Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Materiales de sellado microbianos con cianocrilato para la preparación de la piel antes de la cirugía

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 mayo 2016see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Heridas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Callum Wood

    Correspondencia a: Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

    [email protected]

  • Cheryl Phillips

    Faculty of Health, Sport and Science, Department of Care Sciences, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, UK

Contributions of authors

CP, AL and PH co‐wrote the protocol. PH wrote to manufacturers and professional bodies for additional information. CP co‐ordinated the protocol development. CP and AL co‐wrote the review and all authors agreed the final submission. AL undertook the first update which was read and approved by CP, PH and ID.
The second update was undertaken by CW and approved by CP.

Contributions of editorial base

Nicky Cullum: edited the protocol; advised on methodology, interpretation and protocol content. Approved the final protocol and review prior to submission.
E. Andrea Nelson, Editor: approved the review update prior to submission.
Sally Bell‐Syer: co‐ordinated the editorial process. Advised on methodology, interpretation and content. Edited the review and updated review and supervised the second update of the review.
Ruth Foxlee: designed the search strategy and edited the search methods section. For this second update Rocio Rodriguez‐Lopez ran the searches.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Glamorgan, UK.

    Time and resources to prepare the systematic review

  • Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK.

External sources

  • NIHR/Department of Health (England), (Cochrane Wounds), UK.

    This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to Cochrane Wounds. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health

Declarations of interest

Callum Wood: none known
Cheryl Phillips: none known

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to the following people who refereed the protocol, or review, for readability, relevance and methodological rigour: Cochrane Wounds editors (Susan O'Meara, Dirk Ubbink, Joan Webster and Gill Worthy) and peer referees (Duncan Chambers, Dayanithee Chetty, Iain McCallum, Jane Nadel and Kumar Samraj). Thank you also to the copy editor Denise Mitchell.

Allyson Lipp led the development of the original review and its first update but has now retired from the process. Paul Harris and Iwan Dowie were also substantially involved in the original review and the first update but were not involved in the second update. The involvement of all these review authors is acknowledged.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 May 18

Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery

Review

Callum Wood, Cheryl Phillips

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062.pub4

2013 Aug 21

Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery

Review

Allyson Lipp, Cheryl Phillips, Paul Harris, Iwan Dowie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062.pub3

2010 Oct 06

Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery

Review

Allyson Lipp, Cheryl Phillips, Paul Harris, Iwan Dowie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062.pub2

2009 Oct 07

Cyanoacrylate microbial sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery

Protocol

Cheryl Phillips, Allyson Lipp, Paul Harris, Iwan Dowie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008062

Differences between protocol and review

None.

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Microbial sealant compared with no microbial sealant, Outcome 1 Surgical site infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Microbial sealant compared with no microbial sealant, Outcome 1 Surgical site infection.

Comparison 1. Microbial sealant compared with no microbial sealant

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Surgical site infection Show forest plot

7

859

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.24, 1.18]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Microbial sealant compared with no microbial sealant