVID (see Appendix 1).

Additional studies will be sought from the reference lists of retrieved articles and reviews.

Language

No language restriction will be applied.

Unpublished studies

Abstracts, conference proceedings and other grey literature will not be searched.

Data collection and analysis

Selection of studies

Two review authors will independently assess and agree the search results for studies that might be included in the review. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or referral to a third review author.

Quality assessment

Two review authors will independently assess the included studies for quality using a five‐point scale (Jadad 1996b).

The scale used is as follows.

  • Is the study randomised? If yes give one point.

  • Is the randomisation procedure reported and is it appropriate? If yes add one point, if no deduct one point.

  • Is the study double blind? If yes then add one point.

  • Is the double blind method reported and is it appropriate? If yes add one point, if no deduct one point.

  • Are the reasons for patient withdrawals and dropouts described? If yes add one point.

Data management

Two review authors will extract data and record it on a standard data extraction form. Data suitable for pooling will be entered into RevMan 5.0.

Data Analysis

QUOROM guidelines will be followed (Moher 1999). For efficacy analyses we will use the number of participants in each treatment group who were randomised, received medication, and provided at least one post‐baseline assessment. For safety analyses we will use the number of participants who received study medication in each treatment group. Analyses are planned for different doses. Sensitivity analyses are planned for pain model (dental versus other postoperative pain), trial size (39 or fewer versus 40 or more per treatment arm), and quality score (two versus three or more). A minimum of two studies and 200 participants will be required for any analysis (Moore 1998).

Primary outcome:
Number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief

For each study, mean TOTPAR (total pain relief) or SPID (summed pain intensity difference) for active and placebo groups will be converted to %maxTOTPAR or %maxSPID by division into the calculated maximum value (Cooper 1991). The proportion of participants in each treatment group who achieve at least 50%maxTOTPAR will be calculated using verified equations (Moore 1996; Moore 1997a; Moore 1997b). These proportions will then be converted into the number of participants achieving at least 50%maxTOTPAR by multiplying by the total number of participants in the treatment group. Information on the number of participants with at least 50%maxTOTPAR for active treatment and placebo will be used to calculate relative benefit (RB), and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT) when there is a statistically significant effect. Pain measures accepted for the calculation of TOTPAR or SPID are:

  • five‐point categorical pain relief (PR) scales with comparable wording to "none, slight, moderate, good or complete";

  • four‐point categorical pain intensity (PI) scales with comparable wording to "none, mild, moderate, severe";

  • Visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain relief;

  • VAS for pain intensity.

If none of these measures are available, numbers of participants reporting "very good or excellent" on a five‐point categorical global scale with the wording "poor, fair, good, very good, excellent" will be taken as those achieving at least 50% pain relief (Collins 2001).

Further details of the scales and derived outcomes are in the glossary (Appendix 2).

 Secondary outcomes:
1. Use of rescue medication

Numbers of participants requiring rescue medication will be used to calculate relative risk (RR) and numbers needed to treat to prevent (NNTp) use of rescue medication for treatment and placebo groups. Median (or mean) time to use of rescue medication will be used to calculate the weighted mean of the median (or mean) for the outcome. Weighting will be by number of participants.

2. Adverse events

Numbers of participants reporting adverse events for each treatment group will be used to calculate RR and numbers needed to treat to harm (NNH) estimates for:

  • any adverse event;

  • any serious adverse event (as reported in the study);

  • withdrawal due to an adverse event.

3. Withdrawals

Withdrawals for reasons other than lack of efficacy (participants using rescue medication ‐ see above) and adverse events will be noted, as will exclusions from analysis where data are presented.

RB or RR estimates will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed‐effect model (Morris 1995). NNT, NNTp and NNH with 95% CI will be calculated using the pooled number of events by the method of Cook and Sackett (Cook 1995). A statistically significant difference from control is assumed when the 95% CI of the RB does not include the number one.

Homogeneity of studies will be assessed visually (L'Abbe 1987). The z test (Tramer 1997) will be used to determine if there is a significant difference between NNTs for different doses of active treatment, or between groups in the sensitivity analyses.